[ANN] Jamailet becomes a SourceForge project

2003-06-02 Thread Marco Tedone
Hi, finally Jamailet become a SourceForge project.

You can download sources, binaries and the documentation  by visiting the
following site:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/jamailet/

Please feel free to contribute with your ideas, writing to the project
manager.

Regards,

Marco Tedone
Jemos Founder





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Is this a valid From: address?

2003-06-02 Thread Steve Brewin
Noel,

RFC 2821 section 3.8.4 applies to gateways. My point (2) refers to MTAs
acting as a relay.

>From RFC 2821 section 3.7, Relaying...
"As discussed in section 2.4.1, a relay SMTP has no need to inspect or
act upon the headers or body of the message data and MUST NOT do so
except to add its own "Received:" header (section 4.4) and,
optionally, to attempt to detect looping in the mail system (see
section 6.2)."

I was wrong in as much as there is no optional element to this. According to
the RFC, a relaying MTA should never act as an Internet Message format cop.
It shouldn't even be inspecting the headers, let alone rejecting a message
due to their content.

The case of fetchmail et al. is interesting. Mail fetched from a POP3 or
IMAP server is NOT Internet mail as defined by RFC2821 as POP3 and IMAP are
a foreign (non-SMTP) systems. Nor is an MTA configured to fetch mail from a
POP3 or IMAP server an SMTP gateway >>> as long as the fetched mail is
delivered locally <<<. According to the RFC, the server is acting as a
gateway only if it is injecting mail into the internet, that is, delivering
remotely over the 'net.

One of the modifications I have made to fetchmail is to have the default
configuration reject mail not intended for a recipient in a local domain.
The original reason for doing this was that mail served by POP3/IMAP servers
has arrived on them because they are the local delivery points for the
domain(s) being served. Fetchmail is simply acting as a POP3/IMAP client
that happens to have some very powerful mail tools at its disposal. They
should not be used to deliver the fetched mails anywhere but locally.

We now have a second reason for this restriction. Doing otherwise would
create an SMTP gateway. There are circumstances when it is impossible to
fulfil the rules for a gateway as specified by RFC2821, such as we are
unable to correct invalid originator fields. If we can't guarantee to lay by
the rules, we shouldn't enter the game.

Hopefully this clarifies the responsibilities on James when acting as an
SMTP relay and why a fetchmail configuration is not, and should never act
as, an SMTP gateway.

-- Steve





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Step by step guide

2003-06-02 Thread Kulvir Bhogal
Does anyone know of a good step-by-step guide for James?

I have exhausted the resources on the Apache site and cannot get my
server to work.

 

~Kulvie



how to test

2003-06-02 Thread Kulvir Bhogal
Is there a good way to test if your pop3 server is working?

I tried to use Outlook to talk to the pop3 server of james and kept
getting a:

 

The specified server was found but there was no response from the server
error.

 

When I send a mail to the box I created, I also do not see the DOS
console give me an indication that a mail message was received.  Should
I be receiving some sort of info on the console?

 

~Kulvir



Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?

2003-06-02 Thread Christian Andersson
just one thing... if you are using the old tiny personal firewall by 
tinysoftware..  you might want to check out www.kerio.com which I 
believe have the continuation of the old tiny personal firewall 2.x 
series...

I'm not sure if they bought the tiny personal firewall, or if it was 
tinysoftware that had licens to use it or how it works...

but it looks and works 99.9% the same,only the name and company has 
changed...

/Christian Andersson

Hontvari Jozsef wrote:

The old (2.x) Tiny Personal Firewall. People say it is much better then the
new, non-free version.
- Original Message -
From: "Deso Kule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?


The java.exe of my JRE has all access. Which firewall are you using?
Thanks,
Nick


From: "Hontvari Jozsef" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 14:02:48 +0200
The java.exe of your JRE.

I don't know Norton Personal Firewall, but it can be set on my firewall
to

display a dialog on incoming or outgoing connections. You may want to use
a

similar feature, and set a permanent rule for James.

