RE: [leaf-devel] LEAF vs. Smoothwall
I would guess that it was a problem either with a USB DSL modem or with PPPoE. Also, cable modems sometimes confuse dhcpcd/PPPoE setups with BOOTP. Is there anyone out there using BOOTP-dhcpcd or USB-PPPoE setup? Did LEAF auto detect? --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [leaf-devel] Project Description Goals
An easy to use embedded Linux network appliance for use in small office, home office, and home automation environments. to: An easy to use embedded Linux network appliance for use in LAN, WAN, and WLAN environments. What about: An easy-to-use Embedded Linux Network Applicance; LEAF, like Linux, aims to be scalable to all environments. I don't see the added value in LAN/WAN talk, although WLAN might add some relevance. Cheers, Peter M --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [leaf-devel] Re: kernel 2.4.22
Hi Jacques, Any other ideas/suggestions floating around ? Yes, 1 related to the kernel and 2 not, but Bering related.. -Iptables should have tcp-window-size patch for stateful inspection from patch-o-matic added. -Poptop has a 'newish' feature in 1.1.4 beta called bcrelay (broadcast relay) that is very very useful in certain situations. The CVS version of this is 100% better than the old version. Richard has been recommending people to use the CVS version, so maybe Bering should too? :D -Zebra (routing software) has forked and should be updated. The new fork with 2 releases, Quagga, is already in use at Redhat HP a few other places. It is much better for OSPF and is more actively maintained, since most of the mailing list migrated there. I think one of the Bering crew packaged my old version of Zebra, so here's a heads up that Quagga (www.quagga.net) should be used instead. Cheers! Peter --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [leaf-devel] New project member introductions
Hi Leaf members, All new project members, Please post a message introducing yourself to our development community. Thanks. Some of you already know me from my earlier newbie postings to the lists ;). I am working on customizing LEAF systems for use in HA-environments. Initially my focus is with a Linux-HA replacement for Cisco routers that cost an order of magnitude less and perform better, are more dynamic, etc. Never pay $1000+ for an 8-meg stick of RAM again! :) I have completed kpalived.lrp for use with Bering-uClibc + libc 225 on CF, IDE, or similar (~5mb+) larger storage devices. Keepalived (http://www.keepalived.org) uses the VRRP protocol for failover. In this case VRRP is the same as Cisco's HSRP with IPSEC authentication support. Please see my previous post in leaf-user for full details, http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg12772.html. In the future I hope to add CF+Keepalived, CF + Keepalived + LVS (load-balancing), and CF versions of Bering-uClibc distributions, depending on if people will actually use it. Someday soon I will also actually upload this stuff to the LEAF pages! -- I'm 27 and live in the Palo Alto, CA. Some of my hobbies include snowboarding, chess, computers (of course), video games, and of course going out to bars on the weekends. If you live in the area please feel free to send me an email. I'd be happy to hang out and get geeky. Peter Mueller --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[leaf-devel] kpalived.lrp now available, [minor] update to bgpd.lrp and zebra.lrp
I have completed my high-availability package for .lrp systems, kpalived.lrp, based on Alexandre Cassen's excellent open-source software. Due to limitations in keepalived's code AFAIK it wouldn't compile on glibc 2.0.x. This version was compiled on gcc 2.2.x system. My LRP system is Bering uClibc + libc225 and it works fine for me, YMMV. FYI, It is very possible that keepalive might compile on a gcc 2.1.x or uClibc system. I'm unfortunately not a programmer nor did I have a 2.1.x or 2.0.x system lying around. I didn't think tinkering with makefiles destroying existing machines was such was a good idea. If you get it to compile on one of those platforms (especially 2.0.x) please let me know! I created a few packages to provide libraries that Keepalived needs. You need to download these and add them to your syslinux.cfg file in order for kpalived.lrp to work. Here's the list of files: (Sorry for the size. I did strip what I could, it's unfortunate that all these lib files are so damned big and required) http://download.sidestep.com/lrp/kpalived.lrp 33244 http://download.sidestep.com/lrp/libcrpto.lrp 342800 http://download.sidestep.com/lrp/libpopt.lrp 26598 http://download.sidestep.com/lrp/libssl2.lrp 81400 http://download.sidestep.com/lrp/libz.lrp 26766 I have also modified zebra bgpd (by Eric Kiser - www.eric.kiser.com/glacier.htm) to include /etc/init.d files. The binaries are still gcc 2.0.x. Note : I needed to install an additional library in order to make these function with Bering-uClibc. I've listed it below. http://download.sidestep.com/lrp/zebra.lrp 164145 http://download.sidestep.com/lrp/bgpd.lrp 57368 http://download.sidestep.com/lrp/libm.lrp 142068 Could someone please put these on the sourceforge or mirror page somewhere? This is not my website and I'm able to provide these files only for a little while, especially if there's too much usage. FYI this is my first LRP so please be gentle in your flames ;) Thanks much, Peter Mueller kpalived.help # cat /var/lib/lrpkg/kpalived.help ### Keepalived 1.0.0 *.lrp This file was compiled and packaged for the LEAF Project. This package is designed to simulate HSRP on Linux routers through the use of the program Keepalived. Please visit Keepalived.org for more information on this software. kpalived.lrp For compile, package, and dependency information: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ### # Keepalived 1.0.0 *.lrp information # Last Update: 2003-01-?? Peter Mueller ### Keepalived 1.0.0 Mailing List Information: http://www.keepalived.org/mailinglist.html Documentation: http://www.keepalived.org/documentation.html Summary:Keepalived VRRPv2 Name: Keepalived Version:1.0.0 Source: keepalived.1.0.0.tar.gz