KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Thanks for all the input. I have decided to go with the hoop pine which I sourced at Mathews Timber. They brought out a pack of 100 No. 1 Clears from which I selected 4 pieces of 8" x 1" x 17'. The cost was less than $3 per foot! Today I have been ripping them into lengths and then using my favorite tool at the moment - the Ryobi Thicknesser, to plane them to the correct size. T-88 should be arriving from AS next week. In the mean time I will begin to plot the fuselage plans onto the workbench. Building has begun! -- Darren Crompton AUSTRALIA
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. The spruce kit machined and delivered from an interstate supplier (Australia) is going to cost $3,000AU ($2,365US). Douglas fir on the other hand will be about 1/2 that price. >From what I have seen, fir will be about 15% heavier and is also stronger. I am a fairly light fella at 155lb and my girlfriend is 110lb, (don't let her know I shared that piece of information with the entire Internet!), so weight gained by using fir can be more than offset by our light frames. I'd appreciate some opinions on my choice. Thanks. Darren Crompton AUSTRALIA
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Darren Think about using select Australian Hoop Pine (supplier is in Toowoomba Qld I think) and GL1 Ply from Mister Plywood. The difference in weight is negligible over the amounts that a KR2 uses. I used Spruce and it's just not worth the price to get it herenever again. Get a 1/4 sawn piece of 6x2 Hoop Pine dry it and ask a local cabinet maker to cut it to size where you can watch it happen. John Martindale 29 Jane Circuit TOORMINA NSW 2452 AUSTRALIA phone: 61 2 66584767 (H) 61 2 66869075 (W) mobile: 0403 049990 email:johnja...@optusnet.com.au web: www.members.optusnet.com.au/johnjanet/Martindale.htm - Original Message - From: "Darren Crompton" <kr.2s.dar...@gmail.com> To: <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:37 PM Subject: KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir >I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. The spruce > kit machined and delivered from an interstate supplier (Australia) is > going > to cost $3,000AU ($2,365US). Douglas fir on the other hand will be about > 1/2 that price. > >>From what I have seen, fir will be about 15% heavier and is also stronger. > I am a fairly light fella at 155lb and my girlfriend is 110lb, (don't let > her know I shared that piece of information with the entire Internet!), so > weight gained by using fir can be more than offset by our light frames. > > I'd appreciate some opinions on my choice. > > Thanks. > Darren Crompton > AUSTRALIA > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to > http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
In my experience, douglas fir is about 25% heavier, but it is also stronger. Just make sure it has the proper grain count and runout, ect... Scott --- Darren Cromptonwrote: > I am ready to order my timber and being on a very > tight budget, I am > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative > to spruce. The spruce > kit machined and delivered from an interstate > supplier (Australia) is going > to cost $3,000AU ($2,365US). Douglas fir on the > other hand will be about > 1/2 that price. > > >From what I have seen, fir will be about 15% > heavier and is also stronger. > I am a fairly light fella at 155lb and my girlfriend > is 110lb, (don't let > her know I shared that piece of information with the > entire Internet!), so > weight gained by using fir can be more than offset > by our light frames. > > I'd appreciate some opinions on my choice. > > Thanks. > Darren Crompton > AUSTRALIA > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at > http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to > krnet-le...@mylist.net > Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to > http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php > please see other KRnet info at > http://www.krnet.org/info.html > Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
I am seriously considering Douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. Hey Darren, you have a better alternate right there - hoop pine lumber and ply - same selection criteria. I have made a careful study of the known alternatives and hoop pine is no compromise at all - good stuff. If it were not for an equally good substitute in South Africa, I would have imported hoop pine for my current project. Take care Steve J
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
