[j-nsp] SRX Active/Passive cluster with redundant route based IPSec - connectivity to AWS VPC

2014-05-05 Thread Andy Litzinger
Hi All,
  Two related questions.  I have a pair of SRX 3400s in an Active/Passive
cluster.  They rely on an external gateway for internet access (i.e. my
ISPs don't terminate on the SRXs).  I am setting up redundant tunnels to an
AWS VPC.  Amazon has an example for J-Series (
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/NetworkAdminGuide/Juniper.html),
but I don't think it's for a cluster set-up.

Here are my questions:

1 - If I want to set up a redundant secure tunnel interface (e.g. st0),
should i bind it to an reth interface?

2 - Has anyone connected an Active/Passive SRX cluster to an AWS VPC?  Any
tips or tricks you care to share?

regards,
 -andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] SRX Active/Passive cluster with redundant route based IPSec - connectivity to AWS VPC

2014-05-05 Thread Morgan McLean
Use your loopback and put that in a reth.

Thanks,
Morgan


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Andy Litzinger 
andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,
   Two related questions.  I have a pair of SRX 3400s in an Active/Passive
 cluster.  They rely on an external gateway for internet access (i.e. my
 ISPs don't terminate on the SRXs).  I am setting up redundant tunnels to an
 AWS VPC.  Amazon has an example for J-Series (
 http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/NetworkAdminGuide/Juniper.html
 ),
 but I don't think it's for a cluster set-up.

 Here are my questions:

 1 - If I want to set up a redundant secure tunnel interface (e.g. st0),
 should i bind it to an reth interface?

 2 - Has anyone connected an Active/Passive SRX cluster to an AWS VPC?  Any
 tips or tricks you care to share?

 regards,
  -andy
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] SRX Active/Passive cluster with redundant route based IPSec - connectivity to AWS VPC

2014-05-05 Thread Aaron Dewell

I have terminated IPSec tunnels on reth interfaces entirely successfully.  I 
would think that would work fine in your setup as well.  It wasn't amazon, but 
it was to other remote SRXs.  The ISP in question did terminate on both cluster 
members (two drops).  

That was on a branch SRX.  On the 3400 YMMV but I don't see why it wouldn't 
work.  

On May 5, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Andy Litzinger wrote:
 Hi All,
  Two related questions.  I have a pair of SRX 3400s in an Active/Passive
 cluster.  They rely on an external gateway for internet access (i.e. my
 ISPs don't terminate on the SRXs).  I am setting up redundant tunnels to an
 AWS VPC.  Amazon has an example for J-Series (
 http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/NetworkAdminGuide/Juniper.html),
 but I don't think it's for a cluster set-up.
 
 Here are my questions:
 
 1 - If I want to set up a redundant secure tunnel interface (e.g. st0),
 should i bind it to an reth interface?
 
 2 - Has anyone connected an Active/Passive SRX cluster to an AWS VPC?  Any
 tips or tricks you care to share?
 
 regards,
 -andy
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] SRX Active/Passive cluster with redundant route based IPSec - connectivity to AWS VPC

2014-05-05 Thread Andy Litzinger
Hi Morgan,

I presume that with regards to the loopback you are referring to the
external interface I use as my IPSec peer toward Amazon?

what about the internal logical st interface that I need to create in order
to route my internal traffic into the tunnel?  How do I make that redundant?

thanks!
 -andy


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote:

 Use your loopback and put that in a reth.

 Thanks,
 Morgan


 On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Andy Litzinger 
 andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,
   Two related questions.  I have a pair of SRX 3400s in an Active/Passive
 cluster.  They rely on an external gateway for internet access (i.e. my
 ISPs don't terminate on the SRXs).  I am setting up redundant tunnels to
 an
 AWS VPC.  Amazon has an example for J-Series (
 http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/NetworkAdminGuide/Juniper.html
 ),
 but I don't think it's for a cluster set-up.

 Here are my questions:

 1 - If I want to set up a redundant secure tunnel interface (e.g. st0),
 should i bind it to an reth interface?

 2 - Has anyone connected an Active/Passive SRX cluster to an AWS VPC?  Any
 tips or tricks you care to share?

 regards,
  -andy
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] SRX Active/Passive cluster with redundant route based IPSec - connectivity to AWS VPC

2014-05-05 Thread Andrew Jones
You don't need to do anything special to make the st0 interface 
redundant, it will always run on the active node.


On 06.05.2014 08:38, Andy Litzinger wrote:

Hi Morgan,

I presume that with regards to the loopback you are referring to the
external interface I use as my IPSec peer toward Amazon?

what about the internal logical st interface that I need to create in 
order
to route my internal traffic into the tunnel?  How do I make that 
redundant?


thanks!
 -andy


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com 
wrote:



Use your loopback and put that in a reth.

