KR> Tach drives

2008-10-12 Thread Colin Rainey
John said:
"use a tooth counter sender off the ring gear"

>From observations that is the hardest style to have as a primary or
secondary due to the bracketing etc... to keep the air gap correct. Engine
vibration tends to knock that one out of reading. Volvo and Chrysler both
have used that method as an engine speed sensor, and wear on the ring gear
from starters, dirt and such effect it. The best solution if not the coil
attached tach, is the Tiny Tach that uses an inductive pickup off of one
plug wire. We used these pickups with our Sun Scopes for years with no
trouble. It clips around the plugwire and reads the pulses to a digital
display. Very simple and reliable. In practice I have not seen any tach
failures, and those reported that did fail, did not cause a total ignition
failure, just quit reading. Diodes are a couple of bucks each, so applying 2
in each line insures against total failure, and should last a lifetime of
flying anyhow.

Colin Rainey
Independent Loan Officer
Branch 2375
Apex Mortgage Company
386.615.3388 Home Office
407.739.0834 Cell
407.557.3260 Fax
brokerpi...@bellsouth.net



KR> Tach drives

2008-10-12 Thread Martindale Family
Sorry Colin, yet again I respectfully disagree :-).

Diesel engines often use this method because they don't have coils. They are 
common on marine installations and many trucks and go for years without 
problem. Even the Thielert diesel in the demonstration Cessnas use them. 
They rely on the mass of the steel in each tooth to disturb a magnetic 
fieldthey are not optical, dirt is irrelevant (especially in our 
application) and air gap is not critical although the smaller, within 
limits, the better. I think you might be confusing them with Hall Effect 
sensors that rely on a magnet being set in the flywheel to create a current 
in the sender and which are often used on modern cars for electronic timing 
purposes. A short in your tacho can take your primary to earth irrespective 
of the existence of diodes and I am sure there are automotive examples that 
you may have not observed. Tiny Tachs are notoriously unreliable, difficult 
to calibrate, do not read accurately from suppression leads and can cause 
radio interference by transporting a sample of the ignition voltage through 
the firewall. Check the archives on this subject. Finally WW recommends 
tooth counters and that is good enough for me. I wouldn't bank on a lifetime 
of flying on a couple of two dollar diodes.

John Martindale
29 Jane Circuit
TOORMINA NSW 2452
AUSTRALIA

phone:  61 2 66584767 (H)
 61 2 66869075 (W)
mobile:  0403 049990
email:johnja...@optusnet.com.au
web: www.members.optusnet.com.au/johnjanet/Martindale.htm

- Original Message - 
From: "Colin Rainey" 
To: "KRnet" 
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:19 AM
Subject: KR> Tach drives


> John said:
> "use a tooth counter sender off the ring gear"
>
>>From observations that is the hardest style to have as a primary or
> secondary due to the bracketing etc... to keep the air gap correct. Engine
> vibration tends to knock that one out of reading. Volvo and Chrysler both
> have used that method as an engine speed sensor, and wear on the ring gear
> from starters, dirt and such effect it. The best solution if not the coil
> attached tach, is the Tiny Tach that uses an inductive pickup off of one
> plug wire. We used these pickups with our Sun Scopes for years with no
> trouble. It clips around the plugwire and reads the pulses to a digital
> display. Very simple and reliable. In practice I have not seen any tach
> failures, and those reported that did fail, did not cause a total ignition
> failure, just quit reading. Diodes are a couple of bucks each, so applying 
> 2
> in each line insures against total failure, and should last a lifetime of
> flying anyhow.
>
> Colin Rainey
> Independent Loan Officer
> Branch 2375
> Apex Mortgage Company
> 386.615.3388 Home Office
> 407.739.0834 Cell
> 407.557.3260 Fax
> brokerpi...@bellsouth.net
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html 




KR> Tach drives

2008-10-12 Thread Colin Rainey
John said:
A short in your tacho can take your primary to earth irrespective

of the existence of diodes and I am sure there are automotive examples that

you may have not observed. Tiny Tachs are notoriously unreliable,

And so the story goes that as many people as we have here on the net, we
have experiences that reflect negatively on one type system or another, for
virtually every part of the plane. I have never seen a tach drive short a
coil down, but have seen starter rings that were chewed and damaged due to
starter wear, and these would cause an erratic signal to your tooth counter
system. No I am not referring to a Hall Effect switch. If going to the crank
for a signal, I would use either the internal method found on many 4 and 6
cylinder GMs or the external mounted to the back of the balancer. MSD makes
a universal kit for crank trigger that can be retrofitted onto virtually any
engine.

Every system will have its strengths and weaknesses. Some guys are using
points due to simplicity and low voltage requirements. I find that medieval
when systems like one netter is using, the motorcycle CD system (I believe
Serge is, sorry if I got it wrong) that is very simple and very reliable.
Everyone will have to find their own comfort level with the system they
choose, and compromises made with each design. No system is 100% failsafe.
Especially in aircraft where they typically do not shim starters and an
experienced ear can hear the starter clashing in the ring gear, I would not
run a tooth counter, unless you like the same unreliability you say the Tiny
Tach has.

Colin Rainey
brokerpi...@bellsouth.net



KR> Tach drives

2008-10-12 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
At 12:45 PM 10/13/2006, you wrote:
>No system is 100% failsafe.
>Especially in aircraft where they typically do not shim starters and an
>experienced ear can hear the starter clashing in the ring gear, I would not
>run a tooth counter, unless you like the same unreliability you say the Tiny
>Tach has.
>Colin Rainey
+++


So run a remote, optical,  digital tach rpm checker that could be
placed on top of the instrument panel and is powered by a 9 vdc
battery.  It's quite accurate, is connected to nothing, and is not
that expensive when all things considered.  Climb out (to see
what power I'm getting)  and cruise are really about the only
times I check my tach anyway.  How about one of you electronic
wizards finding a way to run an optical sensor to a readout on
the dash.

Larry Flesner




KR> Tach drives

2008-10-12 Thread Martindale Family
Hi Colin

I agree that chewed teeth could send the signal wonky but surely you would 
replace that sort of damaged part before flight. In any case that is not 
really the issue. A wonky signal to the tacho from a tooth counter will 
never kill your ignition as it's completely independent of it. Using a tacho 
with or without diodes off the coil primary will always carry that risk even 
it is is small as you correctly say. I like medieval points also because I 
understand them and can easily replace them in the field at remote 
Australian airports if I need to. Each to his own circumstance I guess. Long 
live the diode :-)


John Martindale
29 Jane Circuit
TOORMINA NSW 2452
AUSTRALIA

phone:  61 2 66584767 (H)
 61 2 66869075 (W)
mobile:  0403 049990
email:johnja...@optusnet.com.au
web: www.members.optusnet.com.au/johnjanet/Martindale.htm

>
And so the story goes that as many people as we have here on the net, we
> have experiences.