Re: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-935) Improve maven artifacts

2007-12-05 Thread Michael Busch
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> OK, I believe everything is working, should we announce this on
> java-user/the website?
> 

Yep I think we should. I'll go ahead and send the announcement soon.

-Michael

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-935) Improve maven artifacts

2007-12-05 Thread Grant Ingersoll
OK, I believe everything is working, should we announce this on java- 
user/the website?


-Grant

On Dec 4, 2007, at 6:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

There was a problem in that the artifacts were not being copied out  
in time.  Thus, there were no new artifacts.  It should now be  
fixed.  Note, the artifacts are now called 2.3-SNAPSHOT.


I am seriously just considering going back to running a cron job in  
my account to do the whole thing.  The security issues of two  
separate accounts (one for Hudson for building and one for copying)  
is just annoying, as is the interaction between zones and p.a.o.


-Grant

On Dec 4, 2007, at 2:46 AM, Michael Busch wrote:


Karl Wettin wrote:



Sorry if I've missed any discussion about it,

but the snapshots still seems to depend on Clover?



Hi Karl,

no that has been fixed. There should not be any clover  
instrumentation

in the latest snapshots anymore.

-Michael


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucene.grantingersoll.com

Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucene.grantingersoll.com

Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-935) Improve maven artifacts

2007-12-04 Thread Grant Ingersoll
There was a problem in that the artifacts were not being copied out in  
time.  Thus, there were no new artifacts.  It should now be fixed.   
Note, the artifacts are now called 2.3-SNAPSHOT.


I am seriously just considering going back to running a cron job in my  
account to do the whole thing.  The security issues of two separate  
accounts (one for Hudson for building and one for copying) is just  
annoying, as is the interaction between zones and p.a.o.


-Grant

On Dec 4, 2007, at 2:46 AM, Michael Busch wrote:


Karl Wettin wrote:



Sorry if I've missed any discussion about it,

but the snapshots still seems to depend on Clover?



Hi Karl,

no that has been fixed. There should not be any clover instrumentation
in the latest snapshots anymore.

-Michael


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucene.grantingersoll.com

Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-935) Improve maven artifacts

2007-12-03 Thread Michael Busch
Karl Wettin wrote:
> 
> 
> Sorry if I've missed any discussion about it,
> 
> but the snapshots still seems to depend on Clover?
> 

Hi Karl,

no that has been fixed. There should not be any clover instrumentation
in the latest snapshots anymore.

-Michael


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-935) Improve maven artifacts

2007-12-03 Thread Karl Wettin


3 dec 2007 kl. 08.35 skrev Michael Busch (JIRA):


we're deploying nightly snapshots
to the m2 snapshot repository.



Sorry if I've missed any discussion about it,

but the snapshots still seems to depend on Clover?


--
karl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-935) Improve maven artifacts

2007-12-02 Thread Michael Busch (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-935.
--

Resolution: Fixed

I just committed the latest patch.

OK, I think I can close this issue now. We have made good progress
with the maven artifacts since we released 2.2. The artifacts include
the sources and javadocs now and we're deploying nightly snapshots
to the m2 snapshot repository.

Thanks, Grant, and everyone else who helped here!!


> Improve maven artifacts
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935
> Project: Lucene - Java
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Build
>Reporter: Michael Busch
>Assignee: Michael Busch
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: lucene-935-new.patch, lucene-935-remote-repos.patch, 
> lucene-935-rename-poms.patch, lucene-935.patch
>
>
> There are a couple of things we can improve for the next release:
> - "*pom.xml" files should be renamed to "*pom.xml.template"
> - artifacts "lucene-parent" should extend "apache-parent"
> - add source jars as artifacts
> - update  task to work with latest version of 
> maven-ant-tasks.jar
> - metadata filenames should not contain "local"

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-935) Improve maven artifacts

2007-08-22 Thread Michael Busch (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-935.
--

Resolution: Fixed

Committed. Revision: 568766

> Improve maven artifacts
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935
> Project: Lucene - Java
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Build
>Reporter: Michael Busch
>Assignee: Michael Busch
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.3
>
> Attachments: lucene-935-rename-poms.patch, lucene-935.patch
>
>
> There are a couple of things we can improve for the next release:
> - "*pom.xml" files should be renamed to "*pom.xml.template"
> - artifacts "lucene-parent" should extend "apache-parent"
> - add source jars as artifacts
> - update  task to work with latest version of 
> maven-ant-tasks.jar
> - metadata filenames should not contain "local"

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]