Re: [j-nsp] SRX210 IPv6 on ADSL2+ PIM
Hi Everyone,
Just to close this off. I also had JTAC involved, and they have just gotten
back to me.
Family inet6 won't be supported on the ADSL2+ interface until 13.2R1, so
second quarter of 2013!
Guess I'll be taking a $30 external ADSL2+ modem home to bridge the ADSL
over to an Ethernet port.
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Buchanan
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 11:59 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] SRX210 IPv6 on ADSL2+ PIM
Hi Everyone,
I'm trying to get IPv6 up and running on an ADSL2+ pim in an SRX210 without
much luck. Hopefully someone has run across this (good or bad). I'm also
living life on the edge and am running 11.1R3.5. I was running 10.4R4.5 and
can go back to it if anyone thinks that will help.
I keep getting family INET6 not allowed with this encapsulation on a
commit check.
I've tried two different encapsulations and the configs look like this:
This one has the encapsulation in the unit:
show interfaces at-1/0/0
atm-options {
vpi 0;
}
dsl-options {
operating-mode adsl2plus;
}
unit 0 {
encapsulation ether-over-atm-llc;
vci 0.37;
family inet {
filter {
output bruce-qos;
}
address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/29;
}
family inet6 {
address 2607::x::x/126;
}
}
This one has the encapsulation right at the at-1/0/0 level:
show interfaces at-1/0/0
encapsulation ethernet-over-atm;
atm-options {
vpi 0;
}
dsl-options {
operating-mode adsl2plus;
}
unit 0 {
vci 0.37;
family inet {
filter {
output bruce-qos;
}
address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/29;
}
family inet6 {
address 2607::x::x/126;
}
}
Has anyone experienced similar behavior? I'd hate to have to go to an
external modem to get this to work, or have to use PPPoE.
Thanks!
Bruce
Bruce Buchanan
Senior Network Technician
Nexicom
5 King St. E., Millbrook, ON, LOA 1GO
Phone: 705-932-4147
FAX: 705-932-3027
Cell: 705-750-7705
Web: http://www.nexicom.net
Nexicom - Connected. Naturally.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] SRX210 IPv6 on ADSL2+ PIM
Hi Everyone,
I'm trying to get IPv6 up and running on an ADSL2+ pim in an SRX210 without
much luck. Hopefully someone has run across this (good or bad). I'm also
living life on the edge and am running 11.1R3.5. I was running 10.4R4.5 and
can go back to it if anyone thinks that will help.
I keep getting family INET6 not allowed with this encapsulation on a
commit check.
I've tried two different encapsulations and the configs look like this:
This one has the encapsulation in the unit:
show interfaces at-1/0/0
atm-options {
vpi 0;
}
dsl-options {
operating-mode adsl2plus;
}
unit 0 {
encapsulation ether-over-atm-llc;
vci 0.37;
family inet {
filter {
output bruce-qos;
}
address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/29;
}
family inet6 {
address 2607::x::x/126;
}
}
This one has the encapsulation right at the at-1/0/0 level:
show interfaces at-1/0/0
encapsulation ethernet-over-atm;
atm-options {
vpi 0;
}
dsl-options {
operating-mode adsl2plus;
}
unit 0 {
vci 0.37;
family inet {
filter {
output bruce-qos;
}
address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/29;
}
family inet6 {
address 2607::x::x/126;
}
}
Has anyone experienced similar behavior? I'd hate to have to go to an
external modem to get this to work, or have to use PPPoE.
Thanks!
Bruce
Bruce Buchanan
Senior Network Technician
Nexicom
5 King St. E., Millbrook, ON, LOA 1GO
Phone: 705-932-4147
FAX: 705-932-3027
Cell: 705-750-7705
Web: http://www.nexicom.net
Nexicom - Connected. Naturally.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] SRX210 IPv6 on ADSL2+ PIM
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Bruce Buchanan bbuch...@nexicom.net wrote:
I'm trying to get IPv6 up and running on an ADSL2+ pim in an SRX210 without
much luck. Hopefully someone has run across this (good or bad). I'm also
living life on the edge and am running 11.1R3.5. I was running 10.4R4.5 and
can go back to it if anyone thinks that will help.
I keep getting family INET6 not allowed with this encapsulation on a
commit check.
I've tried two different encapsulations and the configs look like this:
[...]
Has anyone experienced similar behavior? I'd hate to have to go to an
external modem to get this to work, or have to use PPPoE.
Disclaimer: I don't think IPv6 actually works over PPP on SRX -
certainly no DHCPv6-PD
I'm running 10.4R5 on srx210h-poe w/ADSL2+ PIM
Here's my interface config --
admin@router show configuration interfaces at-1/0/0
per-unit-scheduler;
encapsulation atm-pvc;
atm-options {
vpi 8;
}
dsl-options {
operating-mode auto;
}
unit 0 {
description ISP;
encapsulation atm-ppp-llc;
vci 8.35;
ppp-options {
chap {
default-chap-secret removed; ## SECRET-DATA
local-name usern...@isp.net;
passive;
}
}
family inet {
negotiate-address;
}
family inet6;
}
Once PPP has done its thing, I can ping the remote interface ID (link local) --
admin@router ping fe80::0221:a0ff:febb:3200 interface at-1/0/0.0 count 5
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fe80::b2c6:9a10:7d:5dc0 -- fe80::221:a0ff:febb:3200
16 bytes from fe80::221:a0ff:febb:3200, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=107.031 ms
16 bytes from fe80::221:a0ff:febb:3200, icmp_seq=1 hlim=64 time=108.289 ms
16 bytes from fe80::221:a0ff:febb:3200, icmp_seq=2 hlim=64 time=131.740 ms
16 bytes from fe80::221:a0ff:febb:3200, icmp_seq=3 hlim=64 time=123.717 ms
16 bytes from fe80::221:a0ff:febb:3200, icmp_seq=4 hlim=64 time=119.417 ms
--- fe80::0221:a0ff:febb:3200 ping6 statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 107.031/118.039/131.740/9.360 ms
..but that's about it.
cheers,
Dale
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] SRX210 IPv6 on ADSL2+ PIM
I think there are just a lot of places in the SRX codebase that don't support IPv6. It's sad, but true. I too have been having problems using IPv6 on VLAN and NHTB IPSec interfaces on SRX 210s and 240s. It feels like Juniper took gobs of Netscreen code, crammed it into JunOS and didn't bother to fix up existing missing features. I keep wanting to like the SRX, and stuff just like this keeps biting me. /two cents --j ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
