Re: [LARTC] HOWTO unmaintained?
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:18:24 -0700 noc ops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know where we stand with lartc howto? > > > regards, > /virendra > > Stephen Hemminger wrote: The new wiki http://linux-net.osdl.org is available and you are welcome to put it there. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] Error in "15.10 Example of full nat solution with QoS"?
Near the end of section 15.10, the following commands are shown for prioritizing SYN packets: iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j MARK --set-mark 0x1 iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j RETURN Shouldn't the "-I" option really be "-A"? Like so: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j MARK --set-mark 0x1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j RETURN Won't using "-I" cause these entries to be inserted at the top of the chain, putting the RETURN before the MARK is set? Maybe I'm missing something. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] Two linux routers with DSL
Hi all! I've the following config: [LAN] - [big router] - [dsl router] - [internet] Big router is a dedicated computer running linux, dsl router is a small device running linux embedded (busybox) and connected to the internet via pppoa. Both routers are connected together via ethernet. I want to reduce as much as possible the load in the dsl router, so I'd like the big router to do NAT. How should I configure both routers? Thank you very much for your help! Eduardo Fernández ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] HOWTO unmaintained?
Does anyone know where we stand with lartc howto? regards, /virendra Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:00:30 +0100 > Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder if someone would host a mediawiki and consider uploading the documentation there. This would make it easier for people to contribute, and I think it shold be fairly easy to convert from it's current format to a wiki >>> >>>Good idea, I'll see if the OSDL will put up a wiki for it >>>on developer.osdl.org, stay tuned. >>> >>> >> >>Can I suggest that you look very hard at Mediawiki (ie as per >>wikipedia). It's built for scalability, is really easy to edit, very >>actively maintained, and has all the distributed stuff built in if you >>really needed to spread the load over several machines. All in all a >>very grown up documentation tool. Oh and it's also multi-lingual so it >>might also be possible to use it to help with the translation issues >> >>I mainly mentioned it because I'm sure there are some tools for >>converting the current lartc faq up to the wiki format and obviously >>that's the first main step. >> >>If someone will host it then I have some experience maintaining a >>mediawiki site and could probably help out some > > > Okay, if the lartc.org guys don't pick it up, I'll setup a mediawiki > when I get back from holiday. For an example see: > http://wiki.linux-nfs.org > > > ___ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iproute2 version (050929)
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 23:34:25 +0200 (CEST)
Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > There is an new minor update to iproute2 utilities available:
> > http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-050929.tar.gz
>
>
> It hangs on "ip rule flush". Tested on 2.6.13.2.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Krzysztof Olędzki
Fixed by this patch (in next release)
==
When assigning an ip address to an ethernet adapter, the newest
(050929) version of 'ip addr' hangs while older versions worked.
The problem was traced to be a removed initialisation. The patch
below corrects this problem.
Regards,
Jerome Borsboom
--- iproute2-050929/lib/libnetlink.c2005-09-21 21:33:18.0 +0200
+++ iproute2-050929/lib/libnetlink.c2005-10-04 13:42:30.0 +0200
@@ -235,7 +235,10 @@
unsigned seq;
struct nlmsghdr *h;
struct sockaddr_nl nladdr;
- struct iovec iov;
+ struct iovec iov = {
+ .iov_base = (void*)n,
+ .iov_len = n->nlmsg_len
+ };
struct msghdr msg = {
.msg_name = &nladdr,
.msg_namelen = sizeof(nladdr),
--
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OSDL http://developer.osdl.org/~shemminger
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] iproute2-050929 ERORR compiling
On 05 Oct 2005 09:47:43 +0200 Krzysiek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are two different problems. The first is arpd needs the dbm library > > (usually dbm-devel on most distros). Or you can just ignore the problem > > if you don't run arpd > > > > The second is problems with building the new ematch grammar stuff. I > > don't > > have an easy fix for this, but you could try a newer version of > > bison/flex. > > There is easy workaround regarding flex. The newest version doesn't work. I > had the same problem - and i had recent versions of flex, bison etc. It works > if you remove recent flex and install older vesion: > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lex/flex-2.5.27.tar.bz2?download There was some discussion with the Redhat and Suse maintainers when Thomas added the ematch stuff. The problem is that the new flex is not backwards compatible, so the distro's aren't switching yet. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] ip address delete bug?
jamal wrote: On Tue, 2005-04-10 at 23:08 +, Alexey Toptygin wrote: On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: [..] Normally, I would add the new IP to eth0, start another ssh to the new IP, log out from the session to the old IP, remove the old IP from eth0 and be done. If I want the server to be reachable under both IPs during a transition period, I can delay deletion of the old IP until later. Then I guess the question is: does anything in common use depend on the old behavior? There's a new feature in newer kernels which allows for an alias to be upgraded to become primary when you delete the primary. You need to configure the sysctl otherwise it defaults to purging all the secondaries when you delete the primary. Thanks for that feature! Just looked at /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/promote_secondaries and it is the feature I was looking for. Merged in 2.6.12, if anyone reads this in a mail archive and wonders whether he has to upgrade. This leads to another question: Can I manually promote a secondary address to become primary without deleting the primary? This would help me to use the new address by default during the transition period. What it sounds like is you need to have ssh run over SCTP instead of TCP to allow multi-homing. Maybe, but I did not find any current openssh version with sctp support. And with promote_secondaries, my original problem is solved perfectly. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] iproute2-050929 ERORR compiling
> There are two different problems. The first is arpd needs the dbm library > (usually dbm-devel on most distros). Or you can just ignore the problem > if you don't run arpd > > The second is problems with building the new ematch grammar stuff. I > don't > have an easy fix for this, but you could try a newer version of > bison/flex. There is easy workaround regarding flex. The newest version doesn't work. I had the same problem - and i had recent versions of flex, bison etc. It works if you remove recent flex and install older vesion: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lex/flex-2.5.27.tar.bz2?download Krzysiek ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
