Re: [j-nsp] EX series needs a special license for BGP?
TBH, I have no clue about the licensing ramifications, only that for the price I paid, I was given the ability to do OSPF, IBGP/EBGP. And it works, with a few kinks (full tables incoming seems to be an issue). Dan -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of TCIS List Acct Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:02 AM To: juniper-nsp Subject: [j-nsp] EX series needs a special license for BGP? Hrmm -- from what I've read, it seems the EX series DOES need a license for BGP, but the J-series does not, unless you need the route-reflector functionality. Am I correct or ? Dan Farrell wrote: If I'm not mistaken I got an EX3200-24T for around $3k (give or take) and I have BGP peering on it. Dan Farrell da...@appliedi.net -Original Message- From: TCIS List Acct [mailto:lista...@tulsaconnect.com] Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:04 AM To: Patrik Olsson Cc: Dan Farrell; juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the EX3200 series? That license adds thousands to the cost.. --Mike --Mike ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4878 (20100218) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4880 (20100219) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] EX series needs a special license for BGP?
On Friday 19 February 2010 10:52:22 pm Dan Farrell wrote: TBH, I have no clue about the licensing ramifications, only that for the price I paid, I was given the ability to do OSPF, IBGP/EBGP. And it works, with a few kinks (full tables incoming seems to be an issue). As you've probably realized, the platform won't support a full v4 table. Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] EX series needs a special license for BGP?
OMG! Jk :). Yeah, that's not a concern of ours at this particular point, with basic carrier failover and some basic route selection we're fine with what it handles. Dan -Original Message- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mti...@globaltransit.net] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:13 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Dan Farrell; TCIS List Acct Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX series needs a special license for BGP? On Friday 19 February 2010 10:52:22 pm Dan Farrell wrote: TBH, I have no clue about the licensing ramifications, only that for the price I paid, I was given the ability to do OSPF, IBGP/EBGP. And it works, with a few kinks (full tables incoming seems to be an issue). As you've probably realized, the platform won't support a full v4 table. Cheers, Mark. __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4881 (20100219) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] EX series needs a special license for BGP?
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:10:12PM -0700, Tommy Perniciaro wrote: Yes - that's correct. Junos will complain about not having the license but BGP will still work, same deal on the J series not having the route reflector license, still works just complains :) EX's BGP license is (last I checked) stil nagware which can be filtered or ignored, though I'm sure that will change over time. J-series' BGP route-reflector license on the other hand is now hard enforced (any neighbors with clusters configured will not come up) as of at least a year+ ago (somewhere in the 8.x's I think). The ironic part is J-series is absolutely worthless as a route-reflector, it suffers *heavily* from the slow route installation bug, and if you ask Juniper about it they say J-series CPU is mostly locked towards forwarding packets rather than processing BGP, and is not intended to be a BGP route reflector (and yet they're still taking your money for the BGP RR licenses, go figure :P). -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] EX series needs a special license for BGP?
Hrmm -- from what I've read, it seems the EX series DOES need a license for BGP, but the J-series does not, unless you need the route-reflector functionality. Am I correct or ? Dan Farrell wrote: If I'm not mistaken I got an EX3200-24T for around $3k (give or take) and I have BGP peering on it. Dan Farrell da...@appliedi.net -Original Message- From: TCIS List Acct [mailto:lista...@tulsaconnect.com] Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:04 AM To: Patrik Olsson Cc: Dan Farrell; juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the EX3200 series? That license adds thousands to the cost.. --Mike --Mike ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] EX series needs a special license for BGP?
Yes - that's correct. Junos will complain about not having the license but BGP will still work, same deal on the J series not having the route reflector license, still works just complains :) Sent from my iPhone On Feb 18, 2010, at 9:05 PM, TCIS List Acct lista...@tulsaconnect.com wrote: Hrmm -- from what I've read, it seems the EX series DOES need a license for BGP, but the J-series does not, unless you need the route-reflector functionality. Am I correct or ? Dan Farrell wrote: If I'm not mistaken I got an EX3200-24T for around $3k (give or take) and I have BGP peering on it. Dan Farrell da...@appliedi.net -Original Message- From: TCIS List Acct [mailto:lista...@tulsaconnect.com] Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:04 AM To: Patrik Olsson Cc: Dan Farrell; juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router But don't you need the advanced feature license to do BGP on the EX3200 series? That license adds thousands to the cost.. --Mike --Mike ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
