Re: [j-nsp] JNCIE-SP study peer
Hi bruno, Although i have pass JNCIE-SP two years ago ,you still can add me. i can give u some suggestions if you really want to go for it. my skype is brunojuniper. Hope you can get your JNCIE soon! -- Best Regards, Bruno -- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:28:12 +0800 From: grand bassam bassamgrand1...@gmail.com To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] JNCIE-SP study peer ? Message-ID: CAAUxybc-A3U+owNSuK_Pk2JwWkhbP=ycfxgbdztz9wmqoxi...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, I come from gulf ,i just finish JNCIP-SP recently . would like to go for JNCIE-SP this year. i hope to find some peer who can study together. Best Regards, Bassam -- Subject: Digest Footer ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 140, Issue 3 *** ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] what is different between virtual router and logical-system
Hi guys, i have use juniper for long time. but today my colleague ask me what is big different bwtween virtual router and logical-system? from my point of view, the big different is interface configuration . with virtual router , interface configuration under global config,while logical -system ,configure their interface under logical-system. anything else ? pls comment .thx. -- Best Regards, Bruno ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Anyone who use inetzero JNCIE-ENT workbook?
Hi All, Is there anyone who use Inetzero JNCIE-ENT workbook. Is it good enough. Last year, I buy proteus JNCIE-SP for my JNCIE-SP preparation.I don't think it's good. not a complete lab .so this time i don't want to choose proteus again. -- Best Regards, Bruno ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] JNCIE-SP LAB Exam
I would recommend Juniper JNCIE-SP bootcamp lab guide. -- Best Regards, Bruno Today's Topics: 1. Re: JNCIE-SP LAB Exam (david@orange.com) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:39:17 +0100 From: david@orange.com To: 'Farhat Abbasse' ab_ferha...@hotmail.co.uk, juniper juniper juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JNCIE-SP LAB Exam Message-ID: 14037_1362991157_513d9835_14037_1097_1_26812f15c2b5a8438d1c9bfcdef73fec2da8f74...@pmexcb1a.intranet-paris.francetelecom.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I recommend the inetzero workbook : https://www.inetzero.com/workbooks-jncie-sp/ David Roy IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 david@orange.com JNCIE-MT/SP #703 - JNCIE-ENT #305 - JNCIP-SEC -Message d'origine- De?: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Farhat Abbasse Envoy??: lundi 11 mars 2013 09:30 ??: juniper juniper Objet?: Re: [j-nsp] JNCIE-SP LAB Exam Thanks to all of you, for your priceless recommendation, I will dive right now on JUNOSPHERE. Could please recommend me any study materials for this Exam. Thanks a lot.BR/ From: bruno.juni...@gmail.com To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; ab_ferha...@hotmail.co.uk Subject: Re:JNCIE-SP LAB Exam Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:51:24 +0800 Hi Farhat, I have pass JNCIE-SP last year. U can purchase rack from juniper . they have junosphere can emulate juniper mx. can do practice everything on it . --Best Regards, Bruno -- Original --From: juniper-nsp-requestjuniper-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net;Date: Mon, Mar 11, 2013 00:00 AMTo: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 124, Issue 14 Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to juniper-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net You can reach the person managing the list at juniper-nsp-ow...@puck.nether.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest... Today's Topics: 1. JNCIE-SP LAB Exam (Farhat Abbasse) -- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 10:03:06 +0100 From: Farhat Abbasse ab_ferha...@hotmail.co.uk To: juniper juniper juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] JNCIE-SP LAB Exam Message-ID: dub115-w137c2d617a8f2c27cbd340aca...@phx.gbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi nice Community, I would like to expose my concern regarding the JNCIE-SP, and I hope you could help me . Actually I do want to take the JNCIE-SP LAB exam, but my problem is that since the LAB is based on MX series it becomes a little bit problematic, as I do not have any MX boxes where I can have hands on it. So, could you please recommend me, any study materials in order to prepare for the JNCIE-SP LAB. your pieces of advice are warmly welcome. BR/ Farhat. -- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 124, Issue 14 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list
