Re: svn 1.7

2012-02-06 Thread Martijn Verburg
Hi all,

I believe the latest version of the Jenkins plugin does provide
support.  However,
Several of us have been having problems upgrading the SVN plugin (this was
originally thought to be an hpi vs jpi naming issue, but it seems to
be deeper than
that).

I didn't have a chance to discuss it in detail with KK at FOSDEM, but I know a
few of the devs were discussing it.

Cheers,
Martijn

On 6 February 2012 14:02, shanz duncan.perr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Just seen this on svnkit website ...

 Lastest stable version of SVNKit (1.3.7) is not compatible with
 Subversion 1.7 working copy format. However, SVNKit 1.7 is under
 development now and we plan to release it in February 2012. Fully
 functional beta will be ready in January 2012.

 Right now you may use SVNKit 1.7.0-alpha2 version, which is available
 in our maven repository or build SVNKit 1.7.0 from sources. SVNKit
 1.7.0-alpha2 is compatible both with the new and old working copy
 formats, but does not yet support all of the Subversion operations.


 On Feb 6, 1:55 pm, shanz duncan.perr...@gmail.com wrote:
 I don't think I've got a choice since my Company is about to PUSH svn
 1.7 out automatically.
 Today I've tried it out but now realise Jenkins isn't ready for it!

 On Feb 6, 1:48 pm, matthew.web...@diamond.ac.uk wrote:







  SVN 1.7 is a major change from 1.6. Subversion 1.7 clients use a new 
  working copy format. Subversion 1.7 clients cannot use Subversion 1.6 (and 
  earlier) working copies. Existing working copies created with Subversion 
  1.6 and earlier need to be upgraded before they can be used with a 
  Subversion 1.7 client.

  If you are thinking of moving to subversion 1.7, consider all the tools 
  you use. For example, we use Jenkins, subversion command line, subversion 
  from Eclipse, etc. We won’t move until we can upgrade all of them. There's 
  no point in Jenkins checking out in 1.7 format, if I can’t use the command 
  line to look at the result (I have to do that occasionally).

  Hope that helps
  Matthew

   -Original Message-
   From: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com 
   [mailto:jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of shanz
   Sent: 06 February 2012 13:34
   To: Jenkins Users
   Subject: svn 1.7

   Can Jenkins support svn 1.7?
   My job complains with - Please upgrade your Subversion (SVNKit)
   client to use this working copy.
   Can I manually upgrade SVNKit?
   I'm using Jenkins 1.442.
   Is it worth upgrading to Jenkins 1.450?

   Does anyone use svn 1.7.x with Jenkins successfully?

  --
  This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
  privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. 
  If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the 
  addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not 
  use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached 
  to the e-mail.
  Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and 
  not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
  Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any 
  attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any 
  damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be 
  transmitted in or with the message.
  Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England 
  and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
  Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom


Re: svn 1.7

2012-02-06 Thread Brian J
Jenkins is using a custom patched version of svnkit. Chances are that work
will need to be done on the 1.7 version as well, which is still in beta.
However, this does not prevent you from upgrading your subversion server to
1.7 to support other 1.7 clients, as the 1.7 server supports 1.6 clients as
well. Jenkins will work fine if the server is updated, or even other
clients on the jenkins machine.


On Feb 6, 2012 7:39 AM, Martijn Verburg martijnverb...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmm, must be my bad - I was sure I read of the support somewhere (it's
 my reason for upgrading as well) - M

 On 6 February 2012 14:23, shanz duncan.perr...@gmail.com wrote:
  Martijn,
  I seem to already have the latest version of th plugin though (1.37)
  and 1.38 doesn't address svn 1.7 format yet ...
  Version 1.38 (not yet released)
 
 Fixed issue #10227: Parameter List subversion tag was not
  displaying tags which have the same date.
 Fixed issue #12201: NullPointerException during SVN update.
 Fixed issue #8036: Subversion plugin to support SVN::Web browser.
 Fixed issue #12525: SVN URL converted to lowercase - Changes
  found every time it has an pull request.
 
 
 
 
  On Feb 6, 2:07 pm, Martijn Verburg martijnverb...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  I believe the latest version of the Jenkins plugin does provide
  support.  However,
  Several of us have been having problems upgrading the SVN plugin (this
was
  originally thought to be an hpi vs jpi naming issue, but it seems to
  be deeper than
  that).
 
  I didn't have a chance to discuss it in detail with KK at FOSDEM, but
I know a
  few of the devs were discussing it.
 
  Cheers,
  Martijn
 
  On 6 February 2012 14:02, shanz duncan.perr...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Just seen this on svnkit website ...
 
   Lastest stable version of SVNKit (1.3.7) is not compatible with
   Subversion 1.7 working copy format. However, SVNKit 1.7 is under
   development now and we plan to release it in February 2012. Fully
   functional beta will be ready in January 2012.
 
   Right now you may use SVNKit 1.7.0-alpha2 version, which is available
   in our maven repository or build SVNKit 1.7.0 from sources. SVNKit
   1.7.0-alpha2 is compatible both with the new and old working copy
   formats, but does not yet support all of the Subversion operations.
 
   On Feb 6, 1:55 pm, shanz duncan.perr...@gmail.com wrote:
   I don't think I've got a choice since my Company is about to PUSH
svn
   1.7 out automatically.
   Today I've tried it out but now realise Jenkins isn't ready for it!
 
   On Feb 6, 1:48 pm, matthew.web...@diamond.ac.uk wrote:
 
SVN 1.7 is a major change from 1.6. Subversion 1.7 clients use a
new working copy format. Subversion 1.7 clients cannot use Subversion 1.6
(and earlier) working copies. Existing working copies created with
Subversion 1.6 and earlier need to be upgraded before they can be used with
a Subversion 1.7 client.
 
If you are thinking of moving to subversion 1.7, consider all the
tools you use. For example, we use Jenkins, subversion command line,
subversion from Eclipse, etc. We won’t move until we can upgrade all of
them. There's no point in Jenkins checking out in 1.7 format, if I can’t
use the command line to look at the result (I have to do that occasionally).
 
Hope that helps
Matthew
 
 -Original Message-
 From: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:
jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of shanz
 Sent: 06 February 2012 13:34
 To: Jenkins Users
 Subject: svn 1.7
 
 Can Jenkins support svn 1.7?
 My job complains with - Please upgrade your Subversion (SVNKit)
 client to use this working copy.
 Can I manually upgrade SVNKit?
 I'm using Jenkins 1.442.
 Is it worth upgrading to Jenkins 1.450?
 
 Does anyone use svn 1.7.x with Jenkins successfully?
 
--
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential,
copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended
addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised
recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the
e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information
in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the
individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or
any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for
any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may
be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in
England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell
Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom