[Lazarus] cross platform pre-compile processing

2015-06-19 Thread Xiangrong Fang
Hi,

I need to run a program before compile my program, so I set it in lazarus's
project settings. It works fine, but, how can I make it a platform
dependent config, i.e.

run "prepare" if the project is compiled under linux, and run "prepare.exe"
if it is compiled on Windows.

Thanks!

Xiangrong
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd

José Mejuto wrote:

El 19/06/2015 a las 9:50, Bo Berglund escribió:


Now I am getting to the real hurdle as follows:

DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Illegal COFF Magic while reading
SPROMEPS.OBJ


Hello,

Try this tool: http://www.agner.org/optimize/#objconv


Looks useful. Out of curiosity, how far can the same job be done by 
invoking the ld linker manually and tweaking its parameters to specify 
different file formats (-b or --format option)?


--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Marc Weustink


On June 19, 2015 9:44:19 PM GMT+02:00, Bo Berglund  
wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:42:35 -0700 (MST), leledumbo
> wrote:
>
>>> The warning about the $F switch concerns a setting to force far
>calls, 
>>> what is the equivalent in FPC? 
>>
>>http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu21.html
>>
>>> And I am not sure that COFF is the correct file type to link 
>>> against... 
>>
>>yes, it is. the fact that you know in undefined symbol step says it
>all. Now
>>you will need to provide how those undefined symbols actually defined.
>They
>>probably occur from external function declaration, which differs from
>>compiler to compiler. For instance:
>>
>>SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$$WORD 
>>
>>is FPC's way to define:
>>
>>unit SPROMEPS;
>>...
>>function RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET(x: RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR; y: WORD):
>WORD;
>>
>>which is explained here:
>>http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu141.html#x172-1750006.2.2
>>
>>and the way to modify it, such that you can match with what the object
>file
>>expects:
>>http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu142.html#x173-1760006.2.3
>>
>>
>
>The error message when compiling the source:
>DongleTest.lpr(22,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
>SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$$WORD
>
>In SproMeps.pas:
>
>
>implementation
>FUNCTION RNBOsproFormatPacket( ApiPacket : RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR;
>   thePacketSize : WORD ) : WORD; STDCALL;
>EXTERNAL;
>
>
>I did not really understand any of teh discussions in the linked
>articles...
>
>Any idea what to do for this particular functio?
>There are 13 in total..


Just guessing, I've no experience with this.

1) Use the converter tool to dump the exported function names from the original 
.obj
2) look for an exported name which looks like RNBOsproFormatPacket
3) use the name conversion option of the converter tool to map the name you 
found to  SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$$WORD (see 
manual)
4) do this for all 13 functions 

Marc


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Bo Berglund
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:42:35 -0700 (MST), leledumbo
 wrote:

>> The warning about the $F switch concerns a setting to force far calls, 
>> what is the equivalent in FPC? 
>
>http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu21.html
>
>> And I am not sure that COFF is the correct file type to link 
>> against... 
>
>yes, it is. the fact that you know in undefined symbol step says it all. Now
>you will need to provide how those undefined symbols actually defined. They
>probably occur from external function declaration, which differs from
>compiler to compiler. For instance:
>
>SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$$WORD 
>
>is FPC's way to define:
>
>unit SPROMEPS;
>...
>function RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET(x: RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR; y: WORD): WORD;
>
>which is explained here:
>http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu141.html#x172-1750006.2.2
>
>and the way to modify it, such that you can match with what the object file
>expects:
>http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu142.html#x173-1760006.2.3
>
>

The error message when compiling the source:
DongleTest.lpr(22,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$$WORD

In SproMeps.pas:


implementation
FUNCTION RNBOsproFormatPacket( ApiPacket : RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR;
   thePacketSize : WORD ) : WORD; STDCALL;
EXTERNAL;


I did not really understand any of teh discussions in the linked
articles...

Any idea what to do for this particular functio?
There are 13 in total..


-- 
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Firebird DB replication options

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt



On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:


Hi,

[Apologies in advance - I know this is not a Firebird list, but here are
many Firebird DB users that could possibly comment.]

Has anybody here used any Firebird database replication software?

