Re: [lace] the logic of Binche
Fun is the word! I'd really like to be able to work lace intuitively. Dance, too, but that's not going to happen except as bobbins dance, on the pillow. Lace it is, diagrams or no, whatever works. Happy lacing everyone, however way you like to make it. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Adele Shaakwrote: > ... if you made the lace yourself from nothing more than a cartoon. It > might actually be more fun, too > -- Bev in Shirley BC, near Sooke on beautiful Vancouver Island, west coast of Canada - To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line: unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/
Re: [lace] the logic of Binche
I think it is actually more difficult to make Binche (and other laces) following a thread diagram than it would be if you made the lace yourself from nothing more than a cartoon. It might actually be more fun, too. When you follow the diagram of what somebody else did, you arenât working intuitively. It is like when you take a dance class, and your teacher tries to teach you a set dance routine that she created. It is so, so hard to remember all the steps and where each one comes and what beat of the music it starts on. Whereas if they played the music and you got up and boogied away on your own, the steps you make up and the way you do it might be very complex but completing a five-minute dance would be easy. For lacemaking, probably your first few efforts at this might not look very nice, and you might run into a lot of technical troubles. But in the old days, you would start small and simple and work your way up to the big and complicated. Probably at a certain point you would learn a lot more about thread paths than most of us will ever learn by doggedly following diagrams. Adele West Vancouver, BC (west coast of Canada) > I still reflect on that, with no conclusion, but getting back to making > lace in the present, I like the new floral designs by Fumi Kanai and her > students, and all I do is follow the lace's diagram using lots of movable > sticky arrows to help keep track. - To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line: unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/
Re: [lace] the logic of Binche
Hello Sharon and everyone Indeed, literacy itself means competence in a given area. I think the other is an ability we all have, that many of us forget to use once we are taught read. Straying off the topic of Binche, there is a poignant perspective on learning to read and lacemaking, the chapter The Three Rs in Alan Brown's "Take the Children..." https://www2.cs.arizona.edu/patterns/weaving/books/ba_2_2000.pdf On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Sharon Ghamari-Tabrizi < shg...@mail.harvard.edu> wrote: > . > What's thrilling about your idea, Bev, is the notion of a kind of reading > that *requires* reading all over, rather than from right to left. > -- Bev in Shirley BC, near Sooke on beautiful Vancouver Island, west coast of Canada - To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line: unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/
Re: [lace] the logic of Binche
Dear Bev I take seriously the idea of thinking about lace design or pattern as a non-linguistic writing system. If you accept this idea, then the lacemakers who may not be able to read are not illiterate if they can read and follow a pattern. What's thrilling about your idea, Bev, is the notion of a kind of reading that *requires* reading all over, rather than from right to left. On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Bev Walkerwrote: > Hello everyone and Jane who wrote: > > > I've never been taught Binche but I've made a few small pieces from > working diagrams and their construction makes absolutely no sense > whatsoever. > > Exactly what I thought when I decided 'how hard can it be' and made a small > piece from its diagram. I am mostly self-taught from books, following a > diagram was easy enough. And then I was able to see up close an old example > of Binche; I marvelled at the mind and hands that created it. Fine, tightly > woven threads seemingly went everywhere, but here, too, was a pattern > repeat! Was there ever a diagram? Probably not. I got an idea, what if the > lacemaker didn't read; they weren't illiterate, they were skilled in other > ways. If they were unhampered by having to look at a page from left to > right, and by extension anything else - could they see in all directions > at once? Maybe they learned their craft by watching someone else, as one > might when learning dance steps? > > I still reflect on that, with no conclusion, but getting back to making > lace in the present, I like the new floral designs by Fumi Kanai and her > students, and all I do is follow the lace's diagram using lots of movable > sticky arrows to help keep track. Find the topmost element that needs doing > first and move on from there. It is usual for several sections across the > design to need attention before advancing. The direction of work is in a > general downward manner even though it seems like one is jumping all over > the place. Weaver pairs become passives and vice versa as required to fill > in a given space. > > IMO working a Binche lace is puzzle-solving at its finest, whether > designing or dependent on the diagram. > > -- > Bev in Shirley BC, near Sooke on beautiful Vancouver Island, west coast of > Canada > > - > To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line: > unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to > arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/ > - To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line: unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/
[lace] the logic of Binche
Hello everyone and Jane who wrote: > I've never been taught Binche but I've made a few small pieces from working diagrams and their construction makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Exactly what I thought when I decided 'how hard can it be' and made a small piece from its diagram. I am mostly self-taught from books, following a diagram was easy enough. And then I was able to see up close an old example of Binche; I marvelled at the mind and hands that created it. Fine, tightly woven threads seemingly went everywhere, but here, too, was a pattern repeat! Was there ever a diagram? Probably not. I got an idea, what if the lacemaker didn't read; they weren't illiterate, they were skilled in other ways. If they were unhampered by having to look at a page from left to right, and by extension anything else - could they see in all directions at once? Maybe they learned their craft by watching someone else, as one might when learning dance steps? I still reflect on that, with no conclusion, but getting back to making lace in the present, I like the new floral designs by Fumi Kanai and her students, and all I do is follow the lace's diagram using lots of movable sticky arrows to help keep track. Find the topmost element that needs doing first and move on from there. It is usual for several sections across the design to need attention before advancing. The direction of work is in a general downward manner even though it seems like one is jumping all over the place. Weaver pairs become passives and vice versa as required to fill in a given space. IMO working a Binche lace is puzzle-solving at its finest, whether designing or dependent on the diagram. -- Bev in Shirley BC, near Sooke on beautiful Vancouver Island, west coast of Canada - To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line: unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/