Re: [JDEV] OT: Trillian forums on Jabber...
Thanks for the clarification, Justin. With all the standardization forming around Jabber as an open IM protocol, I think the Trillian folks (and many others) will be coming around to Jabber in 2003. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Justin Karneges wrote: Hi, First, the Trillian developers _are_ interested in Jabber, they just haven't made a public note about it. Second, that thread is really old, so the early messages should be disregarded. I think Jabber's marketing has improved over the last year, going away from multi-IM towards open-IM as more and more users have gained a clue. You have to understand that most users of the Trillian forum saw Jabber as redundant, since they were only thinking about transports. Read the end of the thread, and you'll see that a lot more people have opened up to Jabber now that they understand what it is. That thread has to hold some kind of record, too, as it spans over a year. I'm supposed to be absent right now, but I felt I had to reply since I'm probably the only one who can save face for these guys. Have fun, -Justin On Saturday 22 February 2003 10:13 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a fine read over at Trillian. Wtf is their deal? http://www.trillian.cc/forums/showthread.php?s=88747c9447b7f11da69447da6e9e 487cthreadid=6777perpage=30highlight=support%20jabber% 20futurepagenumber=1 Lots of pushback against jabber and obviously the trillian dev's are forcefully ignoring jabber interop. ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
RE: [JDEV] OT: Trillian forums on Jabber...
I agree, it's the best choice and it's all free muhahaha. I love Open source, and it's community. Thing's get done much faster Best Regards, Daniel MD -Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Peter Saint-Andre Enviada: segunda-feira, 24 de Fevereiro de 2003 17:31 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: [JDEV] OT: Trillian forums on Jabber... Thanks for the clarification, Justin. With all the standardization forming around Jabber as an open IM protocol, I think the Trillian folks (and many others) will be coming around to Jabber in 2003. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Justin Karneges wrote: Hi, First, the Trillian developers _are_ interested in Jabber, they just haven't made a public note about it. Second, that thread is really old, so the early messages should be disregarded. I think Jabber's marketing has improved over the last year, going away from multi-IM towards open-IM as more and more users have gained a clue. You have to understand that most users of the Trillian forum saw Jabber as redundant, since they were only thinking about transports. Read the end of the thread, and you'll see that a lot more people have opened up to Jabber now that they understand what it is. That thread has to hold some kind of record, too, as it spans over a year. I'm supposed to be absent right now, but I felt I had to reply since I'm probably the only one who can save face for these guys. Have fun, -Justin On Saturday 22 February 2003 10:13 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a fine read over at Trillian. Wtf is their deal? http://www.trillian.cc/forums/showthread.php?s=88747c9447b7f11da69447da6 e9e 487cthreadid=6777perpage=30highlight=support%20jabber% 20futurepagenumber=1 Lots of pushback against jabber and obviously the trillian dev's are forcefully ignoring jabber interop. ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
[JDEV] jabberd patch
Attached is a patch file for jsm/authreg.c that enables one to alter the
behavior of jabberd 1.4 when someone logs in with a username/resource
combination that already has an active session. Currently the existing
session is kicked and the new one logs in. With this patch, one can add the
first-session-priority/ tag to the jsm section of jabber.xml and the
behavior is reversed. That is, the first session is allowed to continue and
the second one is not allowed to log in. I would appreciate comments on this
implementation. It may well be that there are better ways to do this. One bug
that seems to exist in this version is that the second client is not informed
of the login failure, but instead just sits there until it times out. I'm not
quite sure how to correct that. Thanks.
Wes Morgan50a51
session sessn;
53c54
xmlnode x;
---
xmlnode x, session_priority;
70,72c71,85
}else if(!js_mapi_call(si, e_AUTH, p, user, NULL)){
if(jpacket_subtype(p) == JPACKET__GET)
{ /* if it's a type=get for auth, everybody mods it and we result and return it */
---
}else{
/* get existing session data (if any) */
sessn = js_session_primary(user);
if(sessn != NULL)
{
session_priority = xmlnode_get_tag(si-config,first-session-priority);
if(session_priority != NULL)
{
jutil_error(p-x, TERROR_AUTH);
}
log_debug(ZONE,user %s is currently online,user-user);
}
if(!js_mapi_call(si, e_AUTH, p, user, NULL)){
if(jpacket_subtype(p) == JPACKET__GET)
{ /* if it's a type=get for auth, everybody mods it and we result and return it */
76c89
}else{ /* type=set that didn't get handled used to be a problem, but now auth_plain passes on failed checks so it might be normal */
---
}else{ /* type=set that didn't get handled used to be a problem, but now auth_plain passes on failed checks so it might be normal */
78c91,92
}
---
}
}
