Re: [j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300

2015-11-05 Thread Vincent Clement
Hi Farid :)

Yes, but was assuming we talk about 48T, so only 10G as far as I know, no
way to negociate 1G.

Vincent

2015-11-05 10:54 GMT+01:00 Bouzemarene, Farid (ATS) <
farid.bouzemar...@avnet.com>:

> Hi vincent ;)
>
> QFX support 1g also but you have to use 1g SFP !
>
> I had no luck with Cisco or other vendors optics but with juniper ( or
> solidoptics / juniper ) there is no problem .
>
> Farid
>
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of Vincent Clement
> Sent: mercredi 4 novembre 2015 19:12
> To: Michael Loftis
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300
>
> Hello,
>
> Pretty sure QFX in 10G only, so if you want to achieve that, you'll have
> to use a uplink module to have 10G on 4300 side.
>
> Vincent
>
> 2015-11-04 2:23 GMT+01:00 Michael Loftis :
>
> > I'd take a closer look at show interfaces. When a link is 1gig QFX
> > calls it ge-. So you can have an ex-0/0/1 and a ge-0/0/1 but only one
> > is active as I do not believe tri rate SFP+ is supported.
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015, ThienDuc Nguyen
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I was trying to create a LACP bundle between two ports : one on a
> > > EX4300, the other on a QFX5100.
> > > Both link have their speed negotiated at 1GE (but the interface name
> > > on
> > the
> > > QFX is xe-, I can't force it to ge-, and their are no way to force
> > > the speed on the QFX).
> > > if I set the lacp speed to 1ge, the configuration can't commit
> > > because it sees the QFX interface as a 10G interface...
> > >
> > >
> > > Is their a special knob to activate it, or I need to create LACP on
> > > the same device family ?  (the version is  14.1X53-D30.3)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > *Thien Duc Nguyen*
> > > ___
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its
> > possessors into trouble of all kinds."
> > -- Samuel Butler
> > ___
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Vincent Clément
> +33 6 74 49 66 30
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>



-- 
Vincent Clément
+33 6 74 49 66 30
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300

2015-11-05 Thread Vincent Clement
Auto-correct: seems I was wrong, I thought that because no negocation
options on xe interfaces, but should be supported as you said.
I'll make more tests, but I had trouble trying to connect 1G/100M on
QFX5100-48T with old devices.

Vincent

2015-11-05 11:04 GMT+01:00 Vincent Clement :

> Hi Farid :)
>
> Yes, but was assuming we talk about 48T, so only 10G as far as I know, no
> way to negociate 1G.
>
> Vincent
>
> 2015-11-05 10:54 GMT+01:00 Bouzemarene, Farid (ATS) <
> farid.bouzemar...@avnet.com>:
>
>> Hi vincent ;)
>>
>> QFX support 1g also but you have to use 1g SFP !
>>
>> I had no luck with Cisco or other vendors optics but with juniper ( or
>> solidoptics / juniper ) there is no problem .
>>
>> Farid
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
>> Of Vincent Clement
>> Sent: mercredi 4 novembre 2015 19:12
>> To: Michael Loftis
>> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Pretty sure QFX in 10G only, so if you want to achieve that, you'll have
>> to use a uplink module to have 10G on 4300 side.
>>
>> Vincent
>>
>> 2015-11-04 2:23 GMT+01:00 Michael Loftis :
>>
>> > I'd take a closer look at show interfaces. When a link is 1gig QFX
>> > calls it ge-. So you can have an ex-0/0/1 and a ge-0/0/1 but only one
>> > is active as I do not believe tri rate SFP+ is supported.
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015, ThienDuc Nguyen
>> > 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > I was trying to create a LACP bundle between two ports : one on a
>> > > EX4300, the other on a QFX5100.
>> > > Both link have their speed negotiated at 1GE (but the interface name
>> > > on
>> > the
>> > > QFX is xe-, I can't force it to ge-, and their are no way to force
>> > > the speed on the QFX).
>> > > if I set the lacp speed to 1ge, the configuration can't commit
>> > > because it sees the QFX interface as a 10G interface...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Is their a special knob to activate it, or I need to create LACP on
>> > > the same device family ?  (the version is  14.1X53-D30.3)
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > *Thien Duc Nguyen*
>> > > ___
>> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
>> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its
>> > possessors into trouble of all kinds."
>> > -- Samuel Butler
>> > ___
>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vincent Clément
>> +33 6 74 49 66 30
>> ___
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Vincent Clément
> +33 6 74 49 66 30
>



-- 
Vincent Clément
+33 6 74 49 66 30
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300

2015-11-05 Thread Luis Mercado
If you want to do 1g on QFX you need to use an SFP transceiver. If you want to 
do 10g you need an SFP+ transceiver.  
This is specific to the QFX platform you are using... Check here for the 
QFX5100, make sure yours is a match..


http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/specifications/interface-qfx5100-support.html

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Vincent Clement
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 5:29 AM
To: Bouzemarene, Farid (ATS)
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300

Auto-correct: seems I was wrong, I thought that because no negocation options 
on xe interfaces, but should be supported as you said.
I'll make more tests, but I had trouble trying to connect 1G/100M on 
QFX5100-48T with old devices.

Vincent

2015-11-05 11:04 GMT+01:00 Vincent Clement :

> Hi Farid :)
>
> Yes, but was assuming we talk about 48T, so only 10G as far as I know, 
> no way to negociate 1G.
>
> Vincent
>
> 2015-11-05 10:54 GMT+01:00 Bouzemarene, Farid (ATS) <
> farid.bouzemar...@avnet.com>:
>
>> Hi vincent ;)
>>
>> QFX support 1g also but you have to use 1g SFP !
>>
>> I had no luck with Cisco or other vendors optics but with juniper ( 
>> or solidoptics / juniper ) there is no problem .
>>
>> Farid
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On 
>> Behalf Of Vincent Clement
>> Sent: mercredi 4 novembre 2015 19:12
>> To: Michael Loftis
>> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Pretty sure QFX in 10G only, so if you want to achieve that, you'll 
>> have to use a uplink module to have 10G on 4300 side.
>>
>> Vincent
>>
>> 2015-11-04 2:23 GMT+01:00 Michael Loftis :
>>
>> > I'd take a closer look at show interfaces. When a link is 1gig QFX 
>> > calls it ge-. So you can have an ex-0/0/1 and a ge-0/0/1 but only 
>> > one is active as I do not believe tri rate SFP+ is supported.
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015, ThienDuc Nguyen 
>> > 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > I was trying to create a LACP bundle between two ports : one on a 
>> > > EX4300, the other on a QFX5100.
>> > > Both link have their speed negotiated at 1GE (but the interface 
>> > > name on
>> > the
>> > > QFX is xe-, I can't force it to ge-, and their are no way to 
>> > > force the speed on the QFX).
>> > > if I set the lacp speed to 1ge, the configuration can't commit 
>> > > because it sees the QFX interface as a 10G interface...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Is their a special knob to activate it, or I need to create LACP 
>> > > on the same device family ?  (the version is  14.1X53-D30.3)
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > *Thien Duc Nguyen*
>> > > ___
>> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
>> > >  
>> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its 
>> > possessors into trouble of all kinds."
>> > -- Samuel Butler
>> > ___
>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vincent Clément
>> +33 6 74 49 66 30
>> ___
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Vincent Clément
> +33 6 74 49 66 30
>



--
Vincent Clément
+33 6 74 49 66 30
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] estimating affects on firewall filter configuration on MPC throughput?

2015-11-05 Thread Michael Hare
Hello-

I'm looking for knowledge on how a given Juniper firewall filter config affects 
forwarding performance, specifically on an MPC4.  I don't have 100G+ traffic 
generation at my disposal for direct testing.

The specific concern is that we have a dozen or two 'then next-term' counting 
terms on internet ingress for purposes of crude thresholding [things like UDP 
53 > 1400 byte, etc].  I know that minimizing 'then next-term' is recommended, 
and there is a hard cap of roughly 2^10 on next-term use [of which I am nowhere 
near].

I've tried to Google for this and didn't find anything.  If I did, I suspect 
I'd be stuck with biased, worst case scenario third party testing reports.  
Thought I'd start here before trying to engage Juniper; I suspect they may be 
evasive with this information.

-Michael
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300

2015-11-05 Thread Michael Loftis
It isn't 10G only. They support 10g/1g/100m but I don't know if they do tri
rate. And when you insert a 1G SFP it enumerates as ge-n/n/n not as xe- --
I have something like a dozen of these in production and a few 1G SFPs so
not just guessing here.

On Wednesday, November 4, 2015, Vincent Clement 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Pretty sure QFX in 10G only, so if you want to achieve that, you'll have
> to use a uplink module to have 10G on 4300 side.
>
> Vincent
>
> 2015-11-04 2:23 GMT+01:00 Michael Loftis  >:
>
>> I'd take a closer look at show interfaces. When a link is 1gig QFX calls
>> it
>> ge-. So you can have an ex-0/0/1 and a ge-0/0/1 but only one is active as
>> I
>> do not believe tri rate SFP+ is supported.
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015, ThienDuc Nguyen > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I was trying to create a LACP bundle between two ports : one on a
>> EX4300,
>> > the other on a QFX5100.
>> > Both link have their speed negotiated at 1GE (but the interface name on
>> the
>> > QFX is xe-, I can't force it to ge-, and their are no way to force the
>> > speed on the QFX).
>> > if I set the lacp speed to 1ge, the configuration can't commit because
>> it
>> > sees the QFX interface as a 10G interface...
>> >
>> >
>> > Is their a special knob to activate it, or I need to create LACP on the
>> > same device family ?  (the version is  14.1X53-D30.3)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > *Thien Duc Nguyen*
>> > ___
>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> 
>> 
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its
>> possessors
>> into trouble of all kinds."
>> -- Samuel Butler
>> ___
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> 
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Vincent Clément
> +33 6 74 49 66 30
>


-- 

"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp