Re: [leaf-devel] SF Subversion Beta

2005-12-23 Thread Mike Noyes
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 12:32, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
 Mike Noyes wrote:
 | Are we interested in participating in SourceForge's Subversion Beta?
 
 Probably.
 
 Subversion is likely better than CVS for our needs, if only for the reason
 that it *NEVER* modifies files, even if you forget to tag them as binary
 (since the bulk of our CVS repository is binary tar.gz and iso files).

Charles,
Ok. I'll sign us up, unless someone has an objection. The SF staff needs
to know our decision by Wednesday 4 January.

 I've been using subversion for quite a while for several internal
 development projects (including versioning custom binary file formats from
 CAD tools), and have had no problems with it.  It's pretty much a superset
 of CVS, so it's easy to migrate to.

-- 
Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click

___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] SF Subversion Beta

2005-12-23 Thread Martin Hejl

Hi Mike,


Ok. I'll sign us up, unless someone has an objection. The SF staff needs
to know our decision by Wednesday 4 January.
will this be in addition to our current CVS repo, or will the current 
CVS repo be migrated to SVN and we'll be forced to use that? I'm asking 
because a lot of the Bering uClibc infrastructure is built around CVS 
and viewcvs, and while the SF CVS infrastructure isn't terribly 
reliable, I don't really want to have to hustle to move everything 
(webpage+script that generates the packages page, all of the buildtool 
setups) to a possibly not yet stable (I guess that's what being a beta 
tester is all about) SVN repository.


If this is in addition to CVS and we can slowly port everything, I have 
no problem with that.


Martin


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click

___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Re: [leaf-devel] SF Subversion Beta

2005-12-23 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Martin Hejl wrote:

| Hi Mike,
|
| Ok. I'll sign us up, unless someone has an objection. The SF staff needs
| to know our decision by Wednesday 4 January.
| will this be in addition to our current CVS repo, or will the current
| CVS repo be migrated to SVN and we'll be forced to use that? I'm asking
| because a lot of the Bering uClibc infrastructure is built around CVS
| and viewcvs, and while the SF CVS infrastructure isn't terribly
| reliable, I don't really want to have to hustle to move everything
| (webpage+script that generates the packages page, all of the buildtool
| setups) to a possibly not yet stable (I guess that's what being a beta
| tester is all about) SVN repository.
|
| If this is in addition to CVS and we can slowly port everything, I have
| no problem with that.

I should also mention that the web interface to subversion isn't quite as
polished as viewcvs is when working with CVS.

If any scripts are relying on viewcvs like features to get anything other
than the latest revision of something, we'll definately need to slowly port
vs. cutover instantly.

NOTE:
My experience is somewhat dated (ie: 12-18 months ago, when I was setting up
our new subversion repository).  I'm sure things are likely improved greatly
since then, but I'm not up on the current state of the art.

I do all my repository browsing via the tortoise SVN client. :O

- --
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDrIQ/LywbqEHdNFwRAuOQAKD2MpyUhHHF1gD2UmW7Fl5WYr1NsACdELeR
lHmH/jLbSdLKeLLTcJleU4Y=
=Qanh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click

___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel