Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
The use of the ra_svn module rather than the ra_serf one seems to be a rather good approach. The migration process worked well during the last 2 and a half hours. It already took into account all the branches, and partially the trunk and the tags from 1.2preC to 1.7.0. I'll let you know about it tomorrow morning as it is probably going to take another 2 or 3 hours (at least). Based on that, a full local migration of the core (starting with revision 1) would probably take around 5 or 6 hours, plus the time to push all of this into the newly created GitHub repository. Eric On 14/08/2020 21:07, Eric wrote: See my inline answers below. On 14/08/2020 20:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: some more questions 1. did it ever run through completely? During my first tests, I used a starting revision number closer to 6242 to test the process and to save some time (as I knew it would take ages to go through a complete check out). It worked well. But apparently not with the full history. 2. why start at revision 859? Because it is apparently the first revision of the core, according to the logs. I just checked again, using the same command line, i.e.: svn log --stop-on-copy https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/core/ It is 858 and not 859. I don't know why I get this wrong. It's obviously the number 1 if you consider the entire project: svn log --stop-on-copy https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/ 3. did you try https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git#debugging ? Not yet as it is already quite a verbose mode by default. it'd probably more stable if you could work with a full local checkout.. ede I just realised that svn is based on several modules depending on the access protocol: - ra_svn : Module for accessing a repository using the svn network protocol. - ra_serf : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol using serf. I'm trying to see if a switch to ra_svn could improve the situation. The answer will come in at least an hour (as a complete checkout and a migration take time). If not, I will use the third repository access module, the local one: - ra_local : Module for accessing a repository on local disk. One step at a time, starting with the easier one (or maybe not). Eric On 14.08.2020 21:26, Eric wrote: The command is to migrate the complete project, including its history, from svn to git: svn2git https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/core --exclude docs --revision 859:6242 --authors ../authors.txt I first tried without excluding the docs folder. The revision parameters match the first and the 1.15 revisions. So yes, it's a complete checkout of the core (except the 1.15+ commits), including trunk, tags and branches, and their reconstruction and migration to a local git project. Eric On 14/08/2020 20:02, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: probably just sf.net's svn acting up. it sometimes throws weird errors that resolve itself after a time. i guess they get fixed on their servers. who knows. anyway. what is it you are doing when it errs out? a complete checkout? what commands are you running? can you give some context? ..ede On 14.08.2020 20:48, Eric wrote: Hi, I'm encountering a problem during the local migration (ra_serf: The server sent a truncated HTTP response body) when I try to do it from revision 859 to revision 6242. I tried to exclude the 'docs' folder to reduce the size of it, without much success (still the same error after an hour or two during the migration process). Could one of you try these two commands (as indicated here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27267742/why-do-i-get-svn-e120106-ra-serf-the-server-sent-a-truncated-http-response-b) svn cleanup svn up Thanks in advance. Eric On 14/08/2020 11:12, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: openjump-gis ok for me too 2020-08-14 12:03 GMT+02:00, edgar.sol...@web.de : oj-devs oj-developers oj-team or jump instead of oj so many possibilieits ..ede:)) On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: jump-pilot or openjump-pilot or openjump2 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric : Hi, The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not possible at the moment: While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for more information about potentially filing a violation report:
Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
See my inline answers below. On 14/08/2020 20:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: some more questions 1. did it ever run through completely? During my first tests, I used a starting revision number closer to 6242 to test the process and to save some time (as I knew it would take ages to go through a complete check out). It worked well. But apparently not with the full history. 2. why start at revision 859? Because it is apparently the first revision of the core, according to the logs. I just checked again, using the same command line, i.e.: svn log --stop-on-copy https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/core/ It is 858 and not 859. I don't know why I get this wrong. It's obviously the number 1 if you consider the entire project: svn log --stop-on-copy https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/ 3. did you try https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git#debugging ? Not yet as it is already quite a verbose mode by default. it'd probably more stable if you could work with a full local checkout.. ede I just realised that svn is based on several modules depending on the access protocol: - ra_svn : Module for accessing a repository using the svn network protocol. - ra_serf : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol using serf. I'm trying to see if a switch to ra_svn could improve the situation. The answer will come in at least an hour (as a complete checkout and a migration take time). If not, I will use the third repository access module, the local one: - ra_local : Module for accessing a repository on local disk. One step at a time, starting with the easier one (or maybe not). Eric On 14.08.2020 21:26, Eric wrote: The command is to migrate the complete project, including its history, from svn to git: svn2git https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/core --exclude docs --revision 859:6242 --authors ../authors.txt I first tried without excluding the docs folder. The revision parameters match the first and the 1.15 revisions. So yes, it's a complete checkout of the core (except the 1.15+ commits), including trunk, tags and branches, and their reconstruction and migration to a local git project. Eric On 14/08/2020 20:02, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: probably just sf.net's svn acting up. it sometimes throws weird errors that resolve itself after a time. i guess they get fixed on their servers. who knows. anyway. what is it you are doing when it errs out? a complete checkout? what commands are you running? can you give some context? ..ede On 14.08.2020 20:48, Eric wrote: Hi, I'm encountering a problem during the local migration (ra_serf: The server sent a truncated HTTP response body) when I try to do it from revision 859 to revision 6242. I tried to exclude the 'docs' folder to reduce the size of it, without much success (still the same error after an hour or two during the migration process). Could one of you try these two commands (as indicated here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27267742/why-do-i-get-svn-e120106-ra-serf-the-server-sent-a-truncated-http-response-b) svn cleanup svn up Thanks in advance. Eric On 14/08/2020 11:12, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: openjump-gis ok for me too 2020-08-14 12:03 GMT+02:00, edgar.sol...@web.de : oj-devs oj-developers oj-team or jump instead of oj so many possibilieits ..ede:)) On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: jump-pilot or openjump-pilot or openjump2 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric : Hi, The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not possible at the moment: While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for more information about potentially filing a violation report: https://docs.github.com/github/site-policy/github-trademark-policy I just created an organisation named 'openjump-gis' for the time being (hyphens are allowed), according to the title of the openjump.org index page and as it gives an idea of what the project is about. The following options are also available at the moment: - open-jump, - openjumpgis - openjump-project / openjumpproject - oj-gis / ojgis - jump-pilot / jumppilot - openjump-pilot / openjumppilot - geopenjump Note that openjump is available on GitLab for the moment, if you wish to create a mirror repository there. It's always possible to rename an organisation later on (see
Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
some more questions 1. did it ever run through completely? 2. why start at revision 859? 3. did you try https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git#debugging ? it'd probably more stable if you could work with a full local checkout.. ede On 14.08.2020 21:26, Eric wrote: > The command is to migrate the complete project, including its history, from > svn to git: > svn2git https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/core --exclude docs > --revision 859:6242 --authors ../authors.txt > > I first tried without excluding the docs folder. The revision parameters > match the first and the 1.15 revisions. > > So yes, it's a complete checkout of the core (except the 1.15+ commits), > including trunk, tags and branches, and their reconstruction and migration to > a local git project. > > Eric > > On 14/08/2020 20:02, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> probably just sf.net's svn acting up. it sometimes throws weird errors that >> resolve itself after a time. i guess they get fixed on their servers. who >> knows. >> >> anyway. what is it you are doing when it errs out? a complete checkout? what >> commands are you running? can you give some context? >> >> ..ede >> >> On 14.08.2020 20:48, Eric wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm encountering a problem during the local migration (ra_serf: The server >>> sent a truncated HTTP response body) when I try to do it from revision 859 >>> to revision 6242. >>> >>> I tried to exclude the 'docs' folder to reduce the size of it, without much >>> success (still the same error after an hour or two during the migration >>> process). >>> >>> Could one of you try these two commands (as indicated here: >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27267742/why-do-i-get-svn-e120106-ra-serf-the-server-sent-a-truncated-http-response-b) >>> svn cleanup >>> svn up >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> Eric >>> >>> On 14/08/2020 11:12, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: openjump-gis ok for me too 2020-08-14 12:03 GMT+02:00, edgar.sol...@web.de : > oj-devs > oj-developers > oj-team > or jump instead of oj > > so many possibilieits ..ede:)) > > On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: >> jump-pilot >> or >> openjump-pilot >> or >> openjump2 >> >> 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric : >>> Hi, >>> >>> The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the >>> ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not >>> possible at the moment: >>> While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for more information about potentially filing a violation report: https://docs.github.com/github/site-policy/github-trademark-policy >>> I just created an organisation named 'openjump-gis' for the time being >>> (hyphens are allowed), according to the title of the openjump.org index >>> page and as it gives an idea of what the project is about. The following >>> options are also available at the moment: >>> - open-jump, >>> - openjumpgis >>> - openjump-project / openjumpproject >>> - oj-gis / ojgis >>> - jump-pilot / jumppilot >>> - openjump-pilot / openjumppilot >>> - geopenjump >>> >>> Note that openjump is available on GitLab for the moment, if you wish to >>> create a mirror repository there. >>> >>> It's always possible to rename an organisation later on (see >>> https://docs.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/renaming-an-organization). >>> This process automatically updates everything from link redirection to >>> commit attribution. >>> >>> I already added Ede (edeso) and Michaël (mukoki) as owners of this >>> organisation. >>> >>> I also just created an 'openjump-migration' repository as previously >>> discussed and I am now tuning the settings of both the organisation and >>> the repository. >>> >>> Feel free to modify the content / info / settings about these. >>> >>> I should be able to push a first working version for next Monday, maybe >>> before but as schools reopened on Wednesday here in Scotland (children >>> don't attend it on a daily basis during this first week), I can't >>> promise anything. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> On 12/08/2020 13:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: no
Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
The command is to migrate the complete project, including its history, from svn to git: svn2git https://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/core --exclude docs --revision 859:6242 --authors ../authors.txt I first tried without excluding the docs folder. The revision parameters match the first and the 1.15 revisions. So yes, it's a complete checkout of the core (except the 1.15+ commits), including trunk, tags and branches, and their reconstruction and migration to a local git project. Eric On 14/08/2020 20:02, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: probably just sf.net's svn acting up. it sometimes throws weird errors that resolve itself after a time. i guess they get fixed on their servers. who knows. anyway. what is it you are doing when it errs out? a complete checkout? what commands are you running? can you give some context? ..ede On 14.08.2020 20:48, Eric wrote: Hi, I'm encountering a problem during the local migration (ra_serf: The server sent a truncated HTTP response body) when I try to do it from revision 859 to revision 6242. I tried to exclude the 'docs' folder to reduce the size of it, without much success (still the same error after an hour or two during the migration process). Could one of you try these two commands (as indicated here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27267742/why-do-i-get-svn-e120106-ra-serf-the-server-sent-a-truncated-http-response-b) svn cleanup svn up Thanks in advance. Eric On 14/08/2020 11:12, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: openjump-gis ok for me too 2020-08-14 12:03 GMT+02:00, edgar.sol...@web.de : oj-devs oj-developers oj-team or jump instead of oj so many possibilieits ..ede:)) On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: jump-pilot or openjump-pilot or openjump2 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric : Hi, The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not possible at the moment: While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for more information about potentially filing a violation report: https://docs.github.com/github/site-policy/github-trademark-policy I just created an organisation named 'openjump-gis' for the time being (hyphens are allowed), according to the title of the openjump.org index page and as it gives an idea of what the project is about. The following options are also available at the moment: - open-jump, - openjumpgis - openjump-project / openjumpproject - oj-gis / ojgis - jump-pilot / jumppilot - openjump-pilot / openjumppilot - geopenjump Note that openjump is available on GitLab for the moment, if you wish to create a mirror repository there. It's always possible to rename an organisation later on (see https://docs.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/renaming-an-organization). This process automatically updates everything from link redirection to commit attribution. I already added Ede (edeso) and Michaël (mukoki) as owners of this organisation. I also just created an 'openjump-migration' repository as previously discussed and I am now tuning the settings of both the organisation and the repository. Feel free to modify the content / info / settings about these. I should be able to push a first working version for next Monday, maybe before but as schools reopened on Wednesday here in Scotland (children don't attend it on a daily basis during this first week), I can't promise anything. Eric On 12/08/2020 13:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: no worries. i'm pretty sure we are not fixed on that name. for years we have been known as /jump-pilot/ (anybody know why?) and it worked as well. how about you work with a private repo in the mean time and we'll deal with name and organisation when we are ready to branch which is not going to be tomorrow ;) ..ede On 12.08.2020 13:19, Eric wrote: Hi all, Thanks to all of you. According to your answers, I'm in the process of creating a GitHub organisation named 'openjump', containing a public repository named 'openjump-migration'. The current problem is that someone created an account or an organisation with this name last April (https://github.com/openjump), but with no activity since then. I just contacted the GitHub support team to see if it was possible to have a transfer of ownership for this name -- so, of course, with the agreement of the current owner), as it isn't allowed to directly contact the owner for obvious
Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
probably just sf.net's svn acting up. it sometimes throws weird errors that resolve itself after a time. i guess they get fixed on their servers. who knows. anyway. what is it you are doing when it errs out? a complete checkout? what commands are you running? can you give some context? ..ede On 14.08.2020 20:48, Eric wrote: > Hi, > > I'm encountering a problem during the local migration (ra_serf: The server > sent a truncated HTTP response body) when I try to do it from revision 859 to > revision 6242. > > I tried to exclude the 'docs' folder to reduce the size of it, without much > success (still the same error after an hour or two during the migration > process). > > Could one of you try these two commands (as indicated here: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27267742/why-do-i-get-svn-e120106-ra-serf-the-server-sent-a-truncated-http-response-b) > svn cleanup > svn up > > Thanks in advance. > Eric > > On 14/08/2020 11:12, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: >> openjump-gis ok for me too >> >> 2020-08-14 12:03 GMT+02:00, edgar.sol...@web.de : >>> oj-devs >>> oj-developers >>> oj-team >>> or jump instead of oj >>> >>> so many possibilieits ..ede:)) >>> >>> On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: jump-pilot or openjump-pilot or openjump2 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric : > Hi, > > The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the > ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not > possible at the moment: > >> While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that >> username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub >> is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy >> (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). >> Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. >> >> Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a >> trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's >> already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a >> trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for >> more information about potentially filing a violation report: >> >> https://docs.github.com/github/site-policy/github-trademark-policy > I just created an organisation named 'openjump-gis' for the time being > (hyphens are allowed), according to the title of the openjump.org index > page and as it gives an idea of what the project is about. The following > options are also available at the moment: > - open-jump, > - openjumpgis > - openjump-project / openjumpproject > - oj-gis / ojgis > - jump-pilot / jumppilot > - openjump-pilot / openjumppilot > - geopenjump > > Note that openjump is available on GitLab for the moment, if you wish to > create a mirror repository there. > > It's always possible to rename an organisation later on (see > https://docs.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/renaming-an-organization). > This process automatically updates everything from link redirection to > commit attribution. > > I already added Ede (edeso) and Michaël (mukoki) as owners of this > organisation. > > I also just created an 'openjump-migration' repository as previously > discussed and I am now tuning the settings of both the organisation and > the repository. > > Feel free to modify the content / info / settings about these. > > I should be able to push a first working version for next Monday, maybe > before but as schools reopened on Wednesday here in Scotland (children > don't attend it on a daily basis during this first week), I can't > promise anything. > > Eric > > On 12/08/2020 13:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> no worries. i'm pretty sure we are not fixed on that name. for years we >> have been known as /jump-pilot/ (anybody know why?) and it worked as >> well. >> how about you work with a private repo in the mean time and we'll deal >> with name and organisation when we are ready to branch which is not >> going >> to be tomorrow ;) >> >> ..ede >> >> On 12.08.2020 13:19, Eric wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Thanks to all of you. >>> >>> According to your answers, I'm in the process of creating a GitHub >>> organisation named 'openjump', containing a public repository named >>> 'openjump-migration'. The current problem is that someone created an >>> account or an organisation with this name last April >>> (https://github.com/openjump), but with no activity since then. I just >>> contacted the GitHub support team to see if it was possible to have a >>> transfer of ownership for this name -- so, of course, with the >>> agreement >>> of the current owner), as it isn't
Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
