RE: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-02-20 Thread marc fleury

Thanks Scott, 

Jason, making the embeddable Main is important.

marcf

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:47 PM
|To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
|
|
|
|- No explicit references to File or fileystems in the core
|- Dependency on a filesystem would have to be a dependency
|on a filesystem service with a more abstract API, for example,
|JNDI
|- Log4j intialization needs to be able to integrate with existing
|log4j usage
|- The embedded main needs to accept a parent class loader
|to which it delegates to
|- The current references to JMS need to be removed from the
|interceptors as this can be handled by log4j and we need
|to minimize the API requirements in low devices.
|- The base deployment information should not depend
|the standard XML descriptors directly. An object model
|needs to exist that would allow one to deploy components
|without having to go through a J2EE package. For example,
|it should be possible to take an existing service and expose
|it as an EJB without creating an ejb-jar.
|
|
|Scott Stark
|Chief Technology Officer
|JBoss Group, LLC
|
|- Original Message -
|From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:57 PM
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
|
|
| Can anyone find this information?
|
| --jason
|
|
| On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
|  I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the 
|embedable
|  main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing streams
|to
|  deploy etc etc
| 
|  what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
|  applications
|  marcf
|
|
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



RE: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-02-20 Thread marc fleury

Holger Baxmann, Peter Fagerlund...

IBoss, ropot, of the world


unite@!

marcf

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Holger Baxmann
|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 5:23 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
|
|
| On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
|  I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the 
|embedable
|  main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing 
|streams to
|  deploy etc etc
|  
|  what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
|  applications
|
|and then we get what we are not know waiting for: lookup of the jdni
|context in the jndi context.
|
|great!
|i'll donate 50kbyte of my Java iButton 
|
|bax
|-- 
|throw away your harddisks - the JBoss.net is the storage
|We are the staff! We have JBoss. Get things doing.
|
|  marcf
|  
|  
|  
|  ___
|  Jboss-development mailing list
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
| 
| 
| 
| ___
| Jboss-development mailing list
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|
|
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-02-20 Thread Jason Dillon

This is a for a  3.0 right?  I think that for 3.1(3.2) I can have this 
shaved down to a very small footprint and highly embedable... but not by 
3.0.

--jason


marc fleury wrote:

Thanks Scott, 

Jason, making the embeddable Main is important.

marcf

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:47 PM
|To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
|
|
|
|- No explicit references to File or fileystems in the core
|- Dependency on a filesystem would have to be a dependency
|on a filesystem service with a more abstract API, for example,
|JNDI
|- Log4j intialization needs to be able to integrate with existing
|log4j usage
|- The embedded main needs to accept a parent class loader
|to which it delegates to
|- The current references to JMS need to be removed from the
|interceptors as this can be handled by log4j and we need
|to minimize the API requirements in low devices.
|- The base deployment information should not depend
|the standard XML descriptors directly. An object model
|needs to exist that would allow one to deploy components
|without having to go through a J2EE package. For example,
|it should be possible to take an existing service and expose
|it as an EJB without creating an ejb-jar.
|
|
|Scott Stark
|Chief Technology Officer
|JBoss Group, LLC
|
|- Original Message -
|From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:57 PM
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
|
|
| Can anyone find this information?
|
| --jason
|
|
| On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
|  I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the 
|embedable
|  main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing streams
|to
|  deploy etc etc
| 
|  what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
|  applications
|  marcf
|
|
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



RE: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-02-20 Thread marc fleury

3.0 DR1 needs to get out the door,

marcf

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:41 PM
|To: marc fleury
|Cc: Scott M Stark; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
|
|
|This is a for a  3.0 right?  I think that for 3.1(3.2) I can have this 
|shaved down to a very small footprint and highly embedable... but not by 
|3.0.
|
|--jason
|
|
|marc fleury wrote:
|
|Thanks Scott, 
|
|Jason, making the embeddable Main is important.
|
|marcf
|
||-Original Message-
||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
||M Stark
||Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:47 PM
||To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
||Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
||
||
||
||- No explicit references to File or fileystems in the core
||- Dependency on a filesystem would have to be a dependency
||on a filesystem service with a more abstract API, for example,
||JNDI
||- Log4j intialization needs to be able to integrate with existing
||log4j usage
||- The embedded main needs to accept a parent class loader
||to which it delegates to
||- The current references to JMS need to be removed from the
||interceptors as this can be handled by log4j and we need
||to minimize the API requirements in low devices.
||- The base deployment information should not depend
||the standard XML descriptors directly. An object model
||needs to exist that would allow one to deploy components
||without having to go through a J2EE package. For example,
||it should be possible to take an existing service and expose
||it as an EJB without creating an ejb-jar.
||
||
||Scott Stark
||Chief Technology Officer
||JBoss Group, LLC
||
||- Original Message -
||From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
||Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:57 PM
||Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
||
||
|| Can anyone find this information?
||
|| --jason
||
||
|| On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
||  I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the 
||embedable
||  main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, 
|passing streams
||to
||  deploy etc etc
|| 
||  what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
||  applications
||  marcf
||
||
||
||___
||Jboss-development mailing list
||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
||https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|
|
|
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-02-20 Thread Jason Dillon

This answer could be taken in more than one way.  Could you please be 
more specific?

