JESS: simple calculation problem

2007-01-31 Thread M Ismail

hi,

im trying to add a number to another number which keeps increasing on every 
rule


that is what i have:

(defrule fight
(object knife)
  =
(assert (Fight))
(assert (update-scores 10))
(printout t Fight ! crlf)
)

(defrule update-scores
  (update-scores ?c)
  =
 (call ?s setAgr (+ (call ?s getAgr) ?c)))

and i want it to be something like:
score starts with 0

and when rule fight is fire then it should add 10   so the final score is 10

and if another rule is fired it will add also 10 and then the final score is 
20 etc...


how can i do that?  what i have  now is just replacing and not adding

best regards,

m.ismail

_
Veilig  gerust mailen met de verbeterde antivirusscan van Live Mail! 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/mail/launch/default.aspx?Locale=nl-nl



To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]




JESS: how to get the rule text from a defrule

2007-01-31 Thread Skeptic 2000
 
Hi,
 
With Jesp I can easily get the defrule of each of my rules in my .clp files and 
display their names in a Swing application. What I would like to do next is to 
display the actual text of the rule in this same application, can it be easily 
done ?Thanks.
 



 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: JESS: is jess a declaritive language? 
 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:03:15 -0500 To: jess-users@sandia.gov  Well, 
 rules themselves are definitely a declarative programming  concept. But Jess 
 also offers an imperative language, and in fact the  right-hand-sides of 
 rules consist of imperative code.  So in fact, Jess, and systems like it, 
 are hybrid declarative/  imperative.  On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Matthew 
 J Hutchinson wrote:   Hi everyone,   I'm trying to categorize Jess in 
 terms of the different programming   language paradigms. Is Jess 
 declaritive?   Thanks,  Matt   
 - Ernest 
 Friedman-Hill Advanced Software Research Phone: (925) 294-2154 Sandia 
 National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Livermore, CA 94550 http://www.jessrules.com  
  To 
 unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 
 the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own 
 address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
_
Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

Re: JESS: simple calculation problem

2007-01-31 Thread Ernest Friedman-Hill
First, I don't know what ?s is. If it's a variable defined at the  
prompt, don't do that. It won't work reliably in Jess 6, and isn't  
even possible in Jess 7 (the fact that it's possible in Jess 6 is  
unintentional.)


Otherwise, there's nothing wrong here, per se. Every time an update- 
scores fact is asserted, the count will be set to a new value. Of  
course, once an update-scores 10 fact exists, you can't assert  
another one until the original is retracted, so you might want to do  
that in the update-scores rule.


On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:40 AM, M Ismail wrote:


hi,

im trying to add a number to another number which keeps increasing  
on every rule


that is what i have:

(defrule fight
(object knife)
  =
(assert (Fight))
(assert (update-scores 10))
(printout t Fight ! crlf)
)

(defrule update-scores
  (update-scores ?c)
  =
 (call ?s setAgr (+ (call ?s getAgr) ?c)))

and i want it to be something like:
score starts with 0

and when rule fight is fire then it should add 10   so the final  
score is 10


and if another rule is fired it will add also 10 and then the final  
score is 20 etc...


how can i do that?  what i have  now is just replacing and not adding

best regards,

m.ismail

_
Veilig  gerust mailen met de verbeterde antivirusscan van Live  
Mail! http://imagine-windowslive.com/mail/launch/default.aspx? 
Locale=nl-nl



To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify owner-jess- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
Ernest Friedman-Hill
Advanced Software Research  Phone: (925) 294-2154
Sandia National LabsFAX:   (925) 294-2234
PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Livermore, CA 94550 http://www.jessrules.com


To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: JESS: how to get the rule text from a defrule

2007-01-31 Thread Ernest Friedman-Hill

Use the jess.PrettyPrinter class, as described in the manual.

An aside: *please* start a new thread for your new questions; please  
don't reply to an existing message, whether or not you delete the old  
contents while editing your message, unless you're answering someone  
else's question. If you send a reply rather than a new message, then  
threaded email readers (including archives of this list) show your  
messages as related to others that they're not actually related to.  
Thanks.


On Jan 31, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Skeptic 2000 wrote:



Hi,

With Jesp I can easily get the defrule of each of my rules in  
my .clp files and display their names in a Swing application. What  
I would like to do next is to display the actual text of the rule  
in this same application, can it be easily done ?


Thanks.