Hi, I'm encountering a problem during the local migration (ra_serf: The server sent a truncated HTTP response body) when I try to do it from revision 859 to revision 6242. I tried to exclude the 'docs' folder to reduce the size of it, without much success (still the same error after an hour or two during the migration process). Could one of you try these two commands (as indicated here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27267742/why-do-i-get-svn-e120106-ra-serf-the-server-sent-a-truncated-http-response-b) svn cleanup svn up Thanks in advance. Eric On 14/08/2020 11:12, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: openjump-gis ok for me too 2020-08-14 12:03 GMT+02:00, edgar.sol...@web.de : oj-devs oj-developers oj-team or jump instead of oj so many possibilieits ..ede:)) On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: jump-pilot or openjump-pilot or openjump2 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric : Hi, The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not possible at the moment: While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for more information about potentially filing a violation report: https://docs.github.com/github/site-policy/github-trademark-policy I just created an organisation named 'openjump-gis' for the time being (hyphens are allowed), according to the title of the openjump.org index page and as it gives an idea of what the project is about. The following options are also available at the moment: - open-jump, - openjumpgis - openjump-project / openjumpproject - oj-gis / ojgis - jump-pilot / jumppilot - openjump-pilot / openjumppilot - geopenjump Note that openjump is available on GitLab for the moment, if you wish to create a mirror repository there. It's always possible to rename an organisation later on (see https://docs.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/renaming-an-organization). This process automatically updates everything from link redirection to commit attribution. I already added Ede (edeso) and Michaël (mukoki) as owners of this organisation. I also just created an 'openjump-migration' repository as previously discussed and I am now tuning the settings of both the organisation and the repository. Feel free to modify the content / info / settings about these. I should be able to push a first working version for next Monday, maybe before but as schools reopened on Wednesday here in Scotland (children don't attend it on a daily basis during this first week), I can't promise anything. Eric On 12/08/2020 13:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: no worries. i'm pretty sure we are not fixed on that name. for years we have been known as /jump-pilot/ (anybody know why?) and it worked as well. how about you work with a private repo in the mean time and we'll deal with name and organisation when we are ready to branch which is not going to be tomorrow ;) ..ede On 12.08.2020 13:19, Eric wrote: Hi all, Thanks to all of you. According to your answers, I'm in the process of creating a GitHub organisation named 'openjump', containing a public repository named 'openjump-migration'. The current problem is that someone created an account or an organisation with this name last April (https://github.com/openjump), but with no activity since then. I just contacted the GitHub support team to see if it was possible to have a transfer of ownership for this name -- so, of course, with the agreement of the current owner), as it isn't allowed to directly contact the owner for obvious reasons. Apart from that, everything is ready. Eric On 12/08/2020 10:06, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: yup indenting is clearly broken in this reply, maybe better not reply inline with that client Mike ;).. ede On 12.08.2020 09:17, Michaud Michael wrote: Hi, >>> On 07.08.2020 20:55, Eric wrote: Then I checked which OJ lib dependencies rely on JTS and it seems that there is only deegree 2, without considering here the plethora of extensions/plugins. >>> which is the main obstacle. the only clean solution i see is to branch out a new OJ 2.x that initially will break compatibility to all external plugins. that's the bad news. >>> the good news is that this forces us to retouch pretty much all of them and during this effort we might eventually come up with a working plugin manager after all. >> Less than a day of work should be required (if
[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #496 OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing versions
The second test I made is much better. I used your files, but I deleted jmp files and restarted from scratch : - load tiff as raster, tiff as image, jml + style in 1.15, save as 1.15.jmp - load tiff as raster, tiff as image, jml + style in 6370, save as 6370.jmp Try to load 1.15.jmp from 6370 and the other way : OK I observed two problems though : 1/ when saving the jmp, tiff imported as image is considered as a layer without source and oj wants to save it as a jml/shp 2/ tiff imported as image have their absolute name in an attribute so that there is no way to read it correctly if the data is moved to another place. Maybe we should have an option to save paths as relative paths. But none of these problems seem related to your report. --- ** [bugs:#496] OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing versions** **Status:** open **Created:** Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:35 AM UTC by ede **Last Updated:** Fri Aug 14, 2020 12:29 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody as described by Peppe on the mailing list " *On loading project files saved with different versions of OpenJUMP*. There is a break after OpenJUMP 1.5 and before OpenJUMP 6363 on saving/loading project files. a) OpenJUMP 1.5 freezes on loading project files saved at least with OpenJUMP 6363 and 6370 The console (I use Linux) doesn't show any warning. b) OpenJUMP 6363 and 6370 cannot load project files saved at least with OpenJUMP 1.5 . The console doesn't show any warning. c) OpenJUMP 6363 can load project files saved with OpenJUMP 6370 and vice versa " --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #496 OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing versions
Hi Michael, can you send me the files you used as first test? I will try on my side --- ** [bugs:#496] OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing versions** **Status:** open **Created:** Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:35 AM UTC by ede **Last Updated:** Fri Aug 14, 2020 12:19 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody as described by Peppe on the mailing list " *On loading project files saved with different versions of OpenJUMP*. There is a break after OpenJUMP 1.5 and before OpenJUMP 6363 on saving/loading project files. a) OpenJUMP 1.5 freezes on loading project files saved at least with OpenJUMP 6363 and 6370 The console (I use Linux) doesn't show any warning. b) OpenJUMP 6363 and 6370 cannot load project files saved at least with OpenJUMP 1.5 . The console doesn't show any warning. c) OpenJUMP 6363 can load project files saved with OpenJUMP 6370 and vice versa " --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #496 OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing versions
If the problem is between 1.15 and r6370 (title is about 1.15 while report is about 1.5 which seems very old!), I can still not reproduce it. I now tried between 1.15 (r6241), r6335 and r6370, with windows and with linux (windows + wsl/ubuntu). Comparing jmp files, I noticed a small difference between the first jmp file produced after importing data, and jmp file produced after a load from an existing project. But none of these difference prevent another version from opening the project correctly. These differences seem more between reading and writing a jmp file. Just report it to remember : vector layer : identical referenced image layer : first : the ColorThemingStyle includes a DefaultStyle wrapping a vertex style second : the ColorThemingStyle includes a DefaultStyle with no vertex style raster layer : first : a tag null second : the same tag as first : file path is in tag and again in the with the key file-name second : tag is the same, but metadata has no key "file-name" --- ** [bugs:#496] OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing versions** **Status:** open **Created:** Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:35 AM UTC by ede **Last Updated:** Thu Aug 13, 2020 07:13 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody as described by Peppe on the mailing list " *On loading project files saved with different versions of OpenJUMP*. There is a break after OpenJUMP 1.5 and before OpenJUMP 6363 on saving/loading project files. a) OpenJUMP 1.5 freezes on loading project files saved at least with OpenJUMP 6363 and 6370 The console (I use Linux) doesn't show any warning. b) OpenJUMP 6363 and 6370 cannot load project files saved at least with OpenJUMP 1.5 . The console doesn't show any warning. c) OpenJUMP 6363 can load project files saved with OpenJUMP 6370 and vice versa " --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
Re: [JPP-Devel] [GitHub] @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organization
Good start, thank you, Eric,Michaëlenvoyé : 14 août 2020 à 12:18de : Eric à : jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.netobjet : Re: [JPP-Devel] [GitHub] @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organizationAs I previously wrote, I just created it for the time being based on the openjump.org website title (I have personally no preference). It was just to start working on it and it can be changed at any time.Ede, as owner of this organisation, you can do it. Feel absolutely free to do so.EricOn 14/08/2020 11:10, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:well thenhttps://github.com/openjump-gisit is. i can live with that.. edeOn 14.08.2020 11:27, GitHub wrote:>> Hi edeso, @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organization on GitHub. Head over to https://github.com/openjump-gis to check out @openjump-gis’s profile. To join @openjump-gis, follow this link: https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/invitation?via_email=1 This invitation will expire in 7 days. Some helpful tips: - If you get a 404 page, make sure you’re signed in as edeso. - You can also accept the invitation by visiting the organization page directly at https://github.com/openjump-gis If you were not expecting this invitation, you can ignore this email. If @ericgrosso is sending you too many emails, you can block them by visiting https://github.com/settings/blocked_users?block_user=ericgrosso or report them for abuse at https://github.com/contact/report-abuse?report=ericgrosso. Thanks, The GitHub Team To opt out of future invitations from @openjump-gis, follow this link: https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/opt-out___Jump-pilot-devel mailing listJump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel___Jump-pilot-devel mailing listJump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
Re: [JPP-Devel] You've been made an owner of the OpeenJUMP organization
No risk to be dehydrated in Scotland (at least for the time being). 16°C right now with an anticipated peak at 18°C at 5-6pm. Same kind of temperatures until the end of this month. Eric On 14/08/2020 11:50, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: just added minor clarification to the repo title. apart from that go ahead :) and don't forget to drink plenty if you are on this planets summer side ;) On 14.08.2020 12:44, Eric wrote: I saw that too. It has already been corrected. Logo and URL added as well. And I don't know why you didn't have been granted the owner role straight away as I invited you as owner and not member. That's why I had to change your role to correct it. Please let me know if you see anything else, or feel free to change it yourself. E On 14/08/2020 11:39, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: Eric, any idea where the 'OpeenJUMP' note the double e stems from? ..ede On 14.08.2020 12:29, OpeenJUMP wrote: You have been granted admin access to OpeenJUMP. Admins have full rights to the organization and have complete access to all repositories and teams. View all OpeenJUMP admins: https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/people?query=role%3Aowner Read more about organization permissions at: https://docs.github.com/articles/what-are-the-different-access-permissions/#organization-accounts ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
Re: [JPP-Devel] You've been made an owner of the OpeenJUMP organization
just added minor clarification to the repo title. apart from that go ahead :) and don't forget to drink plenty if you are on this planets summer side ;) On 14.08.2020 12:44, Eric wrote: > I saw that too. It has already been corrected. Logo and URL added as well. > > And I don't know why you didn't have been granted the owner role straight > away as I invited you as owner and not member. That's why I had to change > your role to correct it. > > Please let me know if you see anything else, or feel free to change it > yourself. > E > > On 14/08/2020 11:39, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> Eric, any idea where the 'OpeenJUMP' note the double e stems from? ..ede >> >> On 14.08.2020 12:29, OpeenJUMP wrote: >>> You have been granted admin access to OpeenJUMP. Admins have full rights to >>> the organization and have complete access to all repositories and teams. >>> >>> View all OpeenJUMP admins: >>> https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/people?query=role%3Aowner >>> >>> Read more about organization permissions at: >>> https://docs.github.com/articles/what-are-the-different-access-permissions/#organization-accounts >>> >> >> >> ___ >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > > > ___ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
Re: [JPP-Devel] You've been made an owner of the OpeenJUMP organization
I saw that too. It has already been corrected. Logo and URL added as well. And I don't know why you didn't have been granted the owner role straight away as I invited you as owner and not member. That's why I had to change your role to correct it. Please let me know if you see anything else, or feel free to change it yourself. E On 14/08/2020 11:39, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: Eric, any idea where the 'OpeenJUMP' note the double e stems from? ..ede On 14.08.2020 12:29, OpeenJUMP wrote: You have been granted admin access to OpeenJUMP. Admins have full rights to the organization and have complete access to all repositories and teams. View all OpeenJUMP admins: https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/people?query=role%3Aowner Read more about organization permissions at: https://docs.github.com/articles/what-are-the-different-access-permissions/#organization-accounts ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
Re: [JPP-Devel] You've been made an owner of the OpeenJUMP organization
Eric, any idea where the 'OpeenJUMP' note the double e stems from? ..ede On 14.08.2020 12:29, OpeenJUMP wrote: > You have been granted admin access to OpeenJUMP. Admins have full rights to > the organization and have complete access to all repositories and teams. > > View all OpeenJUMP admins: > https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/people?query=role%3Aowner > > Read more about organization permissions at: > https://docs.github.com/articles/what-are-the-different-access-permissions/#organization-accounts > ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
[JPP-Devel] Thanks for the JTS and GitHub work
Hi Eric and others, Thank you very much for the work that you have done with preparing the migration into new JTS version. That will help to keep the project alive and I suppose that move to GitHub supports that as well. -Jukka Rahkonen- github: jratike80 ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
Re: [JPP-Devel] [GitHub] @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organization
