[Lazarus] 2do: about DBGrid from hfiandor 31 oct 2012
dear colleagues: i have found how to fix the name of columns with the field´s name, and i have found how to fix the width of each colum. It works in a pretty way. as i have 20 fields with data about "projects", the last ones scroll the screen to the right and the PC´operator lost the project´s name and i am thinking to put and edit box in the upper place of the DBGrid to show the project´s name (one of the firsts fields of the record) for the active row. If i used a simple edit box, it can be programmed in the OnKeyPress Event, but I don´t know how to do it in the case of a dbGrid. Another question: Can I obtain the Sum of each colums and put in a StringGrid placed above the DBGrid? thanks in advance, yours truly, Ing. Héctor F. Fiandor Rosario hfian...@infomed.sld.cu -- Este mensaje le ha llegado mediante el servicio de correo electronico que ofrece Infomed para respaldar el cumplimiento de las misiones del Sistem a Nacional de Salud. La persona que envia este correo asume el compromiso de usar el servicio a tales fines y cumplir con las regulaciones establecidas Infomed: http://www.sld.cu/ -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] about DBGrid from hfiandor 31 oct 2012
Dear colleagues: i have a BD with 20 fields. In a form i want to fill the data for three of then only, using a DBGrid. the first columns is the Id that is AutoInc and the others are ftString. Please, i don´t know how to fix the name of the columns with the name of the fields selected to be filled. thanks in advance, yours truly, Ing. Héctor F. Fiandor Rosario hfian...@infomed.sld.cu -- Este mensaje le ha llegado mediante el servicio de correo electronico que ofrece Infomed para respaldar el cumplimiento de las misiones del Sistem a Nacional de Salud. La persona que envia este correo asume el compromiso de usar el servicio a tales fines y cumplir con las regulaciones establecidas Infomed: http://www.sld.cu/ -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Free Windows 8 OEM x64 for Lazarus Core Developer(s)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Maxim Ganetsky wrote: > It seems that this revision isn't yet in 2.6.x. BTW, won't it break Lazarus > compilation with FPC 2.6.0? I have FPC 2.6.0 and it compiles OK. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Free Windows 8 OEM x64 for Lazarus Core Developer(s)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > Bug with patch for 64 bit Lazarus component for PostgreSQL: > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23096 > Postgres SQL Connection for 64bit driver > which depends on the FPC implementation: > [...] > The FPC patch has been committed; the Lazarus one hasn't yet. > If you use FPC trunk, you could apply the Lazarus patch I applied it, or actually I removed the whole define because it became obsolete. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Free Windows 8 OEM x64 for Lazarus Core Developer(s)
31.10.2012 22:25, Reinier Olislagers пишет: On 31-10-2012 17:49, luiz americo pereira camara wrote: 1: fcl-db components present (currently missing postgresql). AFAIK, the lack of db components in 64bit is a fpc issue. Somehow some db units were not built in 64bit. I remember some fixes landing in fpc svn repository some time ago So your best bet is ask the fpc devs. Bug with patch for 64 bit Lazarus component for PostgreSQL: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23096 Postgres SQL Connection for 64bit driver which depends on the FPC implementation: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23098 [Patch] FPC Postgres SQL Connection for 64bit driver applied in FPC trunk/2.7.1, revision 22607 marked for backport to 2.6.x (could be/might well be in there already, don't remember). The FPC patch has been committed; the Lazarus one hasn't yet. If you use FPC trunk, you could apply the Lazarus patch It seems that this revision isn't yet in 2.6.x. BTW, won't it break Lazarus compilation with FPC 2.6.0? -- Best regards, Maxim Ganetsky mailto:gan...@narod.ru -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] fpdoc download
Hi. I have some libraries in Lazarus, that I want to generate documentation. I don't have internet at home. I found this link: http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/fpdoc/fpdoc.html Is there a url where I can download the same manual ? Thanks. -- atte Marco Aurelio Ramirez Carrillo -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Free Windows 8 OEM x64 for Lazarus Core Developer(s)
