Re: [leaf-user] Problem with Wisp Init!

2002-11-19 Thread Vladimir I.

Make sure that "eth0" is not in the list of interfaces to bring up 
during boot. Otherwise parprouted will not initialize because it 
cannot find eth0.

Samuel Abreu wrote:

Ok, this "don't work" is in one particular case, i do not test in the 
normal way (With one wireless and one ethernet), in my case, i use 2 
orinoco card (The old problem of the 2 wireless interface that do not 
rename the device of eth2 to netcs1, that you fixed!), and without 
ethernet, if i put the bridge, when the system is load, the parprouted 
process dont exist, in ps ax, then if i call manually the parprouted 
work fine, so, in the parpbridge initialization script, o change the 
normal call of the parprouted (The one with start-stop-daemon 
--start...), and put two lines calling parprouted direct from the path 
(/sbin/parprouted netcs0 netcs1), in that way, it works OK!
Now i trying put the bridge to work with 2 orinoco cards and 1 ethernet, 
but i dont have enough cards to make the necessary tests... =/

Samuel Abreu


Hi Samuel,

That should happen. parprouted is restarted in /etc/network/ifup.

Please give some more information, what do you mean "don't work
well"?




_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963



--
Best Regards,
Vladimir
Systems Engineer (RHCE)



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] tmda.lrp?

2002-11-19 Thread Ping Kwong

Has anyone done something like Tagged Message Delivery Agent (TMDA) for
Dachstein or Bering?  Site is http://tmda.net.  Seems like a small
package too.



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Re: thttpd behind lrp box

2002-11-19 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
C. Dummy wrote:

 Sorry I had trouble with my ISP I don't even know if that was posted 
properly:
Sorry my mistake.
INTERN_WWW_SERVER=192.168.1.203 is uncomented on lrp box the rest of 
changes below on thttpd box.
Commands ran on thttpd box:
ip addr
1: lo:  mtu 3924 qdisc noqueue
   link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
   inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope global lo
2: eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
   link/ether 00:80:c8:35:20:e9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 192.168.1.203/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0

ip route
192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.203
default via 192.168.1.254 dev eth0
net ipfilter list
Chain input (policy ACCEPT: 59 packets, 6090 bytes):
Chain forward (policy ACCEPT: 0 packets, 0 bytes):
Chain output (policy ACCEPT: 43 packets, 3464 bytes):
AutoFW:
MarkFW:
PortFW:

netstat -ln
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address   Foreign Address 
State tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:1023
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN tcp0  0 
0.0.0.0:80  0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN udp
0  0 0.0.0.0:69  0.0.0.0:*  
raw0  0 0.0.0.0:1   0.0.0.0:*   
7  raw0  0 0.0.0.0:6   
0.0.0.0:*   7  Active UNIX domain sockets (only 
servers)
Proto RefCnt Flags   Type   State I-Node Path
unix  0  [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING    /dev/log

It looks like thttpd is running and listening to port 80, but you could 
still have a couple of different problems.

Thttpd is *VERY* picky about it's configuration, and permissions on the 
files it is asked to serve up.  It is possible you have thttpd in a 
state where it will not properly serve your files, although if it is 
running, you should at least get an error page when trying to browse.

It is also possible your web server is setup correctly, but the 
port-forwarding is not working for some reason.  Note that you will 
*NOT* be able to access the web server using it's external IP from 
inside your network (lots of archived list mail about why), so test 
access from a remote system elsewhere on the internet, and test access 
directly to http://192.168.1.203 from your internal network.

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Help!!! My Firewall Crash After FTP some files.

2002-11-19 Thread Matt Schalit
Thitiporn Pornpirunrak wrote:
> [description of newtork]

1) Describe what "crash" means exactly.
2) Paste in a process listing from firewall3.
3) Describe the exact hardware config.



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] tmda.lrp?

2002-11-19 Thread Jeff Newmiller
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Ping Kwong wrote:

> 
> Has anyone done something like Tagged Message Delivery Agent (TMDA) for
> Dachstein or Bering?

Haven't seen it.

> Site is http://tmda.net.  Seems like a small package too.

This is fundamentally a server tool rather than a router tool, requiring a
hard disk to retain information about pending requests.  That is not to
say LEAF can't be or isn't used in dedicated server applications, but they
tend to be less common.

---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Basics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...2k
---



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



RE: [leaf-user] tmda.lrp?

2002-11-19 Thread Ping Kwong
After posting that I found there was already something for qmail which
does something similar and in perl.  So that shouldn't be hard to adapt
if you're going to install the qmail.lrp package.


-Original Message-
From: Jeff Newmiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Ping Kwong
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] tmda.lrp?

On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Ping Kwong wrote:

> 
> Has anyone done something like Tagged Message Delivery Agent (TMDA)
for
> Dachstein or Bering?