Eric, thanks. as stated, for the time being it's as good as any other name. if someone objects that might change but my bet is you just settled it on the first try :) ..ede On 14.08.2020 12:18, Eric wrote: > As I previously wrote, I just created it for the time being based on the > openjump.org website title (I have personally no preference). It was just to > start working on it and it can be changed at any time. > > Ede, as owner of this organisation, you can do it. Feel absolutely free to do > so. > > Eric > > On 14/08/2020 11:10, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> well then >> https://github.com/openjump-gis >> >> it is. i can live with that.. ede >> >> >> On 14.08.2020 11:27, GitHub wrote: >>> Hi edeso, >>> >>> >>> >>> @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organization on >>> GitHub. Head over to https://github.com/openjump-gis to check out >>> @openjump-gis’s profile. >>> >>> >>> >>> To join @openjump-gis, follow this link: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/invitation?via_email=1 >>> >>> >>> >>> This invitation will expire in 7 days. >>> >>> >>> >>> Some helpful tips: >>> >>> >>> >>> - If you get a 404 page, make sure you’re signed in as edeso. >>> >>> - You can also accept the invitation by visiting the organization page >>> directly at https://github.com/openjump-gis >>> >>> >>> >>> If you were not expecting this invitation, you can ignore this email. >>> >>> If @ericgrosso is sending you too many emails, you can block them by >>> visiting https://github.com/settings/blocked_users?block_user=ericgrosso or >>> report them for abuse at >>> https://github.com/contact/report-abuse?report=ericgrosso. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> The GitHub Team >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> To opt out of future invitations from @openjump-gis, follow this link: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/opt-out >>> >>> >> >> >> ___ >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > > > ___ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
Re: [JPP-Devel] [GitHub] @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organization
As I previously wrote, I just created it for the time being based on the openjump.org website title (I have personally no preference). It was just to start working on it and it can be changed at any time. Ede, as owner of this organisation, you can do it. Feel absolutely free to do so. Eric On 14/08/2020 11:10, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: well then https://github.com/openjump-gis it is. i can live with that.. ede On 14.08.2020 11:27, GitHub wrote: Hi edeso, @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organization on GitHub. Head over to https://github.com/openjump-gis to check out @openjump-gis’s profile. To join @openjump-gis, follow this link: https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/invitation?via_email=1 This invitation will expire in 7 days. Some helpful tips: - If you get a 404 page, make sure you’re signed in as edeso. - You can also accept the invitation by visiting the organization page directly at https://github.com/openjump-gis If you were not expecting this invitation, you can ignore this email. If @ericgrosso is sending you too many emails, you can block them by visiting https://github.com/settings/blocked_users?block_user=ericgrosso or report them for abuse at https://github.com/contact/report-abuse?report=ericgrosso. Thanks, The GitHub Team To opt out of future invitations from @openjump-gis, follow this link: https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/opt-out ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
openjump-gis ok for me too 2020-08-14 12:03 GMT+02:00, edgar.sol...@web.de : > oj-devs > oj-developers > oj-team > or jump instead of oj > > so many possibilieits ..ede:)) > > On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: >> jump-pilot >> or >> openjump-pilot >> or >> openjump2 >> >> 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric : >>> Hi, >>> >>> The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the >>> ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not >>> possible at the moment: >>> While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for more information about potentially filing a violation report: https://docs.github.com/github/site-policy/github-trademark-policy >>> >>> I just created an organisation named 'openjump-gis' for the time being >>> (hyphens are allowed), according to the title of the openjump.org index >>> page and as it gives an idea of what the project is about. The following >>> options are also available at the moment: >>> - open-jump, >>> - openjumpgis >>> - openjump-project / openjumpproject >>> - oj-gis / ojgis >>> - jump-pilot / jumppilot >>> - openjump-pilot / openjumppilot >>> - geopenjump >>> >>> Note that openjump is available on GitLab for the moment, if you wish to >>> create a mirror repository there. >>> >>> It's always possible to rename an organisation later on (see >>> https://docs.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/renaming-an-organization). >>> This process automatically updates everything from link redirection to >>> commit attribution. >>> >>> I already added Ede (edeso) and Michaël (mukoki) as owners of this >>> organisation. >>> >>> I also just created an 'openjump-migration' repository as previously >>> discussed and I am now tuning the settings of both the organisation and >>> the repository. >>> >>> Feel free to modify the content / info / settings about these. >>> >>> I should be able to push a first working version for next Monday, maybe >>> before but as schools reopened on Wednesday here in Scotland (children >>> don't attend it on a daily basis during this first week), I can't >>> promise anything. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> On 12/08/2020 13:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: no worries. i'm pretty sure we are not fixed on that name. for years we have been known as /jump-pilot/ (anybody know why?) and it worked as well. how about you work with a private repo in the mean time and we'll deal with name and organisation when we are ready to branch which is not going to be tomorrow ;) ..ede On 12.08.2020 13:19, Eric wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks to all of you. > > According to your answers, I'm in the process of creating a GitHub > organisation named 'openjump', containing a public repository named > 'openjump-migration'. The current problem is that someone created an > account or an organisation with this name last April > (https://github.com/openjump), but with no activity since then. I just > contacted the GitHub support team to see if it was possible to have a > transfer of ownership for this name -- so, of course, with the > agreement > of the current owner), as it isn't allowed to directly contact the > owner > for obvious reasons. > > Apart from that, everything is ready. > > Eric > > On 12/08/2020 10:06, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> yup indenting is clearly broken in this reply, maybe better not reply >> inline with that client Mike ;).. ede >> >> On 12.08.2020 09:17, Michaud Michael wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On 07.08.2020 20:55, Eric wrote: >>> Then I checked which OJ lib dependencies rely on JTS and it >>> seems that >>> there is only deegree 2, >>> without considering here the plethora of extensions/plugins. >>> >>> which is the main obstacle. the only clean solution i see is >>> to >>> branch out >>> a new OJ 2.x that initially will break compatibility to all external >>> plugins. >>> that's the bad news. >>> >>> the good news is that this forces us to retouch pretty much >>> all >>> of them and >>> during this effort we might eventually come up with a working plugin >>> manager >>> after all. >>> >> Less than a day of work should be required (if not
Re: [JPP-Devel] [GitHub] @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organization