I've been reading up on it a bit, and there seems to be more options
available that I expected. Has anybody tried any of them, and could
possibly give some comment.


Do you want replication or clustering ?

I have looked into this problem several times.

From my point of view, all of these solutions suffer from the same problems: 

a) they slow down the database.
and
b) if the database structure changes often, it is a pain to maintain.

The only correct way to implement this is in the server engine itself; 
until that is done, these are crude and makeshift solutions.

(e.g. Postgres got it correct with their 'slony' replication)

IMHO You're better of using nbackup to rebuild the database remotely.
At the very least, that requires no extra triggers, log tables and 
whatnot, and will not slow down the database.


If your database structure is fixed, you don't update very often, the tools you 
mention can be acceptable.
If so, then I'd recommend going with the firebird native tools, such as 
ibreplicator.

Michael.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread leledumbo
> The warning about the $F switch concerns a setting to force far calls, 
> what is the equivalent in FPC? 

http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu21.html

> And I am not sure that COFF is the correct file type to link 
> against... 

yes, it is. the fact that you know in undefined symbol step says it all. Now
you will need to provide how those undefined symbols actually defined. They
probably occur from external function declaration, which differs from
compiler to compiler. For instance:

SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$$WORD 

is FPC's way to define:

unit SPROMEPS;
...
function RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET(x: RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR; y: WORD): WORD;

which is explained here:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu141.html#x172-1750006.2.2

and the way to modify it, such that you can match with what the object file
expects:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu142.html#x173-1760006.2.3



--
View this message in context: 
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Newbie-porting-class-to-FPC-but-get-procedure-assignment-error-tp4042730p4042768.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


[Lazarus] Firebird DB replication options

2015-06-19 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi,

[Apologies in advance - I know this is not a Firebird list, but here are
many Firebird DB users that could possibly comment.]

Has anybody here used any Firebird database replication software?

I've been reading up on it a bit, and there seems to be more options
available that I expected. Has anybody tried any of them, and could
possibly give some comment.

IBReplicator - commercial, cross-platform, full-featured
http://www.ibphoenix.com/products/software/ibreplicator

FiBRE - open source, cross-platform
http://fibre.sourceforge.net/

FBReplicator - open source
http://www.meta.com.au

IBO Replication Module - Delphi/C++ Builder components
http://www.ibobjects.com/iborpl.html

ReplicadorBR - open source
http://sourceforge.net/projects/replicadorbr/

Replicador Firebird - freeware
Originally available from http://replicadorfirebird.ich.pro.br/
Download (2.2MB zip file) from:
http://firebirdfaq.org/files/Replicador_Firebird_1.0.12.7z

CopyCat (components) and CopyTiger (application) - commercial
http://www.microtec.fr/copycat/

ININ Replication Manager - commercial
http://www.inin.hr/

Daffodil Replicator - commercial
http://enterprise.replicator.daffodilsw.com/index.html

DB Replicator - open source fork of Daffodil
http://dbreplicator.org/

DBRE - open source, supports Firebird and MySQL
http://dbre.sourceforge.net/

IB LogManager - not a real replicator, but helps setting up a
hot-standby environment easily:
http://www.upscene.com/products/audit/iblm_main.htm
Demo Flash movie available here:
http://www.iblogmanager.com/download/demos/iblm/iblm_hotstandby.htm

SymmetricsDS - open source, cross platform, supports various DBMS:
http://www.symmetricds.org



Frext - Doesn't seem to have started yet, good research info.
http://frext.sourceforge.net/


Regards,
  - Graeme -


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Bo Berglund
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:01:09 +0200, José Mejuto 
wrote:

>El 19/06/2015 a las 9:50, Bo Berglund escribió:
>
>> Now I am getting to the real hurdle as follows:
>>
>> DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Illegal COFF Magic while reading
>> SPROMEPS.OBJ
>>
>
>Hello,
>
>Try this tool: http://www.agner.org/optimize/#objconv
>
>-- 
Thanks,
I tried the converter but when I entered the command according to the
manual I got an error:

D:\Internet\Download\FreePascal_Lazarus>objconv -fCOFF SPROMEPS.obj
SPROMEPS.coff

Error 2004: Unknown command line option: fCOFF


Then I tried to use a lowercase version (so NOT according to the
manual) and it worked!

