Re: [Leaf-devel] A new look on LEAF components
Serge Caron wrote: > > Hello everyone, Hi Serge, thanks for posting about your work. > It is always best to put your money where your mouth is :-). PacketFilter > v1.71 was released over the weekend promoting a new packaging concept > explained at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/scaron/leaf.htm Are all LEAF's now and in the future packet filters? > I have experimented at length with both Dachstein and Shorewall to > make sure that this implementation did not impact either project > in any way. It has been my experience that lrp files are communicating > vases and, in fact, each of these project ends up with exactly the same > files packaged a different way. It's a shame that you didn't try Oxygen 1.8.0. You would have found quite a few differences that were not in the packaging. > It will be interesting to see the impact of moving away from glibc 2.0.7 > will have on the LEAF project. Oxygen has been using 2.1.3 for over half a year. What's your impression of its impact so far? > This proposal benefits everyone without > limiting what any individual may do, user or developer. I guess. I don't mean this to sound negative though. I'm sure you've come a long way with your work, and it's appreciated. But I'm not convinced that LEAF projects have such a defined base as delimited by your enclosure. Regards, Matt ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution?
> kitakura wrote: > > > > I'm a mosquito developer. > > Nice to hear from you. It's always good to learn > about new linux routers. May I ask why did you choose > the name mosquito? I'm am just curious. Mosquito is short name of Mosquito-net . And it also has meaning of light weight. It is a digression. Mosquito-net is "kaya" in japanese. Although the kaya was used in old Japan, it is not used recently. It seems that it is exported from Japan and is often used in developing countries. > > I'm not well english,so mosquito was made for me.( and japanese.) > > You're english is pretty darn good. Thankfully, there's people > like you who are willing to translate an english program into > japanese. > # Your mail was useful to the study of my English.Thank you. > > 2 month ago , japanese magazine introduced my mosquito,so http > refferal was > > burn,i think . > # burn -> bang : mistake The number of accesses to my site is increasing explosively. When many, about 100 floppy images per day are downloaded. > It should be lost. I don't like that guy. I don't know english well ,so I like that guy and POSIXness. :) ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[Leaf-devel] Program sources for ticker, watchdog, ipfwd
Someone (Richard Doyle?) asked about 10 days ago for the sources of the
ticker program.
The archive 2.9.4-sourcesnapshot.tar.gz, dated May 29, 1999 at
ftp://ftp.linuxrouter.org/linux-router/old/2.9.4/source/
contains the sources for ticker, watchdog, an ipfwd as well as the original
of the binaries found in Dachstein, Shorewall, etc.
I believe ipfwd is now obsolete. I may be wrong :-))
The watchdog code is almost identical to the busybox watchdog code.
Which gave me this silly idea: follow the sequence. If anybody is interested
in this new busybox ticker applet, I will post the diff on my page. However,
this may end up in the next official release of busybox. :-))
Cheers!!!
From: "Serge Caron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LEAF and ticker
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 15:51:12 -0500
Dear busybox :-),
The Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall project at http://leaf.sourceforge.com
is actively using busybox for all current releases.
It is with tongue in cheek that I submit this busybox applet, ticker, for
which we have been budgeting 3Kb since the early release of the Linux Router
Project. It is about time this ticker got a lick.
Ticker is just a warm fuzzy feeling that just won't die and I thought I'd
pass it along.
Cheers,
Serge Caron
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-212-23-14-12.zen.co.uk ([212.23.14.12])
by tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with SMTP
id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.uk>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:07:51 -0500
Received: (qmail 8508 invoked by uid 0); 4 Feb 2002 00:07:46 -
Received: from hyperspace (HELO linuxhacker.org) (192.168.0.1)
by alexholden.net with SMTP; 4 Feb 2002 00:07:46 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:07:46 +
From: Alex Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Serge Caron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [BusyBox] LEAF and ticker
References: <000b01c1acf4$8557b540$840a@piglet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Serge Caron wrote:
> It is with tongue in cheek that I submit this busybox applet, ticker, for
> which we have been budgeting 3Kb since the early release of the Linux
Router
> Project. It is about time this ticker got a lick.