- Original Message -
From: "Deso Kule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?


I have already allowed all traffic in and out of port 25. It might be
that
I
need to allow James to access the internet or port 25 on my domain but
which

program (or module) in James needs to be given access?
Thanks,
Nick


From: Hontvari Jozsef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: James Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 08:41:30 +0200
You have to adjust your firewall. Both incoming and outgoing traffic
of

James (or any other smtp server) goes through port 25.

- Original Message -
From: "Deso Kule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 2:51 AM
Subject: How do I use James with a Firewall?


I have Norton Personal Firewall installed. I have written a JSP
page

that

uses James to send emails from the web. I keep receiving this
message:

javax.mail.SendFailedException: Sending failed;
 nested exception is:
class javax.mail.MessagingException: Could not connect to SMTP
host:

domain

: port

If the firewall is disabled then the mail is delivered.

Thanks
Nick
_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to test

2003-06-02 Thread Marco Tedone
Kulvir, look at the logs folder, under apps/james/. There is a pop3...log
file which registers the POP3 server activities.

Hope it will help,

Marco
- Original Message - 
From: "Kulvir Bhogal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 10:10 PM
Subject: how to test


> Is there a good way to test if your pop3 server is working?
>
> I tried to use Outlook to talk to the pop3 server of james and kept
> getting a:
>
>
>
> The specified server was found but there was no response from the server
> error.
>
>
>
> When I send a mail to the box I created, I also do not see the DOS
> console give me an indication that a mail message was received.  Should
> I be receiving some sort of info on the console?
>
>
>
> ~Kulvir
>
>




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Step by step guide

2003-06-02 Thread Marco Tedone
As far as I know it doesn't exists yet, but have a look at the documentation
on the james site; it's a good point to start.

Marco
- Original Message - 
From: "Kulvir Bhogal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 10:06 PM
Subject: Step by step guide


> Does anyone know of a good step-by-step guide for James?
>
> I have exhausted the resources on the Apache site and cannot get my
> server to work.
>
>
>
> ~Kulvie
>
>




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Step by step guide

2003-06-02 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I have exhausted the resources on the Apache site and cannot get my
> server to work.

What isn't working?

--- Noel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?

2003-06-02 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
That was surprising. Thanks for the info.

- Original Message -
From: "Christian Andersson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?


> just one thing... if you are using the old tiny personal firewall by
> tinysoftware..  you might want to check out www.kerio.com which I
> believe have the continuation of the old tiny personal firewall 2.x
> series...
>
> I'm not sure if they bought the tiny personal firewall, or if it was
> tinysoftware that had licens to use it or how it works...
>
> but it looks and works 99.9% the same,only the name and company has
> changed...
>
> /Christian Andersson
>
> Hontvari Jozsef wrote:
>
> > The old (2.x) Tiny Personal Firewall. People say it is much better then
the
> > new, non-free version.
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Deso Kule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 2:27 PM
> > Subject: Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?
> >
> >
> >
> >>The java.exe of my JRE has all access. Which firewall are you using?
> >>Thanks,
> >>Nick
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>From: "Hontvari Jozsef" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Reply-To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Subject: Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?
> >>>Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 14:02:48 +0200
> >>>
> >>>The java.exe of your JRE.
> >>>
> >>>I don't know Norton Personal Firewall, but it can be set on my firewall
> >
> > to
> >
> >>>display a dialog on incoming or outgoing connections. You may want to
use
> >
> > a
> >
> >>>similar feature, and set a permanent rule for James.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>- Original Message -
> >>>From: "Deso Kule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 1:51 PM
> >>>Subject: Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> I have already allowed all traffic in and out of port 25. It might be
> >>>
> >>>that
> >>>I
> >>>
> need to allow James to access the internet or port 25 on my domain but
> >>>
> >>>which
> >>>
> program (or module) in James needs to be given access?
> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
> 
> 
> >From: Hontvari Jozsef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: James Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: How do I use James with a Firewall?
> >Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 08:41:30 +0200
> >
> >You have to adjust your firewall. Both incoming and outgoing traffic
> >
> > of
> >
> >James (or any other smtp server) goes through port 25.
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Deso Kule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 2:51 AM
> >Subject: How do I use James with a Firewall?
> >
> >
> >
> >>I have Norton Personal Firewall installed. I have written a JSP
> >
> > page
> >
> >that
> >
> >>uses James to send emails from the web. I keep receiving this
> >>>
> >>>message:
> >>>
> >>javax.mail.SendFailedException: Sending failed;
> >>  nested exception is:
> >>class javax.mail.MessagingException: Could not connect to SMTP
> >
> > host:
> >
> >domain
> >
> >>: port
> >>
> >>If the firewall is disabled then the mail is delivered.
> >>
> >>Thanks
> >>Nick
> >>
> >>_
> >>MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> >>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>-
> >>>
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> _
> Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>
> >>_
> >>STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> >>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >>
> >>
> >>-
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional c

