Re: Problem with headless Gump tests
I recently changed some GUI-related code in test methods. It may be related. I'm attaching the relevant CVS commit message. BTW, any idea why Gump nags are not working? Issues like this would be spotted much quicker if they did. -- Salut, Jordi. BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote: Something has broken the test setup when running headless - i.e. with no display hardware. This may be because of something I changed; anyway, I'll try to have a look at it later today. By the way, one can use the test-headless Ant build target to test running headless - I must have forgotten to do that recently ... S. ___ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. ___ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---BeginMessage--- jsalvata2004/02/05 15:37:33 Modified:src/core/org/apache/jmeter/junit JMeterTest.java Log: Properly initializing the GUI so that GUI-related tests work. Revision ChangesPath 1.42 +9 -1 jakarta-jmeter/src/core/org/apache/jmeter/junit/JMeterTest.java Index: JMeterTest.java === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-jmeter/src/core/org/apache/jmeter/junit/JMeterTest.java,v retrieving revision 1.41 retrieving revision 1.42 diff -u -r1.41 -r1.42 --- JMeterTest.java 1 Feb 2004 13:27:09 - 1.41 +++ JMeterTest.java 5 Feb 2004 23:37:33 - 1.42 @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import org.apache.jmeter.gui.GuiPackage; import org.apache.jmeter.gui.JMeterGUIComponent; import org.apache.jmeter.gui.UnsharedComponent; +import org.apache.jmeter.gui.action.ActionRouter; import org.apache.jmeter.gui.tree.JMeterTreeListener; import org.apache.jmeter.gui.tree.JMeterTreeModel; import org.apache.jmeter.gui.tree.JMeterTreeNode; @@ -106,7 +107,14 @@ // ensure the GuiPackage is initialized. JMeterTreeModel treeModel = new JMeterTreeModel(); JMeterTreeListener treeLis = new JMeterTreeListener(treeModel); +treeLis.setActionHandler(ActionRouter.getInstance()); GuiPackage.getInstance(treeLis, treeModel); +// The GuiPackage needs a MainFrame to work: +org.apache.jmeter.gui.MainFrame main = +new org.apache.jmeter.gui.MainFrame( +ActionRouter.getInstance(), +treeModel, +treeLis); TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(); suite.addTest(new JMeterTest(createTitleSet)); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---End Message--- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with headless Gump tests
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004, Jordi Salvat i. Alabart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, any idea why Gump nags are not working? Issues like this would be spotted much quicker if they did. I don't have the historical data necessary to say whether you should expect nags at all. JMeter hasn't been built by Gump last night as the velocity build has failed. And the nag mails get sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] according to the Gump descriptor. I don't know whether jmeter-dev is moderated - if so, the mails won't reach the list if Geir isn't subscribed. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with headless Gump tests
-Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 February 2004 12:57 To: JMeter Developers List Subject: Re: Problem with headless Gump tests On Mon, 09 Feb 2004, Jordi Salvat i. Alabart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, any idea why Gump nags are not working? Issues like this would be spotted much quicker if they did. I don't have the historical data necessary to say whether you should expect nags at all. JMeter hasn't been built by Gump last night as the velocity build has failed. We did use to get nags a long time ago, when Gump was working on cvs.apache.org I've not seen any from the current Gumps (covalent, cocoondev, lsd, nagoya). And the nag mails get sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] according to the Gump descriptor. I don't know whether jmeter-dev is moderated - if so, the mails won't reach the list if Geir isn't subscribed. Does that mean we could change the Gump descriptor to one of us (i.e. one of the committers) instead? [Or perhaps we one can use the list owner or subscribe a dummy user...] Sebastian ___ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. ___ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with headless Gump tests
-Original Message- From: Jordi Salvat i Alabart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 February 2004 12:32 To: JMeter Developers List Subject: Re: Problem with headless Gump tests I recently changed some GUI-related code in test methods. It may be related. I'm attaching the relevant CVS commit message. Yes, I think that's it: +treeLis.setActionHandler(ActionRouter.getInstance()); seems to not work headless. Not quite sure what to do about this - possibly call those methods as part of a new early test, rather than as part of the suite, as crashing the suite means no tests are run later. Not all of the subsequent tests required them, as far as I know. S. ___ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. ___ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with headless Gump tests
Nags used to reach jmeter-dev a (long) while ago. Last one in my records is 28th july. I think one of the Gump machines --the only one nagging-- stopped working, and we've never had nags since. jmeter-dev is moderated -- but non-subscriber's e-mails can still reach it: the moderators receive a warning message and have to allow/deny distribution. I'm currently one of the moderators and I've not seen any Gump messages recently (otherwise I would have let them in, of course). -- Salut, Jordi. Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 09 Feb 2004, Jordi Salvat i. Alabart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, any idea why Gump nags are not working? Issues like this would be spotted much quicker if they did. I don't have the historical data necessary to say whether you should expect nags at all. JMeter hasn't been built by Gump last night as the velocity build has failed. And the nag mails get sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] according to the Gump descriptor. I don't know whether jmeter-dev is moderated - if so, the mails won't reach the list if Geir isn't subscribed. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with headless Gump tests
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004, Sebastian BAZLEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't have the historical data necessary to say whether you should expect nags at all. JMeter hasn't been built by Gump last night as the velocity build has failed. We did use to get nags a long time ago, when Gump was working on cvs.apache.org Yes, I know. I meant that I don't know whether JMeter has been built on lsd when the failure occured. lsd runs the Python rewrite of Gump (Gumpy) and until later last week Gumpy didn't honor optional dependencies for example. Does that mean we could change the Gump descriptor to one of us (i.e. one of the committers) instead? Of course you can, I even encourage you to do so 8-) Stefan -- http://stefanbodewig.blogger.de/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
