Re: [j-nsp] SSG 140 Software

2010-03-30 Thread Christoph Blecker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jimmy,
The latest release version of ScreenOS for the SSG-140 series is
6.3.0r2. However, Juniper also has a knowledge base document
[https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/software/netscreen_versions.jsp]
showing the latest *recommended* ScreenOS version. This version is
usually much more stable than the maintenance releases.

Cheers,
/toph


Jimmy Stewpot wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am interested to know if anyone can provide me with what the latest version 
> of software is for the SSG140?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jimmy.
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkuysZoACgkQg4DtNh1wGhoTGwCePzgwCd1FjeNNqBAPSsFNg+Q6
KQ4AoILWwk7oV+9dgyXq7ghPh/lEgw20
=qc0r
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] SSG 140 Software

2010-03-30 Thread Jimmy Stewpot
Hi All,

I am interested to know if anyone can provide me with what the latest version 
of software is for the SSG140?

Regards,

Jimmy.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] JNCIE-ER

2010-03-30 Thread Joseph Soricelli

Stefan-

Thank you very much for the kind words. I'm sure you did well and  
passed your exam!


Regards,
Joe

Joseph Soricelli
CEO
Proteus Networks

703-980-3999
j...@proteus.net
www.proteus.net
Twitter - @proteusnetworks

On Mar 27, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:


-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dilip Srivastava
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 9:26 AM
To: adnan
Cc: Richard A Steenbergen; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JNCIE-ER

I am also looking for JNCIE-ER please share the documents or study
material

regards
dilip

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:25 PM, adnan   
wrote:



Dear All

I am preparing my JNCIE-ER . if anyone is also preparing contact me

so we

can share the material .


Well I just took the exam yesterday and I don't want to count my  
chickens
before they hatch, but I feel that I did pretty good so here is a  
quick

synopsis of what I used for the exam:

- 'JUNOS Enterprise Routing' by Harry Reynolds and Doug Marschke.   
Read it

twice if you can :)
- 'Advanced Juniper Networks Routing in the Enterprise' courseware  
and labs
which can be found on the Juniper FastTrack site.  I definitely  
recommend
going through the labs because they are extremely representative of  
the

types of things that you are likely to see on the exam.
- 'Adaptive Services' chapter in the JUNOS 'Services Interfaces
Configuration Guide' - its 500 pages but will definitely school you  
on all

the variants of JUNOS Services
- The 'JNCIP-M Study Guide' by Harry Reynolds is another really useful
addition if you can go through that book and do the labs this will  
really

help with routing policy and configuration of OSPF, RIP, and BGP.
- In addition to reading the above and getting a good strong  
foundational
level of understanding, I would say the *single* most useful  
preparation tip
I can give to anyone is to take the JNCIE-ER Bootcamp and/or the  
Remote
Proctored lab exams offered by Proteus Networks.  I haven't  
personally taken
the bootcamp, but I did see the materials from a colleague who sat  
through
it and after sitting the exam I can tell you that Bootcamp is spot  
on.  I

did however take their Remote Proctored exams and once again I am not
disappointed with my experience with them.  Rick Schenderlein was my  
proctor
with Proteus and he really took the time to help me understand the  
areas
that I could use improvement on.  Their products are truly a notch  
above and
will more than prepare you to sit the exam.  These are the guys who  
"wrote
the book" in more ways than one with the JNCIE-ER... their offerings  
should
be considered insurance... you're already shelling out some pretty  
big bucks
to sit the exam, why not do yourself the favor and take a look at  
what they

have to offer - http://www.proteus.net

All in all, I didn't think the exam was that tough, but I also have  
12+

years of experience working with JUNOS and I also have a JNCIE-M.  I
actually finished the exam in a little over 5 hours and spent  
another 1-2
hours going over everything just to make sure I had it right.  I've  
heard
that most people going in are pretty much down to the wire with time  
so I'm
not sure what happened in my case but I hope I can attribute it to  
just

being over-prepared.