RE: Is this a valid From: address?

2003-06-02 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> RFC 2821 section 3.8.4 applies to gateways. My point (2) refers to MTAs
> acting as a relay.

> According to the RFC, a relaying MTA should never act as
> an Internet Message format cop.  It shouldn't even be
> inspecting the headers, let alone rejecting a message
> due to their content.

Since POP3 isn't SMTP, it does seem to me that the gateway concept does
apply.  When acting as an SMTP relay, James does not check those headers.
James tries not to touch the content of a message, except where a matcher or
mailet might chose to do so.

> Mail fetched from a POP3 or IMAP server is NOT Internet mail
> as defined by RFC2821 as POP3 and IMAP are a foreign (non-SMTP)
> systems.

This is why I would view it as a gateway situation.  It certainly isn't a
relay.  Fetchmail is attempting to fabricate an SMTP envelope from SMTP
content, so that it can insert it into the SMTP spool for processing along
with other mail.  If the message had arrived via SMTP, James would have had
a valid SMTP envelope.

> Fetchmail is simply acting as a POP3/IMAP client that happens to
> have some very powerful mail tools at its disposal. They should
> not be used to deliver the fetched mails anywhere but locally.

> There are circumstances when it is impossible to fulfil
> the rules for a gateway as specified by RFC2821, such as
> we are unable to correct invalid originator fields.   If
> we can't guarantee to lay by the rules, we shouldn't enter
> the game.

It seems to me that James is capable of ensuring that a Fetchmail gateway
does not insert mail with invalid routing information.  It caught the one
that you received.  A question is whether or not Fetchmail has the tools
needed to properly construct a valid envelope.  This has been a subject of
discussion in the past, and I believe that the there were changes made to
faciliate administrator control over the fabrication process.  Certainly if
Fetchmail cannot provide a valid envelope, James should not accept it.

If Fetchmail were optionally able to take fetched messages for local
addresses and deposit them directly into the correct message stores, I don't
believe that the POP3Handler would care if the content were bogus.  The loss
of the mailet pipeline is another issue.

--- Noel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mailet advice

2003-06-02 Thread Serge Knystautas
Brian J. Sayatovic wrote:
I'm developing a mailet which needs to add headers specific to local users.
Since some e-als could have multiple local recipients, I have a conflict.
One message can't have two values for the same header.
Does anyone have suggestions on how to handle this?  I'm afraid if I fork
the message somehow, each user will not see the real list of recipients.
Brian,

Please direct your questions to the james-user mailing list.  Thanks.

--
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com/
p. 1.301.656.5501
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mailet advice

2003-06-02 Thread Serge Knystautas
Brian J. Sayatovic wrote:
I'm developing a mailet which needs to add headers specific to local users.
Since some e-als could have multiple local recipients, I have a conflict.
One message can't have two values for the same header.
Does anyone have suggestions on how to handle this?  I'm afraid if I fork
the message somehow, each user will not see the real list of recipients.
Brian,

Please direct your questions to the james-user mailing list.  Thanks.