D:\Internet\Download\FreePascal_Lazarus>objconv -fcoff SPROMEPS.obj
SPROMEPS.coff

Input file: SPROMEPS.obj, output file: SPROMEPS.coff
Converting from OMF32 to COFF32
Warning 1211: 270 comment records ignored

  0 Debug sections removed
  0 Exception sections removed

So now, I changed the line in SPROMEPS.pas from:

{$L SPROMEPS.OBJ}  { LINK WITH THE SUPERPRO OBJECT FILE }

to

{$L SPROMEPS.coff}  { LINK WITH THE SUPERPRO OBJECT FILE }

and the original error disappeared!

Instead I now have a series of undefined identifiers to deal with:

Compile Project, Target: DongleTest.exe: Exit code 1, Errors: 23,
Hints: 2
Spromeps.pas(13,2) Note: Ignored compiler switch "$F"
Spromeps.pas(129,4) Hint: Unit "windows" not used in SproMeps
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROFORMATPACKET$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROINITIALIZE$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROGETFULLSTATUS$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROGETVERSION$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$POINTER$POINTER$POINTER$POINTER$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROFINDFIRSTUNIT$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROFINDNEXTUNIT$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROREAD$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$POINTER$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROEXTENDEDREAD$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$POINTER$POINTER$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROWRITE$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$WORD$WORD$BYTE$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROOVERWRITE$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$WORD$WORD$WORD$WORD$BYTE$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPRODECREMENT$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$WORD$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROACTIVATE$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$WORD$WORD$WORD$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol:
SPROMEPS_RNBOSPROQUERY$RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR$WORD$POINTER$POINTER$POINTER$WORD$$WORD
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: GetVersion
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: GetLastError
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: WriteFile
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: ReadFile
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: DeviceIoControl
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: CloseHandle
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: GetTickCount
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: GetPrivateProfileIntA
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: GetPrivateProfileStringA
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Undefined symbol: CreateFileA

PROGRESS!

The warning about the $F switch concerns a setting to force far calls,
what is the equivalent in FPC?

And I am not sure that COFF is the correct file type to link
against...
Have to look back on all the posts here and find what is recommended.

But now is dinner time and I will quit for a while.

Thanks to all who provided support to me!


-- 
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread José Mejuto

El 19/06/2015 a las 9:50, Bo Berglund escribió:


Now I am getting to the real hurdle as follows:

DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Illegal COFF Magic while reading
SPROMEPS.OBJ



Hello,

Try this tool: http://www.agner.org/optimize/#objconv

--


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2015-06-19 11:28, Bo Berglund wrote:
> Except I got a reply from them that they cannot support older software
> in FPC

And why we love ISV's and closed source software. ;-)


Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd

Bo Berglund wrote:

On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:35:28 +0200, Michael Schnell
 wrote:


On 06/19/2015 12:28 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:

  " Safenet" might be able to provide a GNU C version
of that file."


Except I got a reply from them that they cannot support older software
in FPC
So I guess I have to go the Delphi DLL route instead...

That has nothing to do at all with FPC. FPC uses the same linker 
(format) as GNU C. So you don't need to tell them anything about FPC but 
just mention gcc.



Interesting,
a number of years ago I had a discussion with them about interfacing C
programs on Linux (x86) to the Linux driver they make.
Apparently it does exist some support for that, but I did not pursue
it because we found that we could stay on Windows (we were developing
the 64 bit version of our data processing program at the time).
Maybe I could go back to the info I collectad at that time and dig out
some such interface file?


Maybe, but remember that GCC also runs on Windows and what you're trying 
to do is find the "right" object (linkable) files for FPC + Windows.


Mentioning FPC muddied the water, and gave them an excuse to wiggle out 
of their commitments. Stick to GCC, which is what Michael suggested in 
the first place, and ask for the libraries suitable for whatever 
variants of Windows you are interested in plus the .h file. Knowing the 
content of the .h file, it should be possible to get FPC (or at worst an 
assembler shim) to call their functions.