With tongue also held firmly in cheek I humbly submit a version which I
found to be 96 bytes smaller :)
#include
#include
int main(void)
{
int i;
char c[] = {'.', 'o', ':', 'O', ':', 'o'};
switch(fork()) {
case -1:
return -1;
case 0:
setbuf(stdout, 0);
putchar(' ');
while(1) {
for(i = 0; i < sizeof(c); i++) {
putchar('\b');
putchar(c[i]);
sleep(1);
}
}
}
return 0;
}
[cue frantic attempts to beat me by another 100 bytes]
--
Alex Holden - http://www.linuxhacker.org
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer
From: "Serge Caron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [BusyBox] LEAF and ticker
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 19:35:35 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
Dear Alex,
Lester B Pearson once said "Diplomacy is the art of letting other people
have it your way." :-))
I am glad to see that the busybox community has the greatest sense of humor.
I will report to the LEAF project that their flagship product, ticker, is
now mainstream busysbox and has found a champion in the person of Alex
Holden.
Best regards,
Serge Caron
PS: You can keep the 96 bytes :-)) ROTFL
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[Leaf-devel] A new look on LEAF components
Hello everyone, It is always best to put your money where your mouth is :-). PacketFilter v1.71 was released over the weekend promoting a new packaging concept explained at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/scaron/leaf.htm This is a maintenance release for PacketFilter wich was piggybacking (?) Charles's Dachstein floppy release. In fact, PacketFilter itself is unaware of the change, except for the display of the string "Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall" in the menu. Please note that this is an existing trend: Jacques Nilo is already distributing Shorewall independantly of his Bering distribution. The page above formalize a way to package an appliance such that it is possible to substitute one LEAF environment for another without touching the appliance. The page provide start-up kits and define how Mike, Arne and Ewald could create a replacement kit that would not break the appliance. If such were the case, a developer would now have a choice of kits, each abstracting different kernel versions. This is an interesthing growth path, especially when evaluating competing proposals. >From reading this page, it becomes obvious that the LEAF project needs a librarian, a package repository, and a distribution point for prebuilt kernels. Hint, hint, hint anyone? My personnal developer page also points to this page, just to see if I will get some comments from the general public. The teaser is a LEAF workstation, an appliance that should generate some interest in what else this project can offer. I do hope that Charles, David, and Jacques will comment on this proposal. I have experimented at length with both Dachstein and Shorewall to make sure that this implementation did not impact either project in any way. It has been my experience that lrp files are communicating vases and, in fact, each of these project ends up with exactly the same files packaged a different way. For those of you that want to experiment with different libraries, the PacketFilter lrp package contains no binaries. Between the PacketFilter bootdisk and the LEAF workstation, the following packages are used: ipchains, dhcpcd, ppp, pppoe, libz, ssh, bindc, dhcpd, brctl, rrlogind, and whois. Therefore, if your move to different C libraries is equivalent or better, you won't even have to edit anything on the boot disk: just replace the file LEAF.lrp and go! It will be interesting to see the impact of moving away from glibc 2.0.7 will have on the LEAF project. This proposal benefits everyone without limiting what any individual may do, user or developer. Regards to all, Serge Caron ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution?
On Sunday 03 February 2002 18:17, kitakura wrote: > weblet is copy.but ssh,ssl and pppoe was build by me. Great! There can't be enough people building and maintaining packages like this! Sorry about the comments, they weren't meant to be hostile, rather a quick observation of your page (and no knowledge of Japanese). I don't think anyone would mind you using/exchanging packages this has been done for many years actually. > WebAdmin is not custom version of "weblet". It run on thttp and > uncgi . It can configure many parameters. That is great! Your shell-scripting the CGI then, right? I'm looking at a similar project and a possible online custom floppy-image generator, maybe this is something we can work on together. I'd like to see Mosquito join LEAF, it sounds like an admirable release that has some wonderful additions! > I hope you enjoy mosquito. I'm planning to play with it within the next couple of days, I'm sure I will! Thank-you for the information!!! -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution?