On 31-10-2012 17:49, luiz americo pereira camara wrote: > > 1: fcl-db components present (currently missing postgresql). > > > > AFAIK, the lack of db components in 64bit is a fpc issue. Somehow some > db units were not built in 64bit. I remember some fixes landing in fpc > svn repository some time ago > > So your best bet is ask the fpc devs. Bug with patch for 64 bit Lazarus component for PostgreSQL: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23096 Postgres SQL Connection for 64bit driver which depends on the FPC implementation: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23098 [Patch] FPC Postgres SQL Connection for 64bit driver applied in FPC trunk/2.7.1, revision 22607 marked for backport to 2.6.x (could be/might well be in there already, don't remember). The FPC patch has been committed; the Lazarus one hasn't yet. If you use FPC trunk, you could apply the Lazarus patch -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Assigning Scrollbar.Position crashes on Gtk
I'd like a help of Gtk expert with issue http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23200 This is outside of my usual interests, but the crash happens to affect TAChart, since it imlpements a TScrollBar descendant. Note that the code works on both Win and Qt. -- Alexander S. Klenin -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Free Windows 8 OEM x64 for Lazarus Core Developer(s)
2012/10/31 Vincent Snijders > > > 2012/10/31 Andrew Brunner > >> I'm looking to better Lazarus on Windows 8 (64bit). I realize it just >> came out and it may be not worth the time to run (even in a virtual-box). >> >> I'm offering a few Lazarus core developers a copy of windows 8 so they >> can have it to run and test and improve Lazarus. >> >> The only thing I want is >> 1: fcl-db components present (currently missing postgresql). >> > AFAIK, the lack of db components in 64bit is a fpc issue. Somehow some db units were not built in 64bit. I remember some fixes landing in fpc svn repository some time ago So your best bet is ask the fpc devs. Luiz -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Free Windows 8 OEM x64 for Lazarus Core Developer(s)
2012/10/31 Andrew Brunner > 1: fcl-db components present (currently missing postgresql). > AFAIK, the lack of db components in 64bit is a fpc issue. Somehow some db units were not built in 64bit. I remember some fixes landing in fpc svn repository some time ago So your best bet is ask the fpc devs. Luiz -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Free Windows 8 OEM x64 for Lazarus Core Developer(s)
2012/10/31 Andrew Brunner > I'm looking to better Lazarus on Windows 8 (64bit). I realize it just > came out and it may be not worth the time to run (even in a virtual-box). > > I'm offering a few Lazarus core developers a copy of windows 8 so they can > have it to run and test and improve Lazarus. > > The only thing I want is > 1: fcl-db components present (currently missing postgresql). > 2: Install to Program Files and Build Projects. If the problem is out > of scope - clearly identify problem areas and their external projects. > > Email me for acceptance, I will buy and drop-ship you the cd. You retain > license for your time. Win8 Pro Upgrade or Win8 Pro Full. > > Nice offer, I see you already added to the bounties page at: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Bounties#Windows_8_64bit_Pro_.28Full.2FUpgrade.29 Thanks, Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Remote application
On 10/31/2012 01:47 PM, Lukasz Sokol wrote: Some /free software/ VNC implementations (e.g. UltraVNC) install their own display driver [under Windows] to exactly know /when/ update is needed and where. Good to know ! Thanks, -Michael -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Remote application
On 31/10/2012 09:13, Michael Schnell wrote: > I understand that there are (at least) two ways to do the remote > display. > > A) Read the pixels from the graphics driver. This is what VNC does. > The problem here is, that you don't know when an update is necessary > (and thus you need to do polling) and that reading the pixels needs a > lot of performances (get a GDI-handle, read the complete screen > memory via the bus and then transfer only the pixels that have > changed). Some /free software/ VNC implementations (e.g. UltraVNC) install their own display driver [under Windows] to exactly know /when/ update is needed and where. > -Michael > Lukasz -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Free Windows 8 OEM x64 for Lazarus Core Developer(s)
