[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 11-August-2002
Number of tests run: 897
Successful tests: 893
Errors:1
Failures: 3
[time of test: 11 August 2002 0:40 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[java.vm.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM]
[java.vm.info: mixed mode]
[os.name: Mac OS X]
[os.arch: ppc]
[os.version: 10.1.5]
See http://lubega.com/testarchive/${build.uid} for details of this test.
See http://lubega.com for general test information.
NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting
them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone.
Remember - if a test becomes broken after your changes - fix it or fix the test!
Oh dear - still got some errors!
Thanks for all your effort - we really do love you!
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Mankenler dunyasi lnjobk
Title: Mankens iedxwbhiogidtrrwecujgfeyywkmbqqlwvjwatfoan
Türk ve yabanci mankenlerin resim ve videolari
Ünlülerin gizli çekilmis kaçamaklari
Tamami sansürsüz filmler
Genç kizlarin çiplak resimleri
18 lik çitirlarin nefes kesen görüntüleri
Hiç bir yerde göremeyeceginiz okullu kizlar
Yasanmis hikayeler
Fetisist mankenler
Kapak pozlari
Albüm serileri
Hardcore tam metraj filmler
Türk porno videolari
Türkiye'nin ilk ve tek manken sitesinde aradiginizdan fazlasini bulacaksiniz. Tüm içerige ulasmak için sitemize giris yapmaniz yeterli. Giris icin buraya tiklayiniz
N¬±ùÞµéX¬²'²Þu¼)äç¤Yé\¢g¢½éá¶ÚþØbH zG(û %º,±×¯zZ)éí¨¥x%ËIn,uëÞfz{eËl²«qç讧zØm¶?þX¬¶Ë(º· ~àzwþX¬¶ÏåËbú?º,±×¯zZ)éí
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-593625 ] informix-XA: Transaction-Handling
Bugs item #593625, was opened at 2002-08-11 12:35 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=593625group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Frank Langelage (lafr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: informix-XA: Transaction-Handling Initial Comment: My application works well with LocalTxDS but not with XATxDS. When using the informix-xa-service.xml file, the tables get created but the DB-Session stays in transaction. BTW, I thougt DDL-Statements should not run in transaction ? Creation of Entities is nearly impossible. When using informix-service.xml all works fine. An extract from server.log is attached. (JBoss-3.0.2RC1, JDK 1.3.1, Reliant-Unix 5.45) -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=593625group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans
Hi, I've renamed add/removeClassLoader to add/removeCL for external management of the repository. The MBeanServer uses add/removeClassLoader which ignore requests on UnifiedClassLoaders. I fixed the handling of URLClassLoaders, although this approach won't support package private access across URLs in the same URLClassLoader. I've also added some guards where a URL is mistakenly registered twice. Previously, the CL was removed when the first of the duplicates was removed. I'll look at copying the jmx loading tests into the main testsuite. Regards, Adrian From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:22:25 -0700 Look at fixing it in head as there the BasicMBeanRegistry has been restored, but the default has been changed to JBossMBeanRegistry. The design of our JMX implementation class loading layer has to be geared toward JBoss functionality and requirements. Accommodating whatever is required by the JMX spec is necessary, but if one or the other requires a non-trivial configuration, it is the JMX spec behavior that should incur this burden, not the default JBoss behavior. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 11:44 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans Hi Scott, This is the specs/RIs mechanism for maintaining the LoaderRepository, although it is only implicitly mentioned in the javadoc for the DefaultLoaderRepository: Keeps the list of Class Loaders registered in the MBean Server. It provides the necessary methods to load classes using the registered Class Loaders. The unified repositories are externally managed and hierarchical, so this behaviour is conflicting. I see you have already removed this code. This probably breaks the MLet processing. But then I think it was already broken, MLets are URLClassLoaders not UCLs. I'll take a look at fixing this without breaking bug #592346 Regards, Adrian From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:11:41 -0700 When one registers an MBean that is a ClassLoader the BasicMBeanRegistry adds it to the the default LoaderRepository. This breaks scoped class loading of services, and it really seems to be out of the scope of functionality that the BasicMBeanRegistry should assume. Really I don't see why the BasicMBeanRegistry should have any interaction with the LoaderRepository as all it is doing is adding and removing class loaders. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 11-August-2002
Number of tests run: 897
Successful tests: 893
Errors:1
Failures: 3
[time of test: 11 August 2002 12:41 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[java.vm.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM]
[java.vm.info: mixed mode]
[os.name: Mac OS X]
[os.arch: ppc]
[os.version: 10.1.5]
See http://lubega.com/testarchive/${build.uid} for details of this test.
See http://lubega.com for general test information.
NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting
them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone.
Remember - if a test becomes broken after your changes - fix it or fix the test!
Oh dear - still got some errors!
Thanks for all your effort - we really do love you!
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-590816 ] XAProto Errors on closed XA Resources
Ok, attached is jboss xa compatibility test, version 0.0 pre-alpha :-) Main test is org.jboss.tm.XATest. It is supposed to be resource-manager independent and uses two interfaces org.jboss.tm.test.ResourceManager and org.jboss.tm.test.XAConnection to access/test real resource managers. There is an implementation of these interfaces for JDBC and JMS. I have defined few basic tests as well as tests for bugs #590816 and #585632. Of course more tests are needed. Test is configured by property file which specifies what implementation of org.jboss.tm.test.ResourceManager to be used and configuration of the implementation itself. You can find example configuration for oracle, jbossmq and weblogic-jms. Hope this would be helpful. As usual, questions, comments and suggestions are welcome. -- Igor Fedorenko Think smart. Think automated. Think Dynamics. www.thinkdynamics.com Scott M Stark wrote: Do it. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Igor Fedorenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 9:06 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-590816 ] XAProto Errors on closed XA Resources By the way, why do not we setup XA compatibility tests we can run against different resource managers? I see two types of tests -- tests that use XAResource directly and tests that check TransactionImpl. If this sounds reasonable I can try to write something we can start with. jbossxatests.zip Description: Zip compressed data
RE: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans
I agree we are beyond the spec here. Queue Marc's dance :-) Going boldly where no spec writer has gone, look like you are running stupidly one arm up (left) right leg up behind you, look at the sky with a stupid smile... wwwh! you are running! tada! going beyond the spec, marcf --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD Matrix2) Testsuite Results: 12-August-2002
Number of tests run: 909 Successful tests: 887 Errors:16 Failures: 6 [time of test: 12 August 2002 2:20 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1_03] [java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.] [java.vm.version: 1.3.1_03-b03] [java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM] [java.vm.info: mixed mode] [os.name: Linux] [os.arch: i386] [os.version: 2.4.9-34] Useful resources: - http://lubega.com/testarchive/sun_jdk131_03 for the junit report of this test. - http://lubega.com/testarchive/sun_jdk131_03/logs/ for the logs for this test. - http://lubega.com for general test information. NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone. Remember - if a test becomes broken after your changes - fix it or fix the test! Oh dear - still got some errors! Thanks for all your effort - we really do love you! --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
