> On 2010-12-13 16:48:31, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > How about using vnd.kde.fontspackage instead of x-kde-fontspackage?
>
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> I only used x-kde-fontspackage at aaron's suggestion in one of the
> aforementioned bugs, I'm not attached to it. vnd.kde.fontspackage is fine
> with me too.
>
> Christopher Yeleighton wrote:
> How about submitting a registration of application/vnd.kde.fontspackage
> to IETF first?
> vnd.registrations are just "let go".
> I could prepare the registration form, but some KDE VIP would have to
> sign it.
>
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> OK (?), I'm not familiar with that, so any assistance would be
> appreciated.
1.
Where is a definitive description of the purpose and the content of the media
type?
2.
All registrations in the KDE domain are submitted by David Fauré; accordingly,
his opinion on the matter would be greatly appreciated.
- Christopher
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/#review9232
---
On 2010-12-13 17:07:48, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/
> ---
>
> (Updated 2010-12-13 17:07:48)
>
>
> Review request for kdelibs.
>
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> This patch adjusts the kde "fake" mimetype fonts/package so
> desktop-file-utils/shared-mime-info doesn't complain (using
> application/vnd.kde.fontspackage instead). Addresses bugs #235564, #250924
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
> /trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/kcontrol/kfontinst/apps/kfontview.desktop
> 1206154
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/mimetypes/kde.xml 1206154
>
> Diff: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/diff
>
>
> Testing
> ---
>
> confirmed no warnings/errors from desktop-file-utils/shared-mime-info
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rex
>
>