Oh one other tip, thanks Addy for passing this on to me - make sure  
you read

the full exam in its entirety before starting a single configuration
element.  This is truly an expert level exam, one which requires you  
to
think through your design decisions.  There are often things later  
on in the
exam that might require you to go back and reconfigure something  
you've set
up in an earlier section.  Reading ahead will allow you to save  
yourself

some time when you've thought your design through fully in advance.

I'll let you know in a few days when I receive my pass/fail status...

Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T
www.shortestpathfirst.net
GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Remove EX-4200 stack member

2010-03-30 Thread Jonathan Looney
Personally, I would halt the third member ("request system halt member 3"),
then pull the cables, and then change the VC configuration.  But, that is
just my preferred way of doing it.

-Jon

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Kevin Wormington  wrote:

> I'm running a production stack of 3 EX-4200s using the stacking ports on
> 9.6R1.3.  I would like to remove the 3rd member (no ports in use or
> configured) which is just in line-card mode without effecting the other two.
>  The units were all pre-provisioned.  I'm curious if anyone has attempted
> this and if they just pulled the stacking cables first and then made
> software changes or made software changes and then pulled the cables?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] Remove EX-4200 stack member

2010-03-30 Thread Kevin Wormington
I'm running a production stack of 3 EX-4200s using the stacking ports on 
9.6R1.3.  I would like to remove the 3rd member (no ports in use or 
configured) which is just in line-card mode without effecting the other 
two.  The units were all pre-provisioned.  I'm curious if anyone has 
attempted this and if they just pulled the stacking cables first and 
then made software changes or made software changes and then pulled the 
cables?


Thanks,

Kevin
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] High memory usage on EX4200 stack

2010-03-30 Thread Wouter van den Bergh
Matrin,

We have been experiencing kernel memory leaks on a EX4200 virtual chassis 
containing 2 devices after we upgraded to a 10 release. We were supplied 
version 10.0S3.1 to fix these problems. You might want to give that version a 
try and see if our problems were related.

Regards,

Wouter

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Namens Martin Levin
Verzonden: dinsdag 30 maart 2010 15:53
Aan: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Onderwerp: [j-nsp] High memory usage on EX4200 stack

Hi!
 
We have 3 EX4200 virtual chassis all running 10.0S1.1, one consisting
of 4 EX4200 and the other two och two switches each.
 
The problem below only affects the two stacks with two switches each,
the 2 switch stack does not se this.
 
The problem we're seeing is that member 0, regardless of wether its the
master routing engine or not sees very high memory usage (89%) and the
boxes then become very slow. These switches operate on layer 2 only.
 
If I try to do "request session member 0" i get "could not create child
process" as an error and I can't login to that member. Traffic seems to
flow without problem however.
 
Any thoughts?
 
 
 
---
Martin Levin
IT-strategy & planning
Mölndals stad
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] High memory usage on EX4200 stack

2010-03-30 Thread Martin Levin
Hi!
 
We have 3 EX4200 virtual chassis all running 10.0S1.1, one consisting
of 4 EX4200 and the other two och two switches each.
 
The problem below only affects the two stacks with two switches each,
the 2 switch stack does not se this.
 
The problem we're seeing is that member 0, regardless of wether its the
master routing engine or not sees very high memory usage (89%) and the
boxes then become very slow. These switches operate on layer 2 only.
 
If I try to do "request session member 0" i get "could not create child
process" as an error and I can't login to that member. Traffic seems to
flow without problem however.
 
Any thoughts?
 
 
 
---
Martin Levin
IT-strategy & planning
Mölndals stad
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] JUNOS - TACACS - Cisco ACS Allowed Commands

2010-03-30 Thread Ralph R. Rye
Hello,


I have been trying to get a few Juniper EX4200 switches working with Cisco ACS 
through TACACS+ utilizing "allowed commands".  I have followed the example doc 
on Cisco site here:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_configuration_example09186a0080af7d1d.shtml

Which didn't work at all until I added the "remote" user on the EX 4200, but 
then it would only allow access and the user would be mapped to the "remote" 
username which had "read-only" access.