--
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com/
p. 1.301.656.5501
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Mailet advice

2003-06-02 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Brian J. Sayatovic wrote:
> I'm developing a mailet which needs to add headers specific to local
users.
> Since some e-als could have multiple local recipients, I have a conflict.
> One message can't have two values for the same header.
>
> Does anyone have suggestions on how to handle this?

See the source for LocalDelivery.

--- Noel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [ANN] Jamailet becomes a SourceForge project

2003-06-02 Thread Danny Angus
Congratulation Marco!

This is the *first* mailet project I've heard of, well done.

d.


> -Original Message-
> From: Marco Tedone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 June 2003 19:52
> To: James-user-list
> Subject: [ANN] Jamailet becomes a SourceForge project
> 
> 
> Hi, finally Jamailet become a SourceForge project.
> 
> You can download sources, binaries and the documentation  by visiting the
> following site:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jamailet/
> 
> Please feel free to contribute with your ideas, writing to the project
> manager.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Marco Tedone
> Jemos Founder
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

RE: Is this a valid From: address?

2003-06-02 Thread Steve Brewin
> Since POP3 isn't SMTP, it does seem to me that the gateway
> concept does
> apply.

RFC2821 is clear enough. If James/fetchMail is only delivering locally, it
is not an SMTP gateway as defined therein. Semantically, it is a gateway
between a POP3/IMAP server and James' SMTP spool, but that isn't the same
thing. We are free to do what we consider to be 'the right thing', which is
what I am trying to get a consensus on.

> If the message had arrived via SMTP, James
> would have had
> a valid SMTP envelope.

Not necessarily. Forget about fetchmail for a moment. If an SMTP MTA that
allows invalid envelopes injects a such a message into the 'net , James
would receive a message with an invalid envelope. James would have to deal
with it according to RFC2821.

Does this happen? Oh yes. I tried inject mail with an invalid From: header
(missing domain part) via a number of non-James MTAs and didn't get a single
rejection or failed delivery. One rewrote the From: header adding its
hostname as the domain part. This SMTP relay made the From: header legal,
but according to the RFC acted illegally as the headers should not be
modified by a relay!

So, in real world deployments, the statement "If the message had arrived via
SMTP, James would have had a valid SMTP envelope" is incorrect. The real
world does not enforce the RFCs and does not play by the rules!

> If Fetchmail were optionally able to take fetched messages for local
> addresses and deposit them directly into the correct message
> stores, I don't
> believe that the POP3Handler would care if the content were
> bogus.  The loss
> of the mailet pipeline is another issue.

I do not think this is a viable approach as...
1) If fetchmail bypasses the SMTP spool we lose all the benefits of James's
delivery chain.
2) Without going through mailet processing, we cannot determine "the correct
message stores".

It seems to me that to progress we need to agree that...

1) fetchmail will only deliver locally
2) Further consideration is required regarding James' policy for dealing
with invalid SMTP envelopes however they are received. This should be at a
different time in a different thread.
3) As an >interim< measure, in my fetchmail enhancements, I will modify the
code so that a From: header with a missing domain part is made valid by
appending the local host name (didn't Danny suggest that a while back)?

Adios!

-- Steve


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



SMTP+SSL howto

2003-06-02 Thread Emmanuel Gilmont
Hello,

I try to do a short howto to configure James with SSL/TLS.

Hope it will help you.

EmmanuelAbstract:
-

How to configure James to enable a secure connection using SSL/TLS. This 
document describes the steps to have a running instance of James with a SMTP 
and a POP handler either with SSL/TLS feature.


Issues:
---

There are 2 issues, a major and a minor.

Major issue: quite all SMTP servers around the world use a plain text session 
on port 25 to exchange mails between them. This implies you must have 2 SMTP 
handlers on James. The first one will use plain text session on port 25. The 
second one will use a SSL/TLS session on port 465. If you don't setup the first, 
nobody can send you mails.