Haven't seen it.

> Site is http://tmda.net.  Seems like a small package too.

This is fundamentally a server tool rather than a router tool, requiring
a
hard disk to retain information about pending requests.  That is not to
say LEAF can't be or isn't used in dedicated server applications, but
they
tend to be less common.


---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go
Live...
DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Basics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live
Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.
rocks...2k

---




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Re: cardctl and Bering Rc4

2002-11-19 Thread Jacques Nilo
Le Lundi 18 Novembre 2002 18:20, Hugues Belanger a écrit :
> Hi Jacques,
>
> I'm trying to get two wireless router setup and I found that cardctl is
> not in any of your packages. Can you explain how or where I can get the
> package. ?
>
cardctl together with dump_cardbus and dump_cis  are packaged separately.
They are in the contrib section:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/contrib/
The one in latest correspond to the 3.2.3 pcmcia version.
I should probably mention it in the doc and move that package to the package 
section ...
Jacques



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Problem with Wisp Init!

2002-11-19 Thread Samuel Abreu
Hmm, but i have to use eth0, i want bridge in 3 interface, or i can't?

Samuel Abreu



Make sure that "eth0" is not in the list of interfaces to bring up during 
boot. Otherwise parprouted will not initialize because it cannot find eth0.


_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Problem with Wisp Init!

2002-11-19 Thread Vladimir I.
Samuel Abreu wrote about "Re: [leaf-user] Problem with Wisp Init!":

> Hmm, but i have to use eth0, i want bridge in 3 interface, or i can't?

You can, but as you said, on your testing board you had only two 
wireless interfaces, without Ethernet. Or I misunderstood you?

-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir
Systems Engineer (RHCE)


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Re: question

2002-11-19 Thread Jacques Nilo
Le Mardi 19 Novembre 2002 19:55, Thomas Boore a écrit :
> I am new to the linux router.   I would like to know if
> you have the following nic driver in your modules/lib
>  (DP83815)?
>
> One more question.  I have a unit with one nic and pcmcia
> slot.  My internet ISP is cable modem from charter Comm.
>  I would like to uses the nic to the cable modem and the
> pcmcia for the local network.
>
> What modulars will I need to do this?
>
Yes. It's natsemi.o available here:

http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.18/kernel/drivers/net/natsemi.o

Please send your request for help to the leaf-user list.
Jacques


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Re: forget to tell you about ISP

2002-11-19 Thread Jacques Nilo
Le Mardi 19 Novembre 2002 20:12, Thomas Boore a écrit :
> Charter Comm.  uses the mac address from the nic to see
> the computer and assign the computer IP address with DHCP
> plus no login needed to the ISP.
Fairly typical situation. There should be any pb.
> So the router I need to build is let a gateway.  over
> proxy.
???
> NIC card (ISP)  Pcmcia Card (Local Lan) to two Windows Xp
> and Windows 2000 server and one Linux box.
Once again your situation seems very standard. Check the pcmcia section of 
the Bering user's guide. Post to the leaf-user list if you have any pb.
Jacques



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] The vlan project

2002-11-19 Thread Scott
The vlan project is complete.  I now have 10 independant vlans all sharing
the same bering router as their gateway.  Each client on the vlan is
assigned an ip address by dhcpd running on the router.  As for drivers, I
ended up using intel's new e100 driver that increases the mtu to 1504 to
support vlan tagging.  Very nice of them, and it seems to work great.  The
netgear/tulip cards worked as well with the default tulip driver that
comes with the bering distro (supports mtu up to 1518).
If anyone is interested I'll write a how-to for those that try it in the
future.  When I'm finished I'll post to the list.  Thank you to all who
helped.
-Scott




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] The vlan project

2002-11-19 Thread Jacques Nilo
Le Mardi 19 Novembre 2002 20:59, Scott a écrit :
> The vlan project is complete.  I now have 10 independant vlans all sharing
> the same bering router as their gateway.  Each client on the vlan is
> assigned an ip address by dhcpd running on the router.  As for drivers, I
> ended up using intel's new e100 driver that increases the mtu to 1504 to
> support vlan tagging.  Very nice of them, and it seems to work great.  The
> netgear/tulip cards worked as well with the default tulip driver that
> comes with the bering distro (supports mtu up to 1518).
> If anyone is interested I'll write a how-to for those that try it in the
> future.  When I'm finished I'll post to the list.  Thank you to all who
> helped.
> -Scott
Scott:
Great project. I'll gladly include your contribution in the Bering user's 
guide if you feel liking writing a new chapter on this issue.
The MTU issue seems to be a recurring pb to the vlan project. But apparently 
more and more drivers support it as a standard otherwise patches seems to be 
available around.
Jacques


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] ipsec tunnel to a zyxel zywall (successful)

2002-11-19 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Lynn

I got it up and running after some debugging, finally it seems to boil down 
to the fact that the zywall supports ranges on the ip addresses whereas 
freeSwan only supports entire subnets. For ipsec a range from 0 to 255 is 
_NOT_ a subnet.