> LEAF and LRP are linked right at the top of their homepage. They appear > to be "duplicating" (in some form) the ssh, ssl, weblet, and ppp/pppoe weblet is copy.but ssh,ssl and pppoe was build by me. > packages at a minimum. The "Webadmin" package they have appears to > be a tiny, custom version of "weblet". It didn't appear to have any > WebAdmin is not custom version of "weblet". It run on thttp and uncgi . It can configure many parameters. mosquito default : ip address IN :192.168.0.1/24 OUT: dhcpc console account root: password:none Webadmin account webadmin password: free default Network module eepro100 tulip rtl8139 ne2k-pci I hope you enjoy mosquito. ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[Leaf-devel] [ leaf-Support Requests-512515 ] Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server
Support Requests item #512515, was opened at 2002-02-03 15:01
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=512515&group_id=13751
Category: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Charles Steinkuehler (cstein)
Summary: Buggy Alcatel adsl modem's dhcp server
Initial Comment:
Hello,
I'm trying to get my dachstein router working in
combination with my Alcatel Speedtouch ADSL modem.
It has an option for DHCP spoofing, so theorethically
al I need to do is setup DHCP on my external interface
and that's it.
Sadly, alcatel has made a buggy DHCP server-
implementation on their modems which has the "feature"
of only giving the last 3 bytes of the ip-adress
instead of the subnet mask.
The current dhclient doesn't really like this...
Could anyone provide a patched dhclient package which
resolves this issue or a modified dhcpclient-script
that hardcodes the subnetmask to 255.255.255.255 (i
think that should also do the trick).
I already found a patched version of client.c which
someone else wrote for pathing his RedHat install,
maybe it's useful for adressing this problem under LRP
Thanks in advance,
Thijs
*** client.c.orig Sun Aug 5 12:14:21 2001
--- client.c Sun Aug 5 12:22:12 2001
***
*** 469,476
memcpy(&p->sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,&ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting netmask */
{
! syslog(LOG_ERR,"dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m ");
! return -1;
}
memcpy(&p->sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,&ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting broadcast address */
--- 469,480
memcpy(&p->sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[subnetMask],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,&ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting netmask */
{
! p->sin_addr.s_addr = 0x; /* try
255.255.255.255 */
! if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFNETMASK,&ifr) == -1 )
! {
! syslog(LOG_ERR,"dhcpConfig: ioctl SIOCSIFNETMASK: %
m ");
! return -1;
! }
}
memcpy(&p->sin_addr.s_addr,DhcpOptions.val
[broadcastAddr],4);
if ( ioctl(dhcpSocket,SIOCSIFBRDADDR,&ifr) == -1 ) /*
setting broadcast address */
--
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=512515&group_id=13751
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution?
kitakura wrote: > > I'm a mosquito developer. Nice to hear from you. It's always good to learn about new linux routers. May I ask why did you choose the name mosquito? I'm am just curious. > I'm not well english,so mosquito was made for me.( and japanese.) You're english is pretty darn good. Thankfully, there's people like you who are willing to translate an english program into japanese. > 2 month ago , japanese magazine introduced my mosquito,so http refferal was > burn,i think . Any press is good press. I don't know if that translates well, but maybe it does :) > sorry that i have not contact leaf. Hey don't worry about that. We're all busy with this and that. It's meant to be fun and technical. So there's no pressure as long as you release things that work :) > LRP site may have been lost, It should be lost. I don't like that guy. > I made link to leaf. if a link make trouble,i delete a link. You made a link -- yeeehawww! the more the merrier <-- does that translate? It means more is better and makes us happy (merry). Well nice to hear from you. As Mike Noyes mentioned, join up and add a link to your project on our home page. Regards, Matthew ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] CF (write protect) + IDE adapter
On Sunday 03 February 2002 11:09, guitarlynn wrote: > I prefer the 44-pin products because many of the 486 and P1 products > limit the floppy BIOS to 1.44M. Using the 44-pin bus ensures that > there will be no problems at all, IMHO. CORRECTION The 40-pin is regular IDE connection, the 44-pin is for IDE w/power built-in to the cable (laptop, microboards, etc). Sorry for the braindead statement there. Thanks to Mike for pointing out that I need more coffee this morning! -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] CF (write protect) + IDE adapter
On Sunday 03 February 2002 07:07, Mike Noyes wrote: > Make sure you talk to the people at PC Engines. They may need to make > some changes to their adapter to accommodate the write protect > function of the PQI CF card. > > PQI Write Protect Compact Flash Card Compatibility > http://www.pqi.com.tw/pqi-eng/product/flash-card/com.htm I saw that, but it shouldn't have any effect on IDE other than the error message that you get when you write-protect a floppy. It appears the error messages on that page refer to BIOS calls from the device(s) when it thinks it _should_ be able to write to the device. It only happens when the write-protection is on. > Let them know this is what you would like. Who knows, maybe they will > build it. Yes, I think I will. I've used similar products, but they are European and though the products are fine; ordering, shipping and paying in another denomination is inconvinient. I prefer the 44-pin products because many of the 486 and P1 products limit the floppy BIOS to 1.44M. Using the 44-pin bus ensures that there will be no problems at all, IMHO. Here's some links for some products that I have used: # LCD displays http://www.eio.com/lcdprodt.htm # 90 degree PCI adapters http://www.barada.ca/photos.htm # Compact Flash adapters http://www.esskabel.de/English-Site/products/adapters/CompactFlash/Com p actFlash-Main.htm # Ultra thin CPU heatsinks/fans for Pentium processors in 1U cases http://www.tennmax.com/lasagna_oem.htm -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! --- -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution?
On Sunday 03 February 2002 07:20, Mike Noyes wrote: > Lynn, > It looks like some configuration is possible with a web browser. > > http://babelfish.altavista.com/urltrurl?lp=ja_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww >.s-me.c o.jp%2Fmosquito%2Fpppoe.html Ah... you mentioned Bablefish, but I never came across that page. It is different than the linked Webadmin sample I found on the site. Thanks for linking that! > >It would appear that they're watching our site for "parallel > > upgrades". > > That's good. Maybe we can interest them in joining us. :-) Why, of course!!! Like a new car, I just like a test-drive and a chance to kick a tire once or twice... I was just interested :) I have been busy looking at some CGI options myself lately. :) -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution?
At 2002-02-03 19:40 +0900, kitakura wrote: >I'm a mosquito developer. > >I'm not well english,so mosquito was made for me.( and japanese.) > >Mosquito is based LRP 2.9.8 ,but scripts when boot is not same at all. > >Current version is 3.2.2 update 2. webadmin include many strange english >and japanese. > >2 month ago , japanese magazine introduced my mosquito,so http refferal >was burn,i think . sorry that i have not contact leaf. LRP site may have >been lost, I made link to leaf. if a link make trouble,i delete a link. Kitakura, The LEAF link is great. I was just curious about the Mosquito distribution. Would you like to join the LEAF project? > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Noyes > > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 11:31 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution? > > > > > > Does anyone know anything about a Mosquito distribution from > > Japan? We consistently get significant http referrals from: > > > > http://www.s-me.co.jp/mosquito/ > > > > From what I was able to glean from Babel Fish, it uses LRP 2.9.8 > > as a base. Apparently they developed a web admin system > > (webadmin.lrp). -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4 ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution?
At 2002-02-03 01:05 -0600, guitarlynn wrote: >On Saturday 02 February 2002 08:30, Mike Noyes wrote: > > Does anyone know anything about a Mosquito distribution from Japan? > > We consistently get significant http referrals from: > >LEAF and LRP are linked right at the top of their homepage. They appear to >be "duplicating" (in some form) the ssh, ssl, weblet, and ppp/pppoe >packages at a minimum. The "Webadmin" package they have appears to be a >tiny, custom version of "weblet". It didn't appear to have any ability to >change settings over the web (as I first assumed). I downloaded their >image, but it's a Win32 exe, so I'll put it on a disk the next time I boot >a M$ box here to confirm this. I really don't think it is too much of a >deviation from what LEAF has been doing for some time, other than native >Japanese support/docs. Lynn, It looks like some configuration is possible with a web browser. http://babelfish.altavista.com/urltrurl?lp=ja_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.s-me.c o.jp%2Fmosquito%2Fpppoe.html >It would appear that they're watching our site for "parallel upgrades". That's good. Maybe we can interest them in joining us. :-) -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4 ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] CF (write protect) + IDE adapter
At 2002-02-03 00:52 -0600, guitarlynn wrote: >On Saturday 02 February 2002 10:33, Mike Noyes wrote: > > Everyone, > > It looks like we may finally have a write protect CF+IDE solution. > >HEY, HEY, HEY (Lynn does a happy-dance!!!). >Thank-you Mike! (wiggle, wiggle) > > > > CFDISK.5B $12 each (OEM: $6 each + $50/lot) > > http://www.pcengines.com/testordr.htm > >Nice, but the $20/10 ones that mount on the case and use >the IDE 44's work much nicer for 1U/2U applications! :) > > > > Write Protect Compact Flash Card > > http://www.pqi.com.tw/pqi-eng/product/flash-card/wpcf.htm > >No pricing at this site or the distributors sites, I emailed PQI for >pricing/outlet information. This would be incrediably nice I'll let >everyone know when (if) I hear back from them. Lynn, Make sure you talk to the people at PC Engines. They may need to make some changes to their adapter to accommodate the write protect function of the PQI CF card. PQI Write Protect Compact Flash Card Compatibility http://www.pqi.com.tw/pqi-eng/product/flash-card/com.htm > > I'd really like to see PQI add a write protect switch to their 40 > > pin DOM products. > > > > http://www.pqi.com.tw/pqi-eng/product/flash-disk/fdisk-40pin.htm > >Yes, a product to keep me from cutting tiny toggle switches into those >blasted IDE cables would be a godsend! I can live with the CF cards nicely >though for the time being (if I can get one anyway)! Let them know this is what you would like. Who knows, maybe they will build it. -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4 ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution?
I'm a mosquito developer. I'm not well english,so mosquito was made for me.( and japanese.) Mosquito is based LRP 2.9.8 ,but scripts when boot is not same at all. Current version is 3.2.2 update 2. webadmin include many strange english and japanese. 2 month ago , japanese magazine introduced my mosquito,so http refferal was burn,i think . sorry that i have not contact leaf. LRP site may have been lost, I made link to leaf. if a link make trouble,i delete a link. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Noyes > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 11:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Leaf-devel] Mosquito distribution? > > > Does anyone know anything about a Mosquito distribution from Japan? We > consistently get significant http referrals from: > > http://www.s-me.co.jp/mosquito/ > > From what I was able to glean from Babel Fish, it uses LRP 2.9.8 as a > base. Apparently they developed a web admin system (webadmin.lrp). > > -- > Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4 > > > ___ > Leaf-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel > ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF command FAQ
guitarlynn wrote: > > On Saturday 02 February 2002 01:27, Malcolm Miles wrote: > > > That works from the prompt but when I run lrcfg it defaults to the > > ae-mode. > > K, I don't know where it calls the binary from, but "e3" is the default > and a symlink to "e3ne". There is no reason you couldn't delete the > e3 symlink in /bin and "ln -s /bin/e3ws /bin/e3". > > It should get what you want anyway! No need to modify symlinks. In your /etc/profile, add these lines, logout, and log back in. Then backup your ramdisk: EDITOR=e3ws export EDITOR Best, Matthew ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
