Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss
I agree that timely and full suport for EJB 2.0 and Corba (RMI/IIOP) are critical for the eventual success and acceptance of JBoss. Ivan - Original Message - From: Burkhard Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:09 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss Hi, How about the required Corba (RMI/IIOP) support?? Burkhard - Original Message - From: Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jim Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; JBoss 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:26 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss Local interfaces? I guess that's not too big of a deal since the code can easily be changed later... Hunter From: Jim Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 20:17:41 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss Hi Hunter... --On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:23 AM -0700 Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I correct that JBoss currently does support EJB1.1 + MDB? Yes, this is correct. So between MVC Soft and jBoss MDBs, what are you missing? Jim ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss
Hunter Hillegas wrote: I know that the spec isn't completed and that JBoss will support EJB2.0 when it is final but... Does this mean that work hasn't started or that work in underway (I haven't checked CVS)? 'underway' in that MDB and business methods on home interfaces both work. However, no work has started (that I'm aware of) on the meaty CMP stuff. Just wondering if we should expect something soon after the spec goes final or if that is when the work will begin... Work on the CMP should begin soon, but right now we're trying to make the current CMP perform a bit better. I've been tooling around with the MVCSoft persistence manager and it is a step forward but it doesn't get me all the way there either... Am I correct that JBoss currently does support EJB1.1 + MDB? Yes. -danch Confidential e-mail for addressee only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy the original communication.
Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss
Hi Hunter... --On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:23 AM -0700 Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I correct that JBoss currently does support EJB1.1 + MDB? Yes, this is correct. So between MVC Soft and jBoss MDBs, what are you missing? Jim I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. - Robert Frost, 1916 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss
Local interfaces? I guess that's not too big of a deal since the code can easily be changed later... Hunter From: Jim Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 20:17:41 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss Hi Hunter... --On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:23 AM -0700 Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I correct that JBoss currently does support EJB1.1 + MDB? Yes, this is correct. So between MVC Soft and jBoss MDBs, what are you missing? Jim ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
