Re: [LARTC] Bridging Shaping (Wondershaper)
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 05:31, Justin Morea wrote: I am rather new to all of this and I've got a few questions. I have an ADSL connection with 5 static IPs. Currently the DSL modem is connected directly to a switch, and all the computers to this switch. I would like to place a Linux box inbetween the modem the switch in order to do some traffic shaping. If I understand what I've read so far, I need to place the 2 newtork cards in a bridged mode correct? This should be transparent to the users correct? In bridged mode, what are my options for shaping? Can I just use the normal shaping tools/commands described in LARTC.org? Can I user WonderShaper? Yes you can. However, iptables will not work on a bridge. So you have to use the u32 filter (there is a patch to get iptables working on a bridge). If you shape on a bridge, you can shape on both interfaces, so you don't need the ingress capabilities of the wondershaper. However, you introduce an extra NIC in the data path, so you also introduce extra (small) delays. One of the benefits of ingress shaping, is that it does not introduce extra delays, but it's not so powerfull as egress shaping. Or you can replace the switch with a linux box with some quad-NIC's. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] iptables -m limit
hy, i want a iptables rule to match if a designated trafic is above x bps or pps, i try iptm=/usr/local/sbin/iptables -t mangle $iptm -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -m limit --limit 1/sec $iptm -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -m limit ! --limit 1/sec the results are: 62992 16Mall -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5 62993 16Mall -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5 why the ! argument dont work and is accepted C ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] iptables -m limit
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 10:29, Ciprian Niculescu wrote: hy, i want a iptables rule to match if a designated trafic is above x bps or pps, i try iptm=/usr/local/sbin/iptables -t mangle $iptm -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -m limit --limit 1/sec $iptm -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -m limit ! --limit 1/sec you don't have to use the ! if you go to the second rules, this is because you don't have match the first one, so you are over the limit. So you can do : $iptm -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -m limit --limit 1/sec -j MYTARGET iptm -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j MYTARGET -- Éric Leblond courriel : [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [LARTC] the range of HTB's prio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 17 September 2002 11:50, Nickola Kolev wrote: please tell me the range of prio 1 to 8, 1 being the highest, 8 - the lowest. 0 is highest as I know ... but I've also an question: is there if difference if I have 2 chains and use prio 0 and 7 or prio 0 and 1 ? - -- Regards, Robert - Robert Penz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9hv008tTsQqJDUBMRAuJIAJ90P6MUqvNw2V1sm9qLtPtncGXBnQCeNVFT 9DbmTUzKwv0/eMwgdg2n/lo= =KhJa -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] [htb3] patch errors on 2.4.19mdk
When I apply HTB3 paches to 2.4.19 (mandrake kernel) I get this :
(NO to all questions)
[root@qos test]# patch -p1 -b /arh/compile/patches/htb3.6_2.4.17.diff
patching file net/sched/Config.in
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sched/Config.in.rej
patching file net/sched/Makefile
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sched/Makefile.rej
patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c
patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file include/linux/pkt_sched.h.rej
patching file net/sched/sch_api.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1117.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1205 with fuzz 2.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/sched/sch_api.c.rej
patching file lib/Makefile
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file lib/Makefile.rej
patching file lib/rbtree.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file lib/rbtree.c.rej
patching file include/net/pkt_sched.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file include/net/pkt_sched.h.rej
LATER WHEN COMPILING
==
sch_htb.c:2153: redefinition of `htb_activate_prios'
sch_htb.c:517: `htb_activate_prios' previously defined here
sch_htb.c:2190: redefinition of `htb_deactivate_prios'
sch_htb.c:554: `htb_deactivate_prios' previously defined here
sch_htb.c:2233: redefinition of `htb_class_mode'
sch_htb.c:597: `htb_class_mode' previously defined here
sch_htb.c:2266: redefinition of `htb_change_class_mode'
sch_htb.c:630: `htb_change_class_mode' previously defined here
sch_htb.c:2293: redefinition of `htb_activate'
sch_htb.c:657: `htb_activate' previously defined here
sch_htb.c:2311: redefinition of `htb_deactivate'
sch_htb.c:675: `htb_deactivate' previously defined here
sch_htb.c:2320: redefinition of `htb_enqueue'
sch_htb.c:684: `htb_enqueue' previously defined here
...many similar..
