Re: [LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
Jones Desougi wrote: Try the patch below. (It's bug #413 in bugzilla) Applied, thanks Jones. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
Hi Salim :) * Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and HTB. MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 --set-mark gives invalid argument error message. Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied) Iptables version 1.3.4 Intel x86 architecture. I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn't come to a conclusion or solution. You've hit a bug in iptables :( I've notified in the bugzilla but I have had no answers. You're building iptables with no shared libraries (NO_SHARED_LIBS=1). This means that the code in iptables, when loading the modules for the matches and targets is taking a slightly different code path. The problem is that the MARK target has two versions, 0 and 1, and kernel 2.4.x (at least until 31) supports only version 0. If you don't use share libraries in iptables, both versions are loaded and v1 is used instead of v2. Unfortunately, v1 has a bigger data structure than v0 and your kernel complaints. The only solution for your problem is to rebuild iptables with shared libraries instead of compiling the matches and targets in the binary, statically. I've tried to make a patch, and worked for me but I don't want to mess anything so I've described the problem, the wrong code path and other details to the iptables people. If you want to take a look the bug is #413 in bugzilla.netfilter.org And yes, nobody seems to have this problem because it seems that only few people uses iptables built statically :?? or because nobody seems to be interested. Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net http://www.gotesdelluna.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
DervishD wrote: Hi Salim :) * Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and HTB. MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 --set-mark gives invalid argument error message. Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied) Iptables version 1.3.4 Intel x86 architecture. I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn't come to a conclusion or solution. You've hit a bug in iptables :( I've notified in the bugzilla but I have had no answers. You're building iptables with no shared libraries (NO_SHARED_LIBS=1). This means that the code in iptables, when loading the modules for the matches and targets is taking a slightly different code path. The problem is that the MARK target has two versions, 0 and 1, and kernel 2.4.x (at least until 31) supports only version 0. If you don't use share libraries in iptables, both versions are loaded and v1 is used instead of v2. Unfortunately, v1 has a bigger data structure than v0 and your kernel complaints. That can't be the reason, all revisions of a single match/target are in the same object file and the supported revision is (supposed to be) probed. Salim, can you send a strace of the failing iptables command? ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
Hi Jones :))) * Jones Desougi [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: That can't be the reason, all revisions of a single match/target are in the same object file and the supported revision is (supposed to be) probed. They are not due to the DONT_LOAD usage ;)) The patch below is much better than the one I tested ;))) Try the patch below. (It's bug #413 in bugzilla) Thanks a lot :)) I'll test it as soon as I can. Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net http://www.gotesdelluna.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
Jones Desougi wrote: That can't be the reason, all revisions of a single match/target are in the same object file and the supported revision is (supposed to be) probed. Salim, can you send a strace of the failing iptables command? The key being supposed to be. :-) I somehow expected something like this :) Try the patch below. (It's bug #413 in bugzilla) This looks good, thanks. I'm going to apply it as soon as there is confirmation that it really fixes the problem people are seeing. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
It worked when I changed to NO_SHARED_LIBS=0. thanks guys. will try out the patch today. the command that was failing was a simple --set-mark. Let me know if anyone still wants an strace. Will send it. - Original Message - From: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: DervishD [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; Netfilter Development Mailinglist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 DervishD wrote: Hi Salim :) * Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and HTB. MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 --set-mark gives invalid argument error message. Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied) Iptables version 1.3.4 Intel x86 architecture. I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn't come to a conclusion or solution. You've hit a bug in iptables :( I've notified in the bugzilla but I have had no answers. You're building iptables with no shared libraries (NO_SHARED_LIBS=1). This means that the code in iptables, when loading the modules for the matches and targets is taking a slightly different code path. The problem is that the MARK target has two versions, 0 and 1, and kernel 2.4.x (at least until 31) supports only version 0. If you don't use share libraries in iptables, both versions are loaded and v1 is used instead of v2. Unfortunately, v1 has a bigger data structure than v0 and your kernel complaints. That can't be the reason, all revisions of a single match/target are in the same object file and the supported revision is (supposed to be) probed. Salim, can you send a strace of the failing iptables command? ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
Hello all, I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and HTB. MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 --set-mark gives invalid argument error message. Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied) Iptables version 1.3.4 Intel x86 architecture. I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn't come to a conclusion or solution. please help... thanks Salim ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
