Re: [JBoss-user] Log4j thread dump capture

2003-01-24 Thread Scott M Stark
There appears to be nothing we can do about this as the vm appears to just go
to its native stdout handle. You'll have to wait until the java.util.logging api is
actually being used by the vm.


Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC


- Original Message - 
From: "Sebastian Hauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 3:35 PM
Subject: [JBoss-user] Log4j thread dump capture



Hi,

As far as I can see JBoss wrapes STDOUT and STDERR into log4j categories
which is nice. Though when I take a thread dump I see it only appear on
the console screen but it will not get captured by log4j and written
into a log4j.
Is there a way to set this up?
We would like to run our Jboss servers as background processes but don't
want to loose the possibility to take thread dumps.

Regards,
Sebastian



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



[JBoss-user] Log4j thread dump capture

2003-01-24 Thread Sebastian Hauer

Hi,

As far as I can see JBoss wrapes STDOUT and STDERR into log4j categories
which is nice. Though when I take a thread dump I see it only appear on
the console screen but it will not get captured by log4j and written
into a log4j.
Is there a way to set this up?
We would like to run our Jboss servers as background processes but don't
want to loose the possibility to take thread dumps.

Regards,
Sebastian


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user