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:5078: Error: symbol `L2T' is already defined
{standard input}:5099: Error: symbol `htb_hash' is already defined
{standard input}:5114: Error: symbol `htb_find' is already defined
{standard input}:5155: Error: symbol `htb_clasify' is already defined
{standard input}:5272: Error: symbol `htb_debug_dump' is already defined
{standard input}:5523: Error: symbol `htb_add_to_id_tree' is already defined
{standard input}:5642: Error: symbol `htb_add_to_wait_tree' is already defined
{standard input}:5772: Error: symbol `htb_next_rb_node' is already defined
{standard input}:5814: Error: symbol `htb_add_class_to_row' is already defined
{standard input}:5878: Error: symbol `htb_remove_class_from_row' is already defined
{standard input}:6015: Error: symbol `htb_activate_prios' is already defined
{standard input}:6139: Error: symbol `htb_deactivate_prios' is already defined
sch_htb.c:2770: redefinition of `htb_init'
sch_htb.c:1134: `htb_init' previously defined here
...many similar..
{standard input}:6331: Error: symbol `htb_class_mode' is already defined
{standard input}:6391: Error: symbol `htb_change_class_mode' is already defined
{standard input}:6459: Error: symbol `htb_activate' is already defined
{standard input}:6518: Error: symbol `htb_deactivate' is already defined
..similar..
{standard input}:9850: Error: symbol `cleanup_module' is already defined
make[2]: *** [sch_htb.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19-9mdk/net/sched'
make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_sched] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.19-9mdk/net'
make: *** [_mod_net] Error 2
[root@qos linux-2.4.19-9mdk]#
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: *****SPAM***** [LARTC] the range of HTB's prio
HTB Prios are 0-6 by default (htb 3.6), but afaik u can increase this number at compile-time. btw: is it true that you're a Spamware site or vendor? at least my Spam-Assasin (which consults 2 rbl-hosts...) declares you as such... SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results -- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (9.5 hits, 5 required) SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points) Forged yahoo.com 'Received:' header found SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points) Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com SPAM: [RBL check: found 202.41.99.202.relays.osirusoft.com., type: 127.0.0.6] SPAM: Hit! (0.5 points) Received via a relay in ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org SPAM:[RBL check: found 141.128.135.61.ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org., type: 127.0.0.6] SPAM: Hit! (5.0 points) DNSBL: sender is a Spamware site or vendor SPAM: SPAM: End of SpamAssassin results - HTB and imq was used to control traffic. AC=tc class add dev eth0 parent $AC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps burst 2k $AC 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 $AC 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 please tell me the range of prio _ Do You Yahoo!? ÐÂÏʵ½µ×,ÓéÀÖµ½¼Ò - ÑÅ»¢ÍƳöÃâ·ÑÓéÀÖµç×ÓÖܱ¨! http://cn.ent.yahoo.com/newsletter/index.html ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] [htb3] patch errors on 2.4.19mdk
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 21:52, raptor wrote: Hi Raptor, When I apply HTB3 paches to 2.4.19 (mandrake kernel) I get this : (NO to all questions) --- - [root@qos test]# patch -p1 -b /arh/compile/patches/htb3.6_2.4.17.diff patching file net/sched/Config.in Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sched/Config.in.rej patching file net/sched/Makefile Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sched/Makefile.rej patching file net/sched/sch_htb.c patching file include/linux/pkt_sched.h Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file include/linux/pkt_sched.h.rej patching file net/sched/sch_api.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 1117. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1205 with fuzz 2. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/sched/sch_api.c.rej patching file lib/Makefile Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file lib/Makefile.rej patching file lib/rbtree.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file lib/rbtree.c.rej patching file include/net/pkt_sched.h Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file include/net/pkt_sched.h.rej --- hmm, maybe htb is already in the mdk kernel? anyway, you should patch with patch -p1 --dry-run patchname FIRST, before applying and see if it succeed. -- Kind regards Marc-Christian Petersen http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16 Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16 Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] [htb3] patch errors on 2.4.19mdk
|hmm, maybe htb is already in the mdk kernel? | |anyway, you should patch with patch -p1 --dry-run patchname FIRST, before |applying and see if it succeed. ]- yep it is in, but i'm not sure is it the latest ?? is there a way I can check this ]... Dry run, hu :) didn't knew it ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Cont'd [htb3] patch errors on 2.4.19mdk
Now i applied it again this time answering yes, the only .rej file I got is this : is it fatal !? [root@qos sched]# cat *rej *** *** 1117,1123 psched_timer.expires = jiffies + 1*HZ; #else unsigned long now = jiffies; - psched_time_base = ((u64)now)PSCHED_JSCALE; psched_time_mark = now; psched_timer.expires = now + 60*60*HZ; #endif --- 1117,1124 psched_timer.expires = jiffies + 1*HZ; #else unsigned long now = jiffies; + //psched_time_base = ((u64)now)PSCHED_JSCALE; + psched_time_base += ((u64)(now-psched_time_mark))PSCHED_JSCALE; psched_time_mark = now; psched_timer.expires = now + 60*60*HZ; #endif [root@qos sched]# ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] How to install HTB in kernel 2.4.7-10 ??