--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2015-06-19 12:53, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> 
> Note: The "tiopf:=/data/devel/tiopf/" is an absolute path, so when you
> give your projects to another developer, he has to change
> this macro in every project and every time you give him a new copy.

Yes I know it is an absolute path - as defined for my system. They don't
however need to modify it every time they get a new copy (eg: from a
code repository). They could override it via the "Stored in session only
*.lps" section. So they can do a 'svn up' without loosing there
customisations.

> As alternative you can use "Addition and Overrides" to add the
> macro to all your projects. The other developer only needs to do this
> once as well.

Probably even better. Thanks for that info.


Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:38:39 +0100
Graeme Geldenhuys  wrote:

> On 2015-06-19 12:09, aradeonas wrote:
> > So 'Custom options' work like 'Additions and Overrides' but second one
> > is more specific?
> 
> I believe Mattias said it all. As far as I understand "Additions and
> Overrides" pass settings on to packages too.

It allows any combination. Only project, only packages, only
one packages, all packages except one, etc ...


> The "Custom Options" allows
> you to add any compiler settings, and only apply them to the specific
> project (not passed on to package dependencies).
> 
> In the example I attached I didn't use packages, so the difference is
> probably moot.
> 
> TIP:
> Created a new project, set your most often used IDE Macros (eg:
> tiopf:=/data/devel/tiopf/), then tick the "Set compiler options as
> default" and click OK. Now wherever you create a new project, your most
> used IDE Macros are already defined. Every little bit helps save time. ;-)

Note: The "tiopf:=/data/devel/tiopf/" is an absolute path, so when you
give your projects to another developer, he has to change
this macro in every project and every time you give him a new copy.

As alternative you can use "Addition and Overrides" to add the
macro to all your projects. The other developer only needs to do this
once as well.

Mattias

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread aradeonas
> TIP:
Created a new project, set your most often used IDE Macros (eg:
tiopf:=/data/devel/tiopf/), then tick the "Set compiler options as
default" and click OK. Now wherever you create a new project, your
most used IDE Macros are already defined. Every little bit helps
save time. ;-)
>

Thank you Graeme, you helped me as always.

Regards, Ara


-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - The way an email service should be

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Streaming TStringList with associated objects

2015-06-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 18:29:58 +0700
Kiên Nguyễn Tiến Trung  wrote:

> I have a TStringList containing some strings. Each strings is associated
> with an object typed TPersistent. I realize that, when streaming
> TStringList, all of associated objects are ignored.
> 
> What I have to do?

You could a new TStringList descendent and override
DefineProperties.

Mattias

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2015-06-19 12:09, aradeonas wrote:
> So 'Custom options' work like 'Additions and Overrides' but second one
> is more specific?

I believe Mattias said it all. As far as I understand "Additions and
Overrides" pass settings on to packages too. The "Custom Options" allows
you to add any compiler settings, and only apply them to the specific
project (not passed on to package dependencies).

In the example I attached I didn't use packages, so the difference is
probably moot.

TIP:
Created a new project, set your most often used IDE Macros (eg:
tiopf:=/data/devel/tiopf/), then tick the "Set compiler options as
default" and click OK. Now wherever you create a new project, your most
used IDE Macros are already defined. Every little bit helps save time. ;-)

Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread aradeonas
> "Custom options" is a plain field, simply passed to the compiler.
> Mostly used for uncommon options that have no GUI element in the IDE.
>
> Additions and Overrides is for complex projects with many targets and
> flags (e.g. release/debug, Windows/Linux, experiments, many
> developers). The later allows to enable/disable flags with simple
> mouse clicks.

Understood,thank you.

Ara


-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
  unladen european swallow

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


[Lazarus] Streaming TStringList with associated objects

2015-06-19 Thread Kiên Nguyễn Tiến Trung
I have a TStringList containing some strings. Each strings is associated
with an object typed TPersistent. I realize that, when streaming
TStringList, all of associated objects are ignored.

