Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 09:15 -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote: Also, note-- we (Freescale) do have a patchset coming soon for the e500mc which is a 2.06 embedded 32-bit CPU with category E.HV.We've had this running for a while and are close to finishing some cleanup before posting upstream. We are are also starting to look at 64-bit support for our e5500 CPU we should be a delta on top of the e500mc support. Just want to make you aware of some current work that may overlap your A2 KVM support... The main difference will be the MMU version (FSL is MAV1, A2 is MAV2), and overall TLB structure. The rest should be mostly identical :-) I suspect the TLB virtualization code will be quite different, but it's really going to depend what approach Kun decides to use. You can probably start with doing simple SW load, but performance will suck. Other options that I've been thinking about to try to exploit indirect TLB entries (HW load) in no specific order: - Use the LRAT. (How ? It's small, meant for huge translations ... maybe on top of some large part support demand fault it using a really short asm code path ? Some kind of linear array of 16M translations like we do on power7 KVM ?). Using the LRAT means that you enable the guest direct use of indirect TLB. - Shadow page tables. Paravirtualize (or emulate) insertion of indirect entries and have the HV maintain pre-translated shadows. That means all page faults must go to KVM though, in order to handle protection changes, and you need some reverse mapping to be able to deal with invalidations, unless you trick with paravirt rather than full virt, such as notifying KVM when you populate a PTE. - Like the above but additionally have KVM walk the guest page tables directly and only forward to the guest actual PTE faults. Might require some kind of hcall to tell kvm about the root of the tree (roots actually) on context switch etc... might not be worth it but may also save you overhead. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
-Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kun Wang Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 7:32 PM To: Stuart Yoder Cc: Kun Wang; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott- B07421; Alexander Graf Subject: Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor ? 2011-8-30 22:15, Stuart Yoder ??: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Alexander Grafag...@suse.de wrote: Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC kvm@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Also, note-- we (Freescale) do have a patchset coming soon for the e500mc which is a 2.06 embedded 32-bit CPU with category E.HV.We've had this running for a while and are close to finishing some cleanup before posting upstream. We are are also starting to look at 64-bit support for our e5500 CPU we should be a delta on top of the e500mc support. Just want to make you aware of some current work that may overlap your A2 KVM support... Stuart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Stuart, Thank you very much for your information. That's really helpful to us. I do think there is some overlap between your work and ours. Do you have any suggestions for us to avoid re-inventing the wheel? Best regards, Kun Wang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html I am working on 64-bit support for Freescale e5500 core. I intend to submit the 64-bit patches as soon as e500mc patchset is applied. The changes are book3e compliant. Regards, Mike
RE: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
-Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kun Wang Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 7:32 PM To: Stuart Yoder Cc: Kun Wang; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott- B07421; Alexander Graf Subject: Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor ? 2011-8-30 22:15, Stuart Yoder ??: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Alexander Grafag...@suse.de wrote: Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC k...@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Also, note-- we (Freescale) do have a patchset coming soon for the e500mc which is a 2.06 embedded 32-bit CPU with category E.HV.We've had this running for a while and are close to finishing some cleanup before posting upstream. We are are also starting to look at 64-bit support for our e5500 CPU we should be a delta on top of the e500mc support. Just want to make you aware of some current work that may overlap your A2 KVM support... Stuart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Stuart, Thank you very much for your information. That's really helpful to us. I do think there is some overlap between your work and ours. Do you have any suggestions for us to avoid re-inventing the wheel? Best regards, Kun Wang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html I am working on 64-bit support for Freescale e5500 core. I intend to submit the 64-bit patches as soon as e500mc patchset is applied. The changes are book3e compliant. Regards, Mike
Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC kvm@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Again, welcome on board! Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote: Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC kvm@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Also, note-- we (Freescale) do have a patchset coming soon for the e500mc which is a 2.06 embedded 32-bit CPU with category E.HV.We've had this running for a while and are close to finishing some cleanup before posting upstream. We are are also starting to look at 64-bit support for our e5500 CPU we should be a delta on top of the e500mc support. Just want to make you aware of some current work that may overlap your A2 KVM support... Stuart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