Hi all, How can I add htb to the linux kernel? I download htb from www.docum.org , but I can't use that , I use patch to change Kernel, after change adjust when I use tc add qdisc dev eth0 htb ... RTNETLINK :answerd errore I use kernel 2.4.7-10 ,If you have any idea I am waiting to listen, - This message was sent using sharif web-based mail. http://mehr.sharif.edu ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Problems compiling patched bridge-utils
Hello, I've applied ``bridge-utils-0.9.5-ipmode-1.diff'' to be able to use my shaper as bridge and don't lose the netfilter capabilities, the patch applies with no error messages, which makes me supose everything is working fine. But when i try to recompile the bridge-utils utilities i get the message transcript below: esteban@inercia:~/devel/nexusbm/bridge-utils-0.9.5$ make make -C libbridge make[1]: Entering directory `/home/esteban/devel/bridge-shaper/bridge-utils-0.9.5/libbridge' gcc -Wall -g -c libbridge_devif.c libbridge_devif.c: In function `br_set_bridge_ip_mode': libbridge_devif.c:151: `BRCTL_SET_BRIDGE_IP_MODE' undeclared (first use in this function) libbridge_devif.c:151: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once libbridge_devif.c:151: for each function it appears in.) make[1]: *** [libbridge_devif.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/esteban/devel/bridge-shaper/bridge-utils-0.9.5/libbridge' make: *** [libbridge/libbridge.a] Error 2 If I compile the bridge-utils with no patch applied (or with the lower version diff applied) it compiles seamsly, and I can build a .deb with it too :-) Any Clue? -- Esteban A. Maringolo Buenos Aires, Argentina signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [LARTC] How to install HTB in kernel 2.4.7-10 ??
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 17:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, How can I add htb to the linux kernel? I download htb from www.docum.org , but I can't use that , I use patch to change Kernel, after change adjust when I use tc add qdisc dev eth0 htb ... RTNETLINK :answerd errore I use kernel 2.4.7-10 ,If you have any idea I am waiting to listen, I think you mean you followed the link on www.docum.org to the htb home-page. On the same page is a patch for iproute2. You have to applied this patch to the iproute2 source and use the patched version of the tc command. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Problems compiling patched bridge-utils
Hello, On 17 Sep 2002, Esteban Maringolo wrote: I've applied ``bridge-utils-0.9.5-ipmode-1.diff'' to be able to use my shaper as bridge and don't lose the netfilter capabilities, the patch applies with no error messages, which makes me supose everything is working fine. But when i try to recompile the bridge-utils utilities i get the message transcript below: esteban@inercia:~/devel/nexusbm/bridge-utils-0.9.5$ make make -C libbridge make[1]: Entering directory `/home/esteban/devel/bridge-shaper/bridge-utils-0.9.5/libbridge' gcc -Wall -g -c libbridge_devif.c libbridge_devif.c: In function `br_set_bridge_ip_mode': libbridge_devif.c:151: `BRCTL_SET_BRIDGE_IP_MODE' undeclared (first use in this function) May be you need 2.4.19 kernel in /usr/src/linux patched with bridge-ipmode-2.4.19-2.diff, the user-space stuff is not enough. Any Clue? Regards -- Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] the range of HTB's prio
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 12:00, Robert Penz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 17 September 2002 11:50, Nickola Kolev wrote: please tell me the range of prio 1 to 8, 1 being the highest, 8 - the lowest. 0 is highest as I know ... but I've also an question: is there if difference if I have 2 chains and use prio 0 and 7 or prio 0 and 1 ? No Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] the range of HTB's prio
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 09:53, hanhbnetfilter wrote: HTB and imq was used to control traffic. AC=tc class add dev eth0 parent $AC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps burst 2k $AC 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 $AC 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 please tell me the range of prio htb2 : 0-3 htb3 : 0-7 Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Throttling or policing incoming bandwidth to my linux server
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 20:02, Josh Chamas wrote:
Does anyone have an idea on how to police incoming bandwidth
to my server/workstation, in addition to outgoing. I have
a rule set like this so far that does well to limit my
outbound traffic, but what could I add to this that would
limit my inbound traffic to $LIMIT as well, ideally both
inbound outbound sharing the same $LIMIT say 200kbit.