I'm looking to better Lazarus on Windows 8 (64bit). I realize it just came out and it may be not worth the time to run (even in a virtual-box). I'm offering a few Lazarus core developers a copy of windows 8 so they can have it to run and test and improve Lazarus. The only thing I want is 1: fcl-db components present (currently missing postgresql). 2: Install to Program Files and Build Projects. If the problem is out of scope - clearly identify problem areas and their external projects. Email me for acceptance, I will buy and drop-ship you the cd. You retain license for your time. Win8 Pro Upgrade or Win8 Pro Full. Thanks, -- Andrew Brunner Aurawin LLC 512.574.6298 http://aurawin.com/ Aurawin is a great new way to store, share, and enjoy your photos, videos, music and more. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Indy & WinCE
Le 31/10/2012 12:03, Tommi Prami a écrit : Hello, Donate your changes back to the Project ;) No problem. I know that Marco VDV was playing around with some Indy guys. What would be the best ? I can easily spot where the changes are but I'd like to have some other guy used to post changes Antonio. -Tee- On 31.10.2012 11:42, Antonio Fortuny wrote: Hi ALL. I got rid of the compilation problems of Indy. I've made a little test for WinCE and, good news, it works ! However some minor changes have to be made on a few units to have a clean compilation for WinCE: IdRegisterCore.pas, IdIMAP4.pas, idStackWindows.pas, IdWinsock2.pas Server: Vista32 Client; WinCE Compiled on Vista32, Lazarus 1.1 37816 (29/06/2012) indylaz.lpk compiled but not yet installed in the IDE Server uses a TIdTCPServer and connetions are handled within separated threads, one per new connection, as usual with Indy. Client uses a TIdTCPClient, connection is handled synchronously. Both client and server use the standard IoHandler Stream reader and writer and any binary data runs thru the streams without problem. Of course, I have to take care of string translations between Win32 (WIN1252 code page) and WinCE (Unicode) or whatever goes trhu (specifically from databases). In case you need some more explantions feel free to ask me. Antonio -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Remote application
El 31/10/2012 10:13, Michael Schnell escribió: > I understand that there are (at least) two ways to do the remote display. > > A) Read the pixels from the graphics driver. This is what VNC does. > The problem here is, that you don't know when an update is necessary > (and thus you need to do polling) and that reading the pixels needs a > lot of performances (get a GDI-handle, read the complete screen memory > via the bus and then transfer only the pixels that have changed). (In > fact some time ago I stole this code from VNC, translated it from C to > Pascal and did a thingy that could transfer a rectangle of the screen > via TCP to another PC.) > > or > > B) Hook into the interface between the application and the Windows > manager. This is what Linux "Remote X" and Windows "Remote Desktop" > do. VirtualBox (and supposedly VMWare) seems to be able to do do this, > too, and here I did already see that it is possible to virtualize a > single program rather than a complete Desktop. > > > > Seemingly NX can do both, depending on the situation. I suppose that NX not only compress, but decides from the server (in behalf the client application) what must be send to the client (the graphic server). A lot of things needn't to be send, a lot of things can be joint and send only the final result, and a lot of commands can be queued, cached and sent in less commadds. And the other way around, the client (the graphic server) needent to sent everything. I suppose that NX does smart decisions filtering what needs to be sent in both directions, so saves a lot of traffic and round trips. X11 It is acceptable when in a local machine, but not for remote machines, let alone a WAN. I've heard that the problem is in a poor use of X11 of libraries like gtk or qt, I've also heard that the problem is in xlib, the common libarry of most widgets that doesn't optimize the protocol. I have also heard that X11 is a too low level protocol and should be replaced. There have been some tries like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresco_%28windowing_system%29. In fact, that is what javascript and ajax tries, send widgets etc. -- Saludos Santiago s...@ciberpiula.net -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Indy & WinCE
Hello, Donate your changes back to the Project ;) -Tee- On 31.10.2012 11:42, Antonio Fortuny wrote: Hi ALL. I got rid of the compilation problems of Indy. I've made a little test for WinCE and, good news, it works ! However some minor changes have to be made on a few units to have a clean compilation for WinCE: IdRegisterCore.pas, IdIMAP4.pas, idStackWindows.pas, IdWinsock2.pas Server: Vista32 Client; WinCE Compiled on Vista32, Lazarus 1.1 37816 (29/06/2012) indylaz.lpk compiled but not yet installed in the IDE Server uses a TIdTCPServer and connetions are handled within separated threads, one per new connection, as usual with Indy. Client uses a TIdTCPClient, connection is handled synchronously. Both client and server use the standard IoHandler Stream reader and writer and any binary data runs thru the streams without problem. Of course, I have to take care of string translations between Win32 (WIN1252 code page) and WinCE (Unicode) or whatever goes trhu (specifically from databases). In case you need some more explantions feel free to ask me. Antonio -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Indy & WinCE