The supplier I spoke to in Newcastle said that hoop pine was more brittle than fir, similar weight, same price and more difficult to get in aircraft quality. I had discounted it because of its supposed brittle nature but I do like the idea of building from an Australian timber. On 3/15/07, Steve Jacobswrote: > > I am seriously considering Douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. > > > > Hey Darren, you have a better alternate right there - hoop pine lumber and > ply - same selection criteria. > > I have made a careful study of the known alternatives and hoop pine is no > compromise at all - good stuff. > > If it were not for an equally good substitute in South Africa, I would > have > imported hoop pine for my current project. > > Take care > Steve J > > > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to > http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Here's the "Wood Book", it should contain all the info that you need to choose a wood type for your KR. http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr113/fplgtr113.htm and here is a great Australian source for info; http://www.auf.asn.au/scratchbuilder/contents.html and finally here is the "G" book on the subject; http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/ACNumber/99C827DB9BAAC81B86256B4500596C4E?OpenDocument Hope some of this helps. From the Banty Group, Denny ... Steve Jacobswrote: I am seriously considering Douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. Hey Darren, you have a better alternate right there - hoop pine lumber and ply - same selection criteria. I have made a careful study of the known alternatives and hoop pine is no compromise at all - good stuff. If it were not for an equally good substitute in South Africa, I would have imported hoop pine for my current project. Take care Steve J ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html - Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Go for it, Virg On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:37:22 +1100 "Darren Crompton"writes: > I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. The > spruce > kit machined and delivered from an interstate supplier (Australia) > is going > to cost $3,000AU ($2,365US). Douglas fir on the other hand will be > about > 1/2 that price. > > >From what I have seen, fir will be about 15% heavier and is also > stronger. > I am a fairly light fella at 155lb and my girlfriend is 110lb, > (don't let > her know I shared that piece of information with the entire > Internet!), so > weight gained by using fir can be more than offset by our light > frames. > > I'd appreciate some opinions on my choice. > > Thanks. > Darren Crompton > AUSTRALIA > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at > http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to > http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > >
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
On 3/15/07, Darren Cromptonwrote: > I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. On http://krnet.org/ there is a link to the old paper KR newsletters, downloadable in pdf. Many years ago a gentleman documented just such a substitution, along with a test jig to make sure your wood matched your calculations. -- Regards, RonB
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Here's a PDF file that does just that, gives you a selection and test methodology for the non-certified wood that you use in your project. http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/UEP5RcRYnIYwgM31-UmspXnpzXSACpMccoQgrDp9Uu1qDMgymUiKC-4JXir34SzdezeIxQpOdzPeNtENwWQWwg/testing_wood.pdf Denny ... Ron Butterfieldwrote: On 3/15/07, Darren Crompton wrote: > I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. On http://krnet.org/ there is a link to the old paper KR newsletters, downloadable in pdf. Many years ago a gentleman documented just such a substitution, along with a test jig to make sure your wood matched your calculations. -- Regards, RonB ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html - We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Dear Darren: Here, in Brasil, we are using since the 30's a special wood to built airplanes named FREIJÓ. In accordance with some stories and/or tales, this wood was used to built the main structure of the famous, II WW , British Bomber the (De Havilland? ) " Mosquito". (Some Friend in England could check this information?). Freijó is a little bit heavy than Spruce but is, at least, 20% stronger. We did some tests before starting to built a KR-1 and the average strenght in tension (Dark Freijó), was 1800Kgf per square centimeter ( 11,611 lb/in²). If you want, I can check here prices and freight costs . Best regards, Claudio Holanda - Original Message - From: "Darren Crompton" <kr.2s.dar...@gmail.com> To: <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:37 AM Subject: KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir >I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. The spruce > kit machined and delivered from an interstate supplier (Australia) is > going > to cost $3,000AU ($2,365US). Douglas fir on the other hand will be about > 1/2 that price. > >>From what I have seen, fir will be about 15% heavier and is also stronger. > I am a fairly light fella at 155lb and my girlfriend is 110lb, (don't let > her know I shared that piece of information with the entire Internet!), so > weight gained by using fir can be more than offset by our light frames. > > I'd appreciate some opinions on my choice. > > Thanks. > Darren Crompton > AUSTRALIA > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to > http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > >
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Lots of airplanes have been built using Douglas Fir. It's a little heavier, but also stronger than spruce. Russ - Original Message - From: "Darren Crompton" <kr.2s.dar...@gmail.com> To: <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:37 AM Subject: KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir > I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. The spruce > kit machined and delivered from an interstate supplier (Australia) is going > to cost $3,000AU ($2,365US). Douglas fir on the other hand will be about > 1/2 that price. > > >From what I have seen, fir will be about 15% heavier and is also stronger. > I am a fairly light fella at 155lb and my girlfriend is 110lb, (don't let > her know I shared that piece of information with the entire Internet!), so > weight gained by using fir can be more than offset by our light frames. > > I'd appreciate some opinions on my choice. > > Thanks. > Darren Crompton > AUSTRALIA > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Darren, Fir is a good choice, I have used fir for my airplane. The complete fuse without plywood weighs 22 pounds, if I had built with Spruce it would have weighed about 19 to 20 pounds. Not much difference if you ask me. Truth is, the frame of the airplane only makes up a small part of the whole airplane, if weight is a worry for you (should be) try to save weight somewhere else like in your seats or wheels and brakes. I used Fir because I had a great (read that as free) source for it here otherwise I would have used Spruce. I do agree with Steve Jacobs though, hoop pine is available to you "down under" and is a great substitute for either and probably a lot less expensive. Good luck! Fred Johnson Reno, NV
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
My plane is being built using Doug Fir., its a little harder to work with and splinters eaiser but a fine wood for a plane. Bobby Russ Kendall <rkend...@bendbroadband.com> wrote: Lots of airplanes have been built using Douglas Fir. It's a little heavier, but also stronger than spruce. Russ - Original Message - From: "Darren Crompton" To: Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:37 AM Subject: KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir > I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. The spruce > kit machined and delivered from an interstate supplier (Australia) is going > to cost $3,000AU ($2,365US). Douglas fir on the other hand will be about > 1/2 that price. > > >From what I have seen, fir will be about 15% heavier and is also stronger. > I am a fairly light fella at 155lb and my girlfriend is 110lb, (don't let > her know I shared that piece of information with the entire Internet!), so > weight gained by using fir can be more than offset by our light frames. > > I'd appreciate some opinions on my choice. > > Thanks. > Darren Crompton > AUSTRALIA > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html - Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
where did you find the Fir that meets AC quality? -Jeff Wilder CISSP,CCE,C/EH -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GIT/CM/CS/O d- s:+ a C+++ UH++ P L++ E- w-- N+++ o-- K- w O- M-- V-- PS+ PE- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5- X-- R* tv b++ DI++ D++ G e* h--- r- y+++* --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- >From: bobby burington <bobbycrea...@yahoo.com> >Reply-To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> >To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> >Subject: Re: KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir >Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:34:59 -0700 (PDT) >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lizard.esosoft.net ([66.241.145.18]) by >bay0-mc12-f15.