URL:http://www.keepalived.org Copyright: GPL Description: Keepalived is an excellent implementation of VRRP, the same protocol that Cisco bases HSRP on. This configuration of Keepalived is setup for use with the Zebra routing package for HA-linux routers running bgp v4. It's easy to modify for vanilla-HA or other routing packages. I compiled Keepalived on a RH 7.2 x86-SMP-based system for use with Bering-uClibc + libc225. AFAIK Keepalived does not compile on gcc 2.0.x, but it might compile on uClibc. Please write me an email if you can get it to work. Please modify the keepalived.conf file with your own settings. I'd rather not get email from your routers :). Best of luck, Peter Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ### # keepalived 1.0.0 Information # Last Update: 2003-02-04 Peter Mueller ### -Original Message- From: Peter Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 5:29 PM To: 'Charles Holbrook'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [leaf-user] shorewall and keepalived Hi Charles, I am just curious if anyone has used the shorewall package as well as keepalived on the same system. And how did you overcome the issue of both shorewall and keepalived wanting to do VRRP for the ip addresses? Just got this dropped in my lap and not really sure how to proceed with this. I am getting close to getting something working with LRP keepalived. I was planning on posting both a keepalived LRP (using, as it turns out, bering-uclibc + libc225 compat) and an image of my LRP when it's done, but you're welcome to what I have in the meantime. Just drop me a mail off-list. Peter --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http
RE: [leaf-devel] bering + cf-ide + zebra + VRRP (keepalived) - pr oblem(s) with lib
Some of the names are rather out of date. I've updated a bunch, but many still remain. The information still applies unless the variant _implicitly_ states that it is glibc-2.1, glibc-2.2, or uClibc. gotcha Could someone compile keepalived-1.0.0 and send me the keepalived and genhash binaries? I don't have a RH5.2/gcc 2.0.7 system around and I'd rather not go through all that hassle for one compile :(. Your going to need to re-compile a kernel patched with LVS as well. Why do I need an LVS patch in my kernel? I am already recompiling my kernel with smp, i586, IDE, and tulip so this is not an issue; I just want to know what is going on :). Is this kind of thing listed in a devel-FAQ somewhere? With the exeception of http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1438group_id=13751, http://sourceforge.net/docman/?group_id=13751 doesn't seem very informative. Thanks much, Peter --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [leaf-devel] bering + cf-ide + zebra + VRRP (keepalived) - problem(s) with lib
Hi Lynn, Sorry for the reply format, I'm unfortunately using OWA. Thanks so much for the quick response, it sure made things clear for me. I read the FAQ but for assumed that this wasn't the case with a 2.4.20 system. I was thinking that since there is quite a few out of date LRP documentation all around that it was likely that this was just one more in the pile. Oops! Could someone compile keepalived-1.0.0 and send me the keepalived and genhash binaries? I don't have a RH5.2/gcc 2.0.7 system around and I'd rather not go through all that hassle for one compile :(. URL - http://www.keepalived.org Download - http://www.keepalived.org/software/keepalived-1.0.0.tar.gz Thanks much, Peter -Original Message- From: Lynn Avants To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 1/27/2003 7:56 PM Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] bering + cf-ide + zebra + VRRP (keepalived) - problem(s) with lib On Monday 27 January 2003 09:12 pm, Peter Mueller wrote: Unfortunately I seem to get a segmentation fault immediately after a /usr/local/sbin/keepalived try, and I don't understand why. I compiled on the same machine with a real HD with optimization flag -02 and stripped the binary. These seemed like safe options. Does anyone know why I'd get a segfault right away or have any ideas on what to try? Your not compiling it on a glibc-2.0.7 system like Debian Slink or RH-5.2 This is a requirement for all glibc-dependant binaries used with Bering. Check the LEAF FAQ's: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2666group_id=13751 -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[leaf-devel] bering + cf-ide + zebra + VRRP (keepalived) - problem(s) with lib
Hi list, I'm having some issues getting a package to run under my setup. I have a modified bering 1.0 image placed on a 256-mb flash disk that I interact with using a CF-IDE adapter. I have taken the JNilo's config from http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/development/kernel/2.4 .20/ and added in 586, smp, IDE, tulip, and eepro100 to it. I've got everything working great on this setup until I get to trying to create my own LRP package. I'm trying to add HSRP cisco-like failover of interfaces using http://www.keepalived.org/, a package I consider to be the strongest Linux implementation out there (AFAIK). The package I'm trying to LRP'ize (keepalived) has a few package requirements - popt, libssl, and libcrypto. I used JNilo's libpopt.lrp and libssl.lrp packages, and created my own packages for the /lib/libssl.so.2 and /lib/libcrypto.so.2 dependencies. Theoretically all dependencies would be filled and everything would start humming along merrily.. Unfortunately I seem to get a segmentation fault immediately after a /usr/local/sbin/keepalived try, and I don't understand why. I compiled on the same machine with a real HD with optimization flag -02 and stripped the binary. These seemed like safe options. Does anyone know why I'd get a segfault right away or have any ideas on what to try? (TM?)FYI, I'm not a programmer so I don't know much about debugging segfaults. I can provide .lrp or any other packages upon request. I was planning on forwarding kpalived.lrp to the community afterwards to add support for VRRP to LRP projects. Thanks much, Peter --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