If you create a imq devce (you need to patch kernel + iptables for this), you
can redirect incomint and outgoing to this device so you can make sure IN +
OUT 200kbit.
LIMIT=200kbit
HOSTIP=NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN
start () {
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 10mbit
tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate $LIMIT allot 1500
prio 5 bounded isolated tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio
16 u32 match ip src $HOSTIP flowid 1:1 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:1 sfq
perturb 10
}
The reason I want this is to be able to limit my bandwidth
to what I pay for at my colocation facility, I only have
one server/host machine there, no router.
I have read the docs about policing bandwidth with little
help, and it seems that when I try to reference the ingress
rules, I get a kernel error, maybe its not compiled into my
stock 7.2 redhat by default? It sounded like ingress rules
might be related to policing, if so I am out of luck.
You also need tc with ingress support. Why not compile your own kernel ? And
I don't use RH, so I don't know if there kernels support ingress.
The FreeBSD dummynet/ipfw implementation seem to handle this
just fine out of the box, so I suspect this functionality
is lurking in the tc rules, but have not found any online
docs that seem to know how to clearly do it.
It is, ingress + policer is the answer.
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Linux as bandwidth manager
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] the range of HTB's prio
Aren't you talking about the depth of the classes? Euh stupid me. Indeed. Btw, several months ago I tried to hack my kernel (2.4.17 at that time) and changed the maxdepth to 7... Guess what happenned? It went OOOPS'ing... Anyway. That was HTB2. In htb3 you can change it if you want : htb3.6_2.4.17.diff:+#define TC_HTB_MAXDEPTH 8 So, now with htb3 I can use maximum depth of classes = 7, right? Yep. Or change it in the source to an other value. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Re: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #766 - 9 msgs
Hi, In a busy network you need to use prio. Check how many channels of voice you do need and bandwidth required by each channel (16-32 kbits?). Put voice (udp packets) in the higher priority prio queue and use tbf behind it to limit traffic via prio to the maximum required for your channels. Or use htp putting your udp traffic in the higher priority class. Be careful that higher prio traffic can't be more than 20-30% of the link capacity to avoid starvation of lower prio traffic. Don´t expect good quality in a busy network. When congestion appears your udp packets will be dropped with no mercy (udp is an unresponssive protocol) hurting quality. Best regards, Leonardo Balliache Ps: Cisco has (check your IOS version) RTP header compression that can help a lot to lowering bandwidth requirements. You have to enable it at both sides of the link. Also, why don't try directly with Cisco PQ? At 06:28 a.m. 17/09/02 +0200, you wrote: From: Andreani Luca [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LARTC mailing list (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:49:28 +0200 Subject: [LARTC] Voip and Qos tests Hello list, I'm performing some tests in order to evaluate the possibility to make Voip calls on a busy network. I use some cisco routers with wfq enabled. I want to introduce some linux boxes acting as routers. I am especially interested in low-speed (64-128 kbps) links with PPP and frame-relay. Haw you some reference about similar tests? Whath qdisc (from tc) has best performance in these situations? Thank's Luca ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Re: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #767 - 15 msgs
Hi, Have a look to tbf. It has a selectable latency parameter that adjust the queue length. http://lartc.org/lartc.txt paragraph 9.2.2. Token Bucket Filter can give you more information. Best regards, Leonardo Balliache At 06:45 p.m. 17/09/02 +0200, you wrote: Message: 12 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:19:12 +0200 From: Hannes Ebner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LARTC] latency simulation Hi, how could I achieve a simulation of Bandwidth _and_ Latency? In detail, I need to simulate the characteristics of ISDN and DSL on a simple Ethernet-Connection: ISDN 64 Kbit/s und 10 ms latency DSL 128 Kbit/s und 50 ms latency I would use HTB for the limitation of the Bandwidth, but how am I able to increase the latency? Thank you in advance, Hannes ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Wondershaper
I think I've gotten everything up and running but I'm not sure. How can I tell if wondershaper is running correctly (I just put the command /wondershaper/wshaper in my /etc/rc.local)? Can anyone recommend a good program to log bandwidth usage? Thanx Snuffy2 __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Wondershaper
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 06:42, Justin Morea wrote: I think I've gotten everything up and running but I'm not sure. How can I tell if wondershaper is running correctly (I just put the command /wondershaper/wshaper in my /etc/rc.local)? Can anyone recommend a good program to log bandwidth usage? iptraf, ethereal, ntop, a quick google search will show some more. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