well then https://github.com/openjump-gis it is. i can live with that.. ede On 14.08.2020 11:27, GitHub wrote: > Hi edeso, > > > > @ericgrosso has invited you to join the @openjump-gis organization on GitHub. > Head over to https://github.com/openjump-gis to check out @openjump-gis’s > profile. > > > > To join @openjump-gis, follow this link: > > > > https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/invitation?via_email=1 > > > > This invitation will expire in 7 days. > > > > Some helpful tips: > > > > - If you get a 404 page, make sure you’re signed in as edeso. > > - You can also accept the invitation by visiting the organization page > directly at https://github.com/openjump-gis > > > > If you were not expecting this invitation, you can ignore this email. > > If @ericgrosso is sending you too many emails, you can block them by > visiting https://github.com/settings/blocked_users?block_user=ericgrosso or > report them for abuse at > https://github.com/contact/report-abuse?report=ericgrosso. > > > > Thanks, > > The GitHub Team > > > > > > To opt out of future invitations from @openjump-gis, follow this link: > > > > https://github.com/orgs/openjump-gis/opt-out > > ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
oj-devs oj-developers oj-team or jump instead of oj so many possibilieits ..ede:)) On 14.08.2020 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > jump-pilot > or > openjump-pilot > or > openjump2 > > 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric : >> Hi, >> >> The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the >> ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not >> possible at the moment: >> >>> While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that >>> username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub >>> is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy >>> (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). >>> Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. >>> >>> Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a >>> trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's >>> already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a >>> trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for >>> more information about potentially filing a violation report: >>> >>> https://docs.github.com/github/site-policy/github-trademark-policy >> >> I just created an organisation named 'openjump-gis' for the time being >> (hyphens are allowed), according to the title of the openjump.org index >> page and as it gives an idea of what the project is about. The following >> options are also available at the moment: >> - open-jump, >> - openjumpgis >> - openjump-project / openjumpproject >> - oj-gis / ojgis >> - jump-pilot / jumppilot >> - openjump-pilot / openjumppilot >> - geopenjump >> >> Note that openjump is available on GitLab for the moment, if you wish to >> create a mirror repository there. >> >> It's always possible to rename an organisation later on (see >> https://docs.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/renaming-an-organization). >> This process automatically updates everything from link redirection to >> commit attribution. >> >> I already added Ede (edeso) and Michaël (mukoki) as owners of this >> organisation. >> >> I also just created an 'openjump-migration' repository as previously >> discussed and I am now tuning the settings of both the organisation and >> the repository. >> >> Feel free to modify the content / info / settings about these. >> >> I should be able to push a first working version for next Monday, maybe >> before but as schools reopened on Wednesday here in Scotland (children >> don't attend it on a daily basis during this first week), I can't >> promise anything. >> >> Eric >> >> On 12/08/2020 13:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >>> no worries. i'm pretty sure we are not fixed on that name. for years we >>> have been known as /jump-pilot/ (anybody know why?) and it worked as well. >>> how about you work with a private repo in the mean time and we'll deal >>> with name and organisation when we are ready to branch which is not going >>> to be tomorrow ;) >>> >>> ..ede >>> >>> On 12.08.2020 13:19, Eric wrote: Hi all, Thanks to all of you. According to your answers, I'm in the process of creating a GitHub organisation named 'openjump', containing a public repository named 'openjump-migration'. The current problem is that someone created an account or an organisation with this name last April (https://github.com/openjump), but with no activity since then. I just contacted the GitHub support team to see if it was possible to have a transfer of ownership for this name -- so, of course, with the agreement of the current owner), as it isn't allowed to directly contact the owner for obvious reasons. Apart from that, everything is ready. Eric On 12/08/2020 10:06, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > yup indenting is clearly broken in this reply, maybe better not reply > inline with that client Mike ;).. ede > > On 12.08.2020 09:17, Michaud Michael wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >>> On 07.08.2020 20:55, Eric wrote: >> Then I checked which OJ lib dependencies rely on JTS and it >> seems that >> there is only deegree 2, >> without considering here the plethora of extensions/plugins. >> >>> which is the main obstacle. the only clean solution i see is to >> branch out >> a new OJ 2.x that initially will break compatibility to all external >> plugins. >> that's the bad news. >> >>> the good news is that this forces us to retouch pretty much all >> of them and >> during this effort we might eventually come up with a working plugin >> manager >> after all. >> >> Less than a day of work should be required (if not less) to >> update all the >> plugins which do not rely on a dependency which relies itself on JTS. >> I'm going >> to test it, to see if it's the case. >> >> I tried with my plugins and I just needed a couple of seconds to
Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
jump-pilot or openjump-pilot or openjump2 2020-08-14 11:50 GMT+02:00, Eric : > Hi, > > The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the > ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not > possible at the moment: > >> While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that >> username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub >> is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy >> (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). >> Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. >> >> Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a >> trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's >> already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a >> trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for >> more information about potentially filing a violation report: >> >> https://docs.github.com/github/site-policy/github-trademark-policy > > I just created an organisation named 'openjump-gis' for the time being > (hyphens are allowed), according to the title of the openjump.org index > page and as it gives an idea of what the project is about. The following > options are also available at the moment: > - open-jump, > - openjumpgis > - openjump-project / openjumpproject > - oj-gis / ojgis > - jump-pilot / jumppilot > - openjump-pilot / openjumppilot > - geopenjump > > Note that openjump is available on GitLab for the moment, if you wish to > create a mirror repository there. > > It's always possible to rename an organisation later on (see > https://docs.