Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia nightlies
That is great! Thanks a lot. Uwe Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 09:59:28 UTC+2 schrieb Elliot Saba: > > Hey Uwe, thanks for raising this to our attention. We definitely do > suggest using the generic linux binaries for Travis stuff as they're easier > for us to control, but I wanted to let you know that the issues with the > PPA have been fixed, and you should be good to go now with regards to > getting the latest version from the PPA. > -E > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Tony Kelman > wrote: > >> Yes, those get updated very frequently, see status.julialang.org for >> exactly how recent they are at any time. Those only get out of date if >> there's an issue on the buildbots, which happens occasionally but usually >> doesn't take long to fix. >> >> >> On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 1:50:14 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: >>> >>> The generic linux binaries - I haven't checked those for a while, but it >>> is worth checking if those are current. >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Yakir Gagnon <12.y...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> OK, I'm gonna git pull & make then. That's the only way, right? On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:54:05 AM UTC+10, Uwe Fechner wrote: > > Well, removing the link from the website does not help with the travis > failures: > https://travis-ci.org/mlubin/NaNMath.jl/jobs/76114115 > > Regards: Uwe > > Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015 18:46:31 UTC+2 schrieb Viral Shah: >> >> Elliot has been busy lately, and this has not been maintained for a >> long time. We should probably remove that link from our website. >> >> -viral >> >> On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 9:52:17 PM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> the nightly Julia builds from: >>> https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/julianightlies >>> >>> are currently quiet outdated. >>> >>> As far as I understand they should be auto-generated every night >>> from the head >>> branch of the Julia repository. >>> >>> This seams to be currently broken. >>> >>> Any idea, why? >>> >>> The outdated version is causing problems with failing checks of >>> Travis. >>> >>> Best regards: >>> >>> Uwe >>> >> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -viral >>> >> >
Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia nightlies
Hey Uwe, thanks for raising this to our attention. We definitely do suggest using the generic linux binaries for Travis stuff as they're easier for us to control, but I wanted to let you know that the issues with the PPA have been fixed, and you should be good to go now with regards to getting the latest version from the PPA. -E On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Tony Kelman wrote: > Yes, those get updated very frequently, see status.julialang.org for > exactly how recent they are at any time. Those only get out of date if > there's an issue on the buildbots, which happens occasionally but usually > doesn't take long to fix. > > > On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 1:50:14 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: >> >> The generic linux binaries - I haven't checked those for a while, but it >> is worth checking if those are current. >> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Yakir Gagnon <12.y...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> OK, I'm gonna git pull & make then. That's the only way, right? >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:54:05 AM UTC+10, Uwe Fechner wrote: Well, removing the link from the website does not help with the travis failures: https://travis-ci.org/mlubin/NaNMath.jl/jobs/76114115 Regards: Uwe Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015 18:46:31 UTC+2 schrieb Viral Shah: > > Elliot has been busy lately, and this has not been maintained for a > long time. We should probably remove that link from our website. > > -viral > > On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 9:52:17 PM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> the nightly Julia builds from: >> https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/julianightlies >> >> are currently quiet outdated. >> >> As far as I understand they should be auto-generated every night from >> the head >> branch of the Julia repository. >> >> This seams to be currently broken. >> >> Any idea, why? >> >> The outdated version is causing problems with failing checks of >> Travis. >> >> Best regards: >> >> Uwe >> > >> >> >> -- >> -viral >> >
Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia nightlies
Yes, those get updated very frequently, see status.julialang.org for exactly how recent they are at any time. Those only get out of date if there's an issue on the buildbots, which happens occasionally but usually doesn't take long to fix. On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 1:50:14 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > > The generic linux binaries - I haven't checked those for a while, but it > is worth checking if those are current. > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Yakir Gagnon <12.y...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> OK, I'm gonna git pull & make then. That's the only way, right? >> >> >> On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:54:05 AM UTC+10, Uwe Fechner wrote: >>> >>> Well, removing the link from the website does not help with the travis >>> failures: >>> https://travis-ci.org/mlubin/NaNMath.jl/jobs/76114115 >>> >>> Regards: Uwe >>> >>> Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015 18:46:31 UTC+2 schrieb Viral Shah: Elliot has been busy lately, and this has not been maintained for a long time. We should probably remove that link from our website. -viral On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 9:52:17 PM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote: > > Hello, > > the nightly Julia builds from: > https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/julianightlies > > are currently quiet outdated. > > As far as I understand they should be auto-generated every night from > the head > branch of the Julia repository. > > This seams to be currently broken. > > Any idea, why? > > The outdated version is causing problems with failing checks of Travis. > > Best regards: > > Uwe > > > > -- > -viral >
Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia nightlies
The generic linux binaries - I haven't checked those for a while, but it is worth checking if those are current. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Yakir Gagnon <12.ya...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, I'm gonna git pull & make then. That's the only way, right? > > > On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:54:05 AM UTC+10, Uwe Fechner wrote: >> >> Well, removing the link from the website does not help with the travis >> failures: >> https://travis-ci.org/mlubin/NaNMath.jl/jobs/76114115 >> >> Regards: Uwe >> >> Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015 18:46:31 UTC+2 schrieb Viral Shah: >>> >>> Elliot has been busy lately, and this has not been maintained for a long >>> time. We should probably remove that link from our website. >>> >>> -viral >>> >>> On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 9:52:17 PM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote: Hello, the nightly Julia builds from: https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/julianightlies are currently quiet outdated. As far as I understand they should be auto-generated every night from the head branch of the Julia repository. This seams to be currently broken. Any idea, why? The outdated version is causing problems with failing checks of Travis. Best regards: Uwe >>> -- -viral