What I have to do?
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Bo Berglund
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:35:28 +0200, Michael Schnell
 wrote:

>On 06/19/2015 12:28 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
>>>   " Safenet" might be able to provide a GNU C version
>>> of that file."
>>>
>> Except I got a reply from them that they cannot support older software
>> in FPC
>> So I guess I have to go the Delphi DLL route instead...
>>
>That has nothing to do at all with FPC. FPC uses the same linker 
>(format) as GNU C. So you don't need to tell them anything about FPC but 
>just mention gcc.
>
Interesting,
a number of years ago I had a discussion with them about interfacing C
programs on Linux (x86) to the Linux driver they make.
Apparently it does exist some support for that, but I did not pursue
it because we found that we could stay on Windows (we were developing
the 64 bit version of our data processing program at the time).
Maybe I could go back to the info I collectad at that time and dig out
some such interface file?


-- 
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 04:09:04 -0700
aradeonas  wrote:

> Thank you very much Graeme.
> 
> So 'Custom options' work like 'Additions and Overrides' but second one
> is more specific?

"Custom options" is a plain field, simply passed to the compiler.
Mostly used for uncommon options that have no GUI element in the IDE.

Additions and Overrides is for complex projects with many targets and
flags (e.g. release/debug, Windows/Linux, experiments, many
developers).
The later allows to enable/disable flags with simple mouse clicks.

Mattias

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread aradeonas
> The compiler run **before* *the application is running

Agree,silly question!

> Please define what you mean with "is running in non graphical OS".
I have a simple vps with red hat os on it with only terminal so if I
want to run any app that need LCL it will crash ,so all my server apps
should not depend on graphical package and then it will run smoothly.

Regards, Ara


-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - A fast, anti-spam email service.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:53:10 -0700
aradeonas  wrote:

> Beautiful! Thank you Graeme and Mattias and also Juha.
> 
> So summery is when I have 2 package named clientpkg and serverpkg with
> shared unit but fist one with graphical dependencies so when I make an
> server app I should declare for example -ThisIsServer and for client
> nothing and in code use compiler condition so when ThisIsServer declared
> I exclude graphical code.

Yes, pass -dThisIsServer to the compiler.

 
> Correct and this is the best way?

Depends. Some people don't like scattering their code with IFDEFs. Sven
gave you an alternative with abstract classes.

 
> Also I want to ask how can I find out my app is running in non graphical
> OS?with compiler condition?

The compiler run *before* the application is running. So, no there is
no compiler condition.
Please define what you mean with "is running in non graphical OS".

Mattias

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread aradeonas
Thank you very much Graeme.

So 'Custom options' work like 'Additions and Overrides' but second one
is more specific?

Ara


-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - Same, same, but different...


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2015-06-19 11:22, aradeonas wrote:
> About Compiler Defines,until now I couldn't make them work,I don't know
> why! can you show me an simple example?

Attached is an example which has common code (with IFDEF's), a console
Server app (non GUI), and a Client (gui) app.

Notes:
 - In both the Client and Server apps there is a IDE Macro in
   "Project Options / Compiler Options / Additions and Overrides" that
   defines the location of the common code. Change that to match your
   location. I normally set this to the root of my project directory.
 - In the Client app it defines a "ClientApp" compiler define in
   "Project Options / Compiler Options / Other". The server app doesn't
   have this, and that is what allows you to separate the dependencies
   in the common code.

No Lazarus Packages are used, other than the LCL.lpk for the client app.

Save the attachment and remove the extra extension '.RemoveMe', then
unpack as normal. The extra file extension is added to circumvent stupid
attachment rules in some email servers.

Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/


exampl.tar.gz.RemoveMe
Description: Binary data
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread aradeonas
Beautiful! Thank you Graeme and Mattias and also Juha.

So summery is when I have 2 package named clientpkg and serverpkg with
shared unit but fist one with graphical dependencies so when I make an
server app I should declare for example -ThisIsServer and for client
nothing and in code use compiler condition so when ThisIsServer declared
I exclude graphical code.

Correct and this is the best way?

Also I want to ask how can I find out my app is running in non graphical
OS?with compiler condition?

Regards,
Ara


-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - The way an email service should be


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Juha Manninen
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
 wrote:
> From what I understand Project Options can now set values on packages too.
> How exactly this is done, I don't know.

That is the "Additions and Overrides" you have just discovered.
Just put your custom define there and it affects all dependent packages.

"Additions and Overrides" is versatile but also complex. The is
confusing partly because of the complexity but I think it could be
simplified.
I have added a separate entry for setting LCLWidgetType because many
people did not find it and were asking.
Good ideas for the GUI are welcome, for example as mockups.

Juha

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:22:47 -0700
aradeonas  wrote:

> Aha! That what I mean,you explained it better than me ;)
> 
> About Compiler Defines,until now I couldn't make them work,I don't know
> why! can you show me an simple example?

In Project Options / Compiler Options / Additions and Overrides:

http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/IDE_Window:_Compiler_Options#Add_a_flag_to_project_and_all_packages

In code you can then use:
{$IFDEF SomeFlag}
{$ELSE}
{$ENDIF}

> This project going to be big and I want just changing package from
> client to server change dependencies and allow me to run app in a non
> graphical OS.



Mattias

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Schnell

On 06/19/2015 12:28 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:

  " Safenet" might be able to provide a GNU C version
of that file."


Except I got a reply from them that they cannot support older software
in FPC
So I guess I have to go the Delphi DLL route instead...

That has nothing to do at all with FPC. FPC uses the same linker 
(format) as GNU C. So you don't need to tell them anything about FPC but 
just mention gcc.


-Michael

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Bo Berglund
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 08:55:47 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
 wrote:

>I think that takes you back to Michael's suggestion
>
>"If the obj file format is not GNU/FPC compatible and can't be used by 
>the linker in fpc, " Safenet" might be able to provide a GNU C version 
>of that file."
>
Except I got a reply from them that they cannot support older software
in FPC
So I guess I have to go the Delphi DLL route instead...


-- 
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread aradeonas
Aha! That what I mean,you explained it better than me ;)

About Compiler Defines,until now I couldn't make them work,I don't know
why! can you show me an simple example?
This project going to be big and I want just changing package from
client to server change dependencies and allow me to run app in a non
graphical OS.

Regards,
Ara


-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - Send your email first class


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2015-06-18 22:48, aradeonas wrote:
> units share with these two package that used TPicture in some parts but
> they can be removed with compiler condition.

And it still boggles the mind why TPicture (essentially graphic
handling) must pull in the whole LCL or VCL. Free Pascal's FCL-Image
doesn't require the VCL or LCL, so why must TPicture.

I had a similar issue with code I had to work on a year or two ago.

Anyway, back to the point at hand... From what I understand Project
Options can now set values on packages too. How exactly this is done, I
don't know. Maybe the wiki could help. This should mean that if you set
a compiler define in your project, that compiler define could be applied
to dependency packages too. So your Client app could have the define,
and the Server app doesn't. The code in your package then uses simple
IFDEF's to block out some parts of the code.

I have so many issues with Lazarus Packages these days - I recommend you
scrap them completely and simply use IDE Macros. Build settings,
Compiler Defines etc are much much easier to handle then. Each project
has there own settings and is applied to all the source code involved.

Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread aradeonas
Yes I done something like this but didn't like it so much because I dont
want to have different class naming,Im looking for a way that just
changing some parameter or condition with package do the job.

Regards, Ara


-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - Access all of your messages and folders
  wherever you are

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread Sven Barth
Am 19.06.2015 10:36 schrieb "aradeonas" :
>
> Thanks but I cant understand you.
> Problem is for example I have a class that will used for  server and
> client but in client it will do some works with TPicture and in server
> there is no need for these functions and property and without them also
> class will work but I dont know how separate them so just changing a
> package do the job.

In that case you should use inheritance. Have a class which does the common
part which resides in a shared package. The client package then has a class
that extends that shared class with the TPicture related functionality.

Regards,
Sven
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd

Bo Berglund wrote:


FTimer.OnTimer := @OnCheckTimer

See:

http://wiki.freepascal.org/Code_Conversion_Guide



Amazing! Minutes to get a good solution! What a difference from the
Embarcadero support forum!  :)

The address symbol did the job!


It's worth noting that that's one of the few language-level 
incompatibilities. Bites everybody :-)



Now I am getting to the real hurdle as follows:

DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Illegal COFF Magic while reading
SPROMEPS.OBJ

This caused by the following line in a suppurt file from SafeNet:

..
IMPLEMENTATION
USES
   Windows;

{$L SPROMEPS.OBJ}  { LINK WITH THE SUPERPRO OBJECT FILE }


I think that takes you back to Michael's suggestion

"If the obj file format is not GNU/FPC compatible and can't be used by 
the linker in fpc, " Safenet" might be able to provide a GNU C version 
of that file."