Hi ALL. I got rid of the compilation problems of Indy. I've made a little test for WinCE and, good news, it works ! However some minor changes have to be made on a few units to have a clean compilation for WinCE: IdRegisterCore.pas, IdIMAP4.pas, idStackWindows.pas, IdWinsock2.pas Server: Vista32 Client; WinCE Compiled on Vista32, Lazarus 1.1 37816 (29/06/2012) indylaz.lpk compiled but not yet installed in the IDE Server uses a TIdTCPServer and connetions are handled within separated threads, one per new connection, as usual with Indy. Client uses a TIdTCPClient, connection is handled synchronously. Both client and server use the standard IoHandler Stream reader and writer and any binary data runs thru the streams without problem. Of course, I have to take care of string translations between Win32 (WIN1252 code page) and WinCE (Unicode) or whatever goes trhu (specifically from databases). In case you need some more explantions feel free to ask me. Antonio -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Remote application
I understand that there are (at least) two ways to do the remote display. A) Read the pixels from the graphics driver. This is what VNC does. The problem here is, that you don't know when an update is necessary (and thus you need to do polling) and that reading the pixels needs a lot of performances (get a GDI-handle, read the complete screen memory via the bus and then transfer only the pixels that have changed). (In fact some time ago I stole this code from VNC, translated it from C to Pascal and did a thingy that could transfer a rectangle of the screen via TCP to another PC.) or B) Hook into the interface between the application and the Windows manager. This is what Linux "Remote X" and Windows "Remote Desktop" do. VirtualBox (and supposedly VMWare) seems to be able to do do this, too, and here I did already see that it is possible to virtualize a single program rather than a complete Desktop. Seemingly NX can do both, depending on the situation. It's understandable that doing (B) is at least "difficult", when you want to attach to a running program, as supposedly a program transfers some information when starting and the Window manager needs to know same even when it requests a full repaint. But obviously Windows "Remote Desktop" can handle this problem decently. So attaching to an already running program (not the Desktop it runs on) using (B) is not that easy :-( . Maybe it's possible to something like starting another instance of the program with NX in the way you originally described and do some magic within the program itself to meld the running instance into the newly started one. (Just raving...) -Michael -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Splash window with drop shadow
On 30/10/12 10:49, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: Alberto, how can I make a window transparent?. There's a suggestion here: http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,18738.msg106055.html#msg106055 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Problems with Win8 x64
2012/10/31 Mattias Gaertner > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:43:01 -0500 > Andrew Brunner wrote: > > > After installing Lazarus 1.0.2 binaries I try to compile my project and > get > > > > Fatal: Can't find unit pqconnection used by uDatabase > > > > If I click on the pqconnection unit CodeTools brings me right to the > > proper file. > > > > What can't fpc find the unit? What entry is missing from the fpc.cfg > file? > > Maybe you have a wrong ppu file or maybe you have an include file that > conflicts. > Try in the IDE "Run / Clean up build files". > > It is quiet possible that the unit was not compied for win64 in the default installation, because the postgresql dll was not yet tested with fpc and win64, so nobody knew it actually worked. Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] For Qt LCL users
One nice thing in Qt 5 (it'll have it's own "unique" look on all platforms as style option): http://blog.qt.digia.com/2012/10/30/cleaning-up-styles-in-qt5-and-adding- fusion/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheQtBlog+%28The+Qt+Blog%29 zeljko -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus