[j-nsp] Screen OS OSPF Area 0
Hi everybody need to know weather their is way i can disable the default created OSPF area 0 on the screen OS ISG1000 firewall after the OSPF is enabled, as i need all the interfaces of the firewall in same area x to which it belongs. Also if i keep this area 0 as it is and dont assign any interface is that ok, and rest of the interfaces belong to Area X, should this work fine. I have not work screen os box and we are currently deciding how this can be deployed in the upcoming network. Regards Abhijeet.C ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class
Hello David , Thanks for your response, but this command is supported M320 routers and T-series routing platforms only.. Is there any equivalent for M7i routers ? Thank you. From: david@orange-ftgroup.com To: merye...@hotmail.com CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:12:10 +0100 Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class Hi, You can view drops at the fabric level via the command : show class-of-service fabric statistics David David Roy Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de meryem Z Envoyé : mercredi 10 mars 2010 13:17 Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class hello Community, I configured a forwarding class with high priority loss. Now I need to verify that the traffic sent under this forwarding class ( using a traffic generator) has a high priority loss. The show interface queue doesn't show this information. is there any other way to do it ? Thank you. _ Votre messagerie et bien plus où que vous soyez. Passez à Windows Live Hotmail, c'est gratuit ! https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp * This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. _ Hotmail : une messagerie performante et gratuite avec une sécurité signée Microsoft https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class
Meryem: Maybe try a firewall filter with a counter on the egress interface? Something like: from forwarding-class forwarding-class_name from loss-priority high then count fc-blah_lp-high then accept --Addy. On 3/11/10, meryem Z merye...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello David , Thanks for your response, but this command is supported M320 routers and T-series routing platforms only.. Is there any equivalent for M7i routers ? Thank you. From: david@orange-ftgroup.com To: merye...@hotmail.com CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:12:10 +0100 Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class Hi, You can view drops at the fabric level via the command : show class-of-service fabric statistics David David Roy Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de meryem Z Envoyé : mercredi 10 mars 2010 13:17 Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class hello Community, I configured a forwarding class with high priority loss. Now I need to verify that the traffic sent under this forwarding class ( using a traffic generator) has a high priority loss. The show interface queue doesn't show this information. is there any other way to do it ? Thank you. _ Votre messagerie et bien plus où que vous soyez. Passez à Windows Live Hotmail, c'est gratuit ! https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp * This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. _ Hotmail : une messagerie performante et gratuite avec une sécurité signée Microsoft https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Sent from my mobile device ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] M20 FE PIC
Hi all, Can any of you confirm if the P-4FE-TX module for the M20 supports 10-Base-T operation, or if it is 100Mbit only? Thanks, d. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] training suggestions for advanced MX router kung fu
Hey guys, I'd like to hunt down some advanced training for the MX platform. Any suggestions/reviews? To give you a feel for what I'm after, mine are border gateways with full BGP feeds from I1 and I2 and police traffic per individual user ip address to destination ip for a couple of /16s. From there, I generate default routes to the rest of my network via OSPF. From here I'm hoping to collapse some Nortel 8600s into virtual routers and possibly replace some of my firewall functionality with a MS-DPC to free up some netscreen 5400s (and then put the 5400s into a dual chassis HA mode for my data center Will ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] M20 FE PIC
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:43 AM, David Reader wrote: Can any of you confirm if the P-4FE-TX module for the M20 supports 10-Base-T operation, or if it is 100Mbit only? 100m only. - Jared ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class
it seems a good idea , i will test it. thank you. Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:14:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class From: addy.mat...@gmail.com To: merye...@hotmail.com; david@orange-ftgroup.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Meryem: Maybe try a firewall filter with a counter on the egress interface? Something like: from forwarding-class forwarding-class_name from loss-priority high then count fc-blah_lp-high then accept --Addy. On 3/11/10, meryem Z merye...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello David , Thanks for your response, but this command is supported M320 routers and T-series routing platforms only.. Is there any equivalent for M7i routers ? Thank you. From: david@orange-ftgroup.com To: merye...@hotmail.com CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:12:10 +0100 Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class Hi, You can view drops at the fabric level via the command : show class-of-service fabric statistics David David Roy Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center Tel. +33(0)299876472 Mob. +33(0)685522213 Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com -Message d'origine- De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de meryem Z Envoyé : mercredi 10 mars 2010 13:17 Cc : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : [j-nsp] Verify loss priority for a forwarding class hello Community, I configured a forwarding class with high priority loss. Now I need to verify that the traffic sent under this forwarding class ( using a traffic generator) has a high priority loss. The show interface queue doesn't show this information. is there any other way to do it ? Thank you. _ Votre messagerie et bien plus où que vous soyez. Passez à Windows Live Hotmail, c'est gratuit ! https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp * This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. _ Hotmail : une messagerie performante et gratuite avec une sécurité signée Microsoft https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Sent from my mobile device _ Hotmail : un service de messagerie gratuit, fiable et complet https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Screen OS OSPF Area 0
-Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abhi Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:44 AM To: Juniper Puck Subject: [j-nsp] Screen OS OSPF Area 0 Hi everybody need to know weather their is way i can disable the default created OSPF area 0 on the screen OS ISG1000 firewall after the OSPF is enabled, as i need all the interfaces of the firewall in same area x to which it belongs. Also if i keep this area 0 as it is and dont assign any interface is that ok, and rest of the interfaces belong to Area X, should this work fine. I have not work screen os box and we are currently deciding how this can be deployed in the upcoming network. You can just configure new areas and add your interfaces to their respective areas. As long as you don't have any interfaces bound to Area 0 you will be fine. IIRC you can't delete this default created Area in ScreenOS. HTHs. Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor
Hello list, I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to this question, so I am hoping you can help. I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me routes via RIP for Multicast sources. Is there a way for me to prefer the routes I receive via one of the connections over there other? Thanks, Shane ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Netscreen NAT and TCP window scaling issues
I have a client sitting behind a netscreen firewall that is seeing a delay when trying to connect via tcp to a server on the internet while being natted to the netscreens external IP and TCP window scaling is enabled. If I create a one-to-one nat mapping specifically for the client the connection is instant. Here is the tcpdump on the server when the client tries to connect while being natted to the netscreens external IP with TCP window scaling enabled 16:23:08.847308 IP x.x.x.x.42852 y.y.y.177.22: S 3899166006:3899166006(0) win 65535 mss 1380,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,timestamp 153981609 0,sackOK,eol 16:23:09.755649 IP x.x.x.x.42852 y.y.y.177.22: S 3899166006:3899166006(0) win 65535 mss 1380,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,timestamp 153981618 0,sackOK,eol 16:23:10.756198 IP x.x.x.x.42852 y.y.y.177.22: S 3899166006:3899166006(0) win 65535 mss 1380,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,timestamp 153981628 0,sackOK,eol 16:23:11.756782 IP x.x.x.x.42852 y.y.y.177.22: S 3899166006:3899166006(0) win 65535 mss 1380,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,timestamp 153981638 0,sackOK,eol 16:23:12.757413 IP x.x.x.x.42852 y.y.y.177.22: S 3899166006:3899166006(0) win 65535 mss 1380,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,timestamp 153981648 0,sackOK,eol 16:23:13.758127 IP x.x.x.x.42852 y.y.y.177.22: S 3899166006:3899166006(0) win 65535 mss 1380,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,timestamp 153981658 0,sackOK,eol 16:23:15.759429 IP x.x.x.x.42852 y.y.y.177.22: S 3899166006:3899166006(0) win 65535 mss 1380,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,timestamp 153981678 0,sackOK,eol 16:23:19.762105 IP x.x.x.x.42852 y.y.y.177.22: S 3899166006:3899166006(0) win 65535 mss 1380,sackOK,eol 16:23:19.762130 IP y.y.y.177.22 x.x.x.x.42852: S 4286889391:4286889391(0) ack 3899166007 win 5840 mss 1460 Here is the tcpdump on the server when the client tries to connect while a one-to-one nat is in place with TCP window scaling enabled 17:51:42.373439 IP x.x.x.x.49165 y.y.y.177.22: S 1731332088:1731332088(0) win 65535 mss 1380,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,timestamp 409029697 0,sackOK,eol 17:51:42.438272 IP y.y.y.177.22 x.x.x.49165: S 1297584268:1297584268(0) ack 1731332089 win 5792 mss 1460,nop,nop,timestamp 1704280650 409029697,nop,wscale 9 When the client is being natted to the netscreens public IP we see the SYN makes it to the server, but the server ignores the SYN if the TCP window scale option is set. As soon as the client leaves the window scale option unset the server responds with a SYN-ACK. So it appears there is an issue with window scaling and we verified that disabling window scaling on the client resulted in instant connection. With that being said, we also saw that connections were not delayed if windows scaling was enabled and the client had a one-to-one mapping on the netscreen. Any ideas on why there is an issue with window scaling and one-to-many nat mappings? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor
I tried this, but it seems to set the metric for the route, and does cause the router to choose one interface over the other. Shane On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Hoogen wrote: This should work.. set protocols rip group rip neighbor int metric-in metric -Hoogen On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Shane Ronan sro...@fattoc.com wrote: Hello list, I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to this question, so I am hoping you can help. I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me routes via RIP for Multicast sources. Is there a way for me to prefer the routes I receive via one of the connections over there other? Thanks, Shane ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor
Should have read does not cause sorry On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:08 PM, Shane Ronan wrote: I tried this, but it seems to set the metric for the route, and does cause the router to choose one interface over the other. Shane On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Hoogen wrote: This should work.. set protocols rip group rip neighbor int metric-in metric -Hoogen On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Shane Ronan sro...@fattoc.com wrote: Hello list, I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to this question, so I am hoping you can help. I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me routes via RIP for Multicast sources. Is there a way for me to prefer the routes I receive via one of the connections over there other? Thanks, Shane ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor
-Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Ronan Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 4:53 PM To: Juniper Puck Subject: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Hello list, I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to this question, so I am hoping you can help. I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me routes via RIP for Multicast sources. Is there a way for me to prefer the routes I receive via one of the connections over there other? Real stupid question, but did you try the metric-in statement to adjust the metric for the route from one of the neighbors, assuming both neighbors are not on the same interface... Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor
I did, and it seems to set the metric on the route, regardless of interface. On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote: -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Ronan Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 4:53 PM To: Juniper Puck Subject: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Hello list, I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to this question, so I am hoping you can help. I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me routes via RIP for Multicast sources. Is there a way for me to prefer the routes I receive via one of the connections over there other? Real stupid question, but did you try the metric-in statement to adjust the metric for the route from one of the neighbors, assuming both neighbors are not on the same interface... Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor
Are you setting the metric-in statement at the global level or the neighbor level? Stefan Fouant --Original Message-- From: Shane Ronan To: Stefan Fouant Cc: 'Juniper Puck' Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Sent: Mar 11, 2010 7:32 PM I did, and it seems to set the metric on the route, regardless of interface. On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote: -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Ronan Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 4:53 PM To: Juniper Puck Subject: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Hello list, I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to this question, so I am hoping you can help. I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me routes via RIP for Multicast sources. Is there a way for me to prefer the routes I receive via one of the connections over there other? Real stupid question, but did you try the metric-in statement to adjust the metric for the route from one of the neighbors, assuming both neighbors are not on the same interface... Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor
Show us your config for 'protocols rip'. Stefan Fouant --Original Message-- From: Shane Ronan To: sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net Cc: 'Juniper Puck' Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Sent: Mar 11, 2010 7:53 PM Neighbor level, this is not at all how I expected it to behave. On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:45 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote: Are you setting the metric-in statement at the global level or the neighbor level? Stefan Fouant --Original Message-- From: Shane Ronan To: Stefan Fouant Cc: 'Juniper Puck' Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Sent: Mar 11, 2010 7:32 PM I did, and it seems to set the metric on the route, regardless of interface. On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote: -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Ronan Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 4:53 PM To: Juniper Puck Subject: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Hello list, I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to this question, so I am hoping you can help. I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me routes via RIP for Multicast sources. Is there a way for me to prefer the routes I receive via one of the connections over there other? Real stupid question, but did you try the metric-in statement to adjust the metric for the route from one of the neighbors, assuming both neighbors are not on the same interface... Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor
Config with a small snapshot of the routing table would be nice.. -Hoogen On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Stefan Fouant sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net wrote: Show us your config for 'protocols rip'. Stefan Fouant --Original Message-- From: Shane Ronan To: sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net Cc: 'Juniper Puck' Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Sent: Mar 11, 2010 7:53 PM Neighbor level, this is not at all how I expected it to behave. On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:45 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote: Are you setting the metric-in statement at the global level or the neighbor level? Stefan Fouant --Original Message-- From: Shane Ronan To: Stefan Fouant Cc: 'Juniper Puck' Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Sent: Mar 11, 2010 7:32 PM I did, and it seems to set the metric on the route, regardless of interface. On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote: -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Ronan Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 4:53 PM To: Juniper Puck Subject: [j-nsp] Prefer RIP Neighbor Hello list, I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to this question, so I am hoping you can help. I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me routes via RIP for Multicast sources. Is there a way for me to prefer the routes I receive via one of the connections over there other? Real stupid question, but did you try the metric-in statement to adjust the metric for the route from one of the neighbors, assuming both neighbors are not on the same interface... Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] SRX in HA with OSPF failover time
Hi All, I have configured 2x SRX-3600 in high availability mode in front 2x 6500, the HA mode is active/passive. OSPF is running and I have configured graceful restart on the SRX in order to make the transition between the active and the passive more smoothly. But still when I take down the active machine it takes like 14 sec before the network become stable again. Does anyone has any idea regarding this situation? BR, Tal M ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] M20 FE PIC
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Jared Mauch wrote: On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:43 AM, David Reader wrote: Can any of you confirm if the P-4FE-TX module for the M20 supports 10-Base-T operation, or if it is 100Mbit only? 100m only. Hmm. I wonder how our PICs work fine with 10mbit/s as well? :-) Officially it isn't supported, I think, though. -- Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oykingdom bleeds. Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
