[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2011-07-04 Thread Darryl Miles
Darryl Miles [http://community.jboss.org/people/dlmiles] created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/613355#613355

--
Would the QtWebkit API be suitable for use ?   
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/qtwebkit.html 
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/qtwebkit.html   Is the QWebElement class 
and API what you need and mean ?

Are you looking to manipulate the HTML element markup via DOM ?

Are you looking to manipulate the browser context from JavaScript execution 
from inside the page ?

Is it straightforward enough in Eclipse to start a worker/helper process which 
can share windows handles to provide a seamless IDE (a bit like how Chrome uses 
processes per tab and Firefox now puts Flash in a worker process) ?


I believe the Qt suite is able to run across all the desired platforms, Linux, 
Windows and MaxOSX all in 32bit and 64bit forms.  Hopefully I'll have some 
Maven releases out to allow easier consumption and some Eclipse plugins to 
follow to build work on top of.
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/613355#613355]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2011-01-31 Thread Maxim Areshkau
Maxim Areshkau [http://community.jboss.org/people/mareshkau] created the 
discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/584297#584297

--
Webkit hasn't java dom binding, so for now it's not suits for VPE.
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/584297#584297]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2011-01-30 Thread henk de boer
henk de boer [http://community.jboss.org/people/henk53] created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/584118#584118

--
 Maxim Areshkau wrote:
 
 If say about future usage of XR, possibly it will be good to move on webkit, 
 which eclipse have support too.


Possible, but this one too has some problems:

 The runtime requirements for using WebKit-based Browsers are listed below. 
 Note that failure to meet these runtime requirements will cause the Browser 
 instantiation to fail.
 * Windows:* 32-bit SWT
 * Safari must be installed
 * For OSs older than XP+SP1, the path to the Apple Application Support 
 installation must be prepended to Windows' Path environment variable before 
 running eclipse. This installation will be in a location like C:\Program 
 Files\Common Files\Apple\Apple Application Support.
 
 * Linux: WebKitGTK 1.2.0 or newer must be in the library load path. Examples 
 of Linux distros that meet this requirement by default include Red Hat 
 Enterprise Linux 6 and Ubuntu 10.04.
 * OS X: No additional runtime requirements, the default renderer is 
 WebKit-based.
 
+See: http://www.eclipse.org/swt/faq.php#howusewebkit+


So even though I would personally prefer this as an OS X user, it seems that 
the 32-bit SWT requirement for Windows is a killer letdown here.+
+
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/584118#584118]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2011-01-28 Thread henk de boer
henk de boer [http://community.jboss.org/people/henk53] created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/584043#584043

--
 Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
 
 if you have time try use the nightly update site and let us know if it works 
 ( http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/trunk/ 
 http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/trunk/)

I missed this, but I just tried the release candidate and it seems to work 
perfectly! I installed JBoss Tools RichFaces on my 64 bit OS X 10.6 and it 
installed without problems. I can now open my xhtml pages with JBoss Tools 
HTML Editor. As expected, this shows a single textual editor without the 
Visual/Source, Source and Preview tabs.

Absolutely wonderful!  :) 

(I did found an amount of small problems with the editor, but I'll create a new 
discussion for that)
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/584043#584043]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2011-01-04 Thread Max Andersen
Max Andersen [http://community.jboss.org/people/max.andersen%40jboss.com] 
created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/578576#578576

--
Nick wasn't seeing the forest for trees when he wrote that comment - Denis did 
an attempt on a proper fix - if you have time try use the nightly update site 
and let us know if it works ( 
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/trunk/ 
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/trunk/)

About Xulrunner then the problem is that there is an actual XulRunner 64 bit 
binary but not a 64 bit SWT/XulRunner binding library.

And yes, this does not paint a good picture for the future usage of xulrunner.
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/578576#578576]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2011-01-04 Thread Maxim Areshkau
Maxim Areshkau [http://community.jboss.org/people/mareshkau] created the 
discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/578620#578620

--
If say about future usage of XR, possibly it will be good to move on webkit, 
which eclipse have support too.
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/578620#578620]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2011-01-03 Thread Max Andersen
Max Andersen [http://community.jboss.org/people/max.andersen%40jboss.com] 
created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/578376#578376

--
Henk, just to let you know that our QE found  
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8029 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8029 when verifying what you saw.

So it works for Windows but not for Mac.
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/578376#578376]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2011-01-03 Thread henk de boer
henk de boer [http://community.jboss.org/people/henk53] created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/578422#578422

--
I see. Hmmm, but I don't exactly understand the reasoning:

 Pretty sure there's nothing we can do about this one since there's no 64-bit 
 OSX XulRunner 1.9.1.2.