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/renaming-an-organization). > This process automatically updates everything from link redirection to > commit attribution. > > I already added Ede (edeso) and Michaël (mukoki) as owners of this > organisation. > > I also just created an 'openjump-migration' repository as previously > discussed and I am now tuning the settings of both the organisation and > the repository. > > Feel free to modify the content / info / settings about these. > > I should be able to push a first working version for next Monday, maybe > before but as schools reopened on Wednesday here in Scotland (children > don't attend it on a daily basis during this first week), I can't > promise anything. > > Eric > > On 12/08/2020 13:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> no worries. i'm pretty sure we are not fixed on that name. for years we >> have been known as /jump-pilot/ (anybody know why?) and it worked as well. >> how about you work with a private repo in the mean time and we'll deal >> with name and organisation when we are ready to branch which is not going >> to be tomorrow ;) >> >> ..ede >> >> On 12.08.2020 13:19, Eric wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Thanks to all of you. >>> >>> According to your answers, I'm in the process of creating a GitHub >>> organisation named 'openjump', containing a public repository named >>> 'openjump-migration'. The current problem is that someone created an >>> account or an organisation with this name last April >>> (https://github.com/openjump), but with no activity since then. I just >>> contacted the GitHub support team to see if it was possible to have a >>> transfer of ownership for this name -- so, of course, with the agreement >>> of the current owner), as it isn't allowed to directly contact the owner >>> for obvious reasons. >>> >>> Apart from that, everything is ready. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> On 12/08/2020 10:06, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: yup indenting is clearly broken in this reply, maybe better not reply inline with that client Mike ;).. ede On 12.08.2020 09:17, Michaud Michael wrote: > Hi, > > >>> On 07.08.2020 20:55, Eric wrote: > Then I checked which OJ lib dependencies rely on JTS and it > seems that > there is only deegree 2, > without considering here the plethora of extensions/plugins. > >>> which is the main obstacle. the only clean solution i see is to > branch out > a new OJ 2.x that initially will break compatibility to all external > plugins. > that's the bad news. > >>> the good news is that this forces us to retouch pretty much all > of them and > during this effort we might eventually come up with a working plugin > manager > after all. > >> Less than a day of work should be required (if not less) to > update all the > plugins which do not rely on a dependency which relies itself on JTS. > I'm going > to test it, to see if it's the case. > >> I tried with my plugins and I just needed a couple of seconds to > do it. > > again. we don't have sources for all extensions in OJ Plus at hand or > setup to > build at all. the challenge won't be the modding but the finding and > setting up > plugin repos. > > I wasn't aware of
Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments
Hi, The GitHub support team answered me this morning, stating that the ownership transfer of the 'openjump' username or organisation is not possible at the moment: While I'd love to help, I'm afraid we won't be able to release that username for you today as it's not dormant (not all activity on GitHub is public) or available for release under our name-squatting policy (https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-username-policy). Sorry I don't have better news to share with you on this. Though it may not apply here, it's worth mentioning that we have a trademark policy that could allow you to obtain a username that's already been claimed. If the username you're interested in is a trademark you hold, I'd recommend taking a look at that policy for more information about potentially filing a violation report: https://docs.github.com/github/site-policy/github-trademark-policy I just created an organisation named 'openjump-gis' for the time being (hyphens are allowed), according to the title of the openjump.org index page and as it gives an idea of what the project is about. The following options are also available at the moment: - open-jump, - openjumpgis - openjump-project / openjumpproject - oj-gis / ojgis - jump-pilot / jumppilot - openjump-pilot / openjumppilot - geopenjump Note that openjump is available on GitLab for the moment, if you wish to create a mirror repository there. It's always possible to rename an organisation later on (see https://docs.github.com/en/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/renaming-an-organization). This process automatically updates everything from link redirection to commit attribution. I already added Ede (edeso) and Michaël (mukoki) as owners of this organisation. I also just created an 'openjump-migration' repository as previously discussed and I am now tuning the settings of both the organisation and the repository. Feel free to modify the content / info / settings about these. I should be able to push a first working version for next Monday, maybe before but as schools reopened on Wednesday here in Scotland (children don't attend it on a daily basis during this first week), I can't promise anything. Eric On 12/08/2020 13:38, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: no worries. i'm pretty sure we are not fixed on that name. for years we have been known as /jump-pilot/ (anybody know why?) and it worked as well. how about you work with a private repo in the mean time and we'll deal with name and organisation when we are ready to branch which is not going to be tomorrow ;) ..ede On 12.08.2020 13:19, Eric wrote: Hi all, Thanks to all of you. According to your answers, I'm in the process of creating a GitHub organisation named 'openjump', containing a public repository named 'openjump-migration'. The current problem is that someone created an account or an organisation with this name last April (https://github.com/openjump), but with no activity since then. I just contacted the GitHub support team to see if it was possible to have a transfer of ownership for this name -- so, of course, with the agreement of the current owner), as it isn't allowed to directly contact the owner for obvious reasons. Apart from that, everything is ready. Eric On 12/08/2020 10:06, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: yup indenting is clearly broken in this reply, maybe better not reply inline with that client Mike ;).. ede On 12.08.2020 09:17, Michaud Michael wrote: Hi, >>> On 07.08.2020 20:55, Eric wrote: Then I checked which OJ lib dependencies rely on JTS and it seems that there is only deegree 2, without considering here the plethora of extensions/plugins. >>> which is the main obstacle. the only clean solution i see is to branch out a new OJ 2.x that initially will break compatibility to all external plugins. that's the bad news. >>> the good news is that this forces us to retouch pretty much all of them and during this effort we might eventually come up with a working plugin manager after all. >> Less than a day of work should be required (if not less) to update all the plugins which do not rely on a dependency which relies itself on JTS. I'm going to test it, to see if it's the case. >> I tried with my plugins and I just needed a couple of seconds to do it. again. we don't have sources for all extensions in OJ Plus at hand or setup to build at all. the challenge won't be the modding but the finding and setting up plugin repos. I wasn't aware of this situation. All of a sudden, it seems to be another challenge to migrate all the plugins... Could we decide to norrow openjump-plus to extensions hosted by the project only, and revide the idea of a plugin manager (could be a student project ?). there is a critical bug opening JMP project files which should be fixed before we branch https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/bugs/496/ The idea here is to test the migration based on the OJ
