Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is ON !!!
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:47:59PM +0300, Alexandre Snarskii wrote: Hi, noting that these 'switches' will be MPLS-able in this year, so it can be used not only as 'enterprise switch', but as SP one. And their EX 4200-24F is always ideally suited for metro ethernet distribution/access levels... http://www.juniper.net/switch/products.html The specs say: Layer 3 Features: IPv4 Max number of ARP entries: 16,000 Max number of IPv4 unicast routes in hardware: 12,000 Max number of IPv4 multicast routes in hardware: 2,000 Routing protocols: RIPv1/v2, OSPF, BGP, ISIS 12k of routes would work 25 years ago for a service provider :) Thanks, -- Sabri ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Sampling on fxp0
Benny Sumitro wrote: Hi Benny One quick question about traffic sampling on JNCIE pg 331. The book states that the requirement is to put a sampling filter on all r5's interfaces which are transit interfaces and fxp or OOB interface but in the next paragraph it states that samping does not fuction for traffic flowing on the router's fxp0 OoB management port. Which are from two statements in the same page of JNCIE book correct :) ? Hmm, I think they would mean lo0 instead of fxp0. It is not possible to sample traffic on fxp0 as this traffic does not reach the Cf-chip. Thanks, Sabri ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] GRE over IPsec on J-series
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:36:35AM +0300, Roman Shibrick wrote: Hi, Whether there is a given feature on routers of a J-series? I have found the documentation only for an E-series: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose82/swconfig-ip-services/html/l2tp-over-ipsec-config6.html It means, what J - a series does not support the given feature? The E-series and the J-series are completely different products. The documentation for the J-series is at http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/jseries/junos84/index.html Thanks, -- Sabri ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Duplex settings for FastE ports
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:23:01AM -0400, Dan Farrell wrote: Hi, Can you explain how you were able to actually set your GE interface to 100Mbps? Is it only specific GE interfaces that allow 100Mbps settings? I ask because we just got an M7i, and it is not possible to duplicate the configuration you have below with our own ge-0/0/0. Correct, not all PICs support this. I confirmed it to work on a J-series using RJ45 media. Thanks, -- Sabri ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] J6350's interface down/up
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:51:22PM +0900, usacox wrote: Hi, Thank you for your reply. I configured same setting both interfaces with auto-negotiation. I am looking with no-autonegotiation configuration without its fellow after this problem. Some devices implicitly disable auto-negotiation when you explicitly configure speed and duplex settings. For J-series interfaces, the Fast Ethernet PIMs automatically disable auto-negotiation if you configure both speed and duplex settings. The Gigabit Ethernet PIMs do not, if you want to disable auto-negotiation on GE you will have to do so under gigether-options. If you have a link where one end is doing auto-negotiation and the other is not, you will end up with the first end (the one doing auto-neg) in half-duplex. This is the specified default according to 802.3u. Thanks, -- Sabri ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] J6350's interface down/up
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:18:30AM -0600, Brandon Bennett wrote:
Hi,
When using 10 or 100. There is no such thing at 1000-half (at least
defined in the standard).
That's, correct. However, the following config is valid:
ge-0/0/3 {
speed 100m;
link-mode full-duplex;
gigether-options {
no-auto-negotiation;
}
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.0.3.2/24;
}
}
}
When linked to another ge interface, you get:
ge-5/0/3 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.0.3.1/24;
}
}
}
Autonegotiation information:
Negotiation status: No-autonegotiation
Link partner:
Link mode: Half-duplex, Flow control: None, Remote fault: OK,
Link partner Speed: 100 Mbps
Thanks,
--
Sabri
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Generating inet6 routes
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 03:08:33PM +0100, Ras wrote: Hi, Why is it always 2 minutes after sending an email, the answer that escaped you for an hour becomes obvious... the solution of course is: And then you always have someone who is on the bottom of the j-nsp list and gets this email about 10 minutes later :-) -- Sabri JNCIE-M #261 JNCIS-ER #6 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Generating inet6 routes
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 03:02:02PM +0100, Ras wrote:
Hi,
However, a commit check shows:
# commit check
[edit routing-options generate]
'route ::/0'
RT: invalid destination ::/0 for family inet
error: configuration check-out failed
[edit routing-options]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] show
rib inet6.0 {
generate {
route ::/0 {
metric 1;
discard;
}
}
}
[edit routing-options]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] commit
commit complete
[edit routing-options]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] run show route table inet6.0 hidden
inet6.0: 1 destinations, 1 routes (0 active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
::/0[Aggregate] 00:01:04, metric 1
Discard
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos83/swconfig83-routing/id-10388137.html
Enjoy :)
--
Sabri
JNCIE-M #261
JNCIS-ER #6
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Exam Guideline
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:39:32PM -0700, Omer Fahim wrote: Hello, I have recently passed JNCIS exam. Plannig to sit for JNCIP. Downloaded the e-book of JNCIP from the www.juniper.net. But I do not have any idea how the questions comes on the JNCIP exam. Can anyone help me about this?? Can anyone tell me where I can find the JNCIP questions?? So that I can get an idea how the questions comes on the JNCIP exam? The e-book is a good tool to prepare. If you can get your hands on some equipment do the case studies and analyse your results. Also, read the part where it says Tips for Taking Your Exam. There are no JNCIP exam questions online as every candidate agreed to a non-disclosure agreement (as you did when you attempted JNCIS) regarding the JNTCP. Thanks, -- Sabri JNCIE-M JNCIS-ER ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Virtual Router
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Guy Davies wrote: Hi, As Chuck pointed out, though, the separation is far from complete. For example, if user A logs into logical-router A and starts modifying the config for logical-router A, then user B logs into logical-router B and modifies the config for logical-router B then does a commit, he will commit *all* changes to the config including those made by user A. If those changes are syntactically incomplete, the commit may fail. But worse, if they are syntactically correct but not correct in terms of the intended behaviour, you'll get the incorrect behaviour. Not that I disagree with your recommendation, but there is always the option of edit exclusive. Thanks, -- Sabri JNCIP-M #381 JNCIS-ER #6 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] cRTP on E3
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:45:13PM +0500, S.Hasan Asghar Naqvi wrote:
Hi,
It would be of great help if someone shares the config with us.
E3 interface has following config.
clocking internal;
encapsulation ppp;
unit 0 {
family inet {
address a.b.c.d/30;
}
family mpls;
}
To use cRTP you need to use a services-pic. You then have to use the
statement compression-device if you are not using mlppp. Here is an
example:
interfaces {
ls-0/0/0 {
unit 2 {
compression {
rtp {
port minimum 2000 maximum 64009;
}
}
family inet {
address a.b.c.d/30;
}
family mpls;
}
e3-0/1/0
{
clocking internal;
encapsulation ppp;
unit 0 {
compression-device ls-0/0/0.2
}
}
I have no idea wether or not this works on an e3, the examples I took
from the AJRE course are for serial interfaces.
Thanks,
--
Sabri
JNCIP-M #381
JNCIS-ER
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Certified number
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:04:05PM -0800, Benny Sumitro wrote: Hi Benny, Sorry for this non-technical issue and rather a stupid question. I just recently passed my JNCIS-M exam. Can I know my JNCIS number, you know like the CCIE # 1 or anything? Unfortunately Juniper stopped issuing JNCIS numbers (as well as JNCIA) a while ago. There are still numbers for the JCNIP and JNCIE holders. Thanks, -- Sabri JNCIA-M #747 JNCIS-M #??? JNCIP-M #381 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