--jason


marc fleury wrote:

3.0 DR1 needs to get out the door,

marcf

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:41 PM
|To: marc fleury
|Cc: Scott M Stark; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
|
|
|This is a for a  3.0 right?  I think that for 3.1(3.2) I can have this 
|shaved down to a very small footprint and highly embedable... but not by 
|3.0.
|
|--jason
|
|
|marc fleury wrote:
|
|Thanks Scott, 
|
|Jason, making the embeddable Main is important.
|
|marcf
|
||-Original Message-
||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
||M Stark
||Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:47 PM
||To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
||Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
||
||
||
||- No explicit references to File or fileystems in the core
||- Dependency on a filesystem would have to be a dependency
||on a filesystem service with a more abstract API, for example,
||JNDI
||- Log4j intialization needs to be able to integrate with existing
||log4j usage
||- The embedded main needs to accept a parent class loader
||to which it delegates to
||- The current references to JMS need to be removed from the
||interceptors as this can be handled by log4j and we need
||to minimize the API requirements in low devices.
||- The base deployment information should not depend
||the standard XML descriptors directly. An object model
||needs to exist that would allow one to deploy components
||without having to go through a J2EE package. For example,
||it should be possible to take an existing service and expose
||it as an EJB without creating an ejb-jar.
||
||
||Scott Stark
||Chief Technology Officer
||JBoss Group, LLC
||
||- Original Message -
||From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
||Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:57 PM
||Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main
||
||
|| Can anyone find this information?
||
|| --jason
||
||
|| On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
||  I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the 
||embedable
||  main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, 
|passing streams
||to
||  deploy etc etc
|| 
||  what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
||  applications
||  marcf
||
||
||
||___
||Jboss-development mailing list
||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
||https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|
|
|
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-02-15 Thread Jason Dillon

Can anyone find this information?

--jason


On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
 I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the embedable
 main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing streams to
 deploy etc etc
 
 what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
 applications
 marcf
 
 
 
 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-02-15 Thread Scott M Stark


- No explicit references to File or fileystems in the core
- Dependency on a filesystem would have to be a dependency
on a filesystem service with a more abstract API, for example,
JNDI
- Log4j intialization needs to be able to integrate with existing
log4j usage
- The embedded main needs to accept a parent class loader
to which it delegates to
- The current references to JMS need to be removed from the
interceptors as this can be handled by log4j and we need
to minimize the API requirements in low devices.
- The base deployment information should not depend
the standard XML descriptors directly. An object model
needs to exist that would allow one to deploy components
without having to go through a J2EE package. For example,
it should be possible to take an existing service and expose
it as an EJB without creating an ejb-jar.


Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC

- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main


 Can anyone find this information?

 --jason


 On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
  I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the embedable
  main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing streams
to
  deploy etc etc
 
  what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
  applications
  marcf



___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-02-15 Thread Holger Baxmann

 On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
  I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the embedable
  main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing streams to
  deploy etc etc
  
  what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
  applications

and then we get what we are not know waiting for: lookup of the jdni
context in the jndi context.

great!
i'll donate 50kbyte of my Java iButton 

bax
-- 
throw away your harddisks - the JBoss.net is the storage
We are the staff! We have JBoss. Get things doing.

  marcf
  
  
  
  ___
  Jboss-development mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
 
 
 
 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-01-30 Thread Ken Sipe

Marc,

I've been looking at what it would take to embed jboss.  This has been from
the perspective of trying to embed it into and IDE for development, but I
don't think that matters, there are many similar issues.  A couple of things
jump right out.

1.  Logging.  Does logging make sense in an embedded application?  Where do
you log?  This will be interest on a handheld!  The issue with no logging is
that everything seems to rely on it being there.  What are your thoughts?

2.  The ClassPathExtension class.  The extensions are relative to the jar
that the class is in.  This is jboss.jar in lib/ext.  I'm not sure if this
is the best approach.  It of course works fine in the space of jboss as the
server and controlling agent, but for an embedded applications I don't think
it would.  You at least want to provide a way to specify an absolute path.


Ken
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:05 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] embeddable Main


 I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the embedable
 main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing streams to
 deploy etc etc

 what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
 applications
 marcf



 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] embeddable Main

2002-01-28 Thread marc fleury

I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the embedable
main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing streams to
deploy etc etc

what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
applications
marcf



___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development