But that can't be the reason of course  ;)  The issue even mentions this in the 
description. The entire point is that the editor works despite there not being 
a 64-bit XulRunner, so that it doesn't work because there is no 64-bit 
XulRunner is a bit of a recursive problem.

If I read the issue correctly, those x86 platform filters might help?

Also, how is the situation with the 64-bit XulRunner anyway? Do you know 
anything about this?

If I read the various bugzilla entries at eclipse and mozilla it seems that 
there is a 64 bit version (entries from March 2010 say the work for that is 
'done'), while simultaneously it seems there still isn't one and there might 
never be one(?).

When more and more computers become 64 bits, wouldn't this be a reason to move 
away from XulRunner entirely? Or does this there never will be one only 
applies to the 1.9.x series?
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/578422#578422]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2010-12-24 Thread henk de boer
henk de boer [http://community.jboss.org/people/henk53] created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/577483#577483

--
 Max Andersen wrote:
 
 Yes, we should make it optional:  https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-7058 
 https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-7058
 
 It is better you can install and have 95% of the functionallity working than 
 not being able to install at all.

Just wanted to mention that in JBoss Tools 3.2 beta 2 xulrunner still seems to 
be required:

I tried to install JBoss Tools RichFaces 3.2.0.v20101206-2100-H28-Beta2 on 
Mac OS X 10.6/Eclipse Helios 64 bits and it gave me the following:

Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not be 
found.

  Software being installed: JBoss Tools RichFaces 
3.2.0.v20101206-2100-H28-Beta2 (org.jboss.tools.richfaces.feature.feature.group 
3.2.0.v20101206-2100-H28-Beta2)

  Missing requirement for filter properties ~= $0: XULRunner 
1.9.12.v20101206-2100-H28-Beta2 
(org.jboss.tools.xulrunner.feature.feature.group 
1.9.12.v20101206-2100-H28-Beta2) requires 'org.mozilla.xulrunner.cocoa.macosx 
[1.9.1.2a]' but it could not be found

  Cannot satisfy dependency:

    From: JBoss Tools RichFaces 3.2.0.v20101206-2100-H28-Beta2 
(org.jboss.tools.richfaces.feature.feature.group 3.2.0.v20101206-2100-H28-Beta2)

    To: org.jboss.tools.xulrunner.feature.feature.group 0.0.0
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/577483#577483]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2010-09-26 Thread henk de boer
henk de boer [http://community.jboss.org/people/henk53] created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/563689#563689

--
 Max Andersen wrote:
 
 Yes, we should make it optional:  https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-7058 
 https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-7058
 
 It is better you can install and have 95% of the functionallity working than 
 not being able to install at all.

Indeed, thanks again for the effort.

I'm sure there are people who use the preview and visual stuff a lot, but I'm 
really more of a text guy myself and currently use the editor for it's good 
.xhtml support and content assist etc. There may be more people like me  ;)
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/563689#563689]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2010-09-15 Thread Max Andersen
Max Andersen [http://community.jboss.org/people/max.andersen%40jboss.com] 
created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/561758#561758

--
Yes, we should make it optional:  https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-7058 
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-7058

It is better you can install and have 95% of the functionallity working than 
not being able to install at all.

Besides with Apple not providing a 32bit JVM anymore Leopard(10.5) users won't 
be able to run it anymore either (see linked issues for JBIDE-7058)
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/561758#561758]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2010-09-15 Thread Maxim Areshkau
Maxim Areshkau [http://community.jboss.org/people/mareshkau] created the 
discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/561549#561549

--
XR used for preview in Visual Page Editor. So if we make it optional, preview 
will be not available.
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/561549#561549]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2010-09-10 Thread henk de boer
henk de boer [http://community.jboss.org/people/henk53] created the discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/561407#561407

--
FYI, OS X has the same problem with the 64 bits version of Eclipse. Installing 
the Jboss tools visual editor (which for some reason appears under the name 
richfaces(?) on the update site) fails because of the dreaded XULRunner 
dependency. Installing the 32 bits version of Eclipse solves the problem.

Would it be possible to make the XR dependency optional?

p.s.

On 64 bits Ubuntu 10.04 it just works.
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/561407#561407]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBoss Tools] - Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

2010-09-09 Thread Maxim Areshkau
Maxim Areshkau [http://community.jboss.org/people/mareshkau] created the 
discussion

Re: 64 bit xulrunner - has anyone got one, or detailed steps to build one?

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/561035#561035

--
Hi, Steve.
Unfortunetly there isn't exist any build of XR for windows x64. Try to use x32 
java, eclipse and XR for XR for x86 platform.
--

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/561035#561035]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1containerType=14container=2128]

___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user