Re: [LARTC] Losing Packets after a DNAT in prerouting

2005-07-16 Thread pramod

Did u do this

cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/forwarding 
the output should be 1

Also
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/arp_filter
this should also be 1

thanks 
 pramod





___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


Re: [LARTC] QoS on receive

2005-07-14 Thread pramod

Dropping of packets on the receive side can be done bu IPTABLES..

thanks
pramod

Alexander Sirotkin wrote:

It appears that while Linux has plenty of traffic shaping mechanism on 
transmit, there is nothing on receive side.
While generally it does make sense since transmit is more CPU 
intensive operation, after all receive also
consumes CPU cycles. It is clear that it's best to drop the packet as 
soon as possible, i.e. on receive, if possible -
by the driver itself. It may not be feasible in general case, but I 
can think of a couple of scenarios when it does

make sense.

Any ideas ?
Maybe there is some similar QoS mechanism that I'm not aware of ?



___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


Re: [LARTC] Losing Packets after a DNAT in prerouting

2005-07-14 Thread pramod

Can u attach ur Rules file..

thanks
pramod
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc