Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

2014-04-05 Thread Klaus Groeger
On SRX branches one configures :




interfaces {

    vlan {

         unit 123 {

             family inet {

                        address 192.168.123.1/24

             }

         }

    }

    ge-0/0/0 {

          unit 0 {

             family ethernet-switching

                  vlan {

                       members 123

                   }

             }

         }

    }

}




vlan {

    onetwothree {

        vlan-id 123

        l3-interface vlan.123

    }

}




On SRX IRBs are called RVIs (Routed VLAN Interfaces). This way one gets 
interfaces configured

 as switching interfaces with a routable address. You may apply most L2 options 
in branch SRX as needed, even LAGs and all the other stuff. 




Regards,      Klaus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

2014-04-05 Thread Morgan McLean
Klaus,

Yes its RVI on branch but its IRB on datacenter SRX; you can't even
configure vlans on them.

Anyway, thanks all for the answers, just needed to verify I wasn't going
crazy.

Thanks,
Morgan


On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Klaus Groeger kla...@gmail.com wrote:

 On SRX branches one configures :




 interfaces {

 vlan {

  unit 123 {

  family inet {

 address 192.168.123.1/24

  }

  }

 }

 ge-0/0/0 {

   unit 0 {

  family ethernet-switching

   vlan {

members 123

}

  }

  }

 }

 }




 vlan {

 onetwothree {

 vlan-id 123

 l3-interface vlan.123

 }

 }




 On SRX IRBs are called RVIs (Routed VLAN Interfaces). This way one gets
 interfaces configured

  as switching interfaces with a routable address. You may apply most L2
 options in branch SRX as needed, even LAGs and all the other stuff.




 Regards,  Klaus
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

2014-04-02 Thread Morgan McLean
Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for
routing under the SRX3k and 5k series? I have a customer asking to have
cabinets uplink directly to the SRX3600 (no cluster), which means I'd have
to use bridge domains.

But, I don't think this will even work. Am I correct?

Thanks,
Morgan
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

2014-04-02 Thread Morgan McLean
For the record, I disagree with his method for many reasons, but if I'm
correct this seals the coffin to to speak.

Thanks,
Morgan


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for
 routing under the SRX3k and 5k series? I have a customer asking to have
 cabinets uplink directly to the SRX3600 (no cluster), which means I'd have
 to use bridge domains.

 But, I don't think this will even work. Am I correct?

 Thanks,
 Morgan

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

2014-04-02 Thread Will O'Brien
You can create a VLAN and add interfaces to it.

On Apr 2, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for
 routing under the SRX3k and 5k series? I have a customer asking to have
 cabinets uplink directly to the SRX3600 (no cluster), which means I'd have
 to use bridge domains.
 
 But, I don't think this will even work. Am I correct?
 
 Thanks,
 Morgan
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

2014-04-02 Thread Morgan McLean
Not on a datacenter series SRX.

Thanks,
Morgan


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Will O'Brien will.obr...@noaa.gov wrote:

 You can create a VLAN and add interfaces to it.

 On Apr 2, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote:

  Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for
  routing under the SRX3k and 5k series? I have a customer asking to have
  cabinets uplink directly to the SRX3600 (no cluster), which means I'd
 have
  to use bridge domains.
 
  But, I don't think this will even work. Am I correct?
 
  Thanks,
  Morgan
  ___
  juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

2014-04-02 Thread Per Westerlund
I'm offline right now, but last time I checked, IRBs with bridge domains (SRX 
in transparent/L2 mode) were only used for management, no forwarding of transit 
traffic possible.

/Per

 2 apr 2014 kl. 21:46 skrev Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com:
 
 Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for
 routing under the SRX3k and 5k series? I have a customer asking to have
 cabinets uplink directly to the SRX3600 (no cluster), which means I'd have
 to use bridge domains.
 
 But, I don't think this will even work. Am I correct?
 
 Thanks,
 Morgan
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

2014-04-02 Thread Ben Dale
On the branch at least - if you configure an irb interface, the box will fail 
commit check unless it is in transparent mode and it is only useable for 
management

On 3 Apr 2014, at 7:05 am, Per Westerlund p...@westerlund.se wrote:

 I'm offline right now, but last time I checked, IRBs with bridge domains (SRX 
 in transparent/L2 mode) were only used for management, no forwarding of 
 transit traffic possible.
 
 /Per
 
 2 apr 2014 kl. 21:46 skrev Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com:
 
 Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for
 routing under the SRX3k and 5k series? I have a customer asking to have
 cabinets uplink directly to the SRX3600 (no cluster), which means I'd have
 to use bridge domains.
 
 But, I don't think this will even work. Am I correct?
 
 Thanks,
 Morgan
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp