Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH 5/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Send IPI to host core to wake VCPU
Hi Fengguang,
I understand the problem.
I will send you the URL for the powerpc git tree once my patches
are pulled in so that we can then pass that to the robot.
Thanks.
-suresh
On 11/01/2015 08:51 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Suresh,
>
> Sorry for the noise!
>
> Do you have a git tree that the robot can monitor and test?
>
> In this case of one patchset depending on another, there is no chance
> for the robot to do valid testing based on emailed patches.
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:16:06AM -0500, Suresh E. Warrier wrote:
>> This patch set depends upon a previous patch set that I had submitted to
>> linux-ppc. The URL for that is:
>>
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2015-October/135794.html
>>
>> -suresh
>>
>> On 10/29/2015 11:52 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Suresh,
>>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base,
>>> please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>>>
>>> url:
>>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Suresh-Warrier/KVM-PPC-Book3S-HV-Optimize-wakeup-VCPU-from-H_IPI/20151030-081329
>>> config: powerpc-defconfig (attached as .config)
>>> reproduce:
>>> wget
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
>>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>> make.cross ARCH=powerpc
>>>
>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>>arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c: In function 'icp_rm_set_vcpu_irq':
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c:142:4: error: implicit declaration
> of function 'smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass(hcpu,
>>>^
>>>arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c:143:7: error:
>>> 'PPC_MSG_RM_HOST_ACTION' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> PPC_MSG_RM_HOST_ACTION);
>>> ^
>>>arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c:143:7: note: each undeclared
>>> identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>>>cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>>
>>> vim +/smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass +142
>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c
>>>
>>>136 hcore = -1;
>>>137 if (kvmppc_host_rm_ops_hv)
>>>138 hcore =
>>> find_available_hostcore(XICS_RM_KICK_VCPU);
>>>139 if (hcore != -1) {
>>>140 hcpu = hcore << threads_shift;
>>>141
>>> kvmppc_host_rm_ops_hv->rm_core[hcore].rm_data = vcpu;
>>> > 142 smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass(hcpu,
>>>143
>>> PPC_MSG_RM_HOST_ACTION);
>>>144 } else {
>>>145 this_icp->rm_action |=
>>> XICS_RM_KICK_VCPU;
>>>
>>> ---
>>> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology
>>> Center
>>> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel
>>> Corporation
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> kbuild-all mailing list
>> kbuild-...@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH 5/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Send IPI to host core to wake VCPU
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:10 -0600, Suresh E. Warrier wrote: > Hi Fengguang, > > I understand the problem. > > I will send you the URL for the powerpc git tree once my patches > are pulled in so that we can then pass that to the robot. The robot already knows about the powerpc next tree. It chose the KVM tree because of your subject line. Sending a series to one tree (KVM) that depends on a series in another tree (powerpc) is always problematic, even for humans, so the robot is not really at fault here. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH 5/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Send IPI to host core to wake VCPU
Hi Suresh,
Sorry for the noise!
Do you have a git tree that the robot can monitor and test?
In this case of one patchset depending on another, there is no chance
for the robot to do valid testing based on emailed patches.
Thanks,
Fengguang
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:16:06AM -0500, Suresh E. Warrier wrote:
> This patch set depends upon a previous patch set that I had submitted to
> linux-ppc. The URL for that is:
>
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2015-October/135794.html
>
> -suresh
>
> On 10/29/2015 11:52 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Suresh,
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base,
> > please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
> >
> > url:
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Suresh-Warrier/KVM-PPC-Book3S-HV-Optimize-wakeup-VCPU-from-H_IPI/20151030-081329
> > config: powerpc-defconfig (attached as .config)
> > reproduce:
> > wget
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
> > -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c: In function 'icp_rm_set_vcpu_irq':
> >>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c:142:4: error: implicit declaration
> >>> of function 'smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass'
> >>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass(hcpu,
> >^
> >arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c:143:7: error:
> > 'PPC_MSG_RM_HOST_ACTION' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > PPC_MSG_RM_HOST_ACTION);
> > ^
> >arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c:143:7: note: each undeclared
> > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > vim +/smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass +142
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c
> >
> >136 hcore = -1;
> >137 if (kvmppc_host_rm_ops_hv)
> >138 hcore =
> > find_available_hostcore(XICS_RM_KICK_VCPU);
> >139 if (hcore != -1) {
> >140 hcpu = hcore << threads_shift;
> >141
> > kvmppc_host_rm_ops_hv->rm_core[hcore].rm_data = vcpu;
> > > 142 smp_muxed_ipi_rm_message_pass(hcpu,
> >143
> > PPC_MSG_RM_HOST_ACTION);
> >144 } else {
> >145 this_icp->rm_action |=
> > XICS_RM_KICK_VCPU;
> >
> > ---
> > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology
> > Center
> > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel
> > Corporation
> >
>
> ___
> kbuild-all mailing list
> kbuild-...@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
