Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-04-18 Thread via GitHub


jolshan commented on PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#issuecomment-2064671000

   I wonder if I should backport this to 3.7 as well. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-25 Thread via GitHub


jolshan merged PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-25 Thread via GitHub


jolshan commented on PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#issuecomment-2019067710

   
[testAlterSinkConnectorOffsetsOverriddenConsumerGroupId](https://ge.apache.org/scans/tests?search.names=Git%20branch=P28D=kafka=America%2FLos_Angeles=trunk=org.apache.kafka.connect.integration.OffsetsApiIntegrationTest=testAlterSinkConnectorOffsetsOverriddenConsumerGroupId)
   
   
[testSeparateOffsetsTopic](https://ge.apache.org/scans/tests?search.names=Git%20branch=P28D=kafka=America%2FLos_Angeles=trunk=org.apache.kafka.connect.integration.ExactlyOnceSourceIntegrationTest=testSeparateOffsetsTopic)
   
   These caught my eye but have been flaky/failing since before this change. 
Here are JIRAs for them: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15914 and 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14089
   
   The other tests look known and/or unrelated. I will go ahead and merge.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-25 Thread via GitHub


jolshan commented on PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#issuecomment-2018411363

   Getting a fresh build before merging  


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-22 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1536046613


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupMetadataManager.scala:
##
@@ -1365,6 +1365,16 @@ object GroupMetadataManager {
 
   def maybeConvertOffsetCommitError(error: Errors) : Errors = {
 error match {
+  case Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION =>
+// When committing offsets transactionally, we now verify the 
transaction with the
+// transaction coordinator. Verification can fail with 
`NETWORK_EXCEPTION`, a retriable
+// error which older clients may not expect and retry correctly. We 
have the option of
+// translating `NETWORK_EXCEPTION` to either 
`COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS` or

Review Comment:
   Thanks, I've reworded the comments.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-22 Thread via GitHub


jolshan commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1536023033


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupMetadataManager.scala:
##
@@ -1365,6 +1365,16 @@ object GroupMetadataManager {
 
   def maybeConvertOffsetCommitError(error: Errors) : Errors = {
 error match {
+  case Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION =>
+// When committing offsets transactionally, we now verify the 
transaction with the
+// transaction coordinator. Verification can fail with 
`NETWORK_EXCEPTION`, a retriable
+// error which older clients may not expect and retry correctly. We 
have the option of
+// translating `NETWORK_EXCEPTION` to either 
`COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS` or

Review Comment:
   Thanks for the explanation. I wonder if we could leave out the sentence 
about "we have the option..." and just include " We use 
`COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS` because it retries the request without an 
unnecessary coordinator lookup."



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-22 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1536004118


##
group-coordinator/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinatorServiceTest.java:
##
@@ -1899,8 +1900,19 @@ public void testCommitTransactionalOffsets() throws 
ExecutionException, Interrup
 assertEquals(response, future.get());
 }
 
-@Test
-public void testCommitTransactionalOffsetsWithWrappedError() throws 
ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
+private static Stream 
testCommitTransactionalOffsetsWithWrappedErrorSource() {
+return Stream.of(
+Arguments.arguments(new NotEnoughReplicasException(), 
Errors.COORDINATOR_NOT_AVAILABLE.code()),
+Arguments.arguments(new NetworkException(), 
Errors.COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS.code())
+);
+}
+
+@ParameterizedTest
+@MethodSource("testCommitTransactionalOffsetsWithWrappedErrorSource")

Review Comment:
   That appears to work, thanks!



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-22 Thread via GitHub


dajac commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1535973164


##
group-coordinator/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinatorServiceTest.java:
##
@@ -1899,8 +1900,19 @@ public void testCommitTransactionalOffsets() throws 
ExecutionException, Interrup
 assertEquals(response, future.get());
 }
 
-@Test
-public void testCommitTransactionalOffsetsWithWrappedError() throws 
ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
+private static Stream 
testCommitTransactionalOffsetsWithWrappedErrorSource() {
+return Stream.of(
+Arguments.arguments(new NotEnoughReplicasException(), 
Errors.COORDINATOR_NOT_AVAILABLE.code()),
+Arguments.arguments(new NetworkException(), 
Errors.COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS.code())
+);
+}
+
+@ParameterizedTest
+@MethodSource("testCommitTransactionalOffsetsWithWrappedErrorSource")

Review Comment:
   nit: Would it be possible to use a CsvSource with Errors,Errors? I am not 
sure if CsvSource works with Enums though.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-22 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1535903580


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala:
##
@@ -830,7 +830,11 @@ class ReplicaManager(val config: KafkaConfig,
   val customException =
 error match {
   case Errors.INVALID_TXN_STATE => Some(error.exception("Partition 
was not added to the transaction"))
+  // Transaction verification can fail with a retriable error that 
older clients may not
+  // retry correctly. Translate these to `NOT_ENOUGH_REPLICAS`, 
which will cause such
+  // clients to retry the produce request.