Re: [j-nsp] JNCIE-SP LAB Exam
Hi Farhat, I have pass JNCIE-SP last year. U can purchase rack from juniper . they have junosphere can emulate juniper mx. can do practice everything on it . -- Best Regards, Bruno -- Original -- From: juniper-nsp-requestjuniper-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net; Date: Mon, Mar 11, 2013 00:00 AM To: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 124, Issue 14 Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to juniper-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net You can reach the person managing the list at juniper-nsp-ow...@puck.nether.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest... Today's Topics: 1. JNCIE-SP LAB Exam (Farhat Abbasse) -- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 10:03:06 +0100 From: Farhat Abbasse ab_ferha...@hotmail.co.uk To: juniper juniper juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] JNCIE-SP LAB Exam Message-ID: dub115-w137c2d617a8f2c27cbd340aca...@phx.gbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi nice Community, I would like to expose my concern regarding the JNCIE-SP, and I hope you could help me . Actually I do want to take the JNCIE-SP LAB exam, but my problem is that since the LAB is based on MX series it becomes a little bit problematic, as I do not have any MX boxes where I can have hands on it. So, could you please recommend me, any study materials in order to prepare for the JNCIE-SP LAB. your pieces of advice are warmly welcome. BR/ Farhat. -- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 124, Issue 14 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] which situation we need Interconnecting two Layer 2 VPN
hello , i am new to l2vpn, when i read the l2vpn doc ,i am confuse. why we need interconnecting two layer vpn. is it for connecting two sp l2vpn customer or same service provider customer. take this doc for example ,why we need it . why not connect PE1 and PE5 .then the CE1 and CE5 can communicate? http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.4/topics/example/layer-2-vpn-layer-2-vpn-connection-configuring.html -- Best Regards, Bruno ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] ldp signaling vpls can't up
hello ben, check this link http://sioduy.blogsome.com/2010/10/27/l2vpn-vpls/ . he run ldp vpls success on srx . so i think it's support on srx . -- Best Regards, Bruno -- Original -- From: Ben Dalebd...@comlinx.com.au; Date: Thu, Apr 12, 2012 03:28 PM To: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com; Cc: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ldp signaling vpls can't up Hi Bruno i don't know what did i miss? VPLS routing instances on J Series or SRX Series devices use BGP to send signals to other PE routers. LDP signaling is not supported. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.4/information-products/topic-collections/security/software-all/mpls/index.html?topic-47047.html#jd0e7877 Cheers, Ben ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] Layer 2 feature on srx
hello expert,
i use two srx210h to test some Layer 2 networking features on MX Series
routers. the topo is very simple
PC1---SRX1SRX2PC2. the link in srx1---srx2 is set to trunk mode. PC1
and PC2 is belong to vlan 100. PC1 can't ping PC2.
interfaces {
ge-0/0/1 {
description TO-SRX2;
vlan-tagging;
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode trunk;
vlan-id-list [ 100 200 ];
}
}
}
fe-0/0/4 {
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode access;
vlan-id 100;
}
}
}
irb {
unit 100 {
description GW For VLAN 100;
family inet {
address 100.1.1.254/24;
}
}
unit 200 {
description GW For VLAN 200;
family inet {
address 200.1.1.254/24;
}
}
}
}
security {
forwarding-options {
family {
mpls {
mode packet-based;
}
}
}
}
bridge-domains {
vlan_100 {
vlan-id 100;
routing-interface irb.100;
}
vlan_200 {
vlan-id 200;
routing-interface irb.200;
}
}
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 feature on srx
not need to zone . coz i set it to packet mode
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
-- Original --
From: ashish vermaashish.s...@gmail.com;
Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 05:09 PM
To: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com;
Cc: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 feature on srx
Are you missing zones/policies since it is SRX?