--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Luca Olivetti

El 19/06/15 a les 09:50, Bo Berglund ha escrit:


Now I am getting to the real hurdle as follows:

DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Illegal COFF Magic while reading
SPROMEPS.OBJ

This caused by the following line in a suppurt file from SafeNet:

...
IMPLEMENTATION
USES
Windows;

{$L SPROMEPS.OBJ}  { LINK WITH THE SUPERPRO OBJECT FILE }

{ External functions }


Most probably the OBJ file is in a format that ld doesn't understand, 
see the remark here:



http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu43.html#x50-490001.2.43

Maybe it's possible to convert it to a suitable format, but I cannot 
help you here.


Bye
--
Luca Olivetti
Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es/
Tel. +34 93 5883004 (Ext.3010)  Fax +34 93 5883007

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] I have some custom components, can I convert Delphi -> Lazarus?

2015-06-19 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd

Michael Schnell wrote:

On 06/18/2015 06:01 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:

In the pas file referencing the obj file I have this:

IMPLEMENTATION
USES
Windows;
{$L SPROMEPS.OBJ}  { LINK WITH THE SUPERPRO OBJECT FILE }

{ External functions }
FUNCTION RNBOsproFormatPacket( ApiPacket : RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR;
thePacketSize : WORD ) : WORD; STDCALL;
EXTERNAL;




It uses e.g. "STDCALL", so supposedly it is an ANSI C based interface.

If the obj file format is not GNU/FPC compatible and can't be used by 
the linker in fpc, " Safenet" might be able to provide a GNU C version 
of that file.


I can't safely comment on Windows-specific issues, we gave that up years 
ago (the hassle of accounting for every copy on various experimental 
machines etc. was more than it was worth).


Assuming standard linkage conventions the function should "just work", 
but the definition of RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR might need checking.


But being able to successfully link might not be enough. It might be 
possible that the  Safenet thingy does some encryption with the exe 
information file to allow only execution only if  the correct dongle is 
found. That might or might not be compatible with fpc generated exes.


But as a cautionary tale, a colleague who didn't know x86 assembler once 
spent many lunchtimes stepping through AutoCAD to break their dongle 
lookup so that he could do something like running a slightly older (but 
more comprehensive) version than he'd got a formal license for. 
"Security by obscurity" doesn't work, particularly on an open system 
like a PC.


--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Different packages for different usage

2015-06-19 Thread aradeonas
Thanks but I cant understand you.
Problem is for example I have a class that will used for  server and
client but in client it will do some works with TPicture and in server
there is no need for these functions and property and without them also
class will work but I dont know how separate them so just changing a
package do the job.

Regards,
Ara


-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - Accessible with your email software
  or over the web


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Schnell

On 06/19/2015 09:50 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:


Now I am getting to the real hurdle as follows:

DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Illegal COFF Magic while reading
SPROMEPS.OBJ



Googeling "coff magic" shows e.g. this:

http://wiki.osdev.org/COFF

-Michael

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Bo Berglund
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:01 +0200, Luca Olivetti 
wrote:

>El 19/06/15 a les 09:25, Bo Berglund ha escrit:
>
>> constructor TSentinel.Create;
>> begin
>>FTimer := TTimer.Create(Application);
>>FTimer.Enabled := false;
>>FTimer.Interval := 0;
>>FTimer.OnTimer := OnCheckTimer(Self); //<= Error here
>>...
>
>>
>> Why is this difference Delphi/FPC appearing and what can I do?
>>
>
>Either you use {$MODE DELPHI} or you prepend the method with @, i.e.
>
>FTimer.OnTimer := @OnCheckTimer
>
>See:
>
>http://wiki.freepascal.org/Code_Conversion_Guide
>

Amazing! Minutes to get a good solution! What a difference from the
Embarcadero support forum!  :)

The address symbol did the job!

