Re: Flatpak Manifest Licensing
On Freitag, 19. Mai 2023 02:26:37 CEST Justin Zobel wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > As Binary Factory is to be shut down soon we are moving the Flatpak > manifests to their individual GitLab repositories. > > Most of this is fairly simple, however, some GitLab repositories have > enabled reuse linting (which is great). The Flatpak manifests I have > come across so far have not had any licensing information included. This > email is just to start a discussion about what everyone's thoughts are > about which license to apply for them. > > The GitLab CI files are licensed as CC0-1.0 and I'm thinking that this > might be a suitable license as the Flatpak manifest files are simply > text files. > # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: None > # SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0 We can make license recommendations, but especially for the existing ones I'd say this is something their respective authors need to decide/agree to, we can't just pick whatever we like if there is no license information. Regards, Volker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Flatpak Manifest Licensing
Le ven. 19 mai 2023 à 02:27, Justin Zobel a écrit : > Hey Everyone, > > As Binary Factory is to be shut down soon we are moving the Flatpak > manifests to their individual GitLab repositories. > > Most of this is fairly simple, however, some GitLab repositories have > enabled reuse linting (which is great). The Flatpak manifests I have > come across so far have not had any licensing information included. This > email is just to start a discussion about what everyone's thoughts are > about which license to apply for them. > > The GitLab CI files are licensed as CC0-1.0 and I'm thinking that this > might be a suitable license as the Flatpak manifest files are simply > text files. > # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: None > # SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0 > > Let me know your thoughts. > > Justin > Hi, is this on what Neelaksh worked during SoK? For GCompris, he added it with CopyrightText: None and CC0-1.0 like you say and it's fine with us: https://invent.kde.org/education/gcompris/-/commit/3cb28877c95a84e2c1d8062e2fb6436ef3953024 Cheers, Johnny
Flatpak Manifest Licensing
Hey Everyone, As Binary Factory is to be shut down soon we are moving the Flatpak manifests to their individual GitLab repositories. Most of this is fairly simple, however, some GitLab repositories have enabled reuse linting (which is great). The Flatpak manifests I have come across so far have not had any licensing information included. This email is just to start a discussion about what everyone's thoughts are about which license to apply for them. The GitLab CI files are licensed as CC0-1.0 and I'm thinking that this might be a suitable license as the Flatpak manifest files are simply text files. # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: None # SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0 Let me know your thoughts. Justin