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, bruno bruno.juni...@gmail.com wrote:
hello expert,
i use two srx210h to test some Layer 2 networking features on MX Series
routers. the topo is very simple
PC1---SRX1SRX2PC2. the link in srx1---srx2 is set to trunk mode. PC1
and PC2 is belong to vlan 100. PC1 can't ping PC2.
interfaces {
ge-0/0/1 {
description TO-SRX2;
vlan-tagging;
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode trunk;
vlan-id-list [ 100 200 ];
}
}
}
fe-0/0/4 {
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode access;
vlan-id 100;
}
}
}
irb {
unit 100 {
description GW For VLAN 100;
family inet {
address 100.1.1.254/24;
}
}
unit 200 {
description GW For VLAN 200;
family inet {
address 200.1.1.254/24;
}
}
}
}
security {
forwarding-options {
family {
mpls {
mode packet-based;
}
}
}
}
bridge-domains {
vlan_100 {
vlan-id 100;
routing-interface irb.100;
}
vlan_200 {
vlan-id 200;
routing-interface irb.200;
}
}
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 feature on srx
i am running 11.4R1.6
root@R1# run show version
Hostname: R1
Model: srx210h
JUNOS Software Release [11.4R1.6]
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
-- Original --
From: Tom Storeyt...@snnap.net;
Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 07:56 PM
To: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com;
Cc: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 feature on srx
What software are you running on your SRX's?
The only reason I ask is that I am running 10.4R4.5 on an SRX100, and
this is how I do my VLANs (SRX is in flow mode, but does that really
matter to L2??):
interfaces {
fe-0/0/1 {
description ** Trunk to esxi1;
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members all;
}
native-vlan-id 1;
}
}
}
fe-0/0/4 {
description ** Console server;
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
vlan {
members VLAN11-MGMT;
}
}
}
}
vlan {
unit 10 {
family inet {
address 172.25.144.65/26;
}
family inet6 {
address 2001:::1::/64 {
eui-64;
}
}
}
unit 11 {
family inet {
address 172.25.144.17/28;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
VLAN10-LAN {
vlan-id 10;
l3-interface vlan.10;
}
VLAN11-MGMT {
vlan-id 11;
l3-interface vlan.11;
}
}
The primary difference seems to be that I use vlans instead of
bridge-domains at the bottom, and the vlan interface instead of
irb.
Ive also successfully trunked VLANs to/from a HP switch using this
configuration.
Tom
On 9 April 2012 10:05, bruno bruno.juni...@gmail.com wrote:
hello expert,
i use two srx210h to test some Layer 2 networking features on MX Series
routers. the topo is very simple
PC1---SRX1SRX2PC2. the link in srx1---srx2 is set to trunk mode. PC1
and PC2 is belong to vlan 100. PC1 can't ping PC2.
interfaces {
ge-0/0/1 {
description TO-SRX2;
vlan-tagging;
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode trunk;
vlan-id-list [ 100 200 ];
}
}
}
fe-0/0/4 {
unit 0 {
family bridge {
interface-mode access;
vlan-id 100;
}
}
}
irb {
unit 100 {
description GW For VLAN 100;
family inet {
address 100.1.1.254/24;
}
}
unit 200 {
description GW For VLAN 200;
family inet {
address 200.1.1.254/24;
}
}
}
}
security {
forwarding-options {
family {
mpls {
mode packet-based;
}
}
}
}
bridge-domains {
vlan_100 {
vlan-id 100;
routing-interface irb.100;
}
vlan_200 {
vlan-id 200;
routing-interface irb.200;
}
}
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] vpls test site cant up
i am test vpls,on pe1 there are two site belong to same vpn. when i commit ,i
just saw the ce1 is up .ce3 show lm. anyone can help? i am using the srx to
test vpls.
[edit routing-instances]
root@PE1# show
vpn-a {
instance-type vpls;
interface fe-0/0/5.600;
interface fe-0/0/6.600;
interface fe-0/0/7.600;
route-distinguisher 1.1.1.1:1;
vrf-target target:65000:1;
protocols {
vpls {
site-range 10;
no-tunnel-services;
site ce1 {
site-identifier 1;
interface fe-0/0/5.600;
}
site ce3 {
site-identifier 3;
active-interface primary fe-0/0/6.600;
interface fe-0/0/6.600;
interface fe-0/0/7.600;
}
}
}
}
Instance: vpn-a
Local site: ce1 (1)
connection-site Type St Time last up # Up trans
2 rmt Up Apr 6 16:27:57 2012 1
Remote PE: 2.2.2.2, Negotiated control-word: No
Incoming label: 262154, Outgoing label: 262161
Local interface: lsi.1048836, Status: Up, Encapsulation: VPLS
Description: Intf - vpls vpn-a local site 1 remote site 2
4 rmt RM
Local site: ce3 (3)
connection-site Type St Time last up # Up trans
2 rmt LM
4 rmt LM
when i deactive the site ce1 ,ce3 is up
Instance: vpn-a
Local site: ce3 (3)
connection-site Type St Time last up # Up trans
2 rmt Up Apr 6 16:36:15 2012 1
Remote PE: 2.2.2.2, Negotiated control-word: No
Incoming label: 262146, Outgoing label: 262163
Local interface: lsi.1048837, Status: Up, Encapsulation: VPLS
Description: Intf - vpls vpn-a local site 3 remote site 2
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] vpls mac table problem
hi expert, i am test vpls on srx device. everything is good. ce can ping each other. but when i issue the command run show vpls mac-table on pe. i got nothing . i am running the latest junos os . is there any bug there or what i am missing? [edit] root@R1# run show vpls statistics VPLS statistics: Instance: ce1 Local interface: fe-0/0/5.600, Index: 73 Multicast packets: 139 Multicast bytes : 11752 Flooded packets : 111 Flooded bytes: 9382 Current MAC count: 1 Local interface: lsi.1049088, Index: 76 Remote PE: 2.2.2.2 Current MAC count: 1 [edit] root@R1# run show vpls mac-table root@R1# run show version Hostname: R1 Model: srx210h JUNOS Software Release [11.4R1.6] -- Best Regards, Bruno ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] vpls mac table problem
thx man. it works. -- Best Regards, Bruno -- Original -- From: Jensen Tylerjty...@fiberutilities.com; Date: Thu, Apr 5, 2012 11:20 PM To: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com; juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Subject: RE: [j-nsp] vpls mac table problem show route forwarding-table family vpls Mac-table command is not supported on SRX. Jensen Tyler Sr Engineering Manager Fiberutilities Group, LLC (319) 297-6915 (office) *NEW (319) 364-8100 (fax) (319) 329-8578 (mobile) -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of bruno Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 10:08 AM To: juniper-nsp Subject: [j-nsp] vpls mac table problem hi expert, i am test vpls on srx device. everything is good. ce can ping each other. but when i issue the command run show vpls mac-table on pe. i got nothing . i am running the latest junos os . is there any bug there or what i am missing? [edit] root@R1# run show vpls statistics VPLS statistics: Instance: ce1 Local interface: fe-0/0/5.600, Index: 73 Multicast packets: 139 Multicast bytes : 11752 Flooded packets : 111 Flooded bytes: 9382 Current MAC count: 1 Local interface: lsi.1049088, Index: 76 Remote PE: 2.2.2.2 Current MAC count: 1 [edit] root@R1# run show vpls mac-table root@R1# run show version Hostname: R1 Model: srx210h JUNOS Software Release [11.4R1.6] -- Best Regards, Bruno ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] bgp ipv6 route problem
i am use 10.4R9.2. it did change it to :: when i advertise the bgp route as next-hop . when i add a ipv6 route on interface, the router receive the route from peer, not ignore any more. BUT is it the right way we do ? any other solution? any advice is welcome. lab@test# run show version Hostname: test Model: olive JUNOS Base OS boot [10.4R9.2] JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [10.4R9.2] JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [10.4R9.2] JUNOS Crypto Software Suite [10.4R9.2] JUNOS Packet Forwarding Engine Support (M/T Common) [10.4R9.2] JUNOS Packet Forwarding Engine Support (M20/M40) [10.4R9.2] -- Original -- From: Per Granathper.gran...@gcc.com.cy; Date: Sat, Mar 17, 2012 02:42 PM To: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com; Cc: Kazmierczak, Tomasz (NSN - US/Irving)tomasz.kazmierc...@nsn.com; juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Subject: Re: [j-nsp] bgp ipv6 route problem Are you sure you are not running Junos 11.x ? I said before it was in 10.4 that mapped addresses changed from :: to ::: but it was probably from 11.1. Been some time since I looked into it. Have a look at the Day One book Advanced IPv6 Configuration for an example with :::. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] bgp ipv6 route problem
Hello per， Thanks for ur response.R1 dont accept the route in 10.4. how do we do make it accept the route. Thanks -- Original -- From: Per Granathper.gran...@gcc.com.cy; Date: Fri, Mar 16, 2012 11:46 PM To: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Cc: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com; Subject: RE: [j-nsp] bgp ipv6 route problem In 10.4 the automatically created IPv4-compatible IPv6-address changed, that is the (:::12.1.1.1). Before 10.4 it used to be just (::12.1.1.1). If you have mixture in the network it will be confusing... BTW, the JNCIE exam is now using 10.4. i met some odd problem on junos 10.4 . two router(R1R2) establish ipv4 bgp session with ipv4 and ipv6 family. session is up. only the ipv4 route is accept. not ipv6 route. so i trace on r1 . i find the ipv6 route is ignore. but not problem on junos 9.4. lab@junos104.# run show bgp summary logical-system r1 12.1.1.1 400 26 28 0 1 9 Establ inet.0: 1/1/1/0 inet6.0: 0/0/0/0 Mar 15 03:12:42.988838 bgp_nexthop_sanity: peer 12.1.1.1 (External AS 600) next hop :::12.1.1.1 unexpectedly remote, ignoring routes in this update Mar 15 03:12:42.988853 bgp_rcv_nlri: Peer 12.1.1.1 (External AS 600) Mar 15 03:12:42.988865 bgp_rcv_nlri: ::::/48 Mar 15 03:12:42.90 ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] how to prepare JNCIE-SP lab
hello stefan,
i have check ur doc yestersday.there are two question:
1.how to check mx box have tunnel service card.
2. is it 10 is special for tunnel in lt-0/0/10 . can we use 8 9 or 7 ?
logical-systems {
dc {
interfaces {
lt-0/0/10 {
unit 0 {
description dc-r7;
encapsulation ethernet;
peer-unit 1;
family inet {
address 10.0.8.13/30;
}
family iso;
}
}
}
}
r7 {
interfaces {
lt-0/0/10 {
unit 1 {
description r7-dc;
encapsulation ethernet;
peer-unit 0;
family inet {
address 10.0.8.14/30;
}
family iso;
}
}
}
}
}
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
-- Original --
From: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com;
Date: Thu, Oct 27, 2011 02:49 PM
To: Stefan Fouantsfou...@shortestpathfirst.net;
Cc: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] how to prepare JNCIE-SP lab
thx stefan,
I have practice JNCIP and JNCIE study guide in olive. MX box is expensive for
me . maybe i can fine some srx.
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
-- Original --
From: Stefan Fouantsfou...@shortestpathfirst.net;
Date: Thu, Oct 27, 2011 11:23 AM
To: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com;
Cc: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] how to prepare JNCIE-SP lab
Bruno,
You might want to listen to the certification webinar we put together a few
weeks ago:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/live/111005/#overview
Bottom line, if you can get yourself a single MX you can use logical-systems
and logical- tunnel interfaces to emulate a large topology, or in lieu of that
you can get your hands on some branch SRX devices and convert them to packet
mode. The following blog article I wrote for the M series exam a while back
covers the configuration required if you choose to use MX with Logical Systems.
http://www.shortestpathfirst.net/2010/01/13/preparation-tips-for-the-jncip-mt-and-jncie-mt-exams/
Study material from Junos Class of Service, Junos Multicast Routing, Junos MPLS
VPNs, and the Advanced Junos Service Provider Routing curriculum, and do all
the associated labs as they are highly indicative of the type of things you
will see on the exam.
Harry Reynold's now out-of-print JNCIP and JNCIE Study Guides are still useful
for preparation as well... You can find them in PDF format by searching for
them on Google.
Study hard and practice, practice, practice... Learns those tricks like 'load
merge terminal relative', 'load patch', copy and paste techniques in
conjunction with 'show | display set'.
Another little trick that will save you time when determining aggregates for
summarization:
http://www.shortestpathfirst.net/2011/06/21/jncie-tips-from-the-field-summarization-made-easy/
Good luck and may the force be with you!
Stefan Fouant
JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ER, JNCI
Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks
Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 26, 2011, at 10:50 PM, bruno bruno.juni...@gmail.com wrote:
hello guys,
I have pass jncip-m last year. coz i don't have time to prepare jncie-m ,so i
give up. now i am avaible for jncie .juniper said the MX
series was added in the lab . how to prepare for it .should i buy mx device?
any suggestion? also need JNCIE peer .
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] how to prepare JNCIE-SP lab
thx stefan, I have practice JNCIP and JNCIE study guide in olive. MX box is expensive for me . maybe i can fine some srx. -- Best Regards, Bruno -- Original -- From: Stefan Fouantsfou...@shortestpathfirst.net; Date: Thu, Oct 27, 2011 11:23 AM To: brunobruno.juni...@gmail.com; Cc: juniper-nspjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Subject: Re: [j-nsp] how to prepare JNCIE-SP lab Bruno, You might want to listen to the certification webinar we put together a few weeks ago: http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/live/111005/#overview Bottom line, if you can get yourself a single MX you can use logical-systems and logical- tunnel interfaces to emulate a large topology, or in lieu of that you can get your hands on some branch SRX devices and convert them to packet mode. The following blog article I wrote for the M series exam a while back covers the configuration required if you choose to use MX with Logical Systems. http://www.shortestpathfirst.net/2010/01/13/preparation-tips-for-the-jncip-mt-and-jncie-mt-exams/ Study material from Junos Class of Service, Junos Multicast Routing, Junos MPLS VPNs, and the Advanced Junos Service Provider Routing curriculum, and do all the associated labs as they are highly indicative of the type of things you will see on the exam. Harry Reynold's now out-of-print JNCIP and JNCIE Study Guides are still useful for preparation as well... You can find them in PDF format by searching for them on Google. Study hard and practice, practice, practice... Learns those tricks like 'load merge terminal relative', 'load patch', copy and paste techniques in conjunction with 'show | display set'. Another little trick that will save you time when determining aggregates for summarization: http://www.shortestpathfirst.net/2011/06/21/jncie-tips-from-the-field-summarization-made-easy/ Good luck and may the force be with you! Stefan Fouant JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ER, JNCI Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate Sent from my iPad On Oct 26, 2011, at 10:50 PM, bruno bruno.juni...@gmail.com wrote: hello guys, I have pass jncip-m last year. coz i don't have time to prepare jncie-m ,so i give up. now i am avaible for jncie .juniper said the MX series was added in the lab . how to prepare for it .should i buy mx device? any suggestion? also need JNCIE peer . -- Best Regards, Bruno ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] how to prepare JNCIE-SP lab
hello guys, I have pass jncip-m last year. coz i don't have time to prepare jncie-m ,so i give up. now i am avaible for jncie .juniper said the MX series was added in the lab . how to prepare for it .should i buy mx device? any suggestion? also need JNCIE peer . -- Best Regards, Bruno ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