 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: JESS: is jess a declaritive language?
 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:03:15 -0500
 To: jess-users@sandia.gov

 Well, rules themselves are definitely a declarative programming
 concept. But Jess also offers an imperative language, and in fact  
the

 right-hand-sides of rules consist of imperative code.

 So in fact, Jess, and systems like it, are hybrid declarative/
 imperative.

 On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Matthew J Hutchinson wrote:

  Hi everyone,
 
  I'm trying to categorize Jess in terms of the different  
programming

  language paradigms. Is Jess declaritive?
 
  Thanks,
  Matt
 

 -
 Ernest Friedman-Hill
 Advanced Software Research Phone: (925) 294-2154
 Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234
 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Livermore, CA 94550 http://www.jessrules.com

 
 To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

 in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
 (use your own address!) List problems? Notify owner-jess- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



Soyez parmi les premiers à essayer Windows Live Mail.


-
Ernest Friedman-Hill
Advanced Software Research  Phone: (925) 294-2154
Sandia National LabsFAX:   (925) 294-2234
PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Livermore, CA 94550 http://www.jessrules.com




To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: JESS: is jess a declaritive language?

2007-01-31 Thread Ellen Zhao

Whether to apply the declarative or imperative programming paradigms
really depends much on how data and behaviour should be bound together
in your problem domain. When the relationship between data and
behaviour is fairly weak and highly dynamic, DSLs with declarative
syntax built upon rule engines or workflow/process engines are more
expressive to transfer the real-world scenarios to a computational
model. Workflow/process engines emphasize on conducting the behaviour
while rule engines emphasize on constraining the data. Declarative and
imperative programming paradigms are not mutually exclusive and a good
programming language (for example Jess), usually takes advantages of
both paradigms to achieve maximal expressiveness.

On 1/31/07, Doug Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

And the degree to which a production system leans toward the declarative
or imperative end of the spectrum is as much a matter of programming
style as the language itself.  To the degree that you are thinking of
each rule as a specification of what to do under a set of circumstances,
with flow of control influenced strictly by how the KB changes, you are
emphasizing declarative programming.  To the extent that you are thinking
explicitly about a specific flow of control as in convential programming
you are moving toward procedural programming.
Doug Metzler

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Ernest Friedman-Hill wrote:

 Well, rules themselves are definitely a declarative programming concept. But
 Jess also offers an imperative language, and in fact the right-hand-sides of
 rules consist of imperative code.

 So in fact, Jess, and systems like it, are hybrid declarative/imperative.

 On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Matthew J Hutchinson wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 I'm trying to categorize Jess in terms of the different programming
 language paradigms. Is Jess declaritive?

 Thanks,
 Matt


 -
 Ernest Friedman-Hill
 Advanced Software Research  Phone: (925) 294-2154
 Sandia National LabsFAX:   (925) 294-2234
 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Livermore, CA 94550 http://www.jessrules.com

 
 To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
 (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]






--
Ellen Ning Zhao
Department of Computer Science
University of Applied Science of Kaiserslautern at Zweibruecken


To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: JESS: simple calculation problem

2007-01-31 Thread Henrique Lopes Cardoso

Hi,

I guess you should retract the update-scores fact in the rhs of the 
update-scores rule, otherwise you will not be able to assert a new 
update-scores fact (and therefore the update-scores rule will not fire 
again).


Henrique

M Ismail wrote:

hi,

im trying to add a number to another number which keeps increasing on 
every rule


that is what i have:

(defrule fight
(object knife)
  =
(assert (Fight))
(assert (update-scores 10))
(printout t Fight ! crlf)
)

(defrule update-scores
  (update-scores ?c)
  =
 (call ?s setAgr (+ (call ?s getAgr) ?c)))

and i want it to be something like:
score starts with 0

and when rule fight is fire then it should add 10   so the final score 
is 10


and if another rule is fired it will add also 10 and then the final 
score is 20 etc...


how can i do that?  what i have  now is just replacing and not adding

best regards,

m.ismail

_
Veilig  gerust mailen met de verbeterde antivirusscan van Live Mail! 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/mail/launch/default.aspx?Locale=nl-nl



To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






--
- - - - - -  -  -  -  -  -   -   -
Henrique Lopes Cardoso
DEEC/FEUP
Rua Dr. Roberto Frias | 4200-465 Porto
PORTUGAL
(+351)225081400 ext.1315
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.fe.up.pt/~hlc
- - - - - -  -  -  -  -  -   -   -


To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]