[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3875277#3875277 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3875277 --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
Does anyone at JBoss want to comment on this bug? I can supply a test case that replicates it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3875260#3875260 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3875260 --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
OK, I've have managed to write a generic test case that can be used to prove that a CMP entity's attributes are rendered empty by the Commit Option D refresh thread even if you do not call the a find() method a second time. Using a simple servlet (for want of a better way to talk to the EJBs) I first connected my servlet directly to a CMP entity bean. The entity bean transaction demarcation was set to RequiresNew. In-between setting the attributes of the entity I suspended the current thread. This allowed the thread that controls the Commit Option D that controls the cache to perform a flush(). I then tested the values of the attributes that I had just set... and they were fine. Not a problem. Next I introduced a session bean to act as a processor/proxy for the entity bean. The transaction demarcations were set to Required for the Entity bean, and RequiresNew for the session bean. The processor had a createEntity() method that would create a new entity instance and then start setting the values of the new entity's attributes. After setting a couple of attributes I again suspended the current thread to allow the flushing of the cache to take place. When I inspected the values of the attributes I had just set, they were empty! The session bean had not performed anymore lookups or called anymore finder methods, and yet the entity it was working with had been completely reset. This doesn't appear to be a particularly robust feature of JBoss, but it may be that I am choosing the wrong settings somewhere and would appreciate a little investigation into this matter. I have an EAR file available that can be deployed to show this bug in action, but who do I submit it to? Cheers, Carl. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3874893#3874893 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3874893 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
I've reviewed our code and the problem is occuring because we are defining the properties of an Entity as a one-to-many relationship between the Entity CMP bean and EntityProperty CMP beans: | relationships | ejb-relation | ejb-relation-nameOrder-OrderProperty/ejb-relation-name | ejb-relationship-role | ejb-relationship-role-nameproperty-associated-with-order/ejb-relationship-role-name | multiplicityMany/multiplicity | cascade-delete/ | relationship-role-source |ejb-nameOrderPropertyEntity/ejb-name | /relationship-role-source | cmr-field |cmr-field-nameorderEntity/cmr-field-name | /cmr-field | /ejb-relationship-role | | ejb-relationship-role | ejb-relationship-role-nameorder-has-properties/ejb-relationship-role-name | multiplicityOne/multiplicity | relationship-role-source |ejb-nameOrderEntity/ejb-name | /relationship-role-source | cmr-field |cmr-field-nameorderProperties/cmr-field-name |cmr-field-typejava.util.Set/cmr-field-type | /cmr-field | /ejb-relationship-role | /ejb-relation |/relationships | Within our transaction we hold the reference to the OrderEntity bean, but not the OrderPropertyEntity beans, and it seems as if the latter are being flushed when the option-D refresh thread is triggered. That leaves the OrderEntity bean with references to empty OrderPropertyEntity beans. (The JBoss documentation says that option D does not satisfy the EJB spec - is this why?) Any ideas as to how we can work around this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3874436#3874436 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3874436 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
Actually I managed to reproduce the problem even after removing the relationship (i.e. only setting fields that were not part of the relationship), so this is not the reason at all. Please ignore my last post. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3874441#3874441 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3874441 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
Brilliant, thankyou! I will go and examine our code and find out if where the finder is being called again within the transaction that is persisting to the database. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3874057#3874057 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3874057 --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
Does anyone from JBoss actually read these forums? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3873901#3873901 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3873901 --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
Yes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3873936#3873936 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3873936 --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
I guess, your problem is this http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-979 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3873942#3873942 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3873942 --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
I too am having this problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3845071#3845071 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3845071 --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
I don't see it in a simple testcase. Any more info/instructions? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3843148#3843148 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3843148 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721alloc_id=10040op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
Numerous posts about this. Even a bug report regarding memory leaks, fixed in 3.2.4. I have upgrade from 3.2.2 to 3.2.5 Using the same config as davidmboon. CMP1.1 EJBs with commit option C. Jboss continues to report Unable to passivate due to ctx lock. I have found little help in the documentation. Could really use some direction with this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3843133#3843133 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3843133 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721alloc_id=10040op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
We only get these warnings when we extend a container, if we leave the container configuration blank the jboss.xml, which means we're using 'Standard CMP EntityBean' container, we don't get these warnings. However when I extend the 'Standard CMP EntityBean' container, I also get these wranings | container-configuration extends=Standard CMP EntityBean | container-nameDave CMP EntityBean/container-name | persistence-managerorg.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStoreManager/persistence-manager | commit-optionC/commit-option | /container-configuration | | so it seems that I get these warnings anytime I extend a container... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3842313#3842313 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3842313 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721alloc_id=10040op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Unable to passivate due to ctx lock
Hi.. Same problem CTX lock is occuring when working with jboss3.2.1.. Did anybody find any solution to this .. any solution .. for this please let me know.. thanks.. Madhu a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3825627#3825627;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3825627Reply to the post/a --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