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Thu, >15 Mar 2007 09:36:09 -0700 >Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lizard.esosoft.net)by >lizard.esosoft.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)(envelope-from ><krnet-boun...@mylist.net>)id 1HRsvv-0007gz-PY; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:36:07 >-0800 >Received: from web54602.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.172])by >lizard.esosoft.net with smtp (Exim 4.63)(envelope-from ><bobbycrea...@yahoo.com>) id 1HRsvp-0007VU-DPfor kr...@mylist.net; Thu, 15 >Mar 2007 08:36:01 -0800 >Received: (qmail 13584 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Mar 2007 16:35:00 - >Received: from [67.113.45.66] by web54602.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;Thu, 15 >Mar 2007 09:34:59 PDT >X-Message-Info: >LsUYwwHHNt0bb/8rHYFjV2VnAibEtgq9AcZ6qagsPnqvV+ucm4tXWhL1JZB4dXwy >DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; >d=yahoo.com;h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;b=Obp91CdcIGaulSyAK3Xy8i0eYhKmxtKjlGOGFxSFvn8sm11ynTtMMtq7XuYnXfUPjA/B+GWK8/te0l12Q2qMxpaHFT0gQSF1HStC12VFqU7+FlfhHrTTEje9nAdmxMp9+fFWaLrQLc8kzFnfO1iI8f5pxRKcn6yIl+URyRczNkk=; >X-YMail-OSG: >P8o41VIVM1nFW26hZDV4nwtIcZq8PyJLXVr4_rg1UWXUH2Vwhy9VXYQbTRTqTQsteVS3X4PLcSsr5FlCXTJdlFD8W4aaCV21eFKelqCj2hOZCr_4Yb_SEEgiLGlwPYTqD92lwcv6qgnhcTE- >X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4 >X-BeenThere: kr...@mylist.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 >Precedence: list >List-Id: KRnet >List-Unsubscribe: ><http://mylist.net/listinfo/krnet>,<mailto:krnet-requ...@mylist.net?subject=unsubscribe> >List-Archive: <http://mylist.net/private/krnet> >List-Post: <mailto:kr...@mylist.net> >List-Help: <mailto:krnet-requ...@mylist.net?subject=help> >List-Subscribe: ><http://mylist.net/listinfo/krnet>,<mailto:krnet-requ...@mylist.net?subject=subscribe> >Errors-To: krnet-boun...@mylist.net >Return-Path: krnet-boun...@mylist.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2007 16:36:09.0767 (UTC) >FILETIME=[09666B70:01C76720] > >My plane is being built using Doug Fir., its a little harder to work with >and splinters eaiser but a fine wood for a plane. > Bobby > >Russ Kendall <rkend...@bendbroadband.com> wrote: > Lots of airplanes have been built using Douglas Fir. It's a little >heavier, >but also stronger than spruce. >Russ >- Original Message - >From: "Darren Crompton" >To: >Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:37 AM >Subject: KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir > > > > I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am > > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. The >spruce > > kit machined and delivered from an interstate supplier (Australia) is >going > > to cost $3,000AU ($2,365US). Douglas fir on the other hand will be about > > 1/2 that price. > > > > >From what I have seen, fir will be about 15% heavier and is also >stronger. > > I am a fairly light fella at 155lb and my girlfriend is 110lb, (don't >let > > her know I shared that piece of information with the entire Internet!), >so > > weight gained by using fir can be more than offset by our light frames. > > > > I'd appreciate some opinions on my choice. > > > > Thanks. > > Darren Crompton > > AUSTRALIA > > ___ > > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > > Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to >http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php > > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > >___ >Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp >to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net >Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to >http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php >please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > > >- >Looking for earth-friendly autos? > Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. >___ >Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp >to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net >Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to >http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php >please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Hello Jeff, I actually milled my own lumber for my plane. I live in the middle of a national forest and I am lucky enough to have a neighbor down the road with a large saw mill. So we picked logs with a good grain and he rough cut the logs to lumber size plus a little, then I stacked and dried the lumber and then I milled it to the exact size I wanted. I was able to pick the most