Hi guys, I have started working on this issue by myself.
My first (and simple) approach is already working with the code packaged
with 0.5.2 version. Now I'm trying to apply it to the current code in SVN
(BTW, the developer's doc still points out to CVS) but I'm having some
problems with the Maven 2 build (I guess nothing serious :)
This first version doesn't reduce the total code of the class, just
refactors the code of the startElement method moving out some parts to
private methods (one for each state).
I don't like this solution very much because the generated code is still
huge, and now I want to optimize it, but I need some more time because it
affects not only to the code generation module but also the way the XSD is
parsed and validated. I hope that in a couple of days I will be able to have
something working.
If somebody has any advice or idea I'm glad to hear it!
Best regards,
Jose Luis.
2007/7/31, Changshin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK, I see. Did you guys start to work on JaxMe to solve the issue
then? Have you ever heard from Jochen about it?
Cheers,
ias
On 7/30/07, Robert Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of our customers have a problem with CDDL. Also, we must be Java
1.4 compliant due to other customer requirements.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Changshin Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 3:32 AM
To: Robert Reeves
Cc: Jose Luis Huertas Fernández
Subject: Re: Refactor startElement and get paid
On 7/29/07, Robert Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For our purposes, the Sun JAXB implementation has two problems:
1. It uses a Sun license, which is a problem for some of our
customers
Sun's JAXB 2 RI is licensed under CDDL, which isn't compatible with
GPL. In particular, if you just use it as a component of your
software, it means that your software is considered as Larger Work
and you can license your work regardless of CDDL. If you can specify
such a problem from your customers, I think I can forward the problem
to someone from Sun who you can consult further.
FYI, TmaxSoft (where I worked) adopted Sun's JAXB 2 RI in their
commercial product (Java EE 5 server).
2. I believe it requires Java 5, right?
Yes, it does.
Cheers,
ias
-Original Message-
From: Changshin Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 4:46 AM
To: Jose Luis Huertas Fernández
Cc: Robert Reeves
Subject: Re: Refactor startElement and get paid
Hi all,
Have you guys tried JAXB 2.1.4 available at https://jaxb.dev.java.net/
? I tested the test.xsd and found that generated artifacts from JAXB
2.1.4 got compiled without problem. I guess your wish limit (250)
might not cause a problem as well.
You can ask me further about this issue as I'm familiar with both
JaxMe (actually I'm a committer) and Sun's RI.
Cheers,
ias
On 7/28/07, Jose Luis Huertas Fernández
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perfect, let's see then if Jochen or any other Jaxme developers
(although I
also think he's a bit alone) want to make this contribution.
Otherwise I
would be happy to work on it!
As far as I know, my company was thinking in Sun JAXB RI as the
replacement
implementation, so I don't think they are aware that it suffers the
same
problem (I wasn't aware too). Maybe it's possible to split the
costs, but we
will have to wait until monday to know it. Anyway, I don't think
it's worth
to discuss the details now until we know if Jochen is interested.
Meanwhile I will be taking a look at the code to be able to estimate
the
effort more accurately. Even if I'm not chosen, I will try to do my
bit! :)
Best regards,
José Luis.
2007/7/27, Robert Eric Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cool. We'll wait to see if anybody responds, if you wish.
How much time would you need to complete this refactoring project?
As far as your company goes, keep in mind that the Sun JAXB
implementation
(both 1 and 2) has the same problem. Do you know of any other
implementation?
If not, then maybe your company and my company can split the cost.
You
could work on it at work, and we would subsidize some of the cost
for your
company. Then we both benefit!
Thanks!
Robert
From: Jose Luis Huertas Fernández
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 11:39 AM
To: jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Refactor startElement and get paid
Hello Robert,
we are facing the same problems here. These days we are thinking
if it's
worth for us to fix this bug or it's better changing to another
JAXB
implementation.
I think our company