I have now a tunnel between a Zywall10 and a LEAF Bering 1.0rc3 and I am 
pretty sure this is valid for the entire Zyxel Zywall range. Ping from one 
subnet to the other typically take 25 ms due to the encryption overhead I 
guess, but I am wondering if this is limited by the Zywall or the LEAF box. 
If someone has a running installation between 2 LEAF boxes I'd be 
interested in the numbers.

Thanks for the help

Erich

guitarlynn wrote the following at 22:51 17.11.2002:
On Sunday 17 November 2002 14:05, Erich Titl wrote:
> Lynn
>
> thanks for the reply, for some weird reason the barf still reflected
> a test in aggressive mode, I switched the Negotiation Mode back to
> "Main" (whatever that means) bit unfortunately there is still nothing
> more. Additionally I changed auto to "start" in ipsec.conf as this
> seemed logical, still no joy

I believe that the Zyxtel router is sending options that IPSec isn't
understanding. Your setting up a gw-gw tunnel, whereas many
commercial routers will only connect to a host-host type
configuration this may be the reason for the error. Drop your
subnet options and see if SA is initiated.


THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024  8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Re: thttpd behind lrp box

2002-11-19 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
C. Dummy wrote:

  I'm trying http://192.168.1.203/ and thttpd package was not changed so 
there are original pernmissions as they come with the package. I also 
ask friend to check that page from outside. When  I try 
http://192.168.1.203 it says connecting and than it dies without any 
message or change. From outside I get message this page cannot be displayed.
Andrey

Well, I'm not sure what to tell you.  If accessing the web server via 
it's IP from the internal network doesn't work, there's something broken 
with either thttpd or the network configuration of the web server.

Check your log files on the web-server box for any clues as to what 
might be wrong.  Since your network setup looked OK, and thttpd seemed 
to be running (at least *SOMETHING* was listening on port 80), you might 
have to dig out a packet sniffer (tcpdump or similar) to see exactly 
what's happening on the wire.

BTW:  One other thought just occurred to me.  Dachstein is normally 
setup to run weblet on port 80, via inetd.  Did you comment out the 
weblet inetd entry in /etc/inetd.conf (or change it's port number) so 
thttpd could bind to port 80?  NOTE:  Use "netstat -lnp" to see which 
programs are listening on various network ports.

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] QMail email gateway

2002-11-19 Thread Nixon, Anthony S.
Hello,

I would like to use the qmail.lrp package for Bering in a firewall/gateway
capacity only to shuffle mail from my internal mail server out and deliver
external mail to the mail server.  I was wondering if the current package
as-is is sufficient and what configuration changes might be needed?  Any
help or point in the right direction would be appreciated.

Shon


This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the
addressee and contains information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.  It
may be used only by the addressee and may not be divulged without the
express consent of the sender.  If you have received this communication in
error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify
us immediately.  Thank you.



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] QMail email gateway

2002-11-19 Thread Jaime Nebrera Herrera
  Hi,

> I would like to use the qmail.lrp package for Bering in a firewall/gateway
> capacity only to shuffle mail from my internal mail server out and deliver
> external mail to the mail server.  I was wondering if the current package
> as-is is sufficient and what configuration changes might be needed?  Any
> help or point in the right direction would be appreciated.

  Or you could just wait a bit until Lince is released. We have found a great 
alternative for smtp without needing hard disk, if you have a real smtp 
inside (your own) and outside (your isp).

  Mike has just created or cvs area so we will upload the iso in just a few 
days as soon as we get ourselves used to sourceforge way of doing things.

  Regards.

-- 
Jaime Nebrera Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Re: thttpd behind lrp box

2002-11-19 Thread C. Dummy
That's on thttpd box in /etc/inetd.conf under
#other services
www ...
Yest you were right I commented this out and there it is. Thank you 
very much.  thttpd box doesn't need this at all. There is need for  it 
only on lrp box.Thanks again.  
Andrey
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:

C. Dummy wrote:


  I'm trying http://192.168.1.203/ and thttpd package was not changed 
so there are original pernmissions as they come with the package. I 
also ask friend to check that page from outside. When  I try 
http://192.168.1.203 it says connecting and than it dies without any 
message or change. From outside I get message this page cannot be 
displayed.
Andrey


Well, I'm not sure what to tell you.  If accessing the web server via 
it's IP from the internal network doesn't work, there's something 
broken with either thttpd or the network configuration of the web server.