于 2011-8-30 22:15, Stuart Yoder 写道: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Alexander Grafag...@suse.de wrote: Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC kvm@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Also, note-- we (Freescale) do have a patchset coming soon for the e500mc which is a 2.06 embedded 32-bit CPU with category E.HV.We've had this running for a while and are close to finishing some cleanup before posting upstream. We are are also starting to look at 64-bit support for our e5500 CPU we should be a delta on top of the e500mc support. Just want to make you aware of some current work that may overlap your A2 KVM support... Stuart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Stuart, Thank you very much for your information. That's really helpful to us. I do think there is some overlap between your work and ours. Do you have any suggestions for us to avoid re-inventing the wheel? Best regards, Kun Wang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
于 2011-8-30 17:45, Alexander Graf 写道: Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC kvm@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Again, welcome on board! Alex Thanks, Alex. Yes, we are aware of the e500 work done by Freescale folks. I agree with you that we should coordinate together to achieve as more synergy. Best regards, Kun Wang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC k...@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Again, welcome on board! Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote: Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC k...@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Also, note-- we (Freescale) do have a patchset coming soon for the e500mc which is a 2.06 embedded 32-bit CPU with category E.HV.We've had this running for a while and are close to finishing some cleanup before posting upstream. We are are also starting to look at 64-bit support for our e5500 CPU we should be a delta on top of the e500mc support. Just want to make you aware of some current work that may overlap your A2 KVM support... Stuart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
于 2011-8-30 22:15, Stuart Yoder 写道: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Alexander Grafag...@suse.de wrote: Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC k...@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Also, note-- we (Freescale) do have a patchset coming soon for the e500mc which is a 2.06 embedded 32-bit CPU with category E.HV.We've had this running for a while and are close to finishing some cleanup before posting upstream. We are are also starting to look at 64-bit support for our e5500 CPU we should be a delta on top of the e500mc support. Just want to make you aware of some current work that may overlap your A2 KVM support... Stuart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Stuart, Thank you very much for your information. That's really helpful to us. I do think there is some overlap between your work and ours. Do you have any suggestions for us to avoid re-inventing the wheel? Best regards, Kun Wang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: KVM on IBM PowerEN processor
于 2011-8-30 17:45, Alexander Graf 写道: Hi Kun, On 08/29/2011 11:31 AM, Kun Wang wrote: Hi, everyone, This is Kun Wang from IBM Research China. I and my team have been working on IBM PowerEN processor in recent years, including its simulation, lib/runtime optimization and etc. Now we start the work to enable KVM on PowerEN processor. Since the A2 core of PowerEN follows Power ISA v2.06 (more specifically, book3e and 64-bit), I believe 99% of our work will stick to the ISA, and hence can be leveraged by others. As the new one to this KVM world, I and my team definitely need your help. Looking forward to talking and working with you guys in the future. Welcome to the PowerPC KVM world! I'm looking very much forward to working with you there. Please always CC k...@vger.kernel.org for emails you send to kvm-ppc@vger, unless you think of it as completely off-generic-kvm discussions. I like the idea of having more clever people involved in the PPC KVM process and by CC'ing kvm@vger, we get more exposure. The Freescale e500 cores are basically BookE 2.06 compliant with a few specialties here and there. Have you looked at their code? Sure, it's 32-bit as is now but there is definitely work going on at Freescale to get it 64-bit too. Maybe it makes sense to take the current code as a starting point and slowly move towards an architecture that is more generic. Maybe it makes sense to start from scratch and actually design something flexible that splits guest and host TLB code, so we could potentially run cross-book KVM in the future (which I would love to see happen! Just imagine running a PowerEN guest on a POWER7 system). Either way, please make sure to coordinate any efforts with me and Scott so we don't walk off in different directions and only get to realize we went down the wrong path when there's already a 100 patches patch set on the mailing list :) Again, welcome on board! Alex Thanks, Alex. Yes, we are aware of the e500 work done by Freescale folks. I agree with you that we should coordinate together to achieve as more synergy. Best regards, Kun Wang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
