RE: [JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux
I am using Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS and I am very pleased so far. It is much much faster than Sun. Benjamin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Hamilton Sent: 13 November 2001 12:01 To: 'jBoss-User Mailing List' Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux The key reason not to use the Sun VM seems to be the 'Out-of-memory' issue (thread stack memory allocation) which can limit the number of threads that your system can use. If that is not a problem, then the Sun VM seems to have better docs on the known issues. Cheers david - Original Message - From: "John "EvilJohn" Carney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'jBoss-User Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:51 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux > I'm convinced the Sun JVM is 'better' then the IBM JVM. This doesn't > mean faster, but speed isn't everything. > > IBM runs faster and seems to use less memory. How the hell they get > their stack use so efficient and the Array bounds check elimination so > good, I don't know. However, to be honest I'm not convinced it's > entirely stable. I can't specifically say why, but I don't think it > passes all the tests they say it does. > > On another issue, IBM won't support their JVM with anything other than > WebSphere, so if there's an issue, you're out of luck. > > John > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sundaram > Ramasamy > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:29 PM > To: Sacha Labourey; Tomas Lapienis > Cc: jBoss-User Mailing List > Subject: [JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux > > Hi, > > Which is best JDK implementation for Linux Sun or IBM?. I am planning to > install in Redhat 7.2. > > > Thanks > -SR > > > > > ___ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > ___ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux
The key reason not to use the Sun VM seems to be the 'Out-of-memory' issue (thread stack memory allocation) which can limit the number of threads that your system can use. If that is not a problem, then the Sun VM seems to have better docs on the known issues. Cheers david - Original Message - From: "John "EvilJohn" Carney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'jBoss-User Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:51 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux > I'm convinced the Sun JVM is 'better' then the IBM JVM. This doesn't > mean faster, but speed isn't everything. > > IBM runs faster and seems to use less memory. How the hell they get > their stack use so efficient and the Array bounds check elimination so > good, I don't know. However, to be honest I'm not convinced it's > entirely stable. I can't specifically say why, but I don't think it > passes all the tests they say it does. > > On another issue, IBM won't support their JVM with anything other than > WebSphere, so if there's an issue, you're out of luck. > > John > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sundaram > Ramasamy > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:29 PM > To: Sacha Labourey; Tomas Lapienis > Cc: jBoss-User Mailing List > Subject: [JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux > > Hi, > > Which is best JDK implementation for Linux Sun or IBM?. I am planning to > install in Redhat 7.2. > > > Thanks > -SR > > > > > ___ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > ___ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux
I'm convinced the Sun JVM is 'better' then the IBM JVM. This doesn't mean faster, but speed isn't everything. IBM runs faster and seems to use less memory. How the hell they get their stack use so efficient and the Array bounds check elimination so good, I don't know. However, to be honest I'm not convinced it's entirely stable. I can't specifically say why, but I don't think it passes all the tests they say it does. On another issue, IBM won't support their JVM with anything other than WebSphere, so if there's an issue, you're out of luck. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sundaram Ramasamy Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:29 PM To: Sacha Labourey; Tomas Lapienis Cc: jBoss-User Mailing List Subject: [JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux Hi, Which is best JDK implementation for Linux Sun or IBM?. I am planning to install in Redhat 7.2. Thanks -SR ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] Best JDK for Linux
Hi, Which is best JDK implementation for Linux Sun or IBM?. I am planning to install in Redhat 7.2. Thanks -SR ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user