Review Comment:
   I've updated the comment. Let me know if it looks okay now.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-22 Thread via GitHub


artemlivshits commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1535865337


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala:
##
@@ -830,7 +830,11 @@ class ReplicaManager(val config: KafkaConfig,
   val customException =
 error match {
   case Errors.INVALID_TXN_STATE => Some(error.exception("Partition 
was not added to the transaction"))
+  // Transaction verification can fail with a retriable error that 
older clients may not
+  // retry correctly. Translate these to `NOT_ENOUGH_REPLICAS`, 
which will cause such
+  // clients to retry the produce request.

Review Comment:
   There are multiple errors that could could clients to retry produce request, 
we chose this one because it doesn't trigger metadata refresh.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-22 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1535637194


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinator.scala:
##
@@ -921,7 +921,10 @@ private[group] class GroupCoordinator(
 ): Unit = {
   val (error, verificationGuard) = errorAndGuard
   if (error != Errors.NONE) {
-val finalError = 
GroupMetadataManager.maybeConvertOffsetCommitError(error)
+val finalError = error match {
+  case Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION => 
Errors.COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS

Review Comment:
   I've added a comment and moved the error translation in the old group 
coordinator to `maybeConvertOffsetCommitError`.
   I also moved the error translation in the new group coordinator to 
`handleOperationException` based on feedback from @\dajac.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-22 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1535637194


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinator.scala:
##
@@ -921,7 +921,10 @@ private[group] class GroupCoordinator(
 ): Unit = {
   val (error, verificationGuard) = errorAndGuard
   if (error != Errors.NONE) {
-val finalError = 
GroupMetadataManager.maybeConvertOffsetCommitError(error)
+val finalError = error match {
+  case Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION => 
Errors.COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS

Review Comment:
   I've added a comment and moved the error translation in both group 
coordinators now.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-22 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1535636055


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala:
##
@@ -831,6 +831,7 @@ class ReplicaManager(val config: KafkaConfig,
 error match {
   case Errors.INVALID_TXN_STATE => Some(error.exception("Partition 
was not added to the transaction"))
   case Errors.CONCURRENT_TRANSACTIONS |
+   Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION |

Review Comment:
   Good idea, I've added a comment.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-21 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1534709657


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinator.scala:
##
@@ -921,7 +921,10 @@ private[group] class GroupCoordinator(
 ): Unit = {
   val (error, verificationGuard) = errorAndGuard
   if (error != Errors.NONE) {
-val finalError = 
GroupMetadataManager.maybeConvertOffsetCommitError(error)
+val finalError = error match {
+  case Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION => 
Errors.COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS

Review Comment:
   Thank you for the review!
   
   `maybeConvertOffsetCommitError` is also used in 
[`GroupMetadataManager.createPutCacheCallback`](https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/7e85d7d32e8cb4f3fa9b01fd4197ee43d64ba6d0/core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupMetadataManager.scala#L430).
 I wasn't sure whether it made sense to translate network exceptions on that 
path too. I'm happy to move the translation there if you think it makes sense.
   
   I have the same uncertainty about 
[`handleOperationException`](https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/7e85d7d32e8cb4f3fa9b01fd4197ee43d64ba6d0/group-coordinator/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinatorService.java#L1084)
 in the new group coordinator. All the other group coordinator methods use it 
to translate errors and I was not sure if it made sense to translate network 
exceptions there, for all methods.
   
   Also, I agree, a comment to explain the choice of error would be good. I'll 
add one here and in ReplicaManager too.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-21 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1534709657


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinator.scala:
##
@@ -921,7 +921,10 @@ private[group] class GroupCoordinator(
 ): Unit = {
   val (error, verificationGuard) = errorAndGuard
   if (error != Errors.NONE) {
-val finalError = 
GroupMetadataManager.maybeConvertOffsetCommitError(error)
+val finalError = error match {
+  case Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION => 
Errors.COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS

Review Comment:
   Thank you for the review!
   
   `maybeConvertOffsetCommitError` is also used in 
[`GroupMetadataManager.createPutCacheCallback`](https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/7e85d7d32e8cb4f3fa9b01fd4197ee43d64ba6d0/core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupMetadataManager.scala#L430).
 I wasn't sure whether it made sense to translate network exceptions on that 
path too. I'm happy to move the translation there if you think it makes sense.
   
