AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask
Are you a mail-list-bot or what? If that is the case, you seem to be able to do useful programming in your sparetime ;-) But your parsing subsystem seems not to cope with non-native English emails ... As written in a separate response to your first of the three equivalent emails a week ago (and as should be apparent from CVS), I removed all that jboss-net specific 1.2 stuff from the 3_2 branch and updated to the official xdoclet stuff. The stuff is used by the jboss.net testsuite (and some web-service end-users out there). CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stephen Coy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. März 2003 23:45 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask Hi, Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger anywhere? I can see a couple of flavours of the code (in org.jboss.net.xdoclet and also thirdparty/xdoclet/jboss.net) in Branch_3_2, but I can't see any actual uses of it in build files. Th reason I ask is that I'm currently migrating Branch_3_2 to xdoclet 1.2, and I'm not sure what to do with the jboss.net stuff. Steve Coy --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Tablet PC. Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask
Sorry about that. I sent the message twice, because the first attempt did not show up. If you look at the date of the second one, you will see that it was sent about 8 hours before the first one. It eventually arrived about 28 hours after I sent it. I have no idea what it was doing in the meantime. So, I did see your response - to the second message that arrived first :-) Steve Coy On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 07:45 PM, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: Are you a mail-list-bot or what? If that is the case, you seem to be able to do useful programming in your sparetime ;-) But your parsing subsystem seems not to cope with non-native English emails ... As written in a separate response to your first of the three equivalent emails a week ago (and as should be apparent from CVS), I removed all that jboss-net specific 1.2 stuff from the 3_2 branch and updated to the official xdoclet stuff. The stuff is used by the jboss.net testsuite (and some web-service end-users out there). CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stephen Coy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. März 2003 23:45 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask Hi, Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger anywhere? I can see a couple of flavours of the code (in org.jboss.net.xdoclet and also thirdparty/xdoclet/jboss.net) in Branch_3_2, but I can't see any actual uses of it in build files. Th reason I ask is that I'm currently migrating Branch_3_2 to xdoclet 1.2, and I'm not sure what to do with the jboss.net stuff. Steve Coy --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Tablet PC. Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask
No prob, I even got it three times. Should have read the dates, but I already disposed the original to which I sent you the first reply ;-) CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stephen Coy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 24. März 2003 11:28 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask Sorry about that. I sent the message twice, because the first attempt did not show up. If you look at the date of the second one, you will see that it was sent about 8 hours before the first one. It eventually arrived about 28 hours after I sent it. I have no idea what it was doing in the meantime. So, I did see your response - to the second message that arrived first :-) Steve Coy On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 07:45 PM, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: Are you a mail-list-bot or what? If that is the case, you seem to be able to do useful programming in your sparetime ;-) But your parsing subsystem seems not to cope with non-native English emails ... As written in a separate response to your first of the three equivalent emails a week ago (and as should be apparent from CVS), I removed all that jboss-net specific 1.2 stuff from the 3_2 branch and updated to the official xdoclet stuff. The stuff is used by the jboss.net testsuite (and some web-service end-users out there). CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stephen Coy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. März 2003 23:45 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask Hi, Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger anywhere? I can see a couple of flavours of the code (in org.jboss.net.xdoclet and also thirdparty/xdoclet/jboss.net) in Branch_3_2, but I can't see any actual uses of it in build files. Th reason I ask is that I'm currently migrating Branch_3_2 to xdoclet 1.2, and I'm not sure what to do with the jboss.net stuff. Steve Coy --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Tablet PC. Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask
I will cater for backporting the jboss.net 1.2 module into the 3.2 branch. It is used (in CVS) in the jboss.net testsuite which is still decoupled from the main testsuite as long as J2EE1.4 is not mandatory. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. März 2003 13:46 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask At least the copy in HEAD is actually for xdoclet 1.2. When I migrated HEAD to xdoclet 1.2 I basically ignored the jboss.net xdoclet task. I'd say if the testsuite is OK, it is safe to ignore and let the jboss.net folks fix if there is a problem later. thanks david jencks On 2003.03.20 17:44 Stephen Coy wrote: Hi, Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger anywhere? I can see a couple of flavours of the code (in org.jboss.net.xdoclet and also thirdparty/xdoclet/jboss.net) in Branch_3_2, but I can't see any actual uses of it in build files. Th reason I ask is that I'm currently migrating Branch_3_2 to xdoclet 1.2, and I'm not sure what to do with the jboss.net stuff. Steve Coy --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Tablet PC. Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