I have tried different combinations of syntax on the Cisco ACS in terms of the 
"local-username" and "allowed-commands" with no success ( I also added the 
"set" keyword in front of the commands as some examples demonstrated).  I 
believe I almost have it configured but I missing some simple thing.  I 
searched the forum but all the past posts have made mention of things I have 
already tried.

Anyone have any suggestions?


Config on the EX4200 (JUNOS version 10.0S1.1):

system {
authentication-order [ tacplus password ];
tacplus-server {
1.2.3.4 {
secret "stuff; ## SECRET-DATA
timeout 5;
source-address 5.5.5.5.;
}
}
}
class LIMITED {
permissions all;
}
user LIMITED-USER {
uid 2002;
class LIMITED;
}
user remote {
uid 2001;
class read-only;
}

ACS Config (version 4.2):

Setup per the link above with the following attributes in the "custom 
attributes" box:

local-user-name = LIMITED-USER
allow-commands = "monitor | help | show | ping | traceroute"


Thanks,

Ralph





___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Troubleshooting J6350 Boot

2010-03-30 Thread Felix Schueren

Kessler, Ben wrote:

Hello -

I'm in the process of upgrading a lot of J6350 routers and have one that is
failing on boot after the upgrade.  I'm getting the following messages on
the console when the router tries to boot:

 OK reboot
Rebooting...
elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

Unable to load a kernel!

\

elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

can't load '/kernel'

elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

can't load '/kernel.old'


I have a case open with JTAC but they're a bit slow to respond.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

I suspect you'll have to boot from install media and try a 
reinstallation - something appears to have broken during the upgrade. 
Worst case, the internal flash is damaged.


We've had that happen every once in a while, and a boot & reinstall from 
install media usually fixed it.


Kind regards,

Felix

--
Felix Schüren
Head of Network

---
Host Europe GmbH - http://www.hosteurope.de
Welserstraße 14 - 51149 Köln - Germany
Telefon: 0800 467 8387 - Fax: +49 180 5 66 3233 (*)
HRB 28495 Amtsgericht Köln - USt-IdNr.: DE187370678
Geschäftsführer:
Uwe Braun - Alex Collins - Mark Joseph - Patrick Pulvermüller

(*) 0,14 EUR/Min. aus dem dt. Festnetz; maximal 0,42 EUR/Min. aus
den dt. Mobilfunknetzen


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] Troubleshooting J6350 Boot

2010-03-30 Thread Kessler, Ben
Hello -

I'm in the process of upgrading a lot of J6350 routers and have one that is
failing on boot after the upgrade.  I'm getting the following messages on
the console when the router tries to boot:

 OK reboot
Rebooting...
elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

Unable to load a kernel!

\

elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

can't load '/kernel'

elf32_loadfile: can't load module before kernel

can't load '/kernel.old'


I have a case open with JTAC but they're a bit slow to respond.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Ben
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] Cos model for l2vpn

2010-03-30 Thread meryem Z

hello Community,


Can anyone suggest a Cos model related to L2VPNs ? Also what are the 
limitations for this type of VPNs?

Thanks in advance.


Regards.




  
_
Hotmail : une messagerie performante et gratuite avec une sécurité signée 
Microsoft
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] Using fxp0 as a routed interface

2010-03-30 Thread Vladislav Vasilev
Hello!

I know I can use fxp0 as a routed interface on M7i by setting:

sysctl -w net.pfe.transit_re=1

but this seems to be not possible for M160? Has anyone been able to do
to it on it?

P.S. It is for training purposes, so the CPU will be OK


Regards,
V.Vasilev
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp