Re: [j-nsp] Junos 21+ Killing Finger Muscle Memory - Resolved
On 10/19/23 06:48, Chris Kawchuk wrote: Indeed. Apologies to all --- I too got an update from JNPR on the "show route" vs "show routing" CLI conflict a few weeks ago in early September -- but forgot to share it here. CASE; 2023-0719-733950 Synopsis: "show route" and "show routing" operational mode CLI conflict - JunOS 21+ Root Cause: "show routing" CLI stanza was unhidden to implement "show routing transport-class" command for BGP CT (in JunOS 21+) Resolution: For finger memory convenience, hiding 'show routing' stanza again, and moving BGP CT command to under 'show route' stanza. Understanding is: "show route" will now contain both: - route table related information, AND - routing daemon related information. - Looks like it's a win for the little guy!.. or at least... my little finger that wants to smash that [TAB] key early Indeed! We can be pleased. Well done to all :-). Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Junos 21+ Killing Finger Muscle Memory - Resolved
Indeed. Apologies to all --- I too got an update from JNPR on the "show route" vs "show routing" CLI conflict a few weeks ago in early September -- but forgot to share it here. CASE; 2023-0719-733950 Synopsis: "show route" and "show routing" operational mode CLI conflict - JunOS 21+ Root Cause: "show routing" CLI stanza was unhidden to implement "show routing transport-class" command for BGP CT (in JunOS 21+) Resolution: For finger memory convenience, hiding 'show routing' stanza again, and moving BGP CT command to under 'show route' stanza. Understanding is: "show route" will now contain both: - route table related information, AND - routing daemon related information. - Looks like it's a win for the little guy!.. or at least... my little finger that wants to smash that [TAB] key early - CK. > On 19 Oct 2023, at 15:11, Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > > > On 10/18/23 19:05, Chris Wopat via juniper-nsp wrote: > >> Only complaint is Junos related, with auto tab complete problems as >> extensively discussed in a different thread. > > I have an update on that... > > Our request was granted, and Juniper are initially targeting to fix this in > Junos 24.1. However, there are ongoing discussions to introduce this into > 23.3R2. > > So we may soon see the back of this. > > Mark. > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
On 10/18/23 19:05, Chris Wopat via juniper-nsp wrote: Only complaint is Junos related, with auto tab complete problems as extensively discussed in a different thread. I have an update on that... Our request was granted, and Juniper are initially targeting to fix this in Junos 24.1. However, there are ongoing discussions to introduce this into 23.3R2. So we may soon see the back of this. Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
On 10/18/23 18:55, Tom Beecher wrote: Juniper licensing is honor based. Won't impact functionality, will just grump at you on commits. Okay, so usual licensing enforcement. Just curious why warnings about OSPF and LDP... this is what a router is exactly for. Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
If unlicensed, you even get a license warning for a static route. We have a handful deployed, and being a trio based platform they perform as expected. Hot swapping LMIC support are being explored and of course would be welcome. Only complaint is Junos related, with auto tab complete problems as extensively discussed in a different thread. --Chris On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 08:47 Aaron1 via juniper-nsp < juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > I have an MX304 in the lab, evaluating it at the moment. Junos: 22.2R3.15 > > Telemetry is running and a little different than what I have on my MX960’s > > Also, I get a license warning when committing OSPF and LDP. We got a > license from our account team and now we don’t see that message anymore > > > > > Aaron > > > On Oct 18, 2023, at 7:40 AM, Giuliano C. Medalha via juniper-nsp < > juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > > > > > Good morning > > > > All good ? > > > > Anyone already running MX304 as an edge, using ipfix, flowspec and > telemetry features on the same box ? > > > > > > Any problems related with that ? > > > > If so, what version of Junos are you using? > > > > Thanks > > > > Giuliano > > > > > > WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS. > > Copyright (c) 2023 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved. > > > > IMPORTANTE: > > As informa??es deste e-mail e o conte?do dos eventuais documentos anexos > s?o confidenciais e para conhecimento exclusivo do destinat?rio. Se o > leitor desta mensagem n?o for o seu destinat?rio, fica desde j? notificado > de que n?o poder? divulgar, distribuir ou, sob qualquer forma, dar > conhecimento a terceiros das informa??es e do conte?do dos documentos > anexos. Neste caso, favor comunicar imediatamente o remetente, respondendo > este e-mail ou telefonando ao mesmo, e em seguida apague-o. > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: > > The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments > are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, > transmission, dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. > If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender > immediately and delete the material from any computer, including any copies. > > ___ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
Juniper licensing is honor based. Won't impact functionality, will just grump at you on commits. On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:32 AM Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp < juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > > On 10/18/23 15:47, Aaron1 via juniper-nsp wrote: > > > Also, I get a license warning when committing OSPF and LDP. We got a > license from our account team and now we don’t see that message anymore > > Any details on what this license does, and if there is any operational > risk if you don't apply it? > > Mark. > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
On 10/18/23 15:47, Aaron1 via juniper-nsp wrote: Also, I get a license warning when committing OSPF and LDP. We got a license from our account team and now we don’t see that message anymore Any details on what this license does, and if there is any operational risk if you don't apply it? Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
Also saw this message too… Error related to jflow-specific reporting rate [edit services analytics] 'sensor my-sensor-21' reporting-rate can't be less than 30sec for Inline Jflow Sensor on mx304! error: configuration check-out failed Aaron > On Oct 18, 2023, at 8:48 AM, Aaron1 wrote: > > I have an MX304 in the lab, evaluating it at the moment. Junos: 22.2R3.15 > > Telemetry is running and a little different than what I have on my MX960’s > > Also, I get a license warning when committing OSPF and LDP. We got a license > from our account team and now we don’t see that message anymore > > > > > Aaron > >> On Oct 18, 2023, at 7:40 AM, Giuliano C. Medalha via juniper-nsp >> wrote: >> >> >> Good morning >> >> All good ? >> >> Anyone already running MX304 as an edge, using ipfix, flowspec and telemetry >> features on the same box ? >> >> >> Any problems related with that ? >> >> If so, what version of Junos are you using? >> >> Thanks >> >> Giuliano >> >> >> WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS. >> Copyright (c) 2023 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved. >> >> IMPORTANTE: >> As informa??es deste e-mail e o conte?do dos eventuais documentos anexos s?o >> confidenciais e para conhecimento exclusivo do destinat?rio. Se o leitor >> desta mensagem n?o for o seu destinat?rio, fica desde j? notificado de que >> n?o poder? divulgar, distribuir ou, sob qualquer forma, dar conhecimento a >> terceiros das informa??es e do conte?do dos documentos anexos. Neste caso, >> favor comunicar imediatamente o remetente, respondendo este e-mail ou >> telefonando ao mesmo, e em seguida apague-o. >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: >> The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments are >> solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged >> information. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, >> transmission, dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. >> If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender >> immediately and delete the material from any computer, including any copies. >> ___ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
I have an MX304 in the lab, evaluating it at the moment. Junos: 22.2R3.15 Telemetry is running and a little different than what I have on my MX960’s Also, I get a license warning when committing OSPF and LDP. We got a license from our account team and now we don’t see that message anymore Aaron > On Oct 18, 2023, at 7:40 AM, Giuliano C. Medalha via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > > Good morning > > All good ? > > Anyone already running MX304 as an edge, using ipfix, flowspec and telemetry > features on the same box ? > > > Any problems related with that ? > > If so, what version of Junos are you using? > > Thanks > > Giuliano > > > WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS. > Copyright (c) 2023 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved. > > IMPORTANTE: > As informa??es deste e-mail e o conte?do dos eventuais documentos anexos s?o > confidenciais e para conhecimento exclusivo do destinat?rio. Se o leitor > desta mensagem n?o for o seu destinat?rio, fica desde j? notificado de que > n?o poder? divulgar, distribuir ou, sob qualquer forma, dar conhecimento a > terceiros das informa??es e do conte?do dos documentos anexos. Neste caso, > favor comunicar imediatamente o remetente, respondendo este e-mail ou > telefonando ao mesmo, e em seguida apague-o. > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: > The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments are > solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, transmission, > dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately > and delete the material from any computer, including any copies. > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router
Good morning All good ? Anyone already running MX304 as an edge, using ipfix, flowspec and telemetry features on the same box ? Any problems related with that ? If so, what version of Junos are you using? Thanks Giuliano WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS. Copyright (c) 2023 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved. IMPORTANTE: As informa??es deste e-mail e o conte?do dos eventuais documentos anexos s?o confidenciais e para conhecimento exclusivo do destinat?rio. Se o leitor desta mensagem n?o for o seu destinat?rio, fica desde j? notificado de que n?o poder? divulgar, distribuir ou, sob qualquer forma, dar conhecimento a terceiros das informa??es e do conte?do dos documentos anexos. Neste caso, favor comunicar imediatamente o remetente, respondendo este e-mail ou telefonando ao mesmo, e em seguida apague-o. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, transmission, dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer, including any copies. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