premimum boards with the right grain for building the plane. heres a good EAA article with info and reference to mil spec bulletins that would be good to get. http://www.eaa.org/benefits/sportaviation/octbuilding.html ... I also have a cd with a lot of good info on wood types and uses along with a lot of other construction information and I'd be happy to send a copy of it to you'd like, just let me know your mailing address. There is an eaiser way, I have also been checking the local lumber store down the hill and if you pick through their best kiln dried, straight grained clear (no knots or flaws), lumber stock, they have a lot of useable quality doug fir lumber that meets specs. Bobby wilder_jeff Wilder <wilder_j...@msn.com> wrote: where did you find the Fir that meets AC quality? -Jeff Wilder CISSP,CCE,C/EH -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GIT/CM/CS/O d- s:+ a C+++ UH++ P L++ E- w-- N+++ o-- K- w O- M-- V-- PS+ PE- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5- X-- R* tv b++ DI++ D++ G e* h--- r- y+++* --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- >From: bobby burington >Reply-To: KRnet >To: KRnet >Subject: Re: KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir >Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:34:59 -0700 (PDT) >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lizard.esosoft.net ([66.241.145.18]) by >bay0-mc12-f15.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Thu, >15 Mar 2007 09:36:09 -0700 >Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lizard.esosoft.net)by >lizard.esosoft.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)(envelope-from >)id 1HRsvv-0007gz-PY; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:36:07 >-0800 >Received: from web54602.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.172])by >lizard.esosoft.net with smtp (Exim 4.63)(envelope-from >) id 1HRsvp-0007VU-DPfor kr...@mylist.net; Thu, 15 >Mar 2007 08:36:01 -0800 >Received: (qmail 13584 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Mar 2007 16:35:00 - >Received: from [67.113.45.66] by web54602.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;Thu, 15 >Mar 2007 09:34:59 PDT >X-Message-Info: >LsUYwwHHNt0bb/8rHYFjV2VnAibEtgq9AcZ6qagsPnqvV+ucm4tXWhL1JZB4dXwy >DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; >d=yahoo.com;h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;b=Obp91CdcIGaulSyAK3Xy8i0eYhKmxtKjlGOGFxSFvn8sm11ynTtMMtq7XuYnXfUPjA/B+GWK8/te0l12Q2qMxpaHFT0gQSF1HStC12VFqU7+FlfhHrTTEje9nAdmxMp9+fFWaLrQLc8kzFnfO1iI8f5pxRKcn6yIl+URyRczNkk=; >X-YMail-OSG: >P8o41VIVM1nFW26hZDV4nwtIcZq8PyJLXVr4_rg1UWXUH2Vwhy9VXYQbTRTqTQsteVS3X4PLcSsr5FlCXTJdlFD8W4aaCV21eFKelqCj2hOZCr_4Yb_SEEgiLGlwPYTqD92lwcv6qgnhcTE- >X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4 >X-BeenThere: kr...@mylist.net >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 >Precedence: list >List-Id: KRnet >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: krnet-boun...@mylist.net >Return-Path: krnet-boun...@mylist.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2007 16:36:09.0767 (UTC) >FILETIME=[09666B70:01C76720] > >My plane is being built using Doug Fir., its a little harder to work with >and splinters eaiser but a fine wood for a plane. > Bobby > >Russ Kendall wrote: > Lots of airplanes have been built using Douglas Fir. It's a little >heavier, >but also stronger than spruce. >Russ >- Original Message - >From: "Darren Crompton" >To: >Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 2:37 AM >Subject: KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir > > > > I am ready to order my timber and being on a very tight budget, I am > > seriously considering douglas fir as an alternative to spruce. The >spruce > > kit machined and delivered from an interstate supplier (Australia) is >going > > to cost $3,000AU ($2,365US). Douglas fir on the other hand will be about > > 1/2 that price. > > > > >From what I have seen, fir will be about 15% heavier and is also >stronger. > > I am a fairly light fella at 155lb and my girlfriend is 110lb, (don't >let > > her know I shared that piece of information with the entire Internet!), >so > > weight gained by using fir can be more than offset by our light frames. > > > > I'd appreciate some opinions on my choice. > > > > Thanks. > > Darren Crompton > > AUSTRALIA > > ___ > > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > > to UNsubscribe
KR> Spruce vs Douglas Fir
Many Aircraft in Aust are from Hoop Pine. Including my mates Corby Starlet. He was VERY happy with it. Phil Matheson SAAA Ch. 20 VH-PKR Australia EMAIL: phillipmathe...@bigpond.com KR Web Page: www.philskr2.50megs.com http://www.vw-engines.com/