Now I am getting to the real hurdle as follows:

DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Illegal COFF Magic while reading
SPROMEPS.OBJ

This caused by the following line in a suppurt file from SafeNet:

...
IMPLEMENTATION
USES
   Windows;

{$L SPROMEPS.OBJ}  { LINK WITH THE SUPERPRO OBJECT FILE }

{ External functions }
...

So what I have is an OBJ file that contains the binary interface to
the 12 needed Sentinel driver functions.
This obj file has worked in Delphi versions from D4 up to XE5 without
problems. Can it be used with Lazarus/FPC possibly with some linker
switch???

-- 
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] I have some custom components, can I convert Delphi -> Lazarus?

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Schnell

On 06/18/2015 09:02 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

If all else fails with using the .obj file directly with FPC, what about
using the .obj file in Delphi and create a DLL, which you can then use
from FPC. Could that work?


With that cracking the protection would be extremely easy.

-Michael

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] I have some custom components, can I convert Delphi -> Lazarus?

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Schnell

On 06/18/2015 06:48 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
However, this dongle component can equally well be used without being 
dropped anywhere
"Dropping" is just a design time thingy. any visual component can be 
used by doing the appropriate initialization code manually.


-Michael

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Luca Olivetti

El 19/06/15 a les 09:25, Bo Berglund ha escrit:


constructor TSentinel.Create;
begin
   FTimer := TTimer.Create(Application);
   FTimer.Enabled := false;
   FTimer.Interval := 0;
   FTimer.OnTimer := OnCheckTimer(Self); //<= Error here
   ...




Why is this difference Delphi/FPC appearing and what can I do?



Either you use {$MODE DELPHI} or you prepend the method with @, i.e.

FTimer.OnTimer := @OnCheckTimer

See:

http://wiki.freepascal.org/Code_Conversion_Guide

Bye

--
Luca Olivetti
Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es/
Tel. +34 93 5883004 (Ext.3010)  Fax +34 93 5883007

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] I have some custom components, can I convert Delphi -> Lazarus?

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Schnell

On 06/18/2015 06:01 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:

In the pas file referencing the obj file I have this:

IMPLEMENTATION
USES
Windows;
{$L SPROMEPS.OBJ}  { LINK WITH THE SUPERPRO OBJECT FILE }

{ External functions }
FUNCTION RNBOsproFormatPacket( ApiPacket : RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR;
thePacketSize : WORD ) : WORD; STDCALL;
EXTERNAL;




It uses e.g. "STDCALL", so supposedly it is an ANSI C based interface.

If the obj file format is not GNU/FPC compatible and can't be used by 
the linker in fpc, " Safenet" might be able to provide a GNU C version 
of that file.



But being able to successfully link might not be enough. It might be 
possible that the  Safenet thingy does some encryption with the exe 
information file to allow only execution only if  the correct dongle is 
found. That might or might not be compatible with fpc generated exes.



--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


[Lazarus] Newbie, porting class to FPC but get procedure assignment error

2015-06-19 Thread Bo Berglund
I am trying to make a test program in Lazarus to evaluate if I can
port a dongle component in Delphi to a normal class in Lazarus.
So far I had no real problems but now I don't understand what I am
doing wrong. Relevant code below:

TSentinel = class
  private
FTimer: TTimer;
...
procedure OnCheckTimer(Sender: TObject);
...
  public
{ Public declarations }
constructor Create;
...
end;

constructor TSentinel.Create;
begin
  FTimer := TTimer.Create(Application);
  FTimer.Enabled := false;
  FTimer.Interval := 0;
  FTimer.OnTimer := OnCheckTimer(Self); //<= Error here
  ...
end;

The timer is used to automatically check the presence of the dongle so
I have to assign the OnTimer procedure to the newly created TTimer
object. This works fine in Delphi...

On compilation I get an error message as follows.

In the Delphi code there was no argument on the assignment of the
OnTimer event procedure, in Lazarus it shows this error:
sentinel.pas(647,21) Error: Wrong number of parameters specified for
call to "OnCheckTimer"

Using argument Self or NIL (like I often do in Delphi):
sentinel.pas(647,39) Error: Incompatible type for arg no. 1: Got
"untyped", expected ""

Why is this difference Delphi/FPC appearing and what can I do?

-- 
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus