Re: [j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence
Yes, similar issues on the MX480 with Sampled when inline flow was enabled. On Mar 23, 2015, at 6:30 AM, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk wrote: Does this affect other MX series boxes as well please? adam -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jordan Whited Sent: 20 March 2015 17:41 To: Tan Heng Chai Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence observed with inline sampling enabled, 1.5m in RIB, and one v4 feed (~250k active-paths) changing state 11.4R7.5 - 10+ minutes 12.3R8.7 - ~220 seconds 14.2R1.9 - ~200 seconds YMMV On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Tan Heng Chai ad...@sg.gs wrote: Hi J-NSP, Just wondering if anyone has benchmark/feedback on BGP convergence times on the MX80 with and without sampling on versions higher than 11.4R7.5, especially with reference to PR836197 and the sampling issue? -- Yours Sincerely, Tan Heng Chai Chief Technical Officer - SG.GS http://www.sg.gs ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp --- This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com --- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence
Does this affect other MX series boxes as well please? adam -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jordan Whited Sent: 20 March 2015 17:41 To: Tan Heng Chai Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence observed with inline sampling enabled, 1.5m in RIB, and one v4 feed (~250k active-paths) changing state 11.4R7.5 - 10+ minutes 12.3R8.7 - ~220 seconds 14.2R1.9 - ~200 seconds YMMV On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Tan Heng Chai ad...@sg.gs wrote: Hi J-NSP, Just wondering if anyone has benchmark/feedback on BGP convergence times on the MX80 with and without sampling on versions higher than 11.4R7.5, especially with reference to PR836197 and the sampling issue? -- Yours Sincerely, Tan Heng Chai Chief Technical Officer - SG.GS http://www.sg.gs ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp --- This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com --- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence
observed with inline sampling enabled, 1.5m in RIB, and one v4 feed (~250k active-paths) changing state 11.4R7.5 - 10+ minutes 12.3R8.7 - ~220 seconds 14.2R1.9 - ~200 seconds YMMV On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Tan Heng Chai ad...@sg.gs wrote: Hi J-NSP, Just wondering if anyone has benchmark/feedback on BGP convergence times on the MX80 with and without sampling on versions higher than 11.4R7.5, especially with reference to PR836197 and the sampling issue? -- Yours Sincerely, Tan Heng Chai Chief Technical Officer - SG.GS http://www.sg.gs ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence
Hi J-NSP, Just wondering if anyone has benchmark/feedback on BGP convergence times on the MX80 with and without sampling on versions higher than 11.4R7.5, especially with reference to PR836197 and the sampling issue? -- Yours Sincerely, Tan Heng Chai Chief Technical Officer - SG.GS http://www.sg.gs ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence
13.3R5 or 14.1R4 are better options Sent from my iPhone On Mar 20, 2015, at 14:09, Tan Heng Chai ad...@sg.gs wrote: Hi J-NSP, Just wondering if anyone has benchmark/feedback on BGP convergence times on the MX80 with and without sampling on versions higher than 11.4R7.5, especially with reference to PR836197 and the sampling issue? -- Yours Sincerely, Tan Heng Chai Chief Technical Officer - SG.GS http://www.sg.gs ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence
Depends on the version of code you’re running. At best you’re looking at minutes and in some cases as much as 10 minutes. With the wrong version of Code where the sampled bug is still present you might never get routes installed in the FIB. The fix applied for the PR does allow for convergence but you see a lot of log jams and programming issues during a convergence event. Tends to install routes in a very bursty way. On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Tan Heng Chai ad...@sg.gs wrote: Hi J-NSP, Just wondering if anyone has benchmark/feedback on BGP convergence times on the MX80 with and without sampling on versions higher than 11.4R7.5, especially with reference to PR836197 and the sampling issue? -- Yours Sincerely, Tan Heng Chai Chief Technical Officer - SG.GS http://www.sg.gs ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