   I have the same uncertainty about 
[`handleOperationException`](https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/7e85d7d32e8cb4f3fa9b01fd4197ee43d64ba6d0/group-coordinator/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinatorService.java#L1084)
 in the new group coordinator. All the other group coordinator methods use it 
to translate errors and I was not sure if it made sense to translate network 
exceptions there.
   
   Also, I agree, a comment to explain the choice of error would be good. I'll 
add one here and in ReplicaManager too.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-21 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1534709657


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinator.scala:
##
@@ -921,7 +921,10 @@ private[group] class GroupCoordinator(
 ): Unit = {
   val (error, verificationGuard) = errorAndGuard
   if (error != Errors.NONE) {
-val finalError = 
GroupMetadataManager.maybeConvertOffsetCommitError(error)
+val finalError = error match {
+  case Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION => 
Errors.COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS

Review Comment:
   Thank you for the review!
   
   `maybeConvertOffsetCommitError` is also used in 
[`GroupMetadataManager.createPutCacheCallback`](https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/7e85d7d32e8cb4f3fa9b01fd4197ee43d64ba6d0/core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupMetadataManager.scala#L430).
 I wasn't sure whether it made sense to translate network exceptions on that 
path too. I'm happy to move the translation there if you think it makes sense.
   
   I have the same uncertainty about 
[`handleOperationException`](https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/7e85d7d32e8cb4f3fa9b01fd4197ee43d64ba6d0/group-coordinator/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinatorService.java#L1084)
 in the new group coordinator. All the other group coordinator methods use it 
to translate errors and I was not sure if it made sense to translate network 
exceptions there.
   
   Also, a comment to explain the choice of error would be good. I'll add one 
here and in ReplicaManager too.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-21 Thread via GitHub


artemlivshits commented on code in PR #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559#discussion_r1534632389


##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinator.scala:
##
@@ -921,7 +921,10 @@ private[group] class GroupCoordinator(
 ): Unit = {
   val (error, verificationGuard) = errorAndGuard
   if (error != Errors.NONE) {
-val finalError = 
GroupMetadataManager.maybeConvertOffsetCommitError(error)
+val finalError = error match {
+  case Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION => 
Errors.COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS

Review Comment:
   Should we add a comment why we're translating to this error and not the 
other?



##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala:
##
@@ -831,6 +831,7 @@ class ReplicaManager(val config: KafkaConfig,
 error match {
   case Errors.INVALID_TXN_STATE => Some(error.exception("Partition 
was not added to the transaction"))
   case Errors.CONCURRENT_TRANSACTIONS |
+   Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION |

Review Comment:
   Should we add a comment why we're translating to NotEnoughReplicasException 
error and not something else?  I think there is a bit of thinking that went 
into this logic and the code doesn't reflect it.



##
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/group/GroupCoordinator.scala:
##
@@ -921,7 +921,10 @@ private[group] class GroupCoordinator(
 ): Unit = {
   val (error, verificationGuard) = errorAndGuard
   if (error != Errors.NONE) {
-val finalError = 
GroupMetadataManager.maybeConvertOffsetCommitError(error)
+val finalError = error match {
+  case Errors.NETWORK_EXCEPTION => 
Errors.COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS

Review Comment:
   I'm curious why we singled out this error explicitly rather than putting it 
into the function tasked specifically with error translation?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[PR] KAFKA-16386: Convert NETWORK_EXCEPTIONs from KIP-890 transaction verification [kafka]

2024-03-19 Thread via GitHub


squah-confluent opened a new pull request, #15559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15559

   KIP-890 Part 1 introduced verification of transactions with the transaction 
coordinator on the `Produce` and `TxnOffsetCommit` paths. This introduced the 
possibility of new errors when responding to those requests. For backwards 
compatibility with older clients, a choice was made to convert some of the new 
retriable errors to existing errors that are expected and retried correctly by 
older clients.
   
   `NETWORK_EXCEPTION` was forgotten about and not converted, but can occur if, 
for example, the transaction coordinator is temporarily refusing connections. 
Now, we convert it to:
* `NOT_ENOUGH_REPLICAS` on the `Produce` path, just like the other 
retriable errors that can arise from transaction verification.
* `COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS` on the `TxnOffsetCommit` path. This error 
does not force coordinator lookup on clients, unlike 
`COORDINATOR_NOT_AVAILABLE`. Note that this deviates from KIP-890, which says 
that retriable errors should be converted to `COORDINATOR_NOT_AVAILABLE`.
   
   ### Committer Checklist (excluded from commit message)
   - [ ] Verify design and implementation 
   - [ ] Verify test coverage and CI build status
   - [ ] Verify documentation (including upgrade notes)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org