[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: Problem with cluster under same VM
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Well, if the members are in different clusters, then you will always get different results. | I suggest you don't start all 3 threads concurrently. Have at least 1 member in the cluster, before you start the others. | Otherwise, they will need a merge, and the MERGE protocol was not in your stack. In this last test, I ensured that the second thread would only start 2 seconds after tthe first one (I tried increasing this time without success). I'm adding the MERGE protocol now. Just to make sure I'm doing it right, I added this line: right after the PING protocol. Is this right? Thanks again View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3877647#3877647 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3877647 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: Problem with cluster under same VM
Some new tests: First, I modified the first sleep to:
| //Util.sleep((long) (Math.random()*5000));
| Util.sleep((long) (id*2000));
|
id is now an integer, rather than a String. So now I have the first thread
starting after 2 seconds, the second after 4 and the third after 6. I also
added this to the end of run():
| for (Iterator iter = set.iterator(); iter.hasNext();)
| {
| System.out.println("end "+iter.next()+" by "+id);
| }
|
What I get is:
ended 1 24
end 1_982 by 1
end 1_584 by 1
end 3_415 by 1
end 1_762 by 1
end 1_658 by 1
end 1_395 by 1
end 1_61 by 1
end 3_86 by 1
end 1_415 by 1
end 1_783 by 1
end 3_21 by 1
end 3_938 by 1
end 1_135 by 1
end 1_299 by 1
end 1_924 by 1
end 3_566 by 1
end 1_222 by 1
end 3_251 by 1
end 1_81 by 1
end 3_197 by 1
end 1_239 by 1
end 3_63 by 1
end 1_777 by 1
end 1_324 by 1
ended 2 20
end 2_680 by 2
end 2_895 by 2
end 2_844 by 2
end 2_884 by 2
end 2_119 by 2
end 2_923 by 2
end 2_351 by 2
end 2_863 by 2
end 2_384 by 2
end 2_696 by 2
end 2_481 by 2
end 2_187 by 2
end 2_452 by 2
end 2_935 by 2
end 2_262 by 2
end 2_136 by 2
end 2_322 by 2
end 2_918 by 2
end 2_820 by 2
end 2_416 by 2
ended 3 24
end 1_982 by 3
end 3_415 by 3
end 1_762 by 3
end 1_658 by 3
end 1_395 by 3
end 1_61 by 3
end 3_86 by 3
end 1_783 by 3
end 1_415 by 3
end 3_21 by 3
end 3_10 by 3
end 3_938 by 3
end 1_299 by 3
end 1_135 by 3
end 1_924 by 3
end 1_222 by 3
end 3_566 by 3
end 3_251 by 3
end 1_81 by 3
end 3_197 by 3
end 1_239 by 3
end 3_63 by 3
end 1_777 by 3
end 1_324 by 3
Seems like threads 1 and 3 are on the same cluster, as thread 2 is all
alone.
I got log4j configured to DEBUG, so I geet a lot of extra stuff. One I'm
finding curious is:
creator of own vid (dcbnw225:1987)is different from creator of message's vid
(dcbnw225:1984); discarding message !
Maybe that's a hint???
Thanks a lot
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3877506#3877506
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3877506
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: Problem with cluster under same VM
Did you modify something else?? I'm running on my machine and I still geet inconsistent results: ended 2 26 ended 1 29 ended 3 23 using vsync.xml: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Can it be because I'm running under windows? Would it help using a shared cache loader, even though I don't need it, because I only have to keep a lot of distributed agents in sync (everyone needs to know what the others are doing) Thanks again. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3877504#3877504 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3877504 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