[julia-users] Re: Julia nightlies
Ok, our current .travis.yml file looks like this: language: cpp compiler: - clang notifications: email: false env: matrix: - JULIAVERSION="juliareleases" - JULIAVERSION="julianightlies" before_install: - sudo add-apt-repository ppa:staticfloat/julia-deps -y - sudo add-apt-repository ppa:staticfloat/${JULIAVERSION} -y - sudo apt-get update -qq -y - sudo apt-get install libpcre3-dev julia -y - if [[ -a .git/shallow ]]; then git fetch --unshallow; fi script: - julia -e 'Pkg.init(); Pkg.clone(pwd()); Pkg.test("NaNMath")' How should I change it? Uwe Am Mittwoch, 19. August 2015 08:54:36 UTC+2 schrieb Tony Kelman: > > The generic Linux binaries from > https://status.julialang.org/download/linux-x86_64 are usually kept a > little more up to date, the buildbots repsonsible for those aren't quite as > picky as the Launchpad setup on Ubuntu's servers. > > Travis can be fixed by switching to the more recent "language: julia" > template, which uses the generic Linux binaries rather than the Ubuntu PPA. > > > On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 7:39:56 PM UTC-7, Yakir Gagnon wrote: >> >> OK, I'm gonna git pull & make then. That's the only way, right? >> >> On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:54:05 AM UTC+10, Uwe Fechner wrote: >>> >>> Well, removing the link from the website does not help with the travis >>> failures: >>> https://travis-ci.org/mlubin/NaNMath.jl/jobs/76114115 >>> >>> Regards: Uwe >>> >>> Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015 18:46:31 UTC+2 schrieb Viral Shah: Elliot has been busy lately, and this has not been maintained for a long time. We should probably remove that link from our website. -viral On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 9:52:17 PM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote: > > Hello, > > the nightly Julia builds from: > https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/julianightlies > > are currently quiet outdated. > > As far as I understand they should be auto-generated every night from > the head > branch of the Julia repository. > > This seams to be currently broken. > > Any idea, why? > > The outdated version is causing problems with failing checks of Travis. > > Best regards: > > Uwe >
[julia-users] Re: Julia nightlies
The generic Linux binaries from https://status.julialang.org/download/linux-x86_64 are usually kept a little more up to date, the buildbots repsonsible for those aren't quite as picky as the Launchpad setup on Ubuntu's servers. Travis can be fixed by switching to the more recent "language: julia" template, which uses the generic Linux binaries rather than the Ubuntu PPA. On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 7:39:56 PM UTC-7, Yakir Gagnon wrote: > > OK, I'm gonna git pull & make then. That's the only way, right? > > On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:54:05 AM UTC+10, Uwe Fechner wrote: >> >> Well, removing the link from the website does not help with the travis >> failures: >> https://travis-ci.org/mlubin/NaNMath.jl/jobs/76114115 >> >> Regards: Uwe >> >> Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015 18:46:31 UTC+2 schrieb Viral Shah: >>> >>> Elliot has been busy lately, and this has not been maintained for a long >>> time. We should probably remove that link from our website. >>> >>> -viral >>> >>> On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 9:52:17 PM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote: Hello, the nightly Julia builds from: https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/julianightlies are currently quiet outdated. As far as I understand they should be auto-generated every night from the head branch of the Julia repository. This seams to be currently broken. Any idea, why? The outdated version is causing problems with failing checks of Travis. Best regards: Uwe >>>
[julia-users] Re: Julia nightlies
OK, I'm gonna git pull & make then. That's the only way, right? On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:54:05 AM UTC+10, Uwe Fechner wrote: > > Well, removing the link from the website does not help with the travis > failures: > https://travis-ci.org/mlubin/NaNMath.jl/jobs/76114115 > > Regards: Uwe > > Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015 18:46:31 UTC+2 schrieb Viral Shah: >> >> Elliot has been busy lately, and this has not been maintained for a long >> time. We should probably remove that link from our website. >> >> -viral >> >> On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 9:52:17 PM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> the nightly Julia builds from: >>> https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/julianightlies >>> >>> are currently quiet outdated. >>> >>> As far as I understand they should be auto-generated every night from >>> the head >>> branch of the Julia repository. >>> >>> This seams to be currently broken. >>> >>> Any idea, why? >>> >>> The outdated version is causing problems with failing checks of Travis. >>> >>> Best regards: >>> >>> Uwe >>> >>
[julia-users] Re: Julia nightlies
Well, removing the link from the website does not help with the travis failures: https://travis-ci.org/mlubin/NaNMath.jl/jobs/76114115 Regards: Uwe Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015 18:46:31 UTC+2 schrieb Viral Shah: > > Elliot has been busy lately, and this has not been maintained for a long > time. We should probably remove that link from our website. > > -viral > > On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 9:52:17 PM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> the nightly Julia builds from: >> https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/julianightlies >> >> are currently quiet outdated. >> >> As far as I understand they should be auto-generated every night from the >> head >> branch of the Julia repository. >> >> This seams to be currently broken. >> >> Any idea, why? >> >> The outdated version is causing problems with failing checks of Travis. >> >> Best regards: >> >> Uwe >> >
[julia-users] Re: Julia nightlies
Elliot has been busy lately, and this has not been maintained for a long time. We should probably remove that link from our website. -viral On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 9:52:17 PM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote: > > Hello, > > the nightly Julia builds from: > https://launchpad.net/~staticfloat/+archive/ubuntu/julianightlies > > are currently quiet outdated. > > As far as I understand they should be auto-generated every night from the > head > branch of the Julia repository. > > This seams to be currently broken. > > Any idea, why? > > The outdated version is causing problems with failing checks of Travis. > > Best regards: > > Uwe >