On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 09:38:01AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:37:48 +,
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> >
> > Now that the SRCU Kconfig option is unconditionally selected, there is
> > no longer any point in selecting it. Therefore, remove the "select SRCU"
> > Kconfig statements.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier
> > Cc: James Morse
> > Cc: Alexandru Elisei
> > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose
> > Cc: Oliver Upton
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas
> > Cc: Will Deacon
> > Cc:
> > Cc:
> > Cc:
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> > index 05da3c8f7e88f..312f0e9869111 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> > @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ menuconfig KVM
> > select KVM_MMIO
> > select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
> > select KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK
> > - select SRCU
> > select KVM_VFIO
> > select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
> > select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier
Thank you, Marc! I will apply this on my next rebase.
Thanx, Paul
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
