[JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 and Jetty

2002-05-29 Thread Jason Dillon

Looks like Jetty in JBoss 3.0 (perhaps 3.1 too) will start servicing requests 
before a web application has been fully deployed, leaving the deployment and 
the jetty in a very odd state of funk where nothing works.

--jason

___

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 and Jetty

2001-09-01 Thread Julian Gosnell

Bill,

Thanks for the help.

I think what will probably happen is that we write several implementations of
our HttpSession object, with varying features and cost. Then the user will be
able to pay as they go - i.e. only take on the performance hit associated with
the particular feature set that they require.

I was thinking of a CMP bean as an initial naive and exploratory implementation
- I agree it would not be fast, but it would be simple and persistant.

I've had a very quick look at your stuff and it looks interesting.  It didn't
look like it did persistance, but then many people may wish to avoid that
overhead. There might well be room for an HttpSession object built on
technology like this.

When things get a little further I'll come back to you and we'll talk some
more. I'd like to get a really simple implementation out of the door so that I
understand the problem fully before I really launch into the ultimate solution.

Thanks for your mail,



Jules


Bill Burke wrote:

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  Julian Gosnell
  Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 7:18 AM
  To: marc fleury
  Cc: Greg Wilkins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 and Jetty
 
 
  Marc,
 
  I'm trying to gauge requirements for Jetty within a
  JBoss-3 context.
 
  This is what I have figured so far:
 
  1. JettyService needs to be delivered as a self
  contained SAR. So it can be hot-deployed onto a JBoss
  node. My major concern here is whether the SAR is run
  packed/unpacked. Unpacked is probably not much work.
  Packed will probably require changes to Jetty itself
  (need to investigate).
 
  2. Clustered Session support - if an incoming http
  request can be routed to any one of a number of nodes,
  then HttpSession objects need to be transparently
  distributed, in order that conversational state may be
  maintained between client and webapp. I was thinking
  that the simplest HttpSession implementation might be
  a CMP Bean ? Is this how clustering is expected to
  work in 3.0? Is this the sort of approach that you
  would expect ?
 

 Julian, take a look at http://www.javagroups.com especially the
 DistributedHashtable.  Putting the HttpSession in a CMP Bean is a bad idea.
 You don't want to be hitting the database on every click to your site.  When
 Sacha and I get the HA SFSBs going, I was thinking of making the HttpSession
 a SFSB.  Just an idea though.

 Regards,

 Bill

 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 and Jetty

2001-08-31 Thread Julian Gosnell

Marc,

I'm trying to gauge requirements for Jetty within a
JBoss-3 context.

This is what I have figured so far:

1. JettyService needs to be delivered as a self
contained SAR. So it can be hot-deployed onto a JBoss
node. My major concern here is whether the SAR is run
packed/unpacked. Unpacked is probably not much work.
Packed will probably require changes to Jetty itself
(need to investigate).

2. Clustered Session support - if an incoming http
request can be routed to any one of a number of nodes,
then HttpSession objects need to be transparently
distributed, in order that conversational state may be
maintained between client and webapp. I was thinking
that the simplest HttpSession implementation might be
a CMP Bean ? Is this how clustering is expected to
work in 3.0? Is this the sort of approach that you
would expect ?


Do you have any further primary issues that need
attention ? Once we have something working we can
address secondary issues such as tighter integration
with shared thread pools etc


Jules



Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie

___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 and Jetty

2001-08-31 Thread Bill Burke



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Julian Gosnell
 Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 7:18 AM
 To: marc fleury
 Cc: Greg Wilkins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 and Jetty


 Marc,

 I'm trying to gauge requirements for Jetty within a
 JBoss-3 context.

 This is what I have figured so far:

 1. JettyService needs to be delivered as a self
 contained SAR. So it can be hot-deployed onto a JBoss
 node. My major concern here is whether the SAR is run
 packed/unpacked. Unpacked is probably not much work.
 Packed will probably require changes to Jetty itself
 (need to investigate).

 2. Clustered Session support - if an incoming http
 request can be routed to any one of a number of nodes,
 then HttpSession objects need to be transparently
 distributed, in order that conversational state may be
 maintained between client and webapp. I was thinking
 that the simplest HttpSession implementation might be
 a CMP Bean ? Is this how clustering is expected to
 work in 3.0? Is this the sort of approach that you
 would expect ?


Julian, take a look at http://www.javagroups.com especially the
DistributedHashtable.  Putting the HttpSession in a CMP Bean is a bad idea.
You don't want to be hitting the database on every click to your site.  When
Sacha and I get the HA SFSBs going, I was thinking of making the HttpSession
a SFSB.  Just an idea though.

Regards,

Bill



___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development