Minor issue: some mail clients could not use the SSL/TLS feature to receive 
mail. If it happens, you should setup 2 POP handlers (same as for SMTP).


Note:
-

If you don't know which port to use, have a look in the file /etc/services. It 
defines all standard ports.


Configuring the SMTP handler:
-

Step 1: configure james/SAR-INF/config.xml like this (I remove all comments 
to be clear). I enbale auth and verify in order to prevent any open relay (correct
me if I'm wrong).
  
  
  25
  
 myMailServer
 36
 true
 true
 0
  
   
   
   
  465
  true
  
 myMailServer
 36
 true
 true
 0
  
   
   
   .
   
   // Enable the ssl factory and specify where the java keystore is located
   // ( here in james/SAR-INF/conf -> james/SAR-INF/conf/keystore )
   
  
 
 

   conf/keystore
   keystore
   JKS
   TLS
   SunX509
   false

 
  
  
 
  
   
   

Step 2: in file james/SAR-INF/assembly.xml , duplicate the bloc which has name 
"smtpserver". In the duplicated bloc, change "smtpserver" by "smtpserver-tls".
This reflects the second handler in the file config.xml.

Step 3: create the keystore in james/SAR-INF/conf

In a shell, type the following:

---<>---
: keytool -selfcert -genkey -validity 365 -keypass keystore -keystore ./keystore
Enter keystore password:  keystore
What is your first and last name?
  [Unknown]:
What is the name of your organizational unit?
  [Unknown]:
What is the name of your organization?
  [Unknown]:
What is the name of your City or Locality?
  [Unknown]:
What is the name of your State or Province?
  [Unknown]:
What is the two-letter country code for this unit?
  [Unknown]:
Is CN=Unknown, OU=Unknown, O=Unknown, L=Unknown, ST=Unknown, C=Unknown correct?
  [no]:  yes
---<>---

Type the correct values for your certificate ;-)

Note: use same password (here keystore) everywhere!


Configuring the POP handler:
-

It's the same story as for SMTP. Just decide if you want only a SSL/TLS or
 a PLAIN + SSL/TLS connection.
 
 
Testing:


Start James. If all is correct, it should start without any error message.

To test the SSL/TLS feature, start openssl in a shell and type:

---<>---
: openssl
OpenSSL> s_client -connect localhost:465

//and ssl will print a lot of information...

---<>---






That's all.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Step by step guide

2003-06-02 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2003/06/01 16:06), Kulvir Bhogal wrote:

> Does anyone know of a good step-by-step guide for James?
> 
> I have exhausted the resources on the Apache site and cannot get my
> server to work.

I found the documentation a pleasure:

How to install James
http://james.apache.org/installation_instructions_2_1.html

Once you've been through that process and find James still "isn't
working", send errors, either from phoenix's stderr output, or from the
actual James log files, as appropriate.

Ciao,
Sheldon.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Step by step guide

2003-06-02 Thread Steve Brewin
Also, be sure to read and act on the comments in 'config.xml' indicating
where things need to be changed.

You will also find it helpful to uncomment the 'notifyPostmaster' snippets
to get notification when things fail. You will need to add 'Postmaster' as a
local user using the telnet interface, being sure to add it using the
correct mixed-case name.

Finally, 'tailing' the logs so you can see what happens as it happens is
helpful.

-- Steve

> -Original Message-
> From: Sheldon Hearn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 June 2003 10:54
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: Step by step guide
>
>
> On (2003/06/01 16:06), Kulvir Bhogal wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know of a good step-by-step guide for James?
> >
> > I have exhausted the resources on the Apache site and cannot get my
> > server to work.
>
> I found the documentation a pleasure:
>
>   How to install James
>   http://james.apache.org/installation_instructions_2_1.html
>
> Once you've been through that process and find James still "isn't
> working", send errors, either from phoenix's stderr output,
> or from the
> actual James log files, as appropriate.
>
> Ciao,
> Sheldon.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]