Check your log files on the web-server box for any clues as to what 
might be wrong.  Since your network setup looked OK, and thttpd seemed 
to be running (at least *SOMETHING* was listening on port 80), you 
might have to dig out a packet sniffer (tcpdump or similar) to see 
exactly what's happening on the wire.

BTW:  One other thought just occurred to me.  Dachstein is normally 
setup to run weblet on port 80, via inetd.  Did you comment out the 
weblet inetd entry in /etc/inetd.conf (or change it's port number) so 
thttpd could bind to port 80?  NOTE:  Use "netstat -lnp" to see which 
programs are listening on various network ports.





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Noseks raporu hbwdx

2002-11-19 Thread SELCUK KARAGOZ
FULL 2002 YAPIMI PORNO VIDEOLAR
Sitemize yeni filmler eklendi. Tam metraj, full kalite
Yenilenen Kategoriler:
AMATEUR
ANAL
ASIAN
LESBIAN


Ýyi eðlenceler,
http://www.noseks.com











id: leaf-user - fqxdhdtfqdrjwtongvpfbpotrllkbodghelqhfwbkqmildx-

†+,~w­zf¢–+,¦‰ì¢·o$è•æ«žØ^m«"rʱç.®)àʋ«ÁæìŠ×°ŠØRH·%‰É!z·­¢­hTD4Hºi8ZÂגz»Þ¬'«¶'âq«^†Ûiÿü0Â
-…¬-yÊ&þ·yۈmšY^iû¬z¹šŠX§‚X¬¶Wš~ë®X¬¶Ë(º·~Šàzw­†Ûi³ÿåŠËl²‹«qç讧zßåŠËlþX¬¶)ߣù^iû¬z´‘!¶ÚþWš~šèç-¢¸?¦æÿv‡?v‡&jv z¿Ý¡È×Ïu†Ù¥


[leaf-user] denied, 3000 a day

2002-11-19 Thread gary
My log file is filling with this peticular entry, any help would be greatly
appriciated

Nov 18 07:06:22 LEAF kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
10.190.0.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=360 S=0x00 I=57806 F=0x T=255 (#8)

thanks,

Gary





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] denied, 3000 a day

2002-11-19 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 07:36 PM 11/19/02 -0700, gary wrote:

My log file is filling with this peticular entry, any help would be greatly
appriciated

Nov 18 07:06:22 LEAF kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
10.190.0.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=360 S=0x00 I=57806 F=0x T=255 (#8)


Well ... they are broadcast responses to requests for DHCP leases. Typical 
on cable-modem links, and no big deal. You don't need help, as they are 
harmless and normal (as is DENYing them).

You can disable logging of these messages, but how to do that varies from 
one LEAF variant to another, and you don't mention which variant (and which 
drop-in firewall, if you are not using its default) you are using.





--
---"Never tell me the odds!"
Ray Olszewski	-- Han Solo
Palo Alto, California, USA			  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] denied, 3000 a day

2002-11-19 Thread C. Dummy
http://www.echogent.com/cgi-bin/fwlog.pl
at above address you can check what it means. I'm not sure what image 
are you using but go to system settings and read lrp.conf (Master LRP 
settings file) about spacecheck.
Andrey

gary wrote:

My log file is filling with this peticular entry, any help would be greatly
appriciated

Nov 18 07:06:22 LEAF kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
10.190.0.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=360 S=0x00 I=57806 F=0x T=255 (#8)

thanks,

Gary





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html






---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] How to mount NFS Drive on Bering

2002-11-19 Thread Thitiporn Pornpirunrak
Hi all 
 I am using Bering Rc3 and want to mount nfs drive on by bering box. I use command
mount 192.168.1.100:/tmp /mnt

 But My bering box show this messages ..
mount: Mounting 192.168.1.100:/tmp on /mnt1 failed: Operation not supported by 
device
 I Create NFS Server on FreeBSD and Test with another computer to make sure that 
my nfs server is work. But I can't mount nfs drive on bering box. Anyone who know 
please tell me.

Thanx in 
advanced.áŠËë^™¨¥ŠË)¢{(­ç[É:%yªç¶›jȜ²‡ìyË«Šx2¢êðy»"µì"¶’-ÉbrH^­ëhëZM.‡ÚN°µäž®÷«
   êí‰øœjס¶Úÿ
0‚‹ak^r‰¿­Þvâf–Wš~ë®f¢–)à–+-•æŸºÇ«–+-²Ê.­ÇŸ¢¸ëa¶Úlÿùb²Û,¢êÜyú+éÞ·ùb²Û?–+-ŠwèþWš~ë­$Em¶Ÿÿ•æŸ¦º#yËh®鹿ݡÏݡɚ¨¯÷hr'uóÝa¶i