Re: [LARTC] htb rate > 30mbit not working
Hello again, I tested it with MTU 128 and it works fine :) ... for now I will set it with 2.6 kernel Thanks a lot :) on Wednesday, November 12, 2003, 12:49:01 AM, ste napisali SS> Hello, SS> I tried to set shaper on my local lan with HTB and rate 60mbit SS> I used linux-2.4.22 and tried with 2.4.23rc1 - all QoS and HTB related SS> staff compiled like modules. In both kernels the rate did not reach SS> more than 30mbit( 3MB/sec ) SS> When I delete shaper I can reach 9MB/sec ( about 74mbit ) SS> if I set shaper more than 25mbit the speed did not increase :) SS> I tried this with kernel 2.6.test9 and everything is OK shaper works SS> on 60mbit - so I think this is problem of the current kernel SS> Any ideas ? :) -- Regards, Svetlin Simeonov ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] htb rate > 30mbit not working
On Wednesday, 12 November 2003, at 02:48:26 +0100, Damjan wrote: > Anyway you can run 2.6 its not that bad. > There was a report some time ago about HTB not shaping to the specified bandwidth in 2.6.x when traffics consists of small-sized packages. See: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657 This supposed bug has yet to be acknowledged by some developers. -- Jose Luis Domingo Lopez Linux Registered User #189436 Debian Linux Sid (Linux 2.6.0-test9-mm2) ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] htb rate > 30mbit not working
> I tried to set shaper on my local lan with HTB and rate 60mbit > I used linux-2.4.22 and tried with 2.4.23rc1 - all QoS and HTB related > staff compiled like modules. In both kernels the rate did not reach > more than 30mbit( 3MB/sec ) > > When I delete shaper I can reach 9MB/sec ( about 74mbit ) > if I set shaper more than 25mbit the speed did not increase :) > > I tried this with kernel 2.6.test9 and everything is OK shaper works > on 60mbit - so I think this is problem of the current kernel > > Any ideas ? :) Well there are two new things I can think of in 2.6 vs 2.4. One is that the HZ constant is bigger which peraps can make latencies in the kernel smaller... but I don't know if HZ has any influence on HTB performance. Also 2.6 has NAPI, a new API for network card drivers that modifies the drivers behaviour to better reflect the usage. Its interupt driven on lighter loads, but "poll"-ing based on higher load. Anyway you can run 2.6 its not that bad. -- Damjan Georgievski jabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