Thanks,
Morgan


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Andy Litzinger 
andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com wrote:


Hi All,
  Two related questions.  I have a pair of SRX 3400s in an 
Active/Passive
cluster.  They rely on an external gateway for internet access 
(i.e. my
ISPs don't terminate on the SRXs).  I am setting up redundant 
tunnels to

an
AWS VPC.  Amazon has an example for J-Series (

http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/NetworkAdminGuide/Juniper.html
),
but I don't think it's for a cluster set-up.

Here are my questions:

1 - If I want to set up a redundant secure tunnel interface (e.g. 
st0),

should i bind it to an reth interface?

2 - Has anyone connected an Active/Passive SRX cluster to an AWS 
VPC?  Any

tips or tricks you care to share?

regards,
 -andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp





___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] SRX Active/Passive cluster with redundant route based IPSec - connectivity to AWS VPC

2014-05-05 Thread Morgan McLean
Andy,

Assuming you have your own IP space, you put a public address on the
loopback. Whichever member is active for lo0 will handle the IPSEC if i
recall.

Theres some juniper docs on the details. ST0 will always be on which ever
node is primary.

Thanks,
Morgan


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Jones a...@jonesy.com.au wrote:

 You don't need to do anything special to make the st0 interface redundant,
 it will always run on the active node.


 On 06.05.2014 08:38, Andy Litzinger wrote:

 Hi Morgan,

 I presume that with regards to the loopback you are referring to the
 external interface I use as my IPSec peer toward Amazon?

 what about the internal logical st interface that I need to create in
 order
 to route my internal traffic into the tunnel?  How do I make that
 redundant?

 thanks!
  -andy


 On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote:

  Use your loopback and put that in a reth.

 Thanks,
 Morgan


 On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Andy Litzinger 
 andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi All,
   Two related questions.  I have a pair of SRX 3400s in an
 Active/Passive
 cluster.  They rely on an external gateway for internet access (i.e. my
 ISPs don't terminate on the SRXs).  I am setting up redundant tunnels to
 an
 AWS VPC.  Amazon has an example for J-Series (

 http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/
 NetworkAdminGuide/Juniper.html
 ),
 but I don't think it's for a cluster set-up.

 Here are my questions:

 1 - If I want to set up a redundant secure tunnel interface (e.g. st0),
 should i bind it to an reth interface?

 2 - Has anyone connected an Active/Passive SRX cluster to an AWS VPC?
  Any
 tips or tricks you care to share?

 regards,
  -andy
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



  ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] SRX Active/Passive cluster with redundant route based IPSec - connectivity to AWS VPC

2014-05-05 Thread Ben Dale
Further to Morgan and Andrew's comments, the st0 interface will follow 
whichever interface you have bound to the external-interface in your IKE 
Gateway configuration (ge-0/0/0.0 in the AWS example), so if you bind this to a 
reth (and have the st0 interface in the same redundancy group) you'll be golden.



On 6 May 2014, at 10:44 am, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote:

 Andy,
 
 Assuming you have your own IP space, you put a public address on the
 loopback. Whichever member is active for lo0 will handle the IPSEC if i
 recall.
 
 Theres some juniper docs on the details. ST0 will always be on which ever
 node is primary.
 
 Thanks,
 Morgan
 
 
 On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Jones a...@jonesy.com.au wrote:
 
 You don't need to do anything special to make the st0 interface redundant,
 it will always run on the active node.
 
 
 On 06.05.2014 08:38, Andy Litzinger wrote:
 
 Hi Morgan,
 
 I presume that with regards to the loopback you are referring to the
 external interface I use as my IPSec peer toward Amazon?
 
 what about the internal logical st interface that I need to create in
 order
 to route my internal traffic into the tunnel?  How do I make that
 redundant?
 
 thanks!
 -andy
 
 
 On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Use your loopback and put that in a reth.
 
 Thanks,
 Morgan
 
 
 On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Andy Litzinger 
 andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi All,
  Two related questions.  I have a pair of SRX 3400s in an
 Active/Passive
 cluster.  They rely on an external gateway for internet access (i.e. my
 ISPs don't terminate on the SRXs).  I am setting up redundant tunnels to
 an
 AWS VPC.  Amazon has an example for J-Series (
 
 http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/
 NetworkAdminGuide/Juniper.html
 ),
 but I don't think it's for a cluster set-up.
 
 Here are my questions:
 
 1 - If I want to set up a redundant secure tunnel interface (e.g. st0),
 should i bind it to an reth interface?
 
 2 - Has anyone connected an Active/Passive SRX cluster to an AWS VPC?
 Any
 tips or tricks you care to share?
 
 regards,
